The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink About2018-07-24 Council Meeting Agenda and Reports.pdfPage 1 City of Maple Ridge COUNCIL MEETING AGENDA July 24, 2018 7:00 p.m. Council Chamber Note: This Agenda is also posted on the City’s Web Site at www.mapleridge.ca The purpose of a Council meeting is to enact powers given to Council by using bylaws or resolutions. This is the final venue for debate of issues before voting on a bylaw or resolution. 100 CALL TO ORDER 200 AMENDMENTS TO THE AGENDA 300 APPROVAL OF THE AGENDA 400 ADOPTION OF MINUTES 401 Regular and Special Council Meetings • June 26, 2018 Special Council Meeting • June 26, 2018 Regular Council Meeting • July 10, 2018 Special Council Meeting • July 10, 2018 Regular Council Meeting 402 Minutes to the Public Hearing of July 17, 2018 500 PRESENTATIONS AT THE REQUEST OF COUNCIL MEETING DECORUM Council would like to remind all people present tonight that serious issues are decided at Council meetings which affect many people’s lives. Therefore, we ask that you act with the appropriate decorum that a Council Meeting deserves. Commentary and conversations by the public are distracting. Should anyone disrupt the Council Meeting in any way, the meeting will be stopped and that person’s behavior will be reprimanded. The meeting is live streamed and recorded by the City of Maple Ridge. Council Meeting Agenda July 24, 2018 Council Chamber Page 2 of 11 600 DELEGATIONS 601 TransLink – Proposed Lougheed Highway B-Line Update • Matt Craig, Manager, System Plans • Dan Freeman, Manager, Rapid Bus Projects 602 Home Show Society • Graham Vanstone, Project Coordinator 603 Special Olympics Celebrates 50 years with Global Day of Inclusion • David Stevenson, Special Olympics Athlete • Diane Stevenson 650 QUESTIONS FROM THE PUBLIC Note: Questions from the Public are limited to 15 minutes unless extended by a motion approved by the majority of Council. Each speaker is limited to 2 minutes at a time. 700 ITEMS ON CONSENT 701 Minutes 701.1 Development Agreements Committee Meetings of July 10, July 17 and July 18, 2018 701.2 Committees and Commissions of Council • Environmental Advisory Committee – May 9, 2018 • Public Art Steering Committee – April 19, 2018 702 Reports 702.1 Disbursements for the month ended June 30, 2018 Staff report dated July 24, 2018 recommending that the disbursements for the month ended June 30, 2018 and July 17, 2018 be received for information. 702.2 2018 Council Expenses Staff report dated July 24, 2018 providing an update for Council expenses recorded to date. Council Meeting Agenda July 24, 2018 Council Chamber Page 3 of 11 703 Correspondence 704 Release of Items from Closed Council Status 800 UNFINISHED BUSINESS 801 Motion by Councillor Robson “That the Agricultural Land Commission be asked to explore the use of a land trust model to acquire farmland that would be made available to qualified parties for farm purposes, noting that the Davison Farm in Maple Ridge is currently available for purchase and could be used as a pilot project for such a trust.” 802 Motion by Councillor Masse “That the Ridge Meadows Recycling Society’s position paper on single use plastics be supported; and further That staff be directed to investigate methods to effectively reduce single use plastics in the City of Maple Ridge.” Ridge Meadows Recycling Society position paper attached 900 CORRESPONDENCE 901 School District No. 42 – Eligible School Sites Proposal Letter dated June 22, 2018 from Flavia Coughlan, Secretary Treasurer, School District No. 42 requesting that the City of Maple Ridge respond to the Board of Education’s resolution of proposed eligible school site requirements. Recommendation: That a resolution be passed accepting the Board’s resolution of proposed eligible school site requirements for the School District of Maple Ridge Council Meeting Agenda July 24, 2018 Council Chamber Page 4 of 11 902 Update on the Provincial Decision Allowing Local Government to Prohibit Cannabis Operations in the Agricultural Land Reserve Information bulletin from the Ministry of Agriculture advising on cannabis production regulations for the Agricultural Land Reserve Recommendation: Receive for information 1000 BYLAWS Note: 1001 to 1004 are from the July 17, 2018 Public Hearing Bylaws for Third Reading 1001 2017-066-RZ, 21241 Wicklund Avenue 1001.1 Maple Ridge Zone Amending Bylaw No. 7328-2017 To amend the RT-1 (Two Family Urban Residential) zone to reduce the minimum parcel size from 891 m² (9,591 ft²) to 750 m² (8,073 ft²), minimum width from 22 m (72 ft.) to 20 m (66 ft.), and minimum depth from 30 m (98 ft.) to 27 m (89 ft.) Third reading 1001.2 Maple Ridge Zone Amending Bylaw No. 7322-2017 To rezone from RS-1 (One Family Urban Residential) to RT-1 (Two Family Urban Residential). The current application is to permit the development of a duplex Third reading 1002 2015-373-RZ, 23616 132 Avenue 1002.1 Maple Ridge Official Community Plan Amending Bylaw No. 7469-2018 Schedule “A”, Chapter 10.3, Part VI, A – Silver Valley, Figure 2 - Land Use Plan, is hereby amended from Medium/High Density Residential and Conservation to Conservation/Low Density Urban and Medium/High Density Residential Third reading 1002.2 Maple Ridge Zone Amending Bylaw No. 7195-2015 To rezone from RS-2 (One Family Suburban Residential) to RM-1 (Townhouse Residential) and R-1 (Residential District). The current application is to permit a 16 unit townhouse project and one lot accommodating an existing single residential dwelling. Third reading Council Meeting Agenda July 24, 2018 Council Chamber Page 5 of 11 1003 2018-122-RZ, 12419 Garibaldi Street Maple Ridge Zone Amending Bylaw No. 7451-2018 To rezone from RS-3 (One Family Rural Residential) to RS-2 (One Family Suburban Residential). The current application is to permit a future subdivision of approximately 2 lots. Third reading 1004 2018-200-RZ 1004.1 2018-200-RZ, 26378 126 Avenue Maple Ridge Zone Amending Bylaw No. 7472-2018 To permit a Detached Garden Suite with a maximum Gross Floor Area of 140 m2 (1500 ft2) and a maximum building height of 7.5 metres from ground level Third reading 1004.2 2018-200-RZ, 23525 Dogwood Avenue Maple Ridge Zone Amending Bylaw No. 7473-2018 To permit a Detached Garden Suite with a maximum Gross Floor Area of 140 m2 (1500 ft2) located in the front yard Third reading 1004.3 2018-200-RZ, 10861 Morrisette Place Maple Ridge Zone Amending Bylaw No. 7475-2018 To permit a Detached Garden Suite constructed above a garage with a maximum building height of 6.5 metres Third reading Bylaws for Adoption 1005 2016-004-RZ, 13245 236 Street Maple Ridge Zone Amending Bylaw No. 7211-2016 Staff report dated June 24, 2018 recommending adoption To rezone from RS-2 (One Family Suburban Residential) and RS-3 (One Family Rural Residential) to RM-1 (Townhouse Residential) to permit the future development of 31 townhouse units Adopt 1006 Maple Ridge 2019-2023 Financial Plan Bylaw No. 7454-2018 To establish the five year financial plan for the years 2019 through 2023 Adopt Council Meeting Agenda July 24, 2018 Council Chamber Page 6 of 11 1007 Maple Ridge Business Licencing and Regulation Amending Bylaw No. 7471-2018 To amend Maple Ridge Business Licensing and Regulation Bylaw No. 6815- 2011 Adopt 1008 Maple Ridge Ticket Information Utilization Amending Bylaw No. 7480-2018 To amend schedules to coincide with recent amendments to other bylaws Adopt 1100 REPORTS AND RECOMMENDATIONS Public Works and Development Services 1101 2017-233-RZ, Amendments to Official Community Plan Amending Bylaw, Zone Amending Bylaw, Off Street Parking and Loading Amending Bylaw Staff report dated July 24, 2018 recommending that Maple Ridge Official Community Plan Amending Bylaw No. 7349-2017, Maple Ridge Zone Amending Bylaw No. 7312-2017 and Maple Ridge Off Street Parking and Loading Amending Bylaw No. 7350-2017 to create a new RT-2 (Ground- Oriented Residential Infill) zone to implement the triplex, fourplex and courtyard rezoning applications be given second reading and be forwarded to Public Hearing. 1102 2018-180-RZ, 22057 and 22083 Lougheed Highway, RS-1 to RM-2 Staff report dated July 24, 2018 recommending that Maple Ridge Zone Amending Bylaw No. 7481-2018 to rezone from RS-1 (One Family Urban Residential) to RM-2 (Medium Density Apartment Residential) to allow a five storey apartment building with approximately 86 units and underground parking be given first reading and that the applicant provide further information as described on Schedules C, D and E of the Development Procedures Bylaw No. 5879-1999. 1103 2018-231-RZ, 28621 104 Avenue and 10455 287 Street, A-1 and A-2 to RS-3 Staff report dated July 24, 2018 recommending that Maple Ridge Zone Amending Bylaw No. 7483-2018 to rezone from A-1 (Small Holdings Agricultural) and A-2 (Upland Agricultural) to RS-3 (One Family Rural Residential) to permit a four lot rural residential subdivision be given first reading and that the applicant provide further information as described on Schedules A, B, F and J of the Development Procedures Bylaw No. 5879- 1999, along with information required for a Subdivision application. Council Meeting Agenda July 24, 2018 Council Chamber Page 7 of 11 1104 2018-243-RZ, 21963 Dewdney Trunk Road and 12029 220 Street, RS-1 to RM-5 Staff report dated July 24, 2018 recommending that Maple Ridge Zone Amending Bylaw No. 7484-2018 to rezone from RS-1 (One Family Urban Residential) to RM-5 (Low Density Apartment Residential) to permit a 12 unit multi-family development be given first reading and that the applicant provide further information as described on Schedules C, D and E of the Development Procedures Bylaw No. 5879-1999. 1105 2012-023-RZ, 11240 238 Street, RS-3 to P-6 Staff report dated July 24, 2018 recommending that Maple Ridge Official Community Plan Amending Bylaw No. 7482-2018 to designate a portion of the site from Park to Institutional and to adjust boundaries to enlarge the conservation designation area be given first and second reading and be forwarded to Public Hearing and that Maple Ridge Zone Amending Bylaw No. 7313-2017 to rezone from RS-3 (One Family Rural Residential) to P-6 (Civic Institutional) to permit future development of Fire Hall No. 4 with an associated fire/rescue training centre and community park be given second reading as amended and be forwarded to Public Hearing. 1106 2013-117-RZ, 12182 228 Street, RS-1 to R-3 Staff report dated July 24, 2018 recommending that second and third readings of Maple Ridge Zone Amending Bylaw No. 7055-2014 be rescinded and that Maple Ridge Zone Amending Bylaw No. 7055-2014 to rezone from RS-1 (One Family Urban Residential) to R-3 (Special Amenity Residential District) to permit a future subdivision of approximately 3 single family lots, a lane and a remnant portion be given second reading and be forwarded to Public Hearing. 1107 2017-031-RZ, 21333 River Road, RS-1 to RT-2 Staff report dated July 24, 2018 recommending that Maple Ridge Zone Amending Bylaw No. 7348-2017 to rezone from RS-1 (One Family Urban Residential) to RT-2 (Ground Oriented Residential Infill) to permit development of courtyard residential housing consisting of 4 dwelling units clustered around a common courtyard be given second reading and be forwarded to Public Hearing. Council Meeting Agenda July 24, 2018 Council Chamber Page 8 of 11 1108 2017-221-RZ, 22032 119 Avenue, RS-1 to RT-2 Staff report dated July 24, 2018 recommending that Maple Ridge Zone Amending Bylaw No. 7355-2017 to rezone from RS-1 (One Family Urban Residential) to RT-2 (Ground Oriented Residential Infill) to permit future construction of a triplex be given second reading and be forwarded to Public Hearing. 1109 2017-331-RZ, 12260 Laity Street, RS-1 to RS-1b Staff report dated July 24, 2018 recommending that Maple Ridge Zone Amending Bylaw No. 7385-2017 to rezone from RS-1 (One Family Urban Residential) to RS-1b (One Family Urban [Medium Density] Residential) to permit approximately three lots be given second reading and be forwarded to Public Hearing. 1110 2015-297-DVP, 23025, 23054, 23060 and 23075 Lougheed Highway Staff report dated July 24, 2018 recommending that the Corporate Officer be authorized to sign and seal 2015-297-DVP to relax the setback along a cul-de-sac to permit construction of an approximately 125 unit townhouse complex. 1111 2015-297-DP, 23025, 23054, 23060 and 23054 Lougheed Highway Staff report dated July 24, 2018 recommending that the Corporate Officer be authorized to sign and seal 2015-297-DP to permit 125 townhouse units in phase 1 of a multi-phased development. 1112 2016-105-DVP, 13245 236 Street Staff report dated July 24, 2018 recommending that the Corporate Officer be authorized to sign and seal 2016-105-DVP to reduce minimum front, rear, interior and exterior yard setbacks for specified blocks, increase maximum building height for specified blocks, reduce the minimum required Useable Open Space minimum dimension for specified blocks and increase the maximum retaining wall height to permit a townhouse development consisting of 31 units 1113 2016-105-DP, 13245 236 Avenue, Wildfire Development Permit Staff report dated July 24, 2018 recommending that the Corporate Officer be authorized to sign and seal 2016-105-DP to fulfill requirements of the Wildfire Development Permit Area guidelines. Council Meeting Agenda July 24, 2018 Council Chamber Page 9 of 11 1114 2016-004-DP, 13245 236 Street Staff report dated July 24, 2018 recommending that the Corporate Officer be authorized to sign and seal 2016-004-DP to permit a 31 unit townhouse development consisting of seven buildings, under the RM-1 (Townhouse Residential) zone. 1115 Award of Contract ITT-EN-18-54 232 Street Water Main Replacement (Dewdney Trunk Road to 122 Avenue) Staff report dated July 24, 2018 recommending that Contract ITT-EN18-54, 232 Street Water Main Replacement (Dewdney Trunk Road to 122 Avenue), be awarded to Sandpiper Contracting LLP, that a construction contingency be approved to address potential variations in field conditions, that the Financial Plan be amended to increase the 232 Street Water Main Replacement budget and that the Corporate Officer be authorized to execute the contract. 1116 Award of Contract ITT-EN18-61: Sanitary Sewer Replacement by Pipe Bursting on River Road (McKay Avenue – 530 m North) Staff report dated July 24, 2018 recommending that Contract ITT-EN18-61: Sanitary Sewer Replacement by Pipe Bursting on River Road (McKay Avenue – 530m North) be awarded to PW Trenchless Construction Inc.; that a contract contingency be approved to address potential variations in field conditions; and that the Corporate Officer be authorized to execute the contract. 1117 Lougheed Highway B-Line Initiative Staff report dated July 24, 2018 recommending that the Lougheed Highway B-Line Initiative be endorsed, that opportunities for transit priority measures, development of stop locations and assessments of traffic impacts be maximized through work with TransLink, Ministry of Transportation and Infrastructure and other stakeholders and that a report be provided with details of recommended transit priority measures and implications for all users on the Lougheed Highway corridor. Financial and Corporate Services (including Fire and Police) 1131 Council Meeting Agenda July 24, 2018 Council Chamber Page 10 of 11 Parks, Recreation & Culture 1151 Maple Ridge Pitt Meadows Home Show Society Request – Albion Fairgrounds Staff report dated July 24, 2018 recommending that a request from the Maple Ridge Pitt Meadows Home Show Society for municipally-funded improvements to the large grass main stage viewing area at the Albion Fairgrounds be deferred until after the conclusion of the Albion Flats Area Plan process. 1152 Award of Contract RFP-PL18-29: Albion Community Centre Construction Management Staff report dated July 24, 2018 recommending that Contract RFP-PL18- 29: Albion Community Centre Construction Management be awarded to Double V Construction LTD and that the Corporate Officer be authorized to execute the contract. 1153 Pickleball Update – Garibaldi Secondary School Sports Court Renovation Staff report dated July 24, 2018 recommending that approval be sought from School District No. 42 Board of Education to conduct a full renovation of the sports courts at Garibaldi Secondary School at full cost to the City of Maple Ridge including conversion of one existing tennis court to accommodate six pickleball courts to be completed by the beginning of pickleball season in April 2019. 1154 Youth Centre Wellness Update Staff report dated July 24, 2018 requesting direction from Council and providing options concerning funding toward a Youth Wellness Centre project brought forward by the Maple Ridge/Pitt Meadows Community Services. Administration 1171 Other Committee Issues 1191 Council Meeting Agenda July 24, 2018 Council Chamber Page 11 of 11 1200 STAFF REPORTS 1300 OTHER MATTERS DEEMED EXPEDIENT 1400 NOTICES OF MOTION AND MATTERS FOR FUTURE MEETING 1500 ADJOURNMENT Checked by:________________ Date: ________________ QUESTIONS FROM THE PUBLIC The purpose of the Question Period is to provide the public with an opportunity to ask questions of Council on items that are of concern to them, with the exception of Public Hearing bylaws which have not yet reached conclusion. Council will not tolerate any derogatory remarks directed at Council or staff members. Each person will be permitted 2 minutes to ask their question (a second opportunity is permitted if no one else is sitting in the chairs in front of the podium). Questions must be directed to the Chair of the meeting and not to individual members of Council. The total Question Period is limited to 15 minutes. Council reserves the right to defer responding to a question in order to obtain the information required to provide a complete and accurate response. Other opportunities are available to address Council including public hearings, delegations and community forum. The public may also make their views known to Council by writing or via email and by attending open houses, workshops and information meetings. Serving on an Advisory Committee is an excellent way to have a voice in the future of this community. For more information on these opportunities contact: Clerk’s Department at 604-463-5221 or clerks@mapleridge.ca. Mayor and Council at mayorandcouncil@mapleridge.ca. 400 Adoption and Receipt of Minutes 400 401 Minutes of Regular and Special Council Meetings 401 City of Maple Ridge SPECIAL COUNCIL MEETING MINUTES June 26, 2018 The Minutes of the Special City Council Meeting held on June 26, 2018 at 5:30 p.m. in the Blaney Room of the City Hall, 11995 Haney Place, Maple Ridge, British Columbia for the purpose of transacting regular City business. 0BPRESENT Elected Officials Appointed Staff Mayor N. Read P. Gill, Chief Administrative Officer Councillor C. Bell K. Swift, General Manager of Parks, Recreation & Culture Councillor G. Robson F. Quinn, General Manager of Public Works and Councillor C. Speirs Development Services L. Benson, Director of Corporate Administration ABSENT Other staff as required Councillor Duncan F. King, Director of Human Resources Councillor B. Masse Councillor T. Shymkiw Note: These Minutes are also posted on the City’s Web Site at www.mapleridge.ca 1.0 CALL TO ORDER 2.0 APPROVAL OF THE AGENDA R/2018-363 It was moved and seconded That the agenda for the June 26, 2018 Special Council Meeting be approved. CARRIED 3.0 NOTICE OF CLOSED COUNCIL MEETING R/2018-364 It was moved and seconded That the meeting following this meeting. be closed to the public pursuant to Sections 90 (1) and 90 (2) of the Community Charter as the subject matter being considered relates to the following: Section 90(1)(c) Labour relations or employee negotiations. Special Council Meeting Minutes June 26, 2018 Page 2 of 2 Section 90(1)(e) The acquisition of land or improvements, if the council considers that disclosure might reasonably be expected to harm the interests of the municipality. Section 90(1)(k) Negotiations and related discussions respecting the proposed provision of a municipal service that are at their preliminary stages and that, in the view of the council, could reasonably be expected to harm the interests of the municipality if they were held in public. Section 90(1)(m) A matter that, under another enactment, is such that the public may be excluded from the meeting. Section 90(2)(b) The consideration of information received and held in confidence relating to negotiations between the municipality and a provincial government. Any other matter that may be brought before the Council that meets the requirements for a meeting closed to the public pursuant to Sections 90 (1) and 90 (2) of the Community Charter or Freedom of Information and Protection of Privacy Act. CARRIED 4.0 ADJOURNMENT – 5:35 p.m. _______________________________ N. Read, Mayor Certified Correct ___________________________________ L. Benson, Corporate Officer City of Maple Ridge COUNCIL MEETING MINUTES June 26, 2018 The Minutes of the City Council Meeting held on June 26, 2018 at 7:03 p.m. in the Council Chamber of the City Hall, 11995 Haney Place, Maple Ridge, British Columbia for the purpose of transacting regular City business. 0BPRESENT Elected Officials Appointed Staff Mayor N. Read P. Gill, Chief Administrative Officer Councillor C. Bell K. Swift, General Manager of Parks, Recreation & Culture Councillor K. Duncan F. Quinn, General Manager Public Works and Development Councillor B. Masse Services Councillor G. Robson L. Benson, Director of Corporate Administration Councillor T. Shymkiw C. Nolan, Corporate Controller Councillor C. Speirs C. Carter, Director of Planning A. Allen, Acting Confidential Secretary Other staff as required D. Pollock, Municipal Engineer C. Goddard, Manager of Development and Environmental Services L. Zosiak, Planner 2 D. Hall, Planner 2 Note: These Minutes are also posted on the City’s Web Site at www.mapleridge.ca The meeting was live streamed and recorded by the City of Maple Ridge. Note: Councillor Masse participated in the meeting via GoToMeeting. 100 CALL TO ORDER 200 AMENDMENTS TO THE AGENDA Item 1102 2018-156-AL, 22018 128 Avenue, 22080 128 Avenue, and Parcel ID 001-097-300, Application to Exclude Land from the Agricultural Land Reserve has an amended report which was distributed. Council Meeting Minutes June 26, 2018 Page 2 of 18 300 APPROVAL OF THE AGENDA R/2018-365 It was moved and seconded That the agenda for the Council Meeting of June 26, 2018 be revised to include an amended staff report for Item 1102; and That the agenda as amended be approved. CARRIED 400 ADOPTION AND RECEIPT OF MINUTES 401 Minutes of the Special Council Meeting of June 12, 2018 and the Regular Council meeting of June 12, 2018 R/2018-366 It was moved and seconded That the minutes of the Special Council Meeting of June 12, 2018 and the Regular Council meeting of June 12, 2018 be adopted as circulated. CARRIED 402 Minutes of the Public Hearing of June 19, 2018 R/2018-367 It was moved and seconded That the minutes of the Public Hearing of June 19, 2018 be adopted as circulated. CARRIED 500 PRESENTATIONS AT THE REQUEST OF COUNCIL - Nil 600 DELEGATIONS 601 Youth Restorative Justice Program Update • Ranjit Kingra, Program Coordinator • Collette Madson, title, Maple Ridge/Pitt Meadows Community Services Ms. Kingra gave a presentation on Youth Restorative Justice shared several examples and stories of clients assisted by the program. Ms. Kinga highlighted 2018 activities and accomplishments of the Youth Restorative Justice program. Council Meeting Minutes June 26, 2018 Page 3 of 18 602 BC Micro License Association – Small Scale Cannabis Businesses • Adam Temple, Board of Directors Mr. Temple gave a presentation on the standard cultivation and micro cultivation licences, the economic impact of cannabis, and the expertise BC Micro License Association can provide in crafting land use policies around cannabis in Maple Ridge. 650 QUESTIONS FROM THE PUBLIC Dave Hodgens – Director, Haney Horsemen Association Mr. Hodgens advised of the recent loss of a horse on the 132 Avenue corridor and asked what can be done to eliminate these tragic accidents. He requested the traffic calming suggestions in the Silver Valley Area Plan be revisited and that a public education component occur. Karl Lutsch – President, Haney Horsemen Association Mr. Lutsch asked for increased signage and education on the trails in the Thornhill area as there is growing concern an accident may occur on the multi-purpose trails. 700 ITEMS ON CONSENT 701 Minutes 701.1 Minutes of the Development Agreements Committee Meetings of June 5, June 7 and June 12, 2018 701.2 Minutes of Meetings of Committees and Commissions of Council • Social Policy Advisory Committee – April 4, 2018 702 Reports 702.1 Disbursements for the month ended May 31, 2018 Staff report dated June 26, 2018 recommending that the disbursements for the month ended May 31, 2018 be received for information. Council Meeting Minutes June 26, 2018 Page 4 of 18 702.2 2018 Council Expenses Staff report dated June 26, 2018 providing an update for Council expenses recorded to date. 703 Correspondence 704 Release of Items from Closed Council Status From the June 12, 2018 Closed Council Meeting Item 04.02 Maple Ridge Pitt Meadows Municipal Advisory Committee on Accessibility and Inclusiveness – Member Appointment R/2018-368 It was moved and seconded That Items 701.1, 701.2, 702.1, 702.2 and 704 on the “Items for Consent” agenda be received into the record. CARRIED 800 UNFINISHED BUSINESS 900 CORRESPONDENCE 1000 BYLAWS Note: Item 1001 is from the June 19, 2017 Public Hearing Bylaws for Third Reading 1001 2015-318-RZ, 11650 224 Street 1001.1 Maple Ridge Official Community Plan Amending Bylaw No. 7329-2017 To amend the Town Centre Area Land-Use Designation Map from Ground Oriented Multi-Family to Low Rise Apartment Third reading Council Meeting Minutes June 26, 2018 Page 5 of 18 R/2018-369 It was moved and seconded That Bylaw No. 7329-2017 be given third reading. CARRIED Councillor Duncan - OPPOSED 1001.2 Maple Ridge Zone Amending Bylaw No. 7198-2015 To rezone from RS-1 (One Family Urban Residential) to RM-2 (Medium Density Apartment Residential) to permit the construction of an approximately 130 unit Multi-Family building Third reading R/2018-370 It was moved and seconded That Bylaw No. 7198-2015 be given third reading. CARRIED Councillor Duncan - OPPOSED Bylaws for Adoption 1002 Maple Ridge Business Licencing and Regulation Amending Bylaw No. 7467-2018 To improve the Business Licencing and Regulation Bylaw to ensure it remains current and consistent Adoption R/2018-371 It was moved and seconded That Bylaw No. 7467-2018 be adopted. CARRIED 1003 Council Remuneration Bylaw No. 7448-2018 To amend Bylaw No. 7330-2017 to adjust annual remuneration for Mayor and Council Adoption Council Meeting Minutes June 26, 2018 Page 6 of 18 R/2018-372 It was moved and seconded That Bylaw No. 7448-2018 be adopted. CARRIED 1100 REPORTS AND RECOMMENDATIONS Public Works and Development Services 1101 2018-209-AL, 12930 203 Street, 132 Avenue, 12960 203 Street, 20370 132 Avenue, 12987 210 Street, Application to Exclude Land from the Agricultural Land Reserve Staff report dated June 26, 2018 providing options for consideration pertaining to Application 2018-209-AL to exclude approximately 22.66 hectares (56 acres) of land from the Agricultural Land Reserve. 1101.1 R/2018-373 It was moved and seconded That application 2018-209-AL not be authorized to go forward to the Agricultural Land Commission. Note: The main motion was moved and seconded. Council requested a presentation from Planning Department staff prior to the question being called. D. Hall, Planner, gave a PowerPoint presentation providing the following information: • Application Information • Subject map • Official Community Plan Context • Neighbourhood Plan Context • Site Characteristics • Considerations • Development Proposal • Proposed Benefits • ALR and RGS Information Jim Chu - Applicant – Golden Eagle Farm Group Mr. Chu provided a PowerPoint presentation and explanation on the Agricultural Land Reserve exclusion application. Council Meeting Minutes June 26, 2018 Page 7 of 18 Mayor Read called the question on the motion. DEFEATED Mayor Read, Councillor Masse, Councillor Shymkiw, Councillor Bell, Councillor Robson - OPPOSED 1101.2 R/2018-374 It was moved and seconded That the application be authorized to go forward to the Agricultural Land Commission with a summary of Council’s comments and the staff report. CARRIED Councillor Duncan, Councillor Speirs – OPPOSED 1102 2018-156-AL, 22018 128 Avenue, 22080 128 Avenue, and Parcel ID 001- 097-300, Application to Exclude Land from the Agricultural Land Reserve Staff report dated June 26, 2018 providing options for consideration pertaining to Application 2018-156-AL to exclude approximately 16.15 hectares (39.9 acres) of land from the Agricultural Land Reserve. Note: Councillor Masse left the meeting at 8:54 p.m. due to loss of an online connection. R/2018-375 It was moved and seconded That the application not be authorized to go forward to the Agricultural Land Commission. Note: The main motion was moved and seconded. Council requested a presentation from Planning Department staff prior to the question being called. D. Hall, Planner, gave a PowerPoint presentation providing the following information: • Application Information • Subject map • Official Community Plan Context • Neighbourhood Plan Context • Site Characteristics • Considerations • Development Proposal Council Meeting Minutes June 26, 2018 Page 8 of 18 Wayne Jackson and Kevin Davidson - Applicant Mr. Jackson spoke on the Agricultural Land Reserve exclusion application. Mr. Davidson provided further information around the relocation of the Davidson dairy farm. Mayor Read called the question on the motion. CARRIED 1103 2018-071-AL, 12225 250 Street, Application to Exclude Land from the Agricultural Land Reserve Staff report dated June 26, 2018 providing options for consideration pertaining to Application 2018-071-AL to exclude approximately 0.987 hectares (2.4 acres) of land from the Agricultural Land Reserve. R/2018-376 It was moved and seconded That the application be authorized to go forward to the Agricultural Land Commission with a summary of Council’s comments and the staff report. Note: The main motion was moved and seconded. Council requested a presentation from Planning Department staff prior to the question being called. D. Hall, Planner, gave a PowerPoint presentation providing the following information: • Application Information • Subject map • Official Community Plan Context • Neighbourhood Plan Context • Site Characteristics • Development Proposal • Considerations • Area Zoning Context • Area OCP Context • Proposed Subdivision Note: The meeting was recessed at 9:02 p.m. and reconvened at 9:10 p.m. Councillor Masse rejoined the meeting via GoToMeeting when it was reconvened. Council Meeting Minutes June 26, 2018 Page 9 of 18 Andrew Pozsar - Applicant Mr. Pozsar provided further information on the history of the property and the Agricultural Land Reserve exclusion application. Mayor Read called the question on the motion. DEFEATED Mayor Read, Councillor Duncan, Councillor Shymkiw, Councillor Speirs – OPPOSED 1104 2018-159-RZ, 24331 and 24315 110 Avenue, RS-3 to RS-1d Staff report dated June 26, 2018 recommending that Maple Ridge Zone Amending Bylaw No. 7463-2018 to rezone from RS-3 (One Family Rural Residential) to RS-1d (One Family Urban [Half Acre] Residential) to permit a subdivision of approximately 16 single-family lots not less than 557 m2 in size. R/2018-377 It was moved and seconded In respect of Section 475 of the Local Government Act, requirement for consultation during the development or amendment of an Official Community Plan, Council must consider whether consultation is required with specifically: i. The Board of the Regional District in which the area covered by the plan is located, in the case of a Municipal Official Community Plan; ii. The Board of any Regional District that is adjacent to the area covered by the plan; iii. The Council of any municipality that is adjacent to the area covered by the plan; iv. First Nations; v. Boards of Education, Greater Boards and Improvements District Boards; and vi. The Provincial and Federal Governments and their agencies. and in that regard it is recommended that no additional consultation be required in respect of this matter beyond the early posting of the proposed Official Community Plan amendments on the City’s website, together with an invitation to the public to comment, and; That Bylaw No. 7463-2018 be given first reading; and Council Meeting Minutes June 26, 2018 Page 10 of 18 That the applicant provide further information as described on Schedules A, B, E, F, and G of the Development Procedures Bylaw No. 5879–1999, along with the information required for a Subdivision application. CARRIED 1105 2018-160-RZ, 24387 110 Avenue, RS-3 to RS-1d Staff report dated June 26, 2018 recommending that Maple Ridge Zone Amending Bylaw No. 7464-2018 to rezone from RS-3 (One Family Rural Residential) to RS-1d (One Family Urban [Half Acre] Residential) to permit a subdivision of approximately 11 single-family lots not less than 557 m2 in size. R/2018-378 It was moved and seconded In respect of Section 475 of the Local Government Act, requirement for consultation during the development or amendment of an Official Community Plan, Council must consider whether consultation is required with specifically: i. The Board of the Regional District in which the area covered by the plan is located, in the case of a Municipal Official Community Plan; ii. The Board of any Regional District that is adjacent to the area covered by the plan; iii. The Council of any municipality that is adjacent to the area covered by the plan; iv. First Nations; v. Boards of Education, Greater Boards and Improvements District Boards; and vi. The Provincial and Federal Governments and their agencies. and in that regard it is recommended that no additional consultation be required in respect of this matter beyond the early posting of the proposed Official Community Plan amendments on the City’s website, together with an invitation to the public to comment, and; That Bylaw No. 7464-2018 be given first reading; and That the applicant provide further information as described on Schedules A, B, E, F, and G of the Development Procedures Bylaw No. 5879–1999, along with the information required for a Subdivision application. CARRIED Council Meeting Minutes June 26, 2018 Page 11 of 18 1106 2018-190-RZ, 23627 132 Avenue, RS-2 to RM-1 Staff report dated June 26, 2018 recommending that Maple Ridge Zone Amending Bylaw No.7470-2018 to rezone from RS-2 (One Family Suburban Residential) to RM-1 (Townhouse Residential) to facilitate a 20 unit townhouse development be given first reading and that the applicant provide further information as described on Schedules C, D, E, G and J of the Development Procedures Bylaw No. 5879-1999. R/2018-379 It was moved and seconded That Bylaw No. 7470-2018 be given first reading; and That the applicant provide further information as described on Schedules C, D, E, G and J of the Development Procedures Bylaw No. 5879–1999. CARRIED 1107 2015-373-RZ, 23616 132 Avenue, RS-2 to RM-1 and R-1 Staff report dated June 26, 2018 recommending that Maple Ridge Official Community Plan Amending Bylaw No. 7469-2018 to adjust a conservation boundary on around a watercourse and steep slope be given first and second readings and be forwarded to Public Hearing and that Maple Ridge Zone Amending Bylaw No. 7195-2015 to rezone from RS-2 (One Family Suburban Residential) to RM-1 (Townhouse Residential) to permit a 16 unit townhouse project and to R-1 (Residential District) for one lot to accommodate an existing single residential dwelling being retained be given second reading and be forwarded to Public Hearing. R/2018-380 It was moved and seconded 1) That, in accordance with Section 475 of the Local Government Act, opportunity for early and on-going consultation has been provided by way of posting Bylaw No. 7469-2018 on the municipal website and requiring that the applicant host a Development Information Meeting (DIM), and Council considers it unnecessary to provide any further consultation opportunities, except by way of holding a Public Hearing on the bylaw; 2) That Bylaw No. 7469-2018 be considered in conjunction with the Capital Expenditure Plan and Waste Management Plan; 3) That it be confirmed that Bylaw No. 7469-2018 is consistent with the Capital Expenditure Plan and Waste Management Plan; 4) That Bylaw No. 7469-2018 be given first and second readings and be forwarded to Public Hearing; Council Meeting Minutes June 26, 2018 Page 12 of 18 5) That Bylaw No. 7195-2015 be given second reading, and be forwarded to Public Hearing; and, 6) That the following terms and conditions be met prior to final reading: i) Registration of a Rezoning Servicing Agreement as a Restrictive Covenant and receipt of the deposit of a security, as outlined in the Agreement; ii) Amendment to Official Community Plan Schedule "B" and “C”; iii) Road dedication on 236 Street and a corner truncation as required; iv) Park dedication as required, including construction of pedestrian trails; v) Registration of a Restrictive Covenant for the Geotechnical Report, which addresses the suitability of the subject property for the proposed development; vi) Registration of a Restrictive Covenant for stormwater management, including maintenance guidelines; vii) Registration of a Restrictive Covenant for protecting the Visitor Parking; viii) Removal of existing building/s; ix) In addition to the site profile, a disclosure statement must be submitted by a Professional Engineer advising whether there is any evidence of underground fuel storage tanks on the subject property. If so, a Stage 1 Site Investigation Report is required to ensure that the subject property is not a contaminated site; and x) That a voluntary contribution, in the amount of $70,700 [$4,100.00 per townhouse dwelling unit (16 units) and $5,100.00 per single family lot (1 lot)] to be provided in keeping with the Council Policy with regard to Community Amenity Contributions. CARRIED 1108 2018-122-RZ, 12419 Garibaldi Street, RS-3 to RS-2 Staff report dated June 26, 2018 recommending that Maple Ridge Zone Amending Bylaw No. 7451-2018 to rezone from RS-3 (One Family Rural Residential) to RS-2 (One Family Suburban Residential) to permit a subdivision of approximately two residential lots be given second reading and be forwarded to Public Hearing. Council Meeting Minutes June 26, 2018 Page 13 of 18 R/2018-381 It was moved and seconded 1) That Bylaw No. 7451-2018 be given second reading, and be forwarded to Public Hearing; 2) That the following terms and conditions be met prior to final reading: i) Payment of two new 38mm water services; ii) Receipt of Approval for on-site sewage disposal from the Ministry of Health; iii) Registration of a Restrictive Covenant for the Geotechnical Report, which addresses the suitability of the subject property for the proposed development; iv) Registration of a Restrictive Covenant for Tree Protection, Stormwater Management, and onsite sewage disposal for the protection of the septic field areas; v) Complete application for a Wildfire Development Permit; vi) That a voluntary contribution, in the amount of $5,100.00 per single family lot created for a total of $5,100.00 be provided in keeping with the Council Policy with regard to Community Amenity Contributions; and vii) In addition to the site profile, a disclosure statement must be submitted by a Professional Engineer advising whether there is any evidence of underground fuel storage tanks on the subject property. If so, a Stage 1 Site Investigation Report is required to ensure that the subject property is not a contaminated site. CARRIED Mayor Read, Councillor Speirs, Councillor Duncan - OPPOSED 1109 2017-028-DVP, 11184, 11154 and 11080 240 Street Staff report dated June 26, 2018 recommending that the Corporate Officer be authorized to sign and seal 2017-028-DVP to vary the Subdivision and Development Servicing Bylaw to waive the requirement for underground wiring. R/2018-382 It was moved and seconded That the Corporate Officer be authorized to sign and seal 2017-028-DVP respecting property located at 11184, 11154, & 11080 240 Street. CARRIED Council Meeting Minutes June 26, 2018 Page 14 of 18 1110 2018-234-DVP, 25171 117 Avenue Staff report dated June 26, 2018 recommending that the Corporate Officer be authorized to sign and seal 2018-234-DVP to vary the required road carriageway width on 117 Avenue. R/2018-383 It was moved and seconded That the Corporate Officer be authorized to sign and seal 2018-234-DVP respecting property located at 25171 117 Avenue. CARRIED 1111 2018-240-DVP, 27115 Ferguson Avenue Staff report dated June 26, 2018 recommending that the Corporate Officer be authorized to sign and seal 2018-240-DVP to reduce required asphalt width for the rural load road. R/2018-384 It was moved and seconded That the Corporate Officer be authorized to sign and seal 2018-240-DVP respecting property located at 27115 Ferguson Avenue. CARRIED 1112 2018-200-RZ, Detached Garden Suites (DGS) Pilot Project, Zone Amending Bylaws and Housing Agreement Bylaws Staff report dated June 26, 2018 recommending that Maple Ridge Zone Amending Bylaw No. 7472-2018 for property at 26378 126 Avenue, Maple Ridge Zone Amending Bylaw No. 7473-2018 for property at 23525 Dogwood Avenue, Maple Ridge Zone Amending Bylaw No. 7474-2018 for property at 12621 Ansell Street and Maple Ridge Zone Amending Bylaw No. 7475-2018 for property at 10861 Morrisette Place to permit expansion of the Detached Garden Suite regulations be given first and second reading and be forwarded to Public Hearing and that 26378 126 Avenue Housing Agreement Bylaw No. 7476-2081, 23525 Dogwood Avenue Housing Agreement Bylaw No. 7477-2018, 12621 Ansell Street Housing Agreement Bylaw No. 7478-2018 and 10861 Morrisette Place Housing Agreement Bylaw No. 7479-2018 to authorize the City of Maple Ridge to enter into a Housing Agreement be given first, second and third reading. Council Meeting Minutes June 26, 2018 Page 15 of 18 1112.1 R/2018-385 It was moved and seconded 1. For property located at 26378 – 126th Avenue: a. That Bylaw 7472-2018 be given first and second reading and be forwarded to Public Hearing; and b. That Bylaw 7476-2018 be given first, second, and third reading. CARRIED Mayor Read, Councillor Masse - OPPOSED 1112.2 R/2018-386 It was moved and seconded 2. For property located at 23525 Dogwood Avenue: a. That Bylaw 7473-2018 be given first and second reading and be forwarded to Public Hearing; and b. That Bylaw 7477-2018 be given first, second, and third reading. CARRIED Mayor Read, Councillor Masse – OPPOSED 1112.3 R/2018-387 It was moved and seconded 3. For property located at 12621 Ansell Street: a. That Bylaw 7474-2018 be given first and second reading and be forwarded to Public Hearing; and b. That Bylaw 7478-2018 be given first, second, and third reading. DEFEATED Mayor Read, Councillor Bell, Councillor Shymkiw, Councillor Robson, Councillor Masse - OPPOSED 1112.4 R/2018-388 It was Moved and seconded 4. For property located at 10861 Morrisette Place: a. That Bylaw 7475-2018 be given first and second reading and be forwarded to Public Hearing; and b. That Bylaw 7479-2018 be given first, second, and third reading. CARRIED Council Meeting Minutes June 26, 2018 Page 16 of 18 1113 22270 128 Avenue – Request for Sanitary Service Connection Outside the Urban Containment Boundary Staff report dated June 26, 2018 recommending that the request to amend the Fraser Sewerage Area to include the proposed building footprint on 22270 128 Avenue be supported and forwarded to the Greater Vancouver Sewerage and Drainage District Board of Directors for inclusion into the Fraser Sewerage Area. R/2018-389 It was moved and seconded That the request to provide a sanitary service connection to 22270 128 Avenue be supported and forwarded to the Greater Vancouver Sewerage and Drainage District Board for consideration. CARRIED 1114 Maple Ridge Ticket Information Utilization Amending Bylaw No. 7468-2018 Staff report dated June 26, 2018 recommending that Maple Ridge Ticket Information Utilization Amending Bylaw No. 7468-2018 to amend the fine schedule to coincide with amendments to the Maple Ridge Soil Deposit Regulation Bylaw and the new Maple Ridge Wildlife and Vector Control Bylaw. R/2018-390 It was moved and seconded That Bylaw No.7468-2018 be given first, second and third readings. CARRIED Financial and Corporate Services (including Fire and Police) 1131 2017 Annual Report and 2017 Statement of Financial Information Staff report dated June 26, 2018 recommending that the 2017 Annual Report be received and that the 2017 Statement of Financial Information be approved. R/2018-391 It was moved and seconded That the 2017 Annual Report be received as required by the Community Charter, and Council Meeting Minutes June 26, 2018 Page 17 of 18 That the Statement of Financial Information be approved as required by the Financial Information Act. CARRIED Parks, Recreation & Culture 1151 Youth Wellness Centre Lease Agreement and Update Staff report dated June 26, 2018 recommending that the Youth Wellness Centre lease agreement with Maple Ridge Pitt Meadows Community Services be renewed for an additional two-year period ending on October 31, 2020. R/2018-392 It was moved and seconded That the Youth Wellness Centre lease agreement with Maple Ridge Pitt Meadows Community Services be renewed for an additional two-year period ending on October 31, 2020. CARRIED 1152 Cottonwoods Child Care Centre Lease Renewal Staff report dated June 26, 2018 recommending that the Cottonwoods Child Care Centre Lease Agreement be renewed for an additional three year period ending on June 30, 2021, with an option to renew. R/2018-393 It was moved and seconded That the Cottonwoods Child Care Centre lease agreement be renewed for an additional three-year period ending on June 30, 2021, with an option to renew. CARRIED 1153 Albion Community Centre Operating Model Staff report dated June 26, 2018 recommending that staff conduct a call for Expressions of Interest for the operation of the Albion Community Centre and that a task group be formed to develop a recommendation regarding a tri-party agreement for the operation of the centre. Council Meeting Minutes June 26, 2018 Page 18 of 18 R/2018-394 It was moved and seconded That staff conduct a call for Expressions of Interest (EOI) for the operation and program servicing of the Albion Community Centre; and further That a Task Group composed of City of Maple Ridge and School District No. 42 staff be formed under the 2017 Master Agreement on Cooperation for the Joint Use of Public Facilities and Coordination of Services to develop a recommendation regarding a tri-party agreement for the operation of the Albion Community Centre. CARRIED Administration – Nil Other Committee Issues – Nil 1200 STAFF REPORTS – Nil 1300 OTHER MATTERS DEEMED EXPEDIENT – Nil 1400 NOTICES OF MOTION AND MATTERS FOR FUTURE MEETINGS – Nil 1500 ADJOURNMENT – 10:05 p.m. _______________________________ N. Read, Mayor Certified Correct ___________________________________ L. Benson, Corporate Officer City of Maple Ridge SPECIAL COUNCIL MEETING MINUTES July 10, 2018 The Minutes of the Special City Council Meeting held on July 26, 2018 at 5:30 p.m. in the Blaney Room of the City Hall, 11995 Haney Place, Maple Ridge, British Columbia for the purpose of transacting regular City business. 0BPRESENT Elected Officials Appointed Staff Councillor C. Bell P. Gill, Chief Administrative Officer Councillor Duncan K. Swift, General Manager of Parks, Recreation & Culture Councillor B. Masse F. Quinn, General Manager of Public Works and Councillor G. Robson Development Services Councillor T. Shymkiw D. Denton, Acting Corporate Officer Councillor C. Speirs Other staff as required R. MacNair, Manager of Bylaw & Licensing Services ABSENT M. Orsetti, Assistant Manager of Bylaw & Licensing Services Mayor N. Read C. Carter, Director of Planning L. Siracusa, Director of Economic Development & Civic Properties Note: These Minutes are also posted on the City’s Web Site at www.mapleridge.ca Note: As Acting Mayor, Councillor Speirs chaired the meeting in Mayor Read’s absence 1.0 CALL TO ORDER 2.0 APPROVAL OF THE AGENDA R/2018-402 It was moved and seconded That the agenda for the July 10, 2018 Special Council Meeting be approved. CARRIED Special Council Meeting Minutes July 10, 2018 Page 2 of 2 3.0 NOTICE OF CLOSED COUNCIL MEETING R/2018-403 It was moved and seconded That the meeting following this meeting. be closed to the public pursuant to Sections 90 (1) and 90 (2) of the Community Charter as the subject matter being considered relates to the following: Section 90(1)(e) The acquisition and disposition of land if the council considers that disclosure might reasonably be expected to harm the interests of the municipality. Section 90(1)(g) Litigation or potential litigation affecting the municipality. Section 90(2)(b) The consideration of information received and held in confidence relating to negotiations between the municipality and a provincial government. Any other matter that may be brought before the Council that meets the requirements for a meeting closed to the public pursuant to Sections 90 (1) and 90 (2) of the Community Charter or Freedom of Information and Protection of Privacy Act. CARRIED 4.0 ADJOURNMENT – 5:33 p.m. _______________________________ N. Read, Mayor Certified Correct ___________________________________ D. Denton, Acting Corporate Officer City of Maple Ridge COUNCIL MEETING MINUTES July 10, 2018 The Minutes of the City Council Meeting held on July 10, 2018 at 7:00 p.m. in the Council Chamber of the City Hall, 11995 Haney Place, Maple Ridge, British Columbia for the purpose of transacting regular City business. 0BPRESENT Elected Officials Appointed Staff Councillor C. Bell P. Gill, Chief Administrative Officer Councillor K. Duncan K. Swift, General Manager of Parks, Recreation & Culture Councillor B. Masse F. Quinn, General Manager Public Works and Development Councillor G. Robson Services Councillor T. Shymkiw T. Thompson, Chief Financial Officer Councillor C. Speirs C. Carter, Director of Planning D. Denton, Acting Corporate Officer ABSENT A. Gaunt, Confidential Secretary Mayor N. Read Other staff as required D. Pollock, Municipal Engineer R. MacNair, Manager of Bylaw Licencing M. Orsetti, Assistant Manager of Bylaw & Licensing Services T. Cotroneo, Manager of Community Services Note: These Minutes are also posted on the City’s Web Site at www.mapleridge.ca The meeting was live streamed and recorded by the City of Maple Ridge Note: As Acting Mayor, Councillor Speirs chaired the meeting in the absence of Mayor Read Note: Councillor Shymkiw was not in attendance at the start of the meeting. 100 CALL TO ORDER 200 AMENDMENTS TO THE AGENDA Item 1151 New Public Art Location Recommendations to be dealt with following Item 603 Council Meeting Minutes July 10, 2018 Page 2 of 9 300 APPROVAL OF THE AGENDA R/2018-404 It was moved and seconded That the agenda of the Council Meeting of July 10, 2018 be amended to deal with Item 1151 following Item 603 and that the agenda be approved as amended. CARRIED 400 ADOPTION AND RECEIPT OF MINUTES – Nil 500 PRESENTATIONS AT THE REQUEST OF COUNCIL 600 DELEGATIONS 601 Municipal Advisory Committee on Accessibility and Inclusiveness (“MACAI”) • Recognition of Recipients of the Accessibility and Inclusiveness Awards The Manager of Community Services provided a history on the Accessibility and Inclusiveness Awards and introduced Kristina Morrison and Greg Turnbull, members of the Municipal Advisory Committee of Accessibility and Inclusiveness to present the awards. The recipients of the awards are as follows: • Bev Schmahmann – Ridge Meadows Seniors Society • Linda Begg – Manager Dollar Tree Located at 207th and Dewdney Trunk Road • Phil Brian – Owner/ Operator of the Town Square Cobbler • Heather Treleaven – Coordinator of the Maple Ridge, Pitt Meadows and Katzie Seniors Network • Eleana Di Giovanni – District Helping Teacher with the Learning Services Department, School District 42 • Salvation Army, Ridge Meadows Ministries – represented by Darrel Pilgrim • Canadian Tire Jumpstart Charities – represented by Brian Hutton, Owner/Operator of Canadian Tire Maple Ridge • Maple Ridge and Pitt Meadows Kidsport Chapter – represented by Len Walters, committee member volunteer Council Meeting Minutes July 10, 2018 Page 3 of 9 602 Hope for Freedom Society Update • Rob Thiessen, Managing Director Mr. Thiessen introduced the Hope for Freedom Society and provided a history of the Society’s involvement in the City of Maple Ridge. He outlined work done by the Society in providing shelter for homeless persons through area churches for the months of February, March and April 2018 and spoke on how well this program worked once the churches became involved. Mr. Thiessen reported on positive aspects of the program and stated that the Society hopes to open shelters again starting on October 1, 2018 and running through to March 31, 2019. Mr. Thiessen requested that Council consider the placement of a container to house people’s buggies and bikes when these persons are picked up at a pickup point and indicated that he has had discussions with staff. He also spoke on the management of goods in the container. The General Manager of Public Works and Development provided clarification on the request for a container. Note: Councillor Shymkiw joined the meeting at 7:34 p.m. 603 Public Art Steering Committee Annual Update • Wayne Bissky, Chair • Yvonne Chui, Staff Liaison The staff liaison introduced the committee and the Chair. Mr. Bissky gave a PowerPoint presentation providing an annual update for the Public Art Steering Committee. He gave an overview of the history and mandate of the committee and highlighted projects planned and delivered in 2017. Mr. Bissky advised on the committee’s recommendation of five new locations for public art in 2018-2020. Note: Item 1151 New Public Art Location Recommendations was dealt with following Item 603 650 QUESTIONS FROM THE PUBLIC Chris Fairfax – owner of the Wolf Bar Mr. Fairfax distributed and reviewed documents pertaining to provincial rules on new non-medical cannabis stores. Council Meeting Minutes July 10, 2018 Page 4 of 9 He asked if office space will be considered when the City of Maple Ridge starts the process of regulating non-medical cannabis store and asked if he could receive a recommendation prior to applying for a licence. Councillor Speirs advised that the City currently has no application process in place. The General Manager of Public Works and Development offered to meet with Mr. Fairfax to provide further clarification on questions. Ryan Groundwater Mr. Groundwater stated that an RFP for solid waste collection has come out and asked if there will be an in-house comparator for City staff to do this work. The Municipal Engineer indicated that direction from Council is to look at contracted services. Mr. Groundwater asked that as the City already has fleets of vehicles if in- house solid waste collection will be looked at. The Municipal Engineer clarified that the City of Maple Ridge does not currently have vehicles for garbage collection in its fleet. Mr. Groundwater reiterated his question as to whether Council has considered or will consider bringing solid waste pick up in-house. Councillor Speirs indicated that providing solid waste collection through in- house services is a question better fielded by incoming Council following the upcoming municipal election and the outcome of the plebiscite on solid waste pick up. 700 ITEMS ON CONSENT 701 Minutes 701.1 Minutes of the Development Agreements Committee Meetings of June 26, June 27, June 28 and July 3, 2018 701.2 Minutes of Meetings of Committees and Commissions of Council • Community Heritage Commission – May 10, 2018 702 Reports - Nil Council Meeting Minutes July 10, 2018 Page 5 of 9 703 Correspondence – Nil 704 Release of Items from Closed Council Status – Nil R/2018-405 It was moved and seconded That Items 701.1 and 701.2 on the “Items on Consent” agenda be received into the record. CARRIED 800 UNFINISHED BUSINESS – Nil 900 CORRESPONDENCE – Nil 1000 BYLAWS Bylaws for Adoption 1001 Maple Ridge Ticket Information Utilization Amending Bylaw No. 7468-2018 To amend the fine schedule to coincide with amendments to the Maple Ridge Soil Deposit Regulation Bylaw and the new Maple Ridge Wildlife and Vector Control Bylaw Adoption R/2018-406 It was moved and seconded That Bylaw 7468-2018 be adopted. CARRIED 1100 REPORTS AND RECOMMENDATIONS Public Works and Development Services 1101 Maple Ridge Business Licencing and Regulation Amending Bylaw Staff report dated July 10, 2018 recommending that Maple Ridge Business Licencing and Regulation Amending Bylaw No. 7471-2018 to amend Bylaw No. 6815-2011 be given first, second and third readings. Council Meeting Minutes July 10, 2018 Page 6 of 9 R/2018-407 It was moved and seconded That Bylaw No.7471-2018 be given first, second and third readings. CARRIED 1102 Maple Ridge Ticket Information Utilization Amending Bylaw Staff report dated July 10, 2018 recommending that Maple Ridge Ticket Information Utilization Amending Bylaw No. 7480-2018 to amend schedules to coincide with recent amendments to other bylaws be given first, second and third readings. R/2018-408 It was moved and seconded That Bylaw No. 7480-2018 be given first, second and third readings. CARRIED Financial and Corporate Services (including Fire and Police) 1131 Maple Ridge 2019-2023 Financial Plan Bylaw Staff report dated July 10, 2018 recommending that Maple Ridge 2019- 2023 Financial Plan Bylaw No. 7454-2018 be given first, second and third readings. R/2018-409 It was moved and seconded That Bylaw 7454-2018 be given first, second and third readings. CARRIED 1132 Maple Ridge Development Cost Charges Imposition Bylaw Staff report dated July 10, 2018 recommending that second and third readings of Maple Ridge Development Cost Charges Imposition Bylaw No. 7320-2017 be rescinded and that Maple Ridge Development Cost Charges Imposition Bylaw No. 7320-2017 be given second and third readings as amended and be sent to the Ministry of Municipal Affairs and Housing for review and approval by the Inspector of Municipalities. Council Meeting Minutes July 10, 2018 Page 7 of 9 R/2018-410 It was moved and seconded That second and third readings of Bylaw No. 7320-2017 be rescinded; and further That Bylaw No. 7320-2017 be given second and third reading as amended and be sent to the Ministry of Municipal Affairs and Housing for review and approval by the Inspector of Municipalities. CARRIED Councillor Shymkiw - OPPOSED 1133 2018 Audit Services Staff report dated July 10, 2018 recommending that the contract for audit services with BDO Canada LLP be extended to include the 2018 fiscal year. R/2018-411 It was moved and seconded That on the recommendation of the Audit & Finance Committee, the contract for audit services with BDO Canada LLP be extended to include the 2018 fiscal year. CARRIED 1134 Intergovernmental Committee Staff report dated July 10, 2018 recommending the establishment of an Intergovernmental Committee by the incoming Council. R/2018-412 It was moved and seconded That incoming Council establish an Intergovernmental Committee as outlined in the staff report dated July 10, 2018. CARRIED Councillor Robson, Councillor Shymkiw - OPPOSED Council Meeting Minutes July 10, 2018 Page 8 of 9 Parks, Recreation & Culture Note: Item 1151 was dealt with following Item 603. 1151 New Public Art Location Recommendation Staff report dated July 10, 2018 recommending that Albion Community Centre, Telosky Stadium, Hammond Community Centre, sidewalk improvements on Lougheed Highway between 224 Street and 226 Street and an area on 224th Street between Lougheed Highway and Dewdney Trunk Road be approved for new public art installations. R/2018-413 It was moved and seconded That the following five locations be approved for new public art installations in 2018-2020: Albion Community Centre; Telosky Stadium; Hammond Community Centre; Sidewalk improvements on Lougheed Highway (between 224th Street and 226th Street); and 224th Street (between Lougheed Highway and Dewdney Trunk Road). CARRIED 1152 Award of Contract – Telosky Stadium/Thomas Haney Synthetic Fields Construction Staff report dated July 10, 2018 recommending that Contract ITT-PL18-31: Telosky Stadium Synthetic Turf Fields Civil Works be awarded to Cedar Crest Land (BC) Ltd., that a contingency be authorized and that the Corporate Officer be authorized to execute the contract. R/2018-414 It was moved and seconded That Contract ITT-PL18-31: Telosky Stadium Synthetic Turf Fields Civil Works be awarded to Cedar Crest Lands (BC) Ltd. in the amount of $5,674,100 plus taxes, as well as a contingency of $600,000 be authorized; and further That the Corporate Officer be authorized to execute the contract. CARRIED Council Meeting Minutes July 10, 2018 Page 9 of 9 1153 Festival Grant Program – Second Intake Staff report dated July 10, 2018 recommending that festival support allocations for special events scheduled for November 1, 2018 to April 30, 2019 be approved. Note: Councillor Bell excused herself form discussion of Item 1153 at 8:35 p.m. as she is on the Steering Committee for the Christmas Haven. R/2018-415 It was moved and seconded That festival support allocations totaling $14,143 for special events scheduled for November 1, 2018 to April 30, 2019, as outlined in Attachment 1 to the “Festival Grant Program – Second Intake” report dated July 10, 2018, be approved. CARRIED Note: Councillor Bell returned to the meeting at 8:36 p.m. Administration – Nil Other Committee Issues – Nil 1200 STAFF REPORTS – Nil 1300 OTHER MATTERS DEEMED EXPEDIENT – Nil 1400 NOTICES OF MOTION AND MATTERS FOR FUTURE MEETINGS – Nil 1500 ADJOURNMENT – 8:38 p.m. _______________________________ N. Read, Mayor Certified Correct ___________________________________ D. Denton, Acting Corporate Officer 402 Minutes of the Public Hearing 402 City of Maple Ridge PUBLIC HEARING July 17, 2018 The Minutes of the Public Hearing held in the Council Chamber of City Hall, 11995 Haney Place, Maple Ridge, British Columbia on July 17, 2018 at 7:03 p.m. ____________________________________________________________________________ PRESENT Elected Officials Appointed Staff Mayor N. Read P. Gill, Chief Administrative Officer Councillor C. Bell F. Quinn, General Manager of Public Works and Councillor K. Duncan Development Councillor B. Masse C. Carter, Director of Planning Councillor G. Robson A. Kopystynski, Acting Manager of Development and Councillor C. Speirs Environmental Services L Benson, Corporate Officer ABSENT A. Gaunt, Confidential Secretary Councillor T. Shymkiw Other staff as required B. Elliott, Manager of Community Services L. Zosiak, Planner 2 L. Siracusa, Director of Economic Development & Civic Properties ______________________________________________________________________________ Mayor Read called the meeting to order. The Corporate Officer explained the procedure and rules of order of the Public Hearing and advised that the bylaws will be considered further at the next Council Meeting on July 24, 2018. The Mayor then called upon Planning Department staff to present the following items on the agenda: 1) 2017-066-RZ, 21241 Wicklund Avenue Lot 3 District Lot 242 Group 1 New Westminster District Plan 14112 Maple Ridge Zone Amending Bylaw No. 7328-2017 That PART 6, RESIDENTIAL ZONES, SECTION 601, ONE FAMILY AND TWO FAMILY RESIDENTIAL ZONES, Sub-Section (C) REGULATIONS FOR THE SIZE, SHAPE AND SITING OF BUILDING AND STRUCTURES, item 4) Buildings and Structures for Two Family Residential Use in the RT-1 Zone is amended by deleting clause (d) and replacing it with the following clauses: “(d) shall not be permitted on a lot less than 750 m². (e) notwithstanding item (d) above, lots located within the Town Centre, as identified on Schedule H, which are either a corner lot or provided with lane access, shall not be permitted on a lot less than 557 m²”. Public Hearing Minutes July 17, 2018 Page 2 of 6 To Amend Schedule “D” MINIMUM LOT AREA AND DIMENSIONS by deleting the line: “RT-1 22m 30m 891m2” Replacing it as follows: “RT-1 20 m 27m 750 m² See item 7 below” To Amend Schedule “D” MINIMUM LOT AREA AND DIMENSIONS by inserting a new item7, after item 6 as follows: “7. For lots located within the Town Centre, as identified on Schedule H, which are either a corner lot or provided with lane access, shall not be less than 557 m²”. Maple Ridge Zone Amending Bylaw No. 7322-2017 To rezone from RS-1 (One Family Urban Residential) to RT-1 (Two Family Urban Residential). The current application is to permit the development of a duplex. That PART 6, RESIDENTIAL ZONES, SECTION 601, Sub-Section (C) REGULATIONS FOR THE SIZE, SHAPE AND SITING OF BUILDING AND STRUCTURES, Clause (4) Buildings and Structures for Two Family Residential Use in the RT-1 Zone is amended by the addition of the following sub-clause in correct alphabetical order: Notwithstanding the above, shall not be permitted on a lot less than 742 m², for the parcel or tract of land described as Lot 3 District Lot 242 Group 1 New Westminster District Plan 14112 The Corporate Officer advised that no correspondence was received on this item. The Acting Manager of Development and Environmental Services gave a PowerPoint presentation providing the following information: • Application Information • Subject Map • Official Community Plan Context • Neighbourhood Context • Site Characteristics • Development Proposal • Proposed Site Plan • Proposed Elevations • Terms and Conditions Public Hearing Minutes July 17, 2018 Page 3 of 6 The Mayor called for speakers for first call. Leonard Bertram-Jones Mr. Bertram-Jones spoke in opposition to the application. He would like the area to remain a single family dwelling area, expressing that freedom of space and land for grandchildren is very important. The Mayor called for speakers for second call. The Mayor called for speakers for third call. There being no further comment, the Mayor declared this item dealt with. Note: Item 2 was withdrawn. 2) 2015-373-RZ, 23616 132 Avenue 3) 2018-122-RZ, 12419 Garibaldi Street Lot 37 District Lot 6881 Group 1 New Westminster District Plan 57415 Maple Ridge Zone Amending Bylaw No. 7451-2018 To rezone from RS-3 (One Family Rural Residential) to RS-2 (One Family Suburban Residential). The current application is to permit a future subdivision of approximately 2 lots. The Corporate Officer advised that no correspondence was received on this item. The Acting Manager of Development and Environmental Services gave a PowerPoint presentation providing the following information: • Application Information • Subject Map • Official Community Plan Context • Neighbourhood Context • Site Characteristics • Development Proposal • Proposed Site Plan • Terms and Conditions The Mayor called for speakers for first call. Public Hearing Minutes July 17, 2018 Page 4 of 6 Ryan Harmon - Applicant Mr. Harmon spoke as the owner of the subject property. He provided further information on the request for subdivision and expressed that he did not feel that the application will negatively impact the neighbourhood and that precedence has been set with other properties in the neighbourhood having been subdivided into 2 lots. Mr. Harmon spoke on plans to share the property with family and to ensure as little environmental impact as possible when building and when adding a septic field. The Mayor called for speakers for second and third calls. There being no further comment, the Mayor declared this item dealt with. 4) 2018-200-RZ 26378 126 Avenue Lot 34 Except: Part Subdivided by Plan BCP13892, Section 24 Township 12 New Westminster District Plan LMP19841 Maple Ridge Zone Amending Bylaw No. 7472-2018 PART 4 GENERAL REGULATIONS, is amended as follows: a. Section 402 REGULATIONS FOR PERMITTED USES OF LAND, BUILDINGS & STRUCTURES, Section 11, Dwelling units for a Detached Garden Suite use, be amended by adding the following new clause at the end of this Section in the correct alphabetical or numerical order: The Detached Garden Suite provisions in this Section 11 will apply to the properties listed below, except where differences to these provisions are specifically stated for each: i. At 26378 – 126th Avenue (Lot 34, Except: Part Subdivided by Plan BCP13892, Section 24, Township 12, New Westminster District, Plan LMP19841) a Detached Garden Suite with a maximum Gross Floor Area of 140m2 (1500 ft2) and a maximum building height of 7.5 metres from ground level is permitted. 23525 Dogwood Avenue Lot “B” Section 28 Township 12 New Westminster District Plan 6734 Maple Ridge Zone Amending Bylaw No. 7473-2018 PART 4 GENERAL REGULATIONS, is amended as follows: a. Section 402 REGULATIONS FOR PERMITTED USES OF LAND, BUILDINGS & STRUCTURES, Section 11, Dwelling units for a Detached Garden Suite use, be amended by adding the following new clause at the end of this Section in the correct alphabetical or numerical order: Public Hearing Minutes July 17, 2018 Page 5 of 6 The Detached Garden Suite provisions in this Section 11 will apply to the properties listed below, except where differences to these provisions are specifically stated for each: ii. At 23525 Dogwood Avenue (Lot “B” Section 28 Township 12 New Westminster District Plan 6734) a Detached Garden Suite with a maximum Gross Floor Area of 140m2 (1500 ft2) located in the front yard is permitted. 10861 Morrisette Place Lot 8 Section 11 Township 12 New Westminster District Plan EPP67241 Maple Ridge Zone Amending Bylaw No. 7475-2018 PART 4 GENERAL REGULATIONS, is amended as follows: a. Section 402 REGULATIONS FOR PERMITTED USES OF LAND, BUILDINGS & STRUCTURES, Section 11, Dwelling units for a Detached Garden Suite use, be amended by adding the following new clause at the end of this Section in the correct alphabetical or numerical order: The Detached Garden Suite provisions in this Section 11 will apply to the properties listed below, except where differences to these provisions are specifically stated for each: iv. At 10861 Morrisette Place (Lot 8 Section 11 Township 12 New Westminster District Plan EPP67241) a Detached Garden Suite constructed above a garage with a maximum building height of 6.5 metres is permitted. A secondary suite within the principal dwelling unit is also permitted on this property. The Corporate Officer advised that no correspondence was received on this item. L. Zosiak, Planner gave a PowerPoint presentation providing the following information: • Background on DGS Pilot Project • Identifying Participating Properties • DGS Pilot Project – Test Cases • Bylaw Readings • Test Case No. 1 – 26478 126 Avenue o Subject Map o Land Use o Zoning Text Amending Bylaw • Test Case No. 2 – 23525 Dogwood Avenue o Subject Map o Land Use o Zoning Text Amending Bylaw Public Hearing Minutes July 17, 2018 Page 6 of 6 • Test Case No. 3 – 10861 Morrisette Place o Subject Map o Land Use o Zoning Text Amending Bylaw • Housing Agreement Bylaw readings • Summary of Next Steps The Mayor called for speakers for first call. Brenda Richardson Ms. Richardson identified herself as the owner of the property on Dogwood Avenue. She expressed that she is excited about the detached garden suite project and also expressed appreciation to Council for their consideration. The Mayor called for speakers for second and third calls. There being no further comment, the Mayor declared this item dealt with. Having given all those persons whose interests were deemed affected by the matters contained herein a chance to be heard, the Mayor adjourned the Public Hearing at 7:24 p.m. ____________________________ N. Read, Mayor Certified Correct ______________________________ L. Benson, Corporate Officer 700 ITEMS ON CONSENT 700 701 Minutes 701 701.1 Development Agreements Committee 701.1 701.2 Minutes of Meetings of Committees and Commissions of Council 701.2 702 Reports 702 CityCityCityCity of Maple Ridgeof Maple Ridgeof Maple Ridgeof Maple Ridge TO:TO:TO:TO: Her Worship Mayor Nicole Read MEETING MEETING MEETING MEETING DATEDATEDATEDATE:::: July 24, 2018 and Members of Council FROM:FROM:FROM:FROM: Chief Administrative Officer MEETING: MEETING: MEETING: MEETING: Council SUBJECTSUBJECTSUBJECTSUBJECT: Disbursements for the month ended June 30, 2018 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY:EXECUTIVE SUMMARY:EXECUTIVE SUMMARY:EXECUTIVE SUMMARY: The disbursements summary for the past period is attached for information. All voucher payments are approved by the Mayor or Acting Mayor and a Finance Manager. Council authorizes the disbursements listing through Council resolution. Expenditure details are available by request through the Finance Department. RECOMMENDATION:RECOMMENDATION:RECOMMENDATION:RECOMMENDATION: That the That the That the That the disbursements as listed below for the month ended disbursements as listed below for the month ended disbursements as listed below for the month ended disbursements as listed below for the month ended JuneJuneJuneJune 30303030, 2018, 2018, 2018, 2018 bebebebe received for received for received for received for information only.information only.information only.information only. GENERALGENERALGENERALGENERAL $$$$ 8,848,08,848,08,848,08,848,075757575 PAPAPAPAYROLLYROLLYROLLYROLL $$$$ 1111,,,,865865865865,,,,231231231231 PURCHASE CARDPURCHASE CARDPURCHASE CARDPURCHASE CARD $$$$ 88888888,,,,895895895895 $$$$ 10101010,,,,802802802802,,,,201201201201 DISCUSSION:DISCUSSION:DISCUSSION:DISCUSSION: a)a)a)a) Background Context:Background Context:Background Context:Background Context: The adoption of the Five Year Consolidated Financial Plan has appropriated funds and provided authorization for expenditures to deliver municipal services. The disbursements are for expenditures that are provided in the financial plan. b)b)b)b) Community Communications:Community Communications:Community Communications:Community Communications: The citizens of Maple Ridge are informed on a routine monthly basis of financial disbursements. 702.1 c)c)c)c) Business Plan / Business Plan / Business Plan / Business Plan / Financial Implications:Financial Implications:Financial Implications:Financial Implications: Highlights of larger items included in Financial Plan or Council Resolution • Cedar Crest Lands (BC) Ltd – Merkley artificial turf field $ 248,380 • Chandos Construction Ltd – Leisure Centre upgrades $ 687,340 • Fraser Valley Regional Library – 2nd quarter member assessment $ 703,351 • G.V. Water District – Water consumption Feb 28 – Mar 27/18 $ 470,788 • Pomerleau Inc – 270A St reservoir $ 212,017 • Ridge Meadows Recycling Society – Monthly contract for recycling $ 207,783 d)d)d)d) Policy Implications:Policy Implications:Policy Implications:Policy Implications: Corporate governance practice includes reporting the disbursements to Council monthly. CONCLUSIONS:CONCLUSIONS:CONCLUSIONS:CONCLUSIONS: The disbursements for the month ended June 30, 2018 have been reviewed and are in order. Original signed by Trevor Hansvall ______________________________________________ Prepared by: Trevor HansvallTrevor HansvallTrevor HansvallTrevor Hansvall Accounting Clerk IIAccounting Clerk IIAccounting Clerk IIAccounting Clerk II Original signed by Trevor Thompson _______________________________________________ Approved by: Trevor Trevor Trevor Trevor Thompson, Thompson, Thompson, Thompson, BBA, BBA, BBA, BBA, CPA, CPA, CPA, CPA, CGACGACGACGA Chief Financial OfficerChief Financial OfficerChief Financial OfficerChief Financial Officer Original signed by Paul Gill _______________________________________________ Concurrence: Paul Gill, BBA, Paul Gill, BBA, Paul Gill, BBA, Paul Gill, BBA, CPA, CPA, CPA, CPA, CGACGACGACGA Chief Administrative Chief Administrative Chief Administrative Chief Administrative OfficerOfficerOfficerOfficer VENDOR NAMEVENDOR NAMEVENDOR NAMEVENDOR NAME DESCRIPTION OF PAYMENTDESCRIPTION OF PAYMENTDESCRIPTION OF PAYMENTDESCRIPTION OF PAYMENT AMOUNTAMOUNTAMOUNTAMOUNT 0946235 BC Ltd Roadside mowing 38,777 0981077 BC Ltd Security refund 106,378 1075033 BC Ltd Security refund 26,523 A & A Testing Ltd Pipeline maintenance 49,483 Aplin & Martin Consultants Ltd Design storm development, various sites 2,247 Downtown beautification - Lougheed at 226 St 14,554 Local area service 20300 Block Hampton St 7,372 River Road traffic calming (Steves St to Carshill St)16,111 Road widening design Abernethy Way (224 St to 232 St)5,548 Watermain replacement (232 St)19,520 65,352 Associated Engineering (BC) Ltd 225 St forcemain upgrade 17,236 Astroturf West Distributor Ltd Synthetic turf field supply & install - Merkley Field 49,350 Badger Daylighting Lp Hydro-excavation - multiple locations 18,854 BC Hydro Electricity 142,412 BC Hydro & Power Authority Pole relocation (132 Ave to Silver Valley Road)51,866 Blue Pine Enterprises Ltd Construction of off leash dog park - 20015 Wharf St 22,831 May watering - 128 Ave (216 St - 224 St)1,890 24,721 Boileau Electric & Pole Ltd Maintenance: Backflow enclosures 5,618 Christmas decorations removal 4,055 Firehall 1 5,426 Firehall 3 404 Homeshow 441 Operations 2,919 Re-aim antennas 490 Street lights 3,599 Supply and install new Kohler generator - Firehall 2 68,251 91,203 CUPE Local 622 Dues - pay periods 18/11 18/12 & 18/13 48,847 Canada Pipe Company Ltd Install water main 36,471 Cedar Crest Lands (BC) Ltd Merkley artificial turf field 248,380 Chandos Construction Ltd Maple Ridge Leisure Centre upgrades 687,340 Cobing Building Solutions Electrical/Mechanical Maintenance: City Hall 1,243 Fire Halls 9,442 Hammond Community Centre 146 Leisure Centre 17,123 Library 466 Operations 2,839 RCMP 1,717 The Act 2,746 35,722 Craven Huston Albion neighbourhood learning and community centre 19,717 Maple Ridge Cemetery expansion 907 20,625 Dhaliwal Developers Ltd Security refund 102,584 Dougness Holdings Ltd Flush & CCTV works yard 29,673 Drake Excavating (2016) Ltd 263 St water pump station project 41,045 Esri Canada Limited Small local government enterprise licence agreement 70,560 Falcon House Ltd Security refund 234,700 Falcon Village Joint Venture Security refund 797,049 Fitness Edge Contracted service provider - fitness classes & programs 29,812 Floris, David And Maureen Compensation for road dedication - 13287 232 St 117,659 Fortis BC - Natural Gas Natural gas 21,370 Fraser Valley Regional Library 2nd quarter member assessment 703,351 Contributed capital replacement funding 10,000 713,351 Fred Surridge Ltd Waterworks supplies 23,443 Golden Ears Winter Club Rental revenue & summer operation agreement - Apr & May 34,629 CITY OF MAPLE RIDGECITY OF MAPLE RIDGECITY OF MAPLE RIDGECITY OF MAPLE RIDGE MONTHLY DISBURSEMENTS - June 2018MONTHLY DISBURSEMENTS - June 2018MONTHLY DISBURSEMENTS - June 2018MONTHLY DISBURSEMENTS - June 2018 VENDOR NAMEVENDOR NAMEVENDOR NAMEVENDOR NAME DESCRIPTION OF PAYMENTDESCRIPTION OF PAYMENTDESCRIPTION OF PAYMENTDESCRIPTION OF PAYMENT AMOUNTAMOUNTAMOUNTAMOUNT Gotraffic Management Inc Traffic control 55,985 Greater Vancouver Water District Water consumption Feb 28 - Mar 27/18 470,788 Maple Ridge billing - micro (Apr)700 471,488 Hallmark Facility Services Inc Janitorial services & supplies: City Hall 3,566 Fire Halls 4,736 Library 4,457 Operations 4,234 Randy Herman Building 4,959 RCMP 4,234 26,185 Heavy PDG Equipment Ltd Excavator rental 16,648 Hepworth, Anthony Security refund 19,050 Hongs Nursery Moss hanging baskets 15,904 Horizon Landscape Contractors Grass cutting - Apr & May 34,910 Waste bag collection - Mar Apr & May 17,831 Weeding - Hampstead 988 53,730 Image Painting & Restoration Painting & restoration services: Caretaker house 2,835 City hall 420 Neighbourhood Park 420 Street lights 17,063 Thomas Haney skate park 630 21,368 Intelligo Networks Inc Juniper network support & maintenance renewal 44,080 Jacks Automotive & Welding Fire Dept equipment repairs 19,935 Johnston Davidson Consulting services - Fire Hall #4 15,593 Lafarge Canada Inc Roadworks material 65,335 Maclean Homes (Edge) Ltd Security refund 172,625 Manulife Financial Employer/employee remittance 157,978 Maple Ridge & PM Arts Council Arts Centre contract 55,254 Program revenue - May 28,043 83,297 Mcelhanney Consulting Services Drainage consulting 18,643 Sidewalk design - 232 St (132 Ave - Silver Valley Road)49,059 67,702 Medical Services Plan Employee medical & health premiums 20,513 Morningstar Homes Ltd Security refund 72,000 MPK Seniors Network Annual program costs 25,000 Municipal Pension Plan BC Employer/employee remittance 467,079 Open Storage Solutions Inc Nimble storage hybrid shelf expansion 59,638 VM ware growth project 2,430 Maintenance 3,206 65,274 Parkland Refining (BC) Ltd Gasoline & diesel fuel 125,797 Paul Bunyan Tree Services Tree maintenance & damaged tree removal 17,036 Pomerleau Inc 270A St reservoir 212,017 RF Binnie & Associates Ltd Arthur Peake Centre design 2,380 Merkley Park synthetic sports field design 21,424 Synthetic turf replacement - Samuel Robertson Technical School 3,899 Telosky Stadium design 2,214 29,917 Raybern Erectors Ltd Supply and install new chainline mesh - Samuel Robertson Technical School 29,967 Receiver General For Canada Employer/employee remittance PP18/11 & PP18/12 802,378 Recycle Systems Recycling equipment - Tipper and sorting conveyor belt 17,347 RG Arenas (Maple Ridge) Ltd Curling rink operating expenses - Apr 2,824 Ice rental - May 56,896 59,720 VENDOR NAMEVENDOR NAMEVENDOR NAMEVENDOR NAME DESCRIPTION OF PAYMENTDESCRIPTION OF PAYMENTDESCRIPTION OF PAYMENTDESCRIPTION OF PAYMENT AMOUNTAMOUNTAMOUNTAMOUNT Ridge Meadows Recycling Society Education - Wildsafe BC 1,250 Litter pickup contract 330 Monthly contract for recycling 207,783 Toilet rebate program 233 Weekly recycling 474 210,071 Rogers Cellular devices May & Jun 21,588 Sanscorp Products Ltd Roadworks material 22,901 Scottish Line Painting Ltd Thermoplastic road markings 19,974 Stantec Consulting Ltd 224 St PRV and flow meter 10,652 263 St water pump station replacement 4,938 270A St reservoir 28,846 44,437 Terra Link Horticulture Inc Overseeding turf mixture - various fields 17,251 Warrington PCI Management Advance for Tower common costs 263,608 Webbco Industrial Ltd PRV and flow meter at 224 St and 127 Ave 74,088 Zoom Audio Visual Networks Inc Council chambers projector replacement 17,702 Disbursements In Excess $15,000 7,917,9767,917,9767,917,9767,917,976 Disbursements Under $15,000 930,099930,099930,099930,099 Total Payee Disbursements 8,848,0758,848,0758,848,0758,848,075 Payroll PP18/12 & PP18/13 1,865,2311,865,2311,865,2311,865,231 Purchase Cards - Payment 88,89588,89588,89588,895 Total Disbursements June 2018 10,802,20110,802,20110,802,20110,802,201 1 of 1 City of Maple Ridge TO: Her Worship Mayor Nicole Read MEETING DATE: July 24, 2018 and Members of Council FILE NO: FROM: Chief Administrative Officer MEETING: Council SUBJECT: 2018 Council Expenses EXECUTIVE SUMMARY In keeping with Council’s commitment to transparency in local government, the attached Schedule lists Council expenses recorded to date. The expenses included on the schedule are those required to be reported in the annual Statement of Financial Information and are available on our website. RECOMMENDATION: Receive for information Discussion The expenses included in the attached schedule are those reported in the annual Statement of Financial Information (SOFI), including those incurred under Policy 3.07 “Council Training, Conferences and Association Building”. The budget for Council includes the provision noted in Policy 3.07 as well as a separate budget for cell phone and iPad usage. The amounts on the attached Schedule are those recorded prior to the preparation of this report and are subject to change. “original signed by Cindy Dale” ______________________________________________________________ Prepared by: Cindy Dale Executive Assistant, Corporate & Financial Services “original signed by Trevor Thompson” _______________________________________________________________ Approved by: Trevor Thompson, BBA, CPA, CGA Chief Financial Officer “original signed by Paul Gill” __________________________________________________________________ Approved by: Paul Gill, BBA, CPA, CGA Chief Administrative Officer 702.2 Month of Event Reason for expense Conferences & Seminars Community Events Mileage / Parking Cell Phones / iPads Totals Bell, CorisaJanuary Portable electronic device charges (e.g. Ipad)17.12 Local Government Leadership Academy (LGLA) Conference 156.60 February South Asian Cultural Society Gala110.00 Portable electronic device charges (e.g. Ipad)17.12 Alouette Addictions Fundraiser60.00 March Portable electronic device charges (e.g. Ipad)17.12 MR Chamber of Commerce Business Excellence Awards 125.00 April Portable electronic device charges (e.g. Ipad)17.12 CivX 2018: Smart Communities, Smart Region April12 199.00MayPortable electronic device charges (e.g. Ipad)8.56 June Portable electronic device charges (e.g. Ipad)8.56 LMLGA General Meeting445.00 Annual Fundraising Dinner and Citizen of the Year Awards Presentation 127.49 JulyAugustSeptemberOctoberNovemberDecember800.60 422.49 - 85.60 1,308.69 Duncan, KierstenJanuary Cell phone charges42.95 Portable electronic device charges (e.g. Ipad)8.56 Local Government Leadership Academy (LGLA) Conference 758.44February South Asian Cultural Society Gala110.00 Cell phone charges47.97 Portable electronic device charges (e.g. Ipad)17.12 March Cell phone charges42.95 Portable electronic device charges (e.g. Ipad)17.12 April Cell phone charges86.52 Portable electronic device charges (e.g. Ipad)4.28 MayCell phone charges42.80 Portable electronic device charges (e.g. Ipad)4.28 LMLGA375.00 LMLGA Credit for Conference Not Attended (325.00) June Cell phone charges42.80 Portable electronic device charges (e.g. Ipad)4.28 JulyAugustSeptemberOctoberNovemberDecember808.44 110.00 - 361.63 1,280.07 2018 Council Expenses Month of Event Reason for expense Conferences & Seminars Community Events Mileage / Parking Cell Phones / iPads Totals Masse, BobJanuaryFebruaryMarchAprilMayJuneJulyAugustSeptemberOctoberNovemberDecember- - - - - Read, NicoleJanuary Cell phone charges42.80 Portable electronic device charges (e.g. Ipad)17.12 February Cell phone charges43.02 Portable electronic device charges (e.g. Ipad)8.56 March Cell phone charges47.52 Portable electronic device charges (e.g. Ipad)17.12 April Cell phone charges45.65 Portable electronic device charges (e.g. Ipad)17.12 MayCell phone charges42.80 Portable electronic device charges (e.g. Ipad)17.12 June Cell phone charges45.50 Portable electronic device charges (e.g. Ipad)17.12 JulyAugustSeptemberOctoberNovemberDecember- - - 361.45 361.45 2018 Council Expenses Month of Event Reason for expense Conferences & Seminars Community Events Mileage / Parking Cell Phones / iPads Totals Robson, GordyJanuary Portable electronic device charges (e.g. Ipad)4.28 February South Asian Cultural Society Gala110.00 Portable electronic device charges (e.g. Ipad)4.28 March Portable electronic device charges (e.g. Ipad)4.28 April Portable electronic device charges (e.g. Ipad)4.28 MayPortable electronic device charges (e.g. Ipad)16.46 LMLGA375.00 LMLGA Credit for Conference Not Attended (325.00) June Portable electronic device charges (e.g. Ipad)8.56 LMLGA Refund GST Adjustment7.14 JulyAugustSeptemberOctoberNovemberDecember57.14 110.00 - 42.14 209.28 Shymkiw, TylerJanuary Portable electronic device charges (e.g. Ipad)4.28 February South Asian Cultural Society Gala110.00 Portable electronic device charges (e.g. Ipad)4.28 March Portable electronic device charges (e.g. Ipad)4.28 April Portable electronic device charges (e.g. Ipad)4.28 MayPortable electronic device charges (e.g. Ipad)4.28 June Portable electronic device charges (e.g. Ipad)4.28 JulyAugustSeptemberOctoberNovemberDecember- 110.00 - 25.68 135.68 2018 Council Expenses Month of Event Reason for expense Conferences & Seminars Community Events Mileage / Parking Cell Phones / iPads Totals Speirs, CraigJanuary Cell phone charges44.47 Portable electronic device charges (e.g. Ipad)4.28 February South Asian Cultural Society Gala110.00 Cell phone charges43.32 Portable electronic device charges (e.g. Ipad)4.28 March Cell phone charges42.80 Portable electronic device charges (e.g. Ipad)4.28 MR Chamber of Commerce Business Excellence Awards 125.00 April Cell phone charges42.80 Portable electronic device charges (e.g. Ipad)4.28 MayFederation of Canadian Municipalities (FCM) Conference 1,796.20 LMLGA 2018 Conference and AGM May 9-11-Separate Budget as per Workshop of May 15440.00 LMLGA Credit for Conference Not Attended (379.50) Cell phone charges42.80 Portable electronic device charges (e.g. Ipad)4.28 June Cell phone charges47.67 Portable electronic device charges (e.g. Ipad)4.28 Annual Fundraising Dinner and Citizen of the Year Awards Presentation 127.49 JulyAugustSeptemberOctoberNovemberDecember1,856.70 362.49 - 289.54 2,508.73 TOTALS3,522.88 1,114.98 0.00 1,166.04 5,803.90 2018 Council Expenses 800 Unfinished Business 800 801 Motion by Councillor Robson “That the Agricultural Land Commission be asked to explore the use of a land trust model to acquire farmland that would be made available to qualified parties for farm purposes, noting that the Davison Farm in Maple Ridge is currently available for purchase and could be used as a pilot project for such a trust.” 801 802 Motion by Councillor Masse “That the Ridge Meadows Recycling Society’s position paper on single use plastics be supported; and further That staff be directed to investigate methods to effectively reduce single use plastics in the City of Maple Ridge.” Appendix A - Ridge Meadows Recycling Society Position Paper 802 APPENDIX A 900 Correspondence 900 902 1000 Bylaws 1000 CITY OF MAPLE RIDGE BYLAW NO. 7328-2017 A Bylaw to amend the text of Maple Ridge Zoning Bylaw No. 3510-1985 as amended ____________________________________________________________________________________ WHEREAS, it is deemed expedient to amend the Maple Ridge Zoning Bylaw No. 3510-1985 as amended: NOW THEREFORE, the Municipal Council of the City of Maple Ridge, enacts as follows: 1.This bylaw may be cited as “Maple Ridge Zone Amending Bylaw No. 7328-2017”. 2.Maple Ridge Zoning Bylaw No. 3510-1985 is hereby amended as follows: That PART 6, RESIDENTIAL ZONES, SECTION 601, ONE FAMILY AND TWO FAMILY RESIDENTIAL ZONES, Sub-Section (C) REGULATIONS FOR THE SIZE, SHAPE AND SITING OF BUILDING AND STRUCTURES, item 4) Buildings and Structures for Two Family Residential Use in the RT-1 Zone is amended by deleting clause (d) and replacing it with the following clauses: “(d) shall not be permitted on a lot less than 750 m². (e)notwithstanding item (d) above, lots located within the Town Centre, as identified on Schedule H, which are either a corner lot or provided with lane access, shall not be permitted on a lot less than 557 m²”. 3.To Amend Schedule “D” MINIMUM LOT AREA AND DIMENSIONS by deleting the line: “RT-1 22m 30m 891m2” Replacing it as follows: “RT-1 20 m 27m 750 m² See item 7 below” 4.To Amend Schedule “D” MINIMUM LOT AREA AND DIMENSIONS by inserting a new item 7, after item 6 as follows: “7. For lots located within the Town Centre, as identified on Schedule H, which are either a corner lot or provided with lane access, shall not be less than 557 m²”. 5.Maple Ridge Zoning Bylaw No. 3510-1985 as amended is hereby amended accordingly. READ a first time the 25th day of April, 2017. READ a second time the 12th day of June, 2018. PUBLIC HEARING held the 17th day of July, 2018. READ a third time the day of , 2018. ADOPTED the day of , 2018. PRESIDING MEMBER CORPORATE OFFICER 1001.1 CITY OF MAPLE RIDGE BYLAW NO. 7322-2017 A Bylaw to amend Map "A" forming part of Zoning Bylaw No. 3510 - 1985 as amended ______________________________________________________________________________ WHEREAS, it is deemed expedient to amend Maple Ridge Zoning Bylaw No. 3510 - 1985 as amended; NOW THEREFORE, the Municipal Council of the City of Maple Ridge enacts as follows: 1.This Bylaw may be cited as "Maple Ridge Zone Amending Bylaw No. 7322-2017." 2.That parcel or tract of land and premises known and described as: Lot 3 District Lot 242 Group 1 New Westminster District Plan 14112 and outlined in heavy black line on Map No. 1706 a copy of which is attached hereto and forms part of this Bylaw, is hereby rezoned to RT-1 (Two Family Urban Residential). 3.That PART 6, RESIDENTIAL ZONES, SECTION 601, Sub-Section (C) REGULATIONS FOR THE SIZE, SHAPE AND SITING OF BUILDING AND STRUCTURES, Clause (4) Buildings and Structures for Two Family Residential Use in the RT-1 Zone is amended by the addition of the following sub-clause in correct alphabetical order: Notwithstanding the above, shall not be permitted on a lot less than 742 m², for the parcel or tract of land described as Lot 3 District Lot 242 Group 1 New Westminster District Plan 14112 4.Maple Ridge Zoning Bylaw No. 3510 - 1985 as amended and Map "A" attached thereto are hereby amended accordingly. READ a first time the 28th day of November, 2017. READ a second time the 12th day of June, 2018. PUBLIC HEARING held the 17th day of July, 2018. READ a third time the day of , 20 APPROVED by the Ministry of Transportation and Infrastructure this day of , 20 ADOPTED, the day of , 20 _____________________________ ____________________________ PRESIDING MEMBER CORPORATE OFFICER 1001.2 212 ST.WICKLUND AVE. 122 AVE.212 ST.CAMPBELL AVE. 121 AVE. 122 AVE.NORFOLK PL.LAITY ST.2118012247 21220213212117021310213051224012245 212992132821334211912130912115 213022132321160121162117012230 12156 12243 12239 12218 21158211532129521210213221211221146 2132012101-532115112255 213012120712250 213142132812098 12111 1208921195 213112124012234 213112129721178211982132712086 212972131912200 21175211882129221292211661223 1 212471210521161 2129012242 12128212001223721154 2133021189211522114712225 12217 12116 12222 2130012186 12213 2132812219 121062121121175 12145 2128221196/98121382118812227122392119921190/921223512209 2124121321213212114412212 212012123012196 2123121312120812116721221 2129812161 2131812101 12171 12251 2116121149Rem N 180' E119120 21 182 4 342 109 11 8 186 Rem 3377 352 153 4 6 381 145 146 224 3 Rem 2 152 10 2 350 20 378 351 221 355 375 10 Rem 4 222 3Rem 1 Rem 1 1 149 348 155 360 220 4 125 2 W 100'126 358 7 223 3 374 341 5 6 Rem 419 347 225 26 67 372 354 11 154 150 Rem 2 8 124 3 229 121 22 1 357 9 339 9 349 of 35 2 18 376 4 230 340 353 148 1 181 68 158 122 5 147 233 66 1 380 175 231 1 21102 A 156 346 359 144 373 343 2 379 232 157 6 5 1 PARK114P 60659P 9327LMP 41338P 60659P 37889P 62355 P 46290P 47383 P 17823 P 32505 LMP 5768 P 70721 P 47383P 48094P 48995 P 58583 P 48094 P 77954 P 14686P 19872 P 56896P 67224P 48094 P 7499 P 67224 P 47383P 60659P 14112P 15470 P 56896 P 3 6 5 1 9 P 17823 P 67224 EPP 63666LMP 11733 P 48094 (EP 47384)NWS 1462P 56896 P 7499P 47383 P 46672P 74504 NWS 336 P 3460 P 14686LMP 39238P 62150EPP 58502LMP 38783 LMP 39636LMP 5769LMP 38963RW 18394LMP 39238RW 18394 EP 60661RW 67225 ´ SCALE 1:2,000 MAPLE RIDGE ZONE AMENDINGBylaw No. Map No.From: To: RS-1 (One Family Urban Residential) RT-1 (Two Family Urban Residential) 7322-20171706 CITY OF MAPLE RIDGE BYLAW NO. 7469-2018 A Bylaw to amend the Official Community Plan Bylaw No. 7060-2014 _______________________________________________________________________________ WHEREAS Section 477 of the Local Government Act provides that the Council may revise the Official Community Plan; AND WHEREAS it is deemed expedient to amend Schedules A to the Official Community Plan; NOW THEREFORE, the Municipal Council of the City of Maple Ridge enacts as follows: 1.This Bylaw may be cited for all purposes as "Maple Ridge Official Community Plan Amending Bylaw No. No 7469-2018. 2.Schedule “A”, Chapter 10.3, Part VI, A – Silver Valley, Figure 2 - Land Use Plan, is hereby amended for the parcel or tract of land and premises known and described as:: Lot 1 Except: Parcel “A” (Explanatory Plan 13725), South East Quarter Section 28 Township 12 New Westminster District Plan 2637 and outlined in heavy black line on Map No. 976, a copy of which is attached hereto and forms part of this Bylaw, is hereby designated/amended as shown. 3.Schedule “A”, Chapter 10.3, Part VI, A – Silver Valley, Figure 4 – Trails / Open Space is hereby amended for the parcel or tract of land and premises known and described as:: Lot 1 Except: Parcel “A” (Explanatory Plan 13725), South East Quarter Section 28 Township 12 New Westminster District Plan 2637 and outlined in heavy black line on Map No. 977, a copy of which is attached hereto and forms part of this Bylaw, is hereby amended by adding/removing Conservation. 4.Maple Ridge Official Community Plan Bylaw No. 7060-2014 is hereby amended accordingly. READ a first time the 26th day of June, 2018. READ a second time the 26th day of June, 2018. PUBLIC HEARING held the 17th day of July, 2018. READ a third time the day of , 2018. ADOPTED, the day of , 2018. ___________________________________ _____________________________ PRESIDING MEMBER CORPORATE OFFICER 1002.1 236 ST.236 ST.2361313260 2361613144 13104 236272370213215 13227 237111316023551 2365113165 23675PARK 4 6 8 24 PARK 16 33 35 2 7 Rem 1 39 34 20 A 17 23 PARK 22 P 16555P 2637 P 47603 P 2637P 37422P 2637 (EPS 2081) P 1105 EPP 32491 EPP 72327 *PP157 P 40978 EP 13725 P 1105 P 16555EPP 32492EPP 53011LMP 38113 132 AVE.132 AVE. ´ SCALE 1:2,000 MAPLE RIDGE OFFICIAL COMMUNITY PLAN AMENDINGBylaw No. Map No. Purpose:From: To: To Amend Figure 2 and Figure 3C of the Silver Valley Area PlanMedium/High Density Residential and ConservationConservation Low Density UrbanMedium/High Density Residential 7469-2018976 Urban Area Boundary Urban Area Boundary 236 ST.236 ST.2361313260 2361613144 13104 236272370213215 13227 237111316023551 2365113165 23675PARK 4 6 8 24 PARK 16 33 35 2 7 Rem 1 39 34 20 A 17 23 PARK 22 P 16555P 2637 P 47603 P 2637P 37422P 2637 (EPS 2081) P 1105 EPP 32491 EPP 72327 *PP157 P 40978 EP 13725 P 1105 P 16555EPP 32492EPP 53011LMP 38113 132 AVE.132 AVE. ´ SCALE 1:2,000 MAPLE RIDGE OFFICIAL COMMUNITY PLAN AMENDINGBylaw No. Map No. Purpose:To Amend Figure 4 of the Silver Valley Area Plan as Shown 7469-2018977 Urban Area Boundary Urban Area Boundary To Add To Conservation To Remove From Conservation CITY OF MAPLE RIDGE BYLAW NO. 7195-2015 A Bylaw to amend Map "A" forming part of Zoning Bylaw No. 3510 - 1985 as amended ______________________________________________________________________________ WHEREAS, it is deemed expedient to amend Maple Ridge Zoning Bylaw No. 3510 - 1985 as amended; NOW THEREFORE, the Municipal Council of the City of Maple Ridge enacts as follows: 1.This Bylaw may be cited as "Maple Ridge Zone Amending Bylaw No. 7195-2015." 2.That parcel or tract of land and premises known and described as: Lot 1 Except: Parcel “A” (Explanatory Plan 13725), South East Quarter Section 28 Township 12 New Westminster District Plan 2637 and outlined in heavy black line on Map No. 1652 a copy of which is attached hereto and forms part of this Bylaw, is hereby rezoned to RM-1 (Townhouse Residential) and R-1 (Residential District). 3.Maple Ridge Zoning Bylaw No. 3510 - 1985 as amended and Map "A" attached thereto are hereby amended accordingly. READ a first time the 12th day of January, 2016. READ a second time the 26th day of June, 2018. PUBLIC HEARING held the 17th day of July, 2018. READ a third time the day of , 2018. ADOPTED the day of , 2018. _____________________________ ____________________________ PRESIDING MEMBER CORPORATE OFFICER 1002.2 236 ST.236 ST.2361313260 2361613144 13104 236272370213215 13227 237111316023551 2365113165 23675PARK 4 6 8 24 PARK 16 33 35 2 7 Rem 1 39 34 20 A 17 23 PARK 22 P 16555P 2637 P 47603 P 2637P 37422P 2637 (EPS 2081) P 1105 EPP 32491 EPP 72327 *PP157 P 40978 EP 13725 P 1105 P 16555EPP 32492EPP 53011LMP 38113 132 AVE.132 AVE. ´ SCALE 1:2,000 MAPLE RIDGE ZONE AMENDINGBylaw No. Map No. From: To: RS-2 (One Family Suburban Residential) R-1 (Residential District) RM-1 (Townhouse Residential) 7195-20151652 Urban Area Boundary Urban Area Boundary CITY OF MAPLE RIDGE BYLAW NO. 7451-2018 A Bylaw to amend Map "A" forming part of Zoning Bylaw No. 3510 - 1985 as amended ______________________________________________________________________________ WHEREAS, it is deemed expedient to amend Maple Ridge Zoning Bylaw No. 3510 - 1985 as amended; NOW THEREFORE, the Municipal Council of the City of Maple Ridge enacts as follows: 1.This Bylaw may be cited as "Maple Ridge Zone Amending Bylaw No. 7451-2018." 2.That parcel or tract of land and premises known and described as: Lot 37 District Lot 6881 Group 1 New Westminster District Plan 57415 and outlined in heavy black line on Map No. 1758 a copy of which is attached hereto and forms part of this Bylaw, is hereby rezoned to RS-2 (One Family Suburban Residential). 3.Maple Ridge Zoning Bylaw No. 3510 - 1985 as amended and Map "A" attached thereto are hereby amended accordingly. READ a first time the 8th day of May, 2018. READ a second time the 26th day of June, 2018. PUBLIC HEARING held the 17th day of July, 2018. READ a third time the day of , 2018. ADOPTED, the day of , 2018. _____________________________ ____________________________ PRESIDING MEMBER CORPORATE OFFICER 1003 SAY E R S C R .McNUTT RD.G A RIB AL DI S T.2758012559 12355 12540 12335 12590 12461 2756112459 12366 12390 12419 2753012581 12375 12414 12560 12369 12433 12462 12593 2757312350 2756612458 8 2 56 39 55 1 34 5352 LOT 1 30 5857 36 35 373 29 31 51 Rem 38 P 12094 EPP 31374 P 57415 P 57415 BCP 10209 P 55367 BCP 33203 P 55367 P 55367 P 57415 P 57415 P 57415 P 57415 BCP 25318 EP 69465 BCP 10210 RP 56874 EPP 31376RW 57417 RW 57417 R W 5 5 3 6 8BCP 10211BCP 33204 BCP 25319 ´ SCALE 1:2,500 MAPLE RIDGE ZONE AMENDINGBylaw No. Map No. From: To: RS-3 (One Family Rural Residential) RS-2 (One Family Suburban Residential) 7451-20181758 CITY OF MAPLE RIDGE BYLAW NO. 7472-2018 A Bylaw to amend the text of Maple Ridge Zoning Bylaw No. 3510-1985 as amended _____________________________________________________________________________________ WHEREAS, it is deemed expedient to amend Maple Ridge Zoning Bylaw No. 3510-1985 as amended: NOW THEREFORE, the Municipal Council of the City of Maple Ridge enacts as follows: This Bylaw may be cited as “Maple Ridge Zone Amending Bylaw No. 7472-2018”. Scope: This Bylaw recommends amendments that will permit expansion of the Detached Garden Suite regulations as part of a DGS Pilot Project for specific single-family properties. 1.PART 4 GENERAL REGULATIONS, is amended as follows: a.Section 402 REGULATIONS FOR PERMITTED USES OF LAND, BUILDINGS & STRUCTURES, Section 11, Dwelling units for a Detached Garden Suite use, be amended by adding the following new clause at the end of this Section in the correct alphabetical or numerical order: The Detached Garden Suite provisions in this Section 11 will apply to the properties listed below, except where differences to these provisions are specifically stated for each: i.At 26378 – 126th Avenue (Lot 34, Except: Part Subdivided by Plan BCP13892, Section 24, Township 12, New Westminster District, Plan LMP19841) a Detached Garden Suite with a maximum Gross Floor Area of 140m2 (1500 ft2) and a maximum building height of 7.5 metres from ground level is permitted. 2.Maple Ridge Zoning Bylaw No. 3510-1985 as amended is hereby amended accordingly. READ a first time the 26th day of June, 2018. READ a second time the 26th day of June, 2018. PUBLIC HEARING held the 17th day of July, 2018. READ a third time the day of , 2018. ADOPTED the day of , 2018 _____________________________________ _____________________________________ PRESIDING MEMBER CORPORATE OFFICER 1004.1 CITY OF MAPLE RIDGE BYLAW NO. 7473-2018 A Bylaw to amend the text of Maple Ridge Zoning Bylaw No. 3510-1985 as amended _____________________________________________________________________________________ WHEREAS, it is deemed expedient to amend Maple Ridge Zoning Bylaw No. 3510-1985 as amended: NOW THEREFORE, the Municipal Council of the City of Maple Ridge enacts as follows: This Bylaw may be cited as “Maple Ridge Zone Amending Bylaw No. 7473-2018”. Scope: This Bylaw recommends amendments that will permit expansion of the Detached Garden Suite regulations as part of a DGS Pilot Project for specific single-family properties. 1.PART 4 GENERAL REGULATIONS, is amended as follows: a.Section 402 REGULATIONS FOR PERMITTED USES OF LAND, BUILDINGS & STRUCTURES, Section 11, Dwelling units for a Detached Garden Suite use, be amended by adding the following new clause at the end of this Section in the correct alphabetical or numerical order: The Detached Garden Suite provisions in this Section 11 will apply to the properties listed below, except where differences to these provisions are specifically stated for each: ii.At 23525 Dogwood Avenue (Lot “B”, Section 28, Township 12, New Westminster District, Plan 6734) a Detached Garden Suite with a maximum Gross Floor Area of 140m2 (1500 ft2) located in the front yard is permitted. 2.Maple Ridge Zoning Bylaw No. 3510-1985 as amended is hereby amended accordingly. READ a first time the 26th day of June, 2018. READ a second time the 26th day of June, 2018. PUBLIC HEARING held the 17th day of July, 2018. READ a third time the day of , 2018. ADOPTED the day of , 2018 _____________________________________ _____________________________________ PRESIDING MEMBER CORPORATE OFFICER 1004.2 CITY OF MAPLE RIDGE BYLAW NO. 7475-2018 A Bylaw to amend the text of Maple Ridge Zoning Bylaw No. 3510-1985 as amended _____________________________________________________________________________________ WHEREAS, it is deemed expedient to amend Maple Ridge Zoning Bylaw No. 3510-1985 as amended: NOW THEREFORE, the Municipal Council of the City of Maple Ridge enacts as follows: This Bylaw may be cited as “Maple Ridge Zone Amending Bylaw No. 7475-2018”. Scope: This Bylaw recommends amendments that will permit expansion of the Detached Garden Suite regulations as part of a DGS Pilot Project for specific single-family properties. 1.PART 4 GENERAL REGULATIONS, is amended as follows: a.Section 402 REGULATIONS FOR PERMITTED USES OF LAND, BUILDINGS & STRUCTURES, Section 11, Dwelling units for a Detached Garden Suite use, be amended by adding the following new clause at the end of this Section in the correct alphabetical or numerical order: The Detached Garden Suite provisions in this Section 11 will apply to the properties listed below, except where differences to these provisions are specifically stated for each: iv. At 10861 Morrisette Place (Lot 8, Section 11, Township 12, New Westminster District, Plan EPP67241) a Detached Garden Suite constructed above a garage with a maximum building height of 6.5 metres is permitted. A secondary suite within the principal dwelling unit is also permitted on this property. 2.Maple Ridge Zoning Bylaw No. 3510-1985 as amended is hereby amended accordingly. READ a first time the 26th day of June, 2018. READ a second time the 26th day of June, 2018. PUBLIC HEARING held the 17th day of July, 2018. READ a third time the day of , 2018. ADOPTED the day of , 2018 _____________________________________ _____________________________________ PRESIDING MEMBER CORPORATE OFFICER 1004.3 City of Maple Ridge TO: Her Worship Mayor Nicole Read MEETING DATE: July 24, 2018 and Members of Council FILE NO: 2016-004-RZ FROM: Chief Administrative Officer MEETING: Council SUBJECT: Final Reading Zone Amending Bylaw No. 7211-2016 13245 236 Street EXECUTIVE SUMMARY: Zone Amending Bylaw No.7211-2016 for the subject property, located at 13245 236 Street, has been considered by Council; Public Hearing was held and subsequently the above mentioned Bylaw was granted third reading. The applicant has requested that final reading be granted. The purpose of the rezoning to the RM-1 (Townhouse Residential) zone is to permit the construction of 31 townhouse units (see Appendix C). Council granted first reading for Zone Amending Bylaw No. 7211-2016 on February 23, 2016 and second reading on January 16, 2018. This application was presented at Public Hearing on February 20, 2018, and Council granted third reading on February 27, 2018. RECOMMENDATION: That Zone Amending Bylaw No. 7211-2016 be adopted. DISCUSSION: a)Background Context: Council considered this rezoning application at a Public Hearing held on February 20, 2018. On February 27, 2018 Council granted third reading to Zone Amending Bylaw No. 7211-2016 with the stipulation that the following conditions be addressed: i)Registration of a Rezoning Servicing Agreement as a Restrictive Covenant and receipt of the security deposit, as outlined in the Agreement; ii)Registration of a Restrictive Covenant for the Geotechnical Report, which addresses the suitability of the subject property for the proposed development; iii)Registration of a Restrictive Covenant for protecting the Visitor Parking; iv) Registration of a Restrictive Covenant for Tree Protection; v)Registration of a Restrictive Covenant for Stormwater Management; vi) Removal of existing buildings; vii) In addition to the site profile, a disclosure statement must be submitted by a Professional Engineer advising whether there is any evidence of underground fuel storage tanks on the subject property. If so, a Stage 1 Site Investigation Report is required to ensure that the subject property is not a contaminated site; and 1005 - 2 - viii)That a voluntary contribution, in the amount of $127,100.00 be provided in keeping with the Council Policy with regard to Community Amenity Contributions. The following applies to the above: i)The Rezoning Servicing Agreement has been registered as a Restrictive Covenant and receipt of the security deposit has been received; ii)A Restrictive Covenant for the Geotechnical Report has been submitted for registration on title, as per the letter of undertaking; iii)A Restrictive Covenant for Visitor Parking has been submitted for registration on title, as per the letter of undertaking; iv)A Restrictive Covenant for Tree Protection has been submitted for registration on title, as per the letter of undertaking; v)A Restrictive Covenant for Stormwater Management has been submitted for registration on title, as per the letter of undertaking; vi)The existing buildings have been demolished; vii) A Phase 1 Environmental Site Assessment Report has been provided to ensure that the subject property is not a contaminated site; and viii)A voluntary contribution in the amount of $127,100.00 ($4,100.00 per townhouse dwelling unit) has been provided, in keeping with the Council Policy with regard to Community Amenity Contributions. CONCLUSION: As the applicant has met Council’s conditions, it is recommended that final reading be given to Zone Amending Bylaw No. 7211-2016. “Original signed by Adam Rieu”______________________ Prepared by: Adam Rieu Planning Technician “Original signed by Christine Carter”______________________ Approved by: Christine Carter, M.PL, MCIP, RPP Director of Planning ”Original signed by Frank Quinn”_______________________ Approved by: Frank Quinn, MBA, P.Eng GM: Public Works & Development Services “Original signed by Paul Gill”__________________________ Concurrence: Paul Gill, CPA, CGA Chief Administrative Officer The following appendices are attached hereto: Appendix A – Subject Map Appendix B – Bylaw No. 7211-2016 Appendix C – Site Plan DATE: Jul 9, 2018 2016-004-RZ.2 13245 236 Street PLANNING DEPARTMENT SUBJECT PROPERTY 2018-111-DP2013-087-RZ 2013-087-VP 2013-087-DP 2016-207-DP 2016-208-DP 2015-373-RZ 2015-373-VP 2016-306-DP 2016-031-RZ 2016-370-DP 2015-373-DP 2015-155-RZ 2017-134-DP 2016-031-DP 2017-133-DP 2018-190-RZ 2016-149-DP ´ Scale: 1:2,500 BY: LP Legend Stream Indefinite Creek River Major Rivers & Lakes APPENDIX A CITY OF MAPLE RIDGE BYLAW NO. 7211-2016 A Bylaw to amend Map "A" forming part of Zoning Bylaw No. 3510 - 1985 as amended ______________________________________________________________________________ WHEREAS, it is deemed expedient to amend Maple Ridge Zoning Bylaw No. 3510 - 1985 as amended; NOW THEREFORE, the Municipal Council of the City of Maple Ridge enacts as follows: 1.This Bylaw may be cited as "Maple Ridge Zone Amending Bylaw No. 7211-2016." 2.That parcel or tract of land and premises known and described as: Lot 39 Section 28 Township 12 New Westminster District Plan 40978 and outlined in heavy black line on Map No. 1658 a copy of which is attached hereto and forms part of this Bylaw, is hereby rezoned to RM-1 (Townhouse Residential). 3.Maple Ridge Zoning Bylaw No. 3510 - 1985 as amended and Map "A" attached thereto are hereby amended accordingly. READ a first time the 23rd day of February, 2016. READ a second time the 16th day of January, 2018. PUBLIC HEARING held the 20th day of February, 2018. READ a third time the 27th day of February, 2018. ADOPTED the day of , 20 _____________________________ ____________________________ PRESIDING MEMBER CORPORATE OFFICER APPENDIX B 13305 2355013313 13327 2355113305 13336 23582132892359713335 13320 2366823672236632368523673237162347913317 13312 13328 13326 236472361623687 2372013301 2350013309 13335 235702357513277 13346 2362123646236582364523627236512366923728 23491235512354513339 13215 13227 132452359313315 1326023605 23613236512365523683234612347713316 13345 234852357413283 13312 2361323629236372365023697 23691 13309 13335 13336/40 13350 13318 13332 235812358913165 13295 13331 13332 236622365323667236982367523469235172351313331 13319 13325 13340 236402366123659236772371213313 13319 13325 13321 235572356313322 13340 2358513339 13343 13336 2367923708235 ST.LARCH A V E.BRYANT DRIVELARCH AVE. 132 AVE.236 ST.133 AVE. 9 LMP 52145 PARK LMP 52145P 1105 2 *PP159 32 2 LMP 50571* 7 29 12 3 1 2 21 17 5 13 9 PARK 2 33 37 LMP 50153 18 31 Rem A BCS 577 P 3007 1 33 5 3 24 18 26 23 4 A 6 8 31 P 40978 3 RP 15218 EPP 1248111 15 2 4 P 47603 18 19 18 EP 13725 Rem 1 7 14 24 25 26 L M P 5 2 3 3 7 7 39 25 13 17 27 EPP 1218921 3 17 8 EPP 32491 10 32 30 5 4 38 P 1105 P 40978 EPP 124 8 1 6 9 34 25 16 20 12 11 B C P 2 9 6 3 1 7 6 30 P 24142 4 PP X4138 10 3 P 3742235 26 22 15 16 15 16 27 28 29 P 2637 8 5 6 1 3 1 2 4 8 30 20 1 22 20 1 P 37422LMP 521452 LMP 47584* 4 Rem 3 1 2 *PP157 19 EPP 1248128 21 14 EPP 23139P 47603 P 2637 (EPS 2081) EPP 32491 EPP 12482 LMP 35465EPP 9002 EPP 12 4 8 2 LMP 35465EPP 12483BCP 52028 EPP 12484 EPP 53011EPP 23135EPP 9002 EPP 12484 EPP 53011EPP 12484RW 66892LMP 35468 EPP 32492 EPP 12 4 8 2 EPP 12482 LMP 52146EPP 53011 L M P 5 2 3 3 9 EPP 12484LMP 52146 BCP 29631 EPP 32492EPP 42087EPP 12 4 8 4 BCP 29630EPP 12483EPP 33955LMP 38113 132 AVE.132 AVE. ´ SCALE 1:2,500 MAPLE RIDGE ZONE AMENDINGBylaw No. Map No. From: To: RS-2 (One Family Suburban Residential) RS-3 (One Family Rural Residential)RM-1 (Townhouse Residential) 7211-20161658 Urban Area Boundary Urban Area Boundary APPENDIX C CITY OF MAPLE RIDGE BYLAW NO. 7454-2018 A bylaw to establish the five year financial plan for the years 2019 through 2023 ____________________________________________________________________________________ WHEREAS, the public will have the opportunity to provide comments or suggestions with respect to the financial plan; AND WHEREAS, Council deems this to be a process of public consultation under Section 166 of the Community Charter; NOW THEREFORE, the Council for the City of Maple Ridge enacts as follows: 1.This Bylaw may be cited as “Maple Ridge 2019-2023 Financial Plan Bylaw No. 7454-2018”. 2.Statement 1 attached to and forming part of this bylaw is hereby declared to be the Consolidated Financial Plan of the City of Maple Ridge for the years 2019 through 2023. 3.Statement 2 attached to and forming part of the bylaw is hereby declared to be the Revenue and Property Tax Policy Disclosure for the City of Maple Ridge. 4.Statement 3 attached to and forming part of the bylaw is hereby declared to be the Capital Expenditure Disclosure for the City of Maple Ridge. READ a first time the 10th day of July, 2018. READ a second time the 10th day of July, 2018. READ a third time the 10th day of July, 2018. PUBLIC CONSULTATION completed on the day of . ADOPTED the day of . ________________________________ PRESIDING MEMBER ________________________________ CORPORATE OFFICER ATTACHMENT: Statement 1, Statement 2 and Statement 3 1006 Attachment to Maple Ridge 2019-2023 Financial Plan Bylaw 7454-2018 Statement 1 Consolidated Financial Plan 2019-2023 (in $ thousands) 2019 2020 2021 2022 2023 REVENUES Developer Contributed Assets 20,000 20,000 20,000 20,000 20,000 Developer Cost Charges 6,727 7,901 5,999 2,977 1,304 Developer Specified Projects ----- Parkland Acquisition 200 200 200 200 200 Contribution from Others 1,296 1,369 1,321 1,298 1,305 Development Fees Total 28,223 29,470 27,520 24,475 22,809 Property Taxes 86,924 91,529 96,341 101,369 106,668 Parcel Charges 3,208 3,309 3,413 3,521 3,633 Fees & Charges 43,712 45,329 47,036 48,836 50,732 Interest 2,148 2,313 2,328 2,343 2,358 Grants 4,412 4,350 4,610 4,350 4,351 Property Sales 1,500 2,500 --- Total Revenues 170,127 178,800 181,248 184,894 190,551 EXPENDITURES Operating Expenditures Debt & Interest Payments 2,803 2,674 3,284 3,112 2,945 Amortization 19,780 19,780 19,780 19,780 19,780 Other Expenditures 112,029 115,909 120,050 124,079 127,936 Total Expenditures 134,612 138,363 143,114 146,971 150,661 ANNUAL SURPLUS 35,515 40,437 38,134 37,923 39,890 Add Back: Amortization Expense (Surplus)19,780 19,780 19,780 19,780 19,780 Less: Capital Expenditures 52,941 28,577 26,290 20,035 21,161 Less: Developer Contributed Capital 20,000 20,000 20,000 20,000 20,000 CHANGE IN FINANCIAL POSITION (17,646)11,640 11,624 17,668 18,509 OTHER REVENUES Add: Borrowing Proceeds 19,000 ---- OTHER EXPENDITURES Less: Principal Payments on Debt 3,786 3,870 4,972 5,095 5,224 TOTAL REVENUES LESS EXPENSES (2,432)7,770 6,652 12,573 13,285 INTERNAL TRANSFERS Transfer From Reserve Funds Capital Works Reserve 150 150 150 150 150 Equipment Replacement Reserve 2,334 1,395 1,963 2,183 1,815 Fire Department Capital Reserve ----- Land Reserve ----- Local Area Service Reserve ----- Sanitary Sewer Reserve ----- Total Transfer From Reserve Funds 2,484 1,545 2,113 2,333 1,965 Transfer (To) Reserve Funds Capital Works Reserve -2527 -3905 -2051 -3624 -3090 Equipment Replacement Reserve -3138 -3378 -3554 -3806 -3991 Fire Department Capital Reserve -915 -1052 -1195 -1342 -1495 Land Reserve -5 -5 -5 -5 -5 Local Area Service Reserve 0 0 0 0 0 Sanitary Sewer Reserve 0 0 0 0 0 Total Transfer To Reserve Funds (6,585)(8,340)(6,805)(8,777)(8,581) Transfer From (To) Own Reserves 4,148 (549)748 (651)(888) Transfer From (To) Surplus 2,385 (426)(2,708)(5,478)(5,781) Transfer From (To) Surplus & Own Reserves 6,533 (975)(1,960)(6,129)(6,669) TOTAL INTERNAL TRANSFERS 2,432 (7,770)(6,652)(12,573)(13,285) BALANCED BUDGET ----- Attachment to Maple Ridge 2019-2023 Financial Plan Bylaw 7454-2018 Statement 2 Revenue and Property Tax Policy Disclosure REVENUE DISCLOSURE OBJECTIVES & POLICIES Property Tax Revenue Property tax revenue is the City’s primary revenue source, and one which is heavily reliant on the residential class. Diversification of the tax base and generation of non-tax revenue are ongoing objectives, outlined in Financial Sustainability Policy 5.52 section 6. The Financial Plan includes property tax increases that are as listed below: 2019 2020 2021 2022 2023 General Purpose 1.90% 2.00% 2.00% 2.00% 2.00% Infrastructure Replacement 0.70% 0.70% 0.70% 0.90% 0.90% Parks & Recreation 0.60% 0.60% 0.60% 0.60% 0.60% Drainage 0.30% 0.30% 0.30% 0.10% 0.10% Total Property Tax Increase 3.50% 3.60% 3.60% 3.60% 3.60% Additional information on the tax increases and the cost drivers can be found in the most recent Financial Plan Overview Report. Specific policies discussing the tax increases are included in the Financial Sustainability Plan and related policies which were adopted in 2004. Property tax revenue includes property taxes as well as grants in lieu of property taxes. Parcel Charges Parcel charges are comprised of a recycling charge, a sewer charge and on some properties, a local area service or improvement charge. Parcel charges are a useful tool to charge all or a subset of properties for a fixed or variable amount to support services. Unlike property taxation the variable amount does not need to be related to property assessment value, but can be something that more accurately reflects the cost of the service. Revenue Proportions 2019 2020 2021 2022 2023 $ ('000s)%$ ('000s)%$ ('000s)%$ ('000s)%$ ('000s)% Revenues Property Taxes 86,924 46.0 91,529 51.2 96,341 53.2 101,369 54.8 106,668 56.0 Parcel Charges 3,208 1.7 3,309 1.9 3,413 1.9 3,521 1.9 3,633 1.9 Fees & Charges 43,712 23.1 45,329 25.4 47,036 26.0 48,836 26.4 50,732 26.6 Borrowing Proceeds 19,000 10.0 - - - - - - - - Other Sources 36,283 19.2 38,633 21.6 34,458 19.0 31,168 16.9 29,518 15.5 Total Revenues 189,127 100 178,800 100 181,248 100 184,894 100 190,551 100 Other Sources include: Development Fees Total 28,223 14.9 29,470 16.5 27,520 15.2 24,475 13.2 22,809 12.0 Interest 2,148 1.1 2,313 1.3 2,328 1.3 2,343 1.3 2,358 1.2 Grants (Other Govts)4,412 2.3 4,350 2.4 4,610 2.5 4,350 2.4 4,351 2.3 Property Sales 1,500 0.8 2,500 1.4 - - - - - - 36,283 19.2 38,633 21.6 34,458 19.0 31,168 16.9 29,518 15.5 Attachment to Maple Ridge 2019-2023 Financial Plan Bylaw 7454-2018 Statement 2 (cont.) Revenue and Property Tax Policy Disclosure Fees & Charges Fees should be reviewed annually and updated if needed. Recent fee amendments include recreation fees, development application fees, business license fees and cemetery fees. A major amendment to the Development Costs Charges (DCC) has been submitted to the province and is awaiting approval. The last major amendment was completed in 2008. Minor DCC amendments are done more frequently. Some fees are used to offset the costs of providing specific services. The utility fees are reviewed annually with a view towards using rate stabilization practices to smooth out large fluctuations in rates, as set out in the Business Planning Guidelines. Borrowing Proceeds Debt is used when it makes sense, and with caution as it commits future cash flows to debt payments, restricting the ability to use these funds to provide other services. The source of the debt payments needs to be considered as does the justification for advancing the project. More information on previously approved borrowing can be found in the most recent Financial Plan Overview report. Other Sources This will vary greatly year to year as it includes:  Development fees which fund capital projects from the DCC Reserve  Contribution from others in relation to capital  Grants which are sought from various agencies and may be leveraged with City funds PROPERTY TAX DISCLOSURE The 2019 property tax revenue and updated rates will be included in a Financial Plan Amending Bylaw that proceeds the Property Tax Rate Bylaw, as the 2019 property assessed values are not yet finalized. For information purposes the 2018 distribution is included. Property Tax Revenue Distribution Property Class Tax Rate (`000s)(`000s)($ per 1000) 1 Residential 63,001 78.5%21,027,290 92.7%2.9961 1.0 2 Utility 616 0.9%15,393 0.1%40.0000 13.4 4 Major Industry 628 0.8%26,537 0.1%23.6677 7.9 5 Light Industry 2,981 3.7%302,845 1.4%9.8429 3.3 6 Business, Other 12,860 16.0%1,306,484 5.8%9.8429 3.3 8 Rec., Non-Profit 50 0.1%4,018 0.0%12.5402 4.2 9 Farm 157 0.2%4,627 0.0%34.0106 11.4 Total 80,293 100.0%22,687,195 100.0% (Rate / Res. Rate) Taxation Revenue Assessed Value Multiple Attachment to Maple Ridge 2019-2023 Financial Plan Bylaw 7454-2018 Statement 2 (cont.) Revenue and Property Tax Policy Disclosure PROPERTY TAX DISCLOSURE Objectives & Policies Property taxes are the City’s largest source of revenue and are contained by efficient business practices. Annual business planning practices are the mechanism for resource allocation decisions. The City’s Financial Sustainability Policy section 6 discusses the necessity of diversifying the tax base. Development of employment-related properties is one method of diversification; therefore a key performance measurement in Strategic Economic Initiatives tracks the increased investment and development of non-residential properties. A policy in the Financial Sustainability Plan that calls for stable tax increases and the adoption of the annual increase early in the prior year in the Business Planning Guidelines provides citizens with a more stable and predictable set of cost increases. In some cases costs are phased in over multiple years to stay within the set tax increases. Property Tax Rates It is policy to adjust property tax rates annually to negate the impact of fluctuations in the market values of properties. Tax rates are reduced to negate the market increases. Property tax increases are then applied at the same relative increase for all classes, unless legislation restricts the rates, as with Class 2, Utility. The Business Class and Light Industry Class properties have the same tax rate and are treated as a composite class when setting the tax rates, as the types of businesses in each class are similar. In 2016, the increase was reduced from 3.15% to 1.85% to reduce the relative property tax burden for these properties. A review was done on the Major Industry Class rates and the recommendation from the Audit and Finance Committee and Council was a 5% property tax reduction in both 2009 and 2010 to support additional investments in the subject property and to keep rates competitive. In 2014 and 2015, property taxes charged to major industrial class properties were reduced by $70,000 in each year. In reviewing tax rates to ensure competitiveness, absolute rates, tax multiples and overall tax burden are considered. The impact that assessed values have when comparing to other geographical areas must be considered in a comparison of tax rates. Permissive Tax Exemptions Council has set policies around the use of permissive tax exemptions. These are Council Policies 5.19 through 5.24. These policies discuss Churches, Community Halls, Heritage Sites, Homes for the Care of Children and the Relief of the Aged, the Poor, the Disabled and the Infirm, Municipal Recreational Services, Private Hospitals and Daycares, Private School and Youth Recreation Groups. Revitalization Tax Exemption Program The Employment Land Investment Incentive Program is designed to encourage job creation by supporting private investment in buildings and infrastructure on identified "employment lands". More information on this tax exemption can be found on our website. Attachment to Maple Ridge 2019-2023 Financial Plan Bylaw 7454-2018 Statement 3 Capital Expenditure Disclosure The sole purpose of this statement is to meet legislative requirements and highlight the value of the DCC program; no other conclusions should be drawn from the figures as the information could be misconstrued. This disclosure is required under the Local Government Act s. 560 (2); capital costs attributable to projects to be partially funded by Development Cost Charges (DCC) must be included in the financial plan. The DCC program includes projects as far out as 2038 so the capital expenditures must be extended to match. Certain types of projects are not planned past the five year time horizon of the financial plan. Much less scrutiny is given to projects that are planned in years 2024 through 2038. Projects in these years typically exceed likely funding available. Capital Works Program for 2024 – 2038 (in $ thousands) Capital Works Program 350,802 Source of Funding Development Fees Development Cost Charges 158,922 Parkland Acquisition Reserve - Contribution from Others 3,224 162,146 Borrowing Proceeds - Grants 39,512 Transfer from Reserve Funds 19,175 Revenue Funds 129,969 188,656 350,802 Page 1 of 2 City of Maple Ridge Maple Ridge Business Licencing and Regulation Amending No. 7471-2018 A bylaw to amend Maple Ridge Business Licencing and Regulation Bylaw No. 6815-2011 WHEREAS the Council of The City of Maple Ridge deems it expedient to amend Maple Ridge Business Licencing and Regulation Bylaw No. 6815-2011; NOW THEREFORE, the Council of the City of Maple Ridge enacts as follows: 1.This bylaw may be cited as Maple Ridge Business Licencing and Regulation Amending No. 7471-2018. 2.Maple Ridge Business Licencing and Regulation Bylaw No. 6815-2011 is amended in Part 5 Definitions by replacing the definition of “Temporary” with the following definition “Temporary” means sixty (60) consecutive days in a twelve (12) month period. 3.Maple Ridge Business Licencing and Regulation Bylaw No. 6815-2011 is amended by replacing subsection 6.3.2 with the following 6.3.2 Nothwithstanding section 6.3.1, the Licence fee prescribed in Schedule A may be reduced for a Business which a Licence is issued after the 30th day of September in any calendar year. 4.Maple Ridge Business Licencing and Regulation Bylaw No. 6815-2011 is amended in Schedule A, section 32.Personal Services by changing Category a. Beauty Salon/Barber to read Barber/Hair Salon. 5.Maple Ridge Business Licencing and Regulation Bylaw No. 6815-2011 is amended in Schedule A, section 32.Personal Services by deleting Category b. Body Painting; Category d.Esthetics/Manicure and Category d. Funeral/Crematory/Undertaker and re-lettering all subsequent categories accordingly. 6.Maple Ridge Business Licencing and Regulation Bylaw No. 6815-2011 is amended in Schedule A, section 34.Professional Services by changing Category c. Barrister/Solicitor to read Barrister/Lawyer/Solicitor and changing the wording under the heading Licence Fee from $110.00 per Barrister/Solicitor to read $110.00 per Barrister/Lawyer/Solicitor. 7.Maple Ridge Business Licencing and Regulation Bylaw No. 6815-2011 is amended in Schedule A, section 34.Professional Services by adding a new Category e. Dental Hygienist and adding the wording under the heading Licence Fee $110.00 per Dental Hygienist. 8.Maple Ridge Business Licencing and Regulation Bylaw No. 6815-2011 is amended in Schedule A, section 34.Professional Services by adding a new Category i. Funeral/Crematory/Undertaker and adding the wording under the heading Licence Fee $110.00 per Undertaker. 1007 9. Maple Ridge Business Licencing and Regulation Bylaw No. 6815-2011 is amended in Schedule A, section 34.Professional Services by adding a new Category n. Optician and adding the wording under the heading Licence Fee $110.00 per Optician. 10. Maple Ridge Business Licencing and Regulation Bylaw No. 6815-2011 is amended in Schedule A, section 34.Professional Services by adding a new Category u. Registered Nurse and adding the wording under the heading Licence Fee $110.00 per Registered Nurse. 11. Maple Ridge Business Licencing and Regulation Bylaw No. 6815-2011 is amended in Schedule A, section 34.Professional Services by adding a new Category v. Speech & Hearing Health and adding the wording under the heading Licence Fee $110.00 per Speech & Hearing Health Professional. 12. Maple Ridge Business Licencing and Regulation Bylaw No. 6815-2011 is amended in Schedule A, section 43.Second Hand Dealer by adding a new Category h. Jewellery/Watches and re-lettering all subsequent categories accordingly. 13. Maple Ridge Business Licencing and Regulation Bylaw No. 6815-2011 is amended by updating the table of contents to reflect the current page numbers. READ A FIRST TIME this 10th day of July, 2018. READ A SECOND TIME this 10th day of July, 2018. READ A THIRD TIME this 10th day of July, 2018. ADOPTED this ____ day of ______________, 2018. PRESIDING MEMBER CORPORATE OFFICER Page 1 of 6 City of Maple Ridge Maple Ridge Ticket Information Utilization Amending Bylaw No.7480-2018 A bylaw to amend Maple Ridge Ticket Information Utilization Bylaw No. 6929-2012 WHEREAS the Council of The City of Maple Ridge deems it expedient to amend the Maple Ridge Ticket Information Utilization Bylaw No. 6929-2012 NOW THEREFORE, the Council of the City of Maple Ridge enacts as follows: 1.This bylaw may be cited as Maple Ridge Ticket Information Utilization Amending Bylaw No. 7480-2018. 2.Maple Ridge Ticket Information Utilization Bylaw No. 6929-2012 is amended by deleting the Schedules list in its entirety and replacing it with the following: Schedules Schedule 1 Designated Bylaw Compliance Officer Schedule 2 Animal Control and Licencing Bylaw Schedule 3 Building Bylaw Schedule 4 Business Licencing and Regulation Bylaw Schedule 5 Cat Spay/Neuter Bylaw Schedule 6 Drinking Water Conservation Plan Bylaw Schedule 7 Fire Prevention Bylaw Schedule 8 Fireworks Bylaw Schedule 9 Grow Operation, Health, Nuisance and Safety Bylaw Schedule 10 Highway & Traffic Bylaw Schedule 11 Kennel Regulation Bylaw Schedule 12 Littering Prohibition Bylaw Schedule 13 Noise Control Bylaw Schedule 14 Outdoor Burning Regulation Bylaw Schedule 15 Parks and Recreation Facilities Regulation Bylaw Schedule 16 Pesticide Use Control Bylaw Schedule 17 Rental Premises Standards of Maintenance Bylaw Schedule 18 Scrap Metal Dealer Regulation Bylaw Schedule 19 Sign Bylaw Schedule 20 Smoking Regulation Bylaw Schedule 21 Soil Deposit Regulation Bylaw Schedule 22 Soil Removal Bylaw Schedule 23 Solid Waste and Recycling Regulation Bylaw Schedule 24 Taxi Regulation Bylaw Schedule 25 Tree Management Bylaw Schedule 26 Untidy and Unsightly Premises Bylaw Schedule 27 Watercourse Protection Bylaw Schedule 28 Wildlife and Vector Control Bylaw Schedule 29 Zoning Bylaw 1008 Page 2 of 6 3. Maple Ridge Ticket Information Utilization Bylaw No. 6929-2012 is amended by deleting Schedule 1 in its entirety and replacing it with the following; Schedule 1 Maple Ridge Ticket Information Utilization Bylaw No. 6929-2012 Designated Bylaw Compliance Officer Designated Bylaws Designated Bylaw Compliance Officer Animal Control and Licencing Bylaw No. 6908-2012 Animal Control Officer Bylaw Compliance Officer Fire Department Officer Manager of Bylaw & Licencing Services R.C.M.P. Building Bylaw No. 6925-2012 Building Inspector Bylaw Compliance Officer Chief Building Official Electrical Inspector Electrical Inspector/Safety Officer Fire Department Officer Gas/Plumbing Inspector Manager of Bylaw & Licencing Services Trades Inspector Business Licencing and Regulation Bylaw No. 6815-2011 Bylaw Compliance Officer Fire Department Officer Manager of Bylaw & Licencing Services R.C.M.P. Cat Spay/Neuter Bylaw No. 5756-1999 Animal Control Officer Bylaw Compliance Officer Manager of Bylaw & Licencing Services Drinking Water Conservation Plan Bylaw No. 7425-2018 Bylaw Compliance Officer Fire Chief Fire Department Officer Manager of Bylaw & Licencing Services R.C.M.P. Waterworks Foreman Works Inspector Waterworks Superintendent Fire Prevention Bylaw No. 4111-1988 Bylaw Compliance Officer Fire Department Officer Manager of Bylaw & Licencing Services R.C.M.P. Page 3 of 6 Fireworks Bylaw No. 6279-2004 Bylaw Compliance Officer R.C.M.P. Fire Department Officer Manager of Bylaw & Licencing Services Grow Operation, Health Nuisance and Safety Bylaw No. 6274-2004 Building Inspector Bylaw Compliance Officer Electrical Inspector Electrical Inspector/Safety Officer Fire Department Officer Gas/Plumbing Inspector Manager of Bylaw & Licencing Services R.C.M.P. Trades Inspector Highway & Traffic Bylaw No. 6704-2009 Bylaw Compliance Officer Fire Department Officer Manager of Bylaw & Licencing Services Municipal Engineer Parking Officer R.C.M.P. Kennel Regulation Bylaw No. 6036-2002 Animal Control Officer Bylaw Compliance Officer Chief Building Official Fire Department Officer Manager of Bylaw & Licencing Services Littering Prohibition Bylaw No. 5115-1994 Bylaw Compliance Officer Fire Department Officer Manager of Bylaw & Licencing Services R.C.M.P. Noise Control Bylaw No. 5122-1994 Bylaw Compliance Officer Fire Department Officer Manager of Bylaw & Licencing Services R.C.M.P. Outdoor Burning Regulation Bylaw No. 5535-1997 Bylaw Compliance Officer Fire Department Officer Manager of Bylaw & Licencing Services R.C.M.P. Parks and Recreation Facilities Regulation Bylaw No. 7085-2014 Bylaw Compliance Officer Director Parks and Facilities Fire Department Officer Manager of Bylaw & Licencing Services Manager Parks/Open Spaces Parks Foreman R.C.M.P. Page 4 of 6 Pesticide Use Control Bylaw No. 6413-2006 Bylaw Compliance Officer Director, Parks and Facilities Environmental Planner Environmental Technician Fire Department Officer Manager of Bylaw & Licencing Services Manager, Parks and Open Space Parks Operations Supervisor(s) Trades II Gardener Rental Premises Standards of Maintenance Bylaw No. 6550-2008 Building Inspector Bylaw Compliance Officer Chief Building Official Fire Department Officer Manager of Bylaw & Licencing Services Safety Officer Trades Inspector Scrap Metal Dealer Regulation Bylaw No. 6772-2010 Bylaw Compliance Officer Chief Building Official Fire Department Officer Manager of Bylaw & Licencing Services R.C.M.P. Sign Bylaw No. 4653-1992 Building Inspector Bylaw Compliance Officer Chief Building Official Electrical Inspector Electrical Inspector/Safety Officer Fire Department Officer Gas/Plumbing Inspector Manager of Bylaw & Licencing Services Trades Inspector Smoking Regulation Bylaw No. 5495-1997 Bylaw Compliance Officer Fire Department Officer Manager of Bylaw & Licencing Services R.C.M.P. Soil Deposit Regulation Bylaw No. 7412-2017 Bylaw Compliance Officer Environmental Planner Environmental Technician Fire Department Officer Manager of Development & Environmental Services Manager of Bylaw & Licencing Services Soil Removal Bylaw No. 6398-2006 Bylaw Compliance Officer Environmental Planner Environmental Technician Manager of Development & Environmental Services Page 5 of 6 Manager of Bylaw & Licencing Services Solid Waste and Recycling Regulation Bylaw No. 6800-2011 Bylaw Compliance Officer Manager of Bylaw & Licencing Services Taxi Regulation Bylaw No. 6409-2006 Bylaw Compliance Officer Fire Department Officer Manager of Bylaw & Licencing Services R.C.M.P. Tree Management Bylaw No. 7133-2015 Bylaw Compliance Officer Environmental Planner Environmental Technician Fire Department Officer Manager of Bylaw & Licencing Services Manager of Development & Environmental Services Manager of Parks and Open Space Untidy and Unsightly Premises Bylaw No. 6533-2007 Bylaw Compliance Officer Fire Department Officer Manager of Bylaw & Licencing Services R.C.M.P. Watercourse Protection Bylaw No. 6410-2006 Building Inspector Bylaw Compliance Officer Chief Building Official Environmental Planner Environmental Technician Fire Department Officer Manager of Bylaw & Licencing Services Manager of Development & Environmental Services Municipal Engineer Wildlife and Vector Control Bylaw No. 7437 - 2018 Bylaw Compliance Officer Environmental Planner Environmental Technician Manager of Bylaw & Licencing Services R.C.M.P. Zoning Bylaw No. 3510-1985 Bylaw Compliance Officer Chief Building Official Fire Department Officer Manager of Bylaw & Licencing Services Parking Officer R.C.M.P. Page 6 of 6 4. Maple Ridge Ticket Information Utilization Bylaw No. 6929-2012 is amended by changing Schedule 28 (From Maple Ridge Drinking Water Conservation Plan Bylaw) to read Schedule 6 and placing it in numerical order. 5. Maple Ridge Ticket Information Utilization Bylaw No. 6929-2012 is amended by deleting Schedule 13 (From Maple Ridge Noxious Weed & Other Growth Control Bylaw No. 2384 - 1976) in its entirety and re-numbering the remaining Schedules in numerical order. 6. Maple Ridge Ticket Information Utilization Bylaw No. 6929-2012 is amended by updating the table of contents accordingly. READ A FIRST TIME the 10th day of July, 2018. READ A SECOND TIME the 10th day of July, 2018. READ A THIRD TIME the 10th day of July, 2018. ADOPTED the ____ day of ______________, 2018. PRESIDING MEMBER CORPORATE OFFICER 1100 Reports and Recommendations 1100 1 City of Maple Ridge TO: Her Worship Mayor Nicole Read MEETING DATE: July 24, 2018 and Members of Council FILE NO: 2017-233-RZ FROM: Chief Administrative Officer MEETING: Council SUBJECT: Second Reading Official Community Plan Amending Bylaw No. 7349-2017; Second Reading Zone Amending Bylaw No. 7312-2017; Second Reading Off Street Parking and Loading Amending Bylaw 7350-2017; Triplex, Fourplex and Courtyard Housing EXECUTIVE SUMMARY: On June 13, 2017, Council gave first reading to Official Community Plan Amending Bylaw No. 7349- 2017, Zone Amending Bylaw No. 7312-2017, and Off Street Parking and Loading Amending Bylaw No. 7350-2017 to create a new RT-2 (Ground-Oriented Residential Infill) zone to implement the triplex, fourplex and courtyard housing forms. Since that time, Council has also given first reading to in-stream triplex, fourplex, and courtyard rezoning applications on specific sites in the city, which are dependent on the adoption of the RT-2 triplex, fourplex and courtyard zone. Over the past year, staff have been refining the requirements of the RT-2 zone by working with the developers of the three in-stream rezoning applications cited above, as well as other developers interested in this new housing form. As a result of this work, changes have been proposed to Zone Amending Bylaw No. 7312-2017 to promote neighbourhood compatibility and integration. No changes are necessary to the OCP or Off Street Parking and Loading Bylaw Amendments as proposed at first reading. In order to continue the implementation of these new housing forms, and permit in-stream applications to proceed through their rezoning processes, OCP Bylaw No. 7349-2017, Zone Amending Bylaw No. 7312-2017, and Off Street Parking and Loading Amending Bylaw No. 7350- 2017 are being forwarded to Council for consideration for second reading and referral to Public Hearing. It is important to note that without these amending bylaws, the three in-stream applications would not be able to proceed. RECOMMENDATION: 1.That, in accordance with Section 475 of the Local Government Act, opportunity for early and on-going consultation has been provided by way of posting Official Community Plan Amending Bylaw No. 7349-2017 on the municipal website, and Council considers it unnecessary to provide any further consultation opportunities, except by way of holding a Public Hearing on the bylaw; 2.That Official Community Plan Amending Bylaw No. 7349-2017 be considered in conjunction with the Capital Expenditure Plan and Waste Management Plan; 1101 2 3. That it be confirmed that Official Community Plan Amending Bylaw No. 7349 -2017 is consistent with the Capital Expenditure Plan and Waste Management Plan; 4. That OCP Amending Bylaw No. 7349-2017 be given second reading and forwarded to Public Hearing; and 5. That Zone Amending Bylaw No.7312-2017 be second reading and forwarded to Public Hearing; and 6. That Off Street Parking and Loading Amending Bylaw No. 7350-2017 be given second reading and forwarded to Public Hearing. BACKGROUND: The Housing Action Plan (HAP), endorsed in 2014, and its Implementation Framework endorsed by Council in September, 2015, includes a number of goals and principles aimed at providing safe, affordable and appropriate housing for the community. Specific goals in support of encouraging ground-oriented residential infill housing include: “To improve housing choice for all current and future households”. Strategy #1 of the HAP articulates the importance of a diverse housing mix and innovation and supports the development of a mix of housing forms. In April 2016, Council received a report outlining possible policy and zoning next steps to help implement triplex, fourplex and courtyard residential forms of development and directed that staff prepare OCP and Zoning Bylaw amendments to create the zone. On June 13, 2017, Council received a staff report presenting policy and zoning amendments to the OCP, Zoning Bylaw, and Off Street Parking and Loading Bylaw to create a new RT-2 (Ground-Oriented Residential Infill) zone for triplex, fourplex and courtyard residential forms. The proposed amendments provide for the infill of ground-oriented residential buildings within established residential neighbourhoods and along major corridors, in a form that will be incremental and sensitive to the existing and emerging context. Based on this information, Council gave first reading to OCP Amending Bylaw No. 7349-2017 (see Appendix A), Zone Amending Bylaw No. 7312-2017 (see Appendix B), and Off Street Parking and Loading Amending Bylaw No. 7350-2017 (See Appendix C) on June 13, 2017 to create the new RT-2 zone. At the same meeting, Council gave first reading to a rezoning application to support a proposed courtyard residential project (2017-031-RZ) at 21333 River Road. On July 11, 2017, Council gave first reading to a rezoning for 22032 119 Avenue to support a triplex (2017-221-RZ). On January 30, 2018, Council gave first reading to a rezoning for 11384 207 Street to support a fourplex (2017- 471-RZ). Over the past year, staff have been refining the requirements of the RT -2 zone by working with the developers of the three in-stream rezoning applications cited above, as well as other developers interested in this new housing form. As a result of this work, changes have been proposed to the draft RT-2 Zone Amending Bylaw No.7312-2017 in order to promote neighbourhood compatibility and integration. No changes are proposed to the OCP or Off Street Parking and Loading Bylaw Amendments that were granted first reading. This report presents the amendments to Zone Amending Bylaw No. 7312-2017. It also recommends that the OCP, Zoning, and Off Street Parking Bylaw amendments to create the RT -2 zone be considered for second reading and referred to Public Hearing. Note that the in-stream applications for the courtyard and triplex are also being forwarded to Council for consideration of second reading under separate staff reports. 3 DISCUSSION: To promote the incremental and sensitive integration of new RT-2 (Ground-Oriented Residential Infill) projects into existing neighbourhoods, it was intended that these new housing forms be similar in scale and massing to a detached single-family dwelling, and not replicate townhouse or rowhouse housing form. Dwelling units may be in one building with shared party walls to create triplexes or fourplexes. In the case of courtyard residential development, d welling units may be arranged individually or attached in groups of buildings that still resemble single family dwellings, but clustered around a shared open space in a village-style residential pattern. In all cases, units should take advantage of site context to create uniqueness, orient entrances towards the street where possible, and utilize landscaping and screening to create private or semi-private yard spaces. Planning Analysis: Since Council last reviewed the RT-2 zone, and based on experiences working with the applicants of the instream applications, changes have been proposed to the setback and height requirements of the proposed RT-2 zone to promote greater compatibility of ground-oriented residential infill projects with their surrounding neighbourhoods. It was found that the in-stream triplex, fourplex and courtyard developments, being the first of their kind on a street, were being situated in neighbourhoods with older, generally single storey, single family homes. Furthermore, many of these existing single family homes were not built to the maximum height or lot coverage allowed by the existing Zoning Bylaw. This contrasted with residential infill projects which often propose somewhat larger buildings and footprints. In consideration of these issues, staff worked with applicants to find a balance between neighbourhood character and the developers’ desired floor areas, building footprint, height, massing and design, in order to facilitate the integration of these forms sensitively within existing areas. This work has resulted in minor changes to the proposed height and setback requirements of the proposed RT-2 zone. They are:  Height of principal building or structure reduced from 11.0 m to 9.5 m, for the peak of the roof;  Interior side yard setbacks increased from 1.5 m to 2.25 m. Up to 40% of the side of the building facing the interior side lot line may be sited at 1.5 m to reveal or highlight a side entrance to a dwelling unit, or to create building articulation to break up massing and enhance for visual interest;  Front yard setback for the fourplex and courtyard housing forms decreased from 7.5 m to 6.0 m for properties in the Urban Area Boundary. The following table summarizes the relevant zoning requirements, including proposed changes in BOLD, of the RT-2 zone. The text of the proposed zone amending bylaw is contained in Appendix B. 4 Table 1: Summary of RT-2 Zone Requirements – Town Centre and within the Urban Area Boundary with Revisions in Bold Min.Lot Size Setbacks Lot Width Lot Depth Front Rear Ext. Side Int. Side Triplex Town Centre 700 m2 5.5 m 7.5 m 4.5 m 2.25 m, with reduction to 1.5 m for 40% max of the building wall facing int. side line 20 m 27 m Urban Area Boundary 800 m2 7.5 m Fourplex Town Centre 800 m2 5.5 m 7.5 m 4.5 m 2.25 m, with reduction to 1.5 m for 40% max of the building wall facing int. side line 22 m 30 m Urban Area Boundary 850 m2 6.0 m Courtyard Town Centre 900 m2 5.5 m 7.5 m 4.5 m 2.25 m, with reduction to 1.5 m for 40% max of the building wall facing int. side line 25 m 35 m Urban Area Boundary 950 m2 6.0 m Common to triplex, fourplex and courtyard Lot Coverage 45 % Floor Space Ratio 0.75 Max. Height, Principal Building 9.5 m Parking: Each triplex, fourplex, and courtyard housing development will require two off street parking spaces per unit. This requirement has not changed since first reading of the Off Street Parking and Loading Bylaw Amendment 7350-2017 (See Appendix D). Secondary Suites: Secondary suites are not permitted under the new RT-2 zone. A Section 219 Restrictive Covenant will be required as a condition of rezoning for RT-2 projects to prohibit secondary suites, a practice that the City already applies to duplex rezoning applications. Development Permits: It is intended that the new triplex, fourplex and courtyard housing forms be reviewed with the aid of a form and character development permit. However, tailored development permit guidelines are still under development for these new housing forms, and in-stream applications have used the existing Multi-Family Development Permit guidelines. The design philosophy and intent of these new housing forms have been discussed with the City’s Advisory Design Panel (ADP) in order to advance current in-stream applications, as well as to obtain their feedback for the eventual design specific guidelines. 5 At this time, the courtyard and triplex applications have been reviewed by ADP, and the feedback and comments are reported in each application’s respective and separate staff reports. CONCLUSION: The introduction of a new ground-oriented residential infill zone aligns with the goals, principles and strategies in the HAP, as it will encourage diverse housing forms within the City. Since first reading of the OCP, Zone, and Off Street Parking and Loading Amending Bylaws to create the RT-2 zone, staff have worked with developers to refine the zoning requirements to facilitate the integration of these new housing forms sensitively into existing neighbourhoods. To this end, minor changes have been proposed to the RT-2 Zone Amending Bylaw in terms of building height and setbacks, while the content and details of the OCP and Off Street Parking and Loading Amending Bylaws remain unchanged since first reading. Therefore, it is recommended that Council give consideration for second reading and referral to Public Hearing of OCP Amending Bylaw No. 7349-2017, Zone Amending Bylaw No. 7312-2017, and Off Street Parking and Loading Amending Bylaw No. 7350-2017 to advance the new RT-2 (Ground- Oriented Residential Infill) zone and support current in-stream applications. Should second reading not be granted to these amending bylaws, the three in-stream applications would not be able to proceed. “Original signed by Chee Chan” _______________________________________________ Prepared by: Chee F. Chan, MCIP, RPP, BSc Planner 1 “Original signed by Christine Carter” _______________________________________________ Approved by: Christine Carter, M.PL, MCIP, RPP Director of Planning “Original signed by Frank Quinn” _______________________________________________ Approved by: Frank Quinn, MBA, P. Eng GM: Public Works & Development Services “Original signed by Paul Gill” _______________________________________________ Concurrence: Paul Gill, CPA, CGA Chief Administrative Officer The following appendices are attached hereto: Appendix A – OCP Amending Bylaw No. 7349-2017 Appendix B – Zone Amending Bylaw No. 7312-2017 Appendix C – Off Street Parking and Loading Amending Bylaw No. 7350-2017 CITY OF MAPLE RIDGE BYLAW NO. 7349-2017 A Bylaw to amend the Official Community Plan Bylaw No. 7060-2014 ___________________________________________________________________________________ WHEREAS Section 477 of the Local Government Act provides that the Council may revise the Official Community Plan; AND WHEREAS it is deemed expedient to amend Schedule "A" to the Official Community Plan; NOW THEREFORE, the Municipal Council of the City of Maple Ridge, enacts as follows: 1.This Bylaw may be cited for all purposes as "Maple Ridge Official Community Plan Amending Bylaw No OCP 7349-2017. 2.That Chapter 3 Neighbourhoods & Housing, Section 3.1.3 Residential Designations be amended by repealing policy 3-18(2)(b) and replacing it with the following: 3-18(2)(b) includes ground oriented housing forms such as single detached dwellings, garden suites, duplexes, triplexes, fourplexes, courtyard residential developments, townhouses, apartments, or small lot intensive residential, subject to compliance with Major Corridor Residential Infill policies. 3.That Chapter 3 Neighbourhoods & Housing, Section 3.1.4 Residential Infill and Compatibility Criteria be amended by repealing policy 3-20(a) and replacing them with the following: 3-20(a) building forms such as single detached dwellings, duplexes, triplexes, fourplexes, courtyard residential developments, townhouses, apartments, and small lot intensive residential developments subject to Policy 3-21; 4.That Chapter 10.3 Silver Valley Area Plan, Sections 5.4 Eco-Clusters and 7.0 Design Guidelines be amended by repealing policies 5.4.4(c) and 7.4(h) and replacing them with the following: 5.4.4(c) As a means of providing a diversity of housing types, consider integrating duplex, triplex, and fourplex developments that have the appearance of a single larger residence into the Eco-Clusters. 7.4(h) To blend into a streetscape/cluster of typical larger single family residences, consider designing duplex, triplex and fourplex developments to have the appearance of one larger residence. 5.That Chapter 10.4 Town Centre Area Plan, Section 3.3 Land Use Designations be amended by adding to the paragraph located under the Single-Family Residential designation the following words identified in bold text: The Single-Family Residential designation in the Town Centre provides options for increasing density and choice of housing form, while retaining the single family character in these established neighbourhood blocks. Single-family dwellings, duplex, and triplex are the forms of development permitted in the in the Single Family Designation. APPENDIX A 6.That Chapter 10.4 Town Centre Area Plan, Section 3.3 Land Use Designations be amended by adding to the paragraph located under the Ground-Oriented Multi-Family designation the following words identified in bold text: The Ground-Oriented Multi-Family use is intended to provide housing options that range from a low density attached form to a medium-high density attached form of ground-oriented housing that will generally be a maximum of three (3) storeys in height with ground level access to each unit. The development forms include fourplex, courtyard residential, townhouse, rowhouse, and stacked townhouse. 7.That Chapter 10.4 Town Centre Area Plan be amended by repealing policies 3-17(e) and 3.18 and replacing them with the following: 3-17(e) Duplex and triplex developments will be permitted on a corner lot or a lot with lane access to concealed parking. The minimum lot size for duplex development is 557m2 and the minimum lot size for triplex development is 700 m2. The character of duplex and triplex developments should be similar to a single-family development in its size, scale, and massing. 3-18 Ground-Oriented Multi-Family development should be a maximum of three (3) storeys in height, with ground level entry to each unit, except for the stacked townhouse form (see Policy 3-21). Fourplex developments should also ensure that dwelling units are contained in an individual building resembling a single- family dwelling in its size, scale, and massing. A courtyard residential development may have its dwelling units arranged individually or attached in small groupings of buildings, each resembling a single-family dwelling and located around a common courtyard open space. 8.That Chapter 10.4 Town Centre Area Plan, Appendix A Zoning Matrix, Section 2 be amended by inserting the following after “RT-1 Two Family Urban Residential” under the column heading “Zone” that corresponds to the “Single-Family Residential” designation under the column heading “OCP Designation / Category”: RT-2 Ground-Oriented Residential Infill (limited to triplex residential uses only) 9.That Chapter 10.4 Town Centre Area Plan, Appendix A Zoning Matrix, Section 2 be amended by inserting the following before “RM-1 Townhouse Residential” under the column heading “Zone” that corresponds to the “Ground-Oriented Multi-Family” designation under the column heading “OCP Designation / Category”: RT-2 Ground-Oriented Residential Infill (limited to fourplex and courtyard residential uses only) 10.That Chapter 10.5 Hammond Area Plan, Appendix A Zoning Matrix, Section 2 be amended by inserting the following after “RT-1 Two Family Urban Residential” under the column heading “Zone” that corresponds to the “Single-Family & Compact Residential” designation under the column heading “OCP Designation / Category”: RT-2 Ground-Oriented Residential Infill (limited to triplex residential uses only) 11.That Chapter 10.5 Hammond Area Plan, Appendix A Zoning Matrix, Section 2 be amended by inserting the following before “RM-1 Townhouse Residential” under the column heading “Zone” that corresponds to the “Low Density Multi-Family” designation under the column heading “OCP Designation / Category”: RT-2 Ground-Oriented Residential Infill (limited to fourplex and courtyard residential uses only) 12.That Appendix A Glossary be amended by inserting the following between “Council” and “Density”: Courtyard Residential A residential use where a group of four to eight dwelling units may be separately detached or combined within two or more buildings and arranged around a shared open space. 13.That Appendix A Glossary be amended by deleting “Apartment”, “Fourplex”, “Townhouse” and “Triplex” and replacing them with the following, in alphabetical order: Apartment A residential use where the building or buildings on a lot are each used for three or more dwelling units. Apartment building(s) may contain Townhouse dwelling units, but shall not include Triplex, Fourplex, or Courtyard Residential dwelling units. Fourplex A residential use where the building on a lot is used for four dwelling units. Townhouse A single building comprised of three or more dwelling units separated one from another by party walls extending from foundation to roof, with each dwelling unit having a separate, direct entrance from grade. Triplex, Fourplex, or Courtyard Residential dwelling units are excluded. Triplex A residential use where the building on a lot is used for three dwelling units. 14.That Appendix C Zoning Matrix be amended by inserting the following between “RT-1 Two Family Urban Residential” and “SRS Special Urban Residential” under the column heading “Zone” that corresponds to the “Urban Residential Designation/Neighbourhood Residential – Infill” under the column heading “OCP Designation / Category”: RT-2 Ground-Oriented Residential Infill (limited to triplex residential uses only) 15.That Appendix C Zoning Matrix be amended by inserting the following between “RT-1 Two Family Urban Residential” and “RM-1 Townhouse Residential” under the column heading “Zone” that corresponds to the “Major Corridor Residential Category” under the column heading “OCP Designation / Category”: RT-2 Ground-Oriented Residential Infill 16.Maple Ridge Official Community Plan Bylaw No.7060-2014 is hereby amended accordingly. READ a first time the 13th day of June, 2017. READ a second time the day of , 20 . PUBLIC HEARING held the day of , 20 . READ a third time the day of , 20 . ADOPTED the day of , 20 . _____________________________________ _____________________________ PRESIDING MEMBER CORPORATE OFFICER CITY OF MAPLE RIDGE BYLAW NO. 7312-2017 A Bylaw to amend the text of Maple Ridge Zoning Bylaw No. 3510-1985 as amended ____________________________________________________________________________________ WHEREAS, it is deemed desirable to create a new ground-oriented infill zone called “RT-2 Ground- Oriented Residential Infill”; and WHEREAS, it is deemed expedient to amend the Maple Ridge Zoning Bylaw No. 3510-1985 as amended: NOW THEREFORE, the Municipal Council of the City of Maple Ridge, enacts as follows: 1.This Bylaw may be cited as “Maple Ridge Zone Amending Bylaw No. 7312-2017”. 2.That PART 2 INTERPRETATION the definition of “APARTMENT” is amended by deleting the “.” at the end of the definition and adding the words identified in bold text: APARTMENT use means a residential use where the building or buildings on a lot are each used for three or more dwelling units. Apartment building(s) may contain Townhouse dwelling units, but shall not include Triplex, Fourplex, or Courtyard Residential dwelling units. 3.That PART 2 INTERPRETATION is amended by inserting the following between “Correctional and Rehabilitation” and “Datum Determination Points”: COURTYARD RESIDENTIAL means a residential use where a group of dwelling units not exceeding eight may be separately detached or joined within two or more buildings and arranged around a shared open space. 4.That PART 2 INTERPRETATION is amended by inserting the following between “Food Primary” and “Front Lot Line”: FOURPLEX means a residential use where one building contains only four dwelling units. 5.That PART 2 INTERPRETATION is amended by inserting the following between “Townhouse(s)” and “Two-Family Residential”: TRIPLEX means a residential use where one building contains only three dwelling units. 6.That PART 2 INTERPRETATION the definition of “Townhouse(s)” is amended by adding the words identified in bold text: TOWNHOUSE(S) – means a single building comprised of three or more dwelling units separated one from another by party walls extending from foundation to roof, with each dwelling unit having a separate, direct entrance from grade. Triplex, Fourplex, or Courtyard APPENDIX B Residential dwelling units are excluded. 7.That PART 3 BASIC PROVISIONS, SECTION 302 ZONES (1) is amended by inserting the following between “RT-1 Two Family Urban Residential” and “RM-1 Townhouse Residential”: RT-2 Ground-Oriented Residential Infill 8.That PART 6 RESIDENTIAL ZONES is amended by inserting the following after Section 601E “RST-SV Street Townhouse – Silver Valley”: 601F RT-2 Ground-Oriented Residential Infill A. PURPOSE This zone provides for the infill of ground-oriented residential buildings established in a form similar to surrounding single-detached residential uses. In all forms, Ground-Oriented Residential Infill should emphasize pedestrian connections and open space, while accommodating vehicle access from a street or lane where possible. B. PRINCIPAL USES 1.The following principal use and no other shall be permitted in this zone: (a) Triplex residential use; (b) Fourplex residential use; (c) Courtyard residential use. C. ACCESSORY USES 1.The following uses shall be permitted as accessory uses to one of the permitted principal uses in this zone: (a) Boarding use; (b) Home occupation use. D. ACCESSORY USES 1.Minimum net lot area and dimensions for a triplex residential use: (a) In net lot area 800 square metres; (b) In lot width 20.0 metres; (c) In depth 27.0 metres. 2.Minimum net lot area and dimensions for a fourplex residential use: (a) In net lot area 850 square metres; (b) In lot width 22.0 metres; (c) In depth 30.0 metres. 3.Minimum net lot area and dimensions for a courtyard residential use: (a) In net lot area 950 square metres; (b) In lot width 25.0 metres; (c) In depth 35.0 metres. 4.Minimum net lot area on a lot located within the Town Centre, as identified on Schedule H of the Zoning Bylaw, for the following permitted uses are: (a) Triplex residential use in net lot area 700 square metres; (b) Fourplex residential use in net lot area 800 square metres; (c) Courtyard residential use in net lot area 900 square metres. E. DENSITY 1.No building or structures containing floor area enclosed within the building or structures shall exceed a floor space ratio of 0.75 times the net lot area. F. LOT COVERAGE 1.Buildings and structures shall not exceed lot coverage of 45%. G. SITING 1.Minimum setbacks for principal buildings or principal structures shall not be less than: (a) from a front lot line 7.5 metres for a triplex residential use; (b) from a front lot line 6.0 metres for a fourplex and courtyard residential use; (c) from a rear lot line 7.5 metres; (d) from an exterior side lot line 4.5 metres; (e) from an interior side lot line 2.25 metres, except up to 40 % of the total horizontal length of the wall may be sited not less than 1.5 metres. 2.Minimum setbacks for principal buildings or principal structures located on lots located within the Town Centre, as identified in Schedule H of the Zoning Bylaw, shall not be less than: (a) from a front lot line 5.5 metres; (b) from a rear lot line 7.5 metres; (c) from an exterior side lot line 4.5 metres; INTERIOR SIDE LOT LINE 2.25 m1.5 m a b = 40 % b a (d) from an interior side lot line 2.25 metres, except up to 40 % of the total horizontal length of the wall may be sited not less than 1.5 metres. 3.Minimum setbacks for Accessory Buildings and Accessory Structures shall not be less than: (a) from a rear and interior side lot line 1.5 metres; (b) from a front and exterior side lot line 3 metres, except that no building or structure for an accessory off-street parking use shall be sited within the required front yard setback; (c) from a building used for residential use 1.5 metres; H. SIZE OF BUILDINGS AND STRUCTURES 1.No principal building or principal structure shall exceed a height of 9.5 metres. 2.No accessory building or accessory structure shall exceed a height of 4.5 metres. I. OTHER REGULATIONS 1.Areas for an Accessory Off-Street Parking Use shall, when not concealed, be surrounded by a continuous landscape screen of not less than one metre in height. 2.Hard surface areas in this zone must be 50% permeable. 3.Useable open space for all residential uses must be provided for each dwelling unit on a lot based on the following ratio: (a) 45.0 square metres for each dwelling unit with 3 or more bedrooms; (b) 30.0 square metres for each dwelling unit with less than 3 bedrooms. 4.In a Courtyard Residential use, the courtyard space shall be common to all dwelling units, and: (a) be not less than 7.0 metres in width; (b) be landscaped, which may include: (i). variation in type and scale with areas of large perennials, shrubs and trees, not just grassed areas; (ii). existing trees and landscape features should be kept wherever possible; and (iii). should be designed to create filtering and screening of views; (c) may be used to accommodate driveway access to the dwelling units, but shall not be used to accommodate an Accessory Off-Street Parking uses; and (d) not be included in the requirements for useable open space if the courtyard space also provides driveway access. 9.Maple Ridge Zoning Bylaw No. 3510-1985 as amended is hereby amended accordingly. READ a first time the 13th day of June, 2017. READ a second time the day of , 20 . READ a third time the day of , 20 . ADOPTED the day of , 20 . PRESIDING MEMBER CORPORATE OFFICER CITY OF MAPLE RIDGE BYLAW NO. 7350-2017 A Bylaw to amend the Maple Ridge Parking and Loading Bylaw No. 4350 - 1990 ___________________________________________________________________________________ WHEREAS it is deemed expedient to further amend the Maple Ridge Parking and Loading Bylaw, as amended; NOW THEREFORE, the Municipal Council of the City of Maple Ridge enacts as follows: 1.This Bylaw may be cited for all purposes as "Maple Ridge Parking and Loading Amending Bylaw No 7350-2017. 2.That Appendix A Off-Street Parking Requirements, Section 1(b) be amended by adding the following words identified in bold text: 1(b) A building for one family residential use, two family residential use, triplex residential use, fourplex residential use, courtyard residential use 3.That Appendix A Off-Street Parking Requirements, Section 10.1(a)(1) be amended by replacing the “.” at the end of Section 10.1(a)(1)(b) with a “;” and adding the following words, in sequential order: c)a property with a single triplex development; d)a property with a single fourplex development; e)a property with a courtyard residential development. 4.Maple Ridge Parking and Loading Amending Bylaw No. 4350-1990 is hereby amended accordingly. READ a first time the 13th day of June, 2017. READ a second time the day of , 20 . PUBLIC HEARING held the day of , 20 . READ a third time the day of , 20 . ADOPTED the day of , 20 . _____________________________________ _____________________________ PRESIDING MEMBER CORPORATE OFFICER APPENDIX C City of Maple Ridge TO: Her Worship Mayor Nicole Read MEETING DATE: July 24, 2018 and Members of Council FILE NO: 2018-180-RZ FROM: Chief Administrative Officer MEETING: Council SUBJECT: First Reading Zone Amending Bylaw No. 7481-2018 22057 and 22083 Lougheed Highway EXECUTIVE SUMMARY: An application has been received to rezone the subject properties, located at 22057 and 22083 Lougheed Highway, from RS-1 (One Family Urban Residential) to RM-2 (Medium Density Apartment Residential) to allow a five storey apartment buiding with approximately 86 units and underground parking. To proceed further with this application additional information is required as outlined below. Pursuant to Council Policy 6.31, this application is subject to the Community Amenity Contribution charge of approximately $3,100 per apartment dwelling unit created. RECOMMENDATIONS: 1.That Zone Amending Bylaw No. 7481-2018 be given first reading; and 2.That the applicant provide further information as described on Schedules C, D and E of the Development Procedures Bylaw No. 5879–1999. DISCUSSION: a)Background Context: Applicant: Bissky Architecture And Urban Design Inc. Legal Description: Lot 3 District Lot 397 Group 1 New Westminster District Plan 11251; Lot 4 District Lot 397 Group 1 New Westminster District Plan 11251 OCP: Existing: Urban Residential Zoning: Existing: RS-1 (One Family Urban Residential) Proposed: RM-2 (Medium Density Apartment Residential) Surrounding Uses: North: Use: Single Family Residential Zone: RS-1 (One Family Urban Residential) Designation: Urban Residential 1102 - 2 - South: Use: Single Family Residential Zone: RS-1 (One Family Urban Residential) Designation: Urban Residential East: Use: Maple Ridge Baptist Church Zone: P-4 (Place of Worship) Designation: Institutional West: Use: Single Family Residential Zone: RS-1 (One Family Urban Residential) Designation: Urban Residential Existing Use of Property: Single Family Residential (Group Home) Proposed Use of Property: Multi-Family Residential Site Area: 0.33 ha (0.82 acres) Access: 221 Street; Lane Servicing requirement: Urban Standard b) Site Characteristics: The two subject properties, located at 22057 and 22083 Lougheed Highway, are located on the north side of Lougheed Highway, between 220 Street and 221 Street (see Appendicies A and B). The subject properties are relatively flat and are currently occupied by single family houses that are currently being rented out to a registered charity. c) Project Description: The applicant is proposing to rezone the two subject properties from RS-1 (One Family Urban Residential) to RM-2 (Medium Density Apartment Residential) to allow for a five storey apartment building with approximately 86 units and underground parking. The applicant is proposing four storeys at the rear, adjacent to the lane, and five storeys along Lougheed Highway. The four storeys is proposed as a transition to the surrounding single family re sidential properties to the north. The application proposes a mix of studio, one, two and three bedroom units. A variance would be required to the RM-2 (Medium Density Apartment Residential) zone to allow for a five storey apartment building, as well as a variance to setbacks along the south and east property boundaries. At this time the current application has been assessed to determine its compliance with the Official Community Plan (OCP) and provide a land use assessment only. Detailed review and comments will need to be made once full application packages have been received. A more detailed analysis and a further report will be required prior to second reading. Such assessment may impact proposed lot boundaries and yields, OCP designations and Bylaw particulars, and may require application for further development permits. d) Planning Analysis: Official Community Plan: The subject properties are located to the west, just outside, of the Town Centre Area Plan. The OCP designates the subject properties Urban Residential – Major Corridor, and development of the properties are subject to the Major Corridor infill policies of the OCP. The Major Corridor Residential category identifies the various types of housing forms which are encouraged along major road corridors to include: single detached dwellings, duplexes, triplexes, fourplexes, townhouses, apartments, and small lot intensive residential developments. These policies require that development be compatible with the surrounding neighbourhood, with particular attention given to - 3 - site design, setbacks, and lot configuration with the existing pattern of development in the area. It is noted that one of the underlying principles in the OCP is to encourage growth within the Urban Area Boundary (UAB) and to accommodate growth through infill by promoting a mix of housing types and tenures (Policy 3-1). The proposed rezoning of the subject property to RM-2 (Medium Density Apartment Residential) aligns with the Major Corridor Residential infill policies. Policy 3-20 c) Major Corridor Residential indicates apartment buildings have a maximum height of four storeys; however, other OCP policies provide support for the increase in height noting density bonus and the provision of rental housing are mechanisms for achieving additional density and height. At the July 17, 2018 Council Workshop, Council gave consideration to a report on a draft Framework for density bonus regulations. The Framework envisions, for the RM-2 (Medium Density Apartment Residential) zone, an increase in base density of 0.4 FSR, to a max of 2.2 FSR, in exchange for the provision of 10% of net floor area being rental, with rents being 10% below Canada Mortgage and Housing Corporation (CMHC) average market rents, or a cash-in-lieu rate of $96.88 per m² ($9.00 per ft²). The draft Framework will provide an increase in height from four storeys in the Major Corridor Residential and Urban Residential land use designations. In light of the increased height being proposed, the applicant will be asked to provide a shadow analysis, particularly as it pertains to the single family homes to the north. The following OCP policies would also apply to this rezoning application: 3-30 Maple Ridge will consider density bonus as a means of encouraging the provision of affordable, rental and special needs housing, and amenities. 3-31 Maple Ridge supports the provision of rental accommodation and encourages the construction of rental units that vary in size and number of bedrooms. 3-32 Maple Ridge supports the provision of affordable, rental and special needs housing throughout the District. 3-33 Maple Ridge will encourage housing that incorporates “age-in-place” concepts and senior housing designed to accommodate special needs. The applicant has indicated they intend to meet the above-referenced policies at this point, and have suggested providing 10% of the units as market rental and 5% as adaptable units, in accordance with the BC Building Code, Section 3.8.5., Adaptable Dwelling Units. Further details will be discussed in a future second reading report to Council. As mentioned above, the draft Density Bonus Framework endorsed by Council provides the option of either providing 10% of units at below market rates or paying a cash-in-lieu rate. Given that this project is not providing rental units at below market rates, the applicant will be requested to adjust the proposal to better align with the Density Bonus Framework. Housing Action Plan: Maple Ridge’s vision and commitment to towards housing is encompassed in this statement contained in the Maple Ridge Housing Action Plan (MRHAP): "Access to safe, affordable, and appropriate housing that meets the diverse and changing needs of the community is a priority.” The current application will provide approximately 86 new apartment units directly adjacent to the Town Centre, and as mentioned above, the applicant offers a diverse mix of studio, one, two and - 4 - three bedroom units. The applicant also intends to meet the need for rental, affordable, special needs or age-in place housing, as discussed above, with details to be determined prior to second reading. Zoning Bylaw: The applicant is proposing to rezone the two subject properties from RS-1 (One Family Urban Residential) to RM-2 (Medium Density Apartment Residential) (see Appendix C) to allow for a five storey apartment buiding with approximately 86 units and underground parking (see Appendix D). The applicant is proposing a mix of studio, one, two and three bedroom units. The maximum floor space ratio (FSR) permitted in the RM-2 (Medium Density Apartment Residential) zone is 1.8. This application is proposing an FSR of 2.0. Early discussions with the applicant suggest they will provide 10% of the units as market rental and 5% of the units as adaptable, in exchange for the increased density and height. Staff note that a draft Density Bonus Framework for various Town Centre and Major Corridor zones, including the RM-2 (Medium Density Apartment Residential) zone, was presented to Council at its July 17, 2018 Workshop. This basis, or as Council might otherwise direct, will form the Framework for further discussion with the applicant on their density and amenity proposal. As identified above, the details of such pending discussions and the measures undertaken by the applicant to better align their proposal with the Density Bonus Framework will be reported to Council in the second reading report. It has also been suggested by the applicant, that they will provide some electric vehicle charging infrastructure, the number and type are to be determined prior to second reading. The minimum lot size for the proposed RM-2 (Medium Density Apartment Residential) zone is 0.13 ha (0.3 acres) and the proposed consolidated lot area is approximately 0 .33 ha (0.8 acres). The applicant has indicated that variances to height and setbacks will be applied for through a Development Variance Permit application. Development Permits: Pursuant to Section 8.7 of the OCP, a Multi-Family Development Permit application is required to ensure the current proposal enhances existing neighbourhoods with compatible housing styles that meet diverse needs, and minimize potential conflicts with neighbouring land uses. Advisory Design Panel: A Multi-Family Development Permit is required and must be reviewed by the Advisory Design Panel prior to second reading. Development Information Meeting: A Development Information Meeting is required for this application. Prior to second reading the applicant is required to host a Development Information Meeting in accordance with Council Policy 6.20. e) Interdepartmental Implications: In order to advance the current application, after first reading, comments and input, will be sought from the various internal departments and external agencies listed below: a) Engineering Department; b) Fire Department; c) Building Department; d) Parks Department; e) School District; - 5 - f) Ministry of Transportation and Infrastructure; and g) Canada Post. The above list is intended to be indicative only and it may become necessary, as t he application progresses, to liaise with agencies and/or departments not listed above. This application has not been forwarded to the Engineering Department for comments at this time; therefore, an evaluation of servicing requirements has not been undertaken. We anticipate that this evaluation will take place between first and second reading. f) Intergovernmental Implications This development application will be referred to the Ministry of Transportation and Infrastructure (MOTI) after first reading to determine if they have any concerns or requirements that will impact the proposed development. MOTI will need to approve of Zoning Bylaw No. 7481-2018 prior to the bylaw obtaining final reading. g) Development Applications: In order for this application to proceed the following information must be provided, as re quired by Development Procedures Bylaw No. 5879–1999 as amended: 1. A complete Rezoning Application (Schedule C); 2. A Multi-Family Residential Development Permit Application (Schedule D); and 3. A Development Variance Permit (Schedule E). As part of the information being submitted above, to include details about provision of market rental and adaptable units, stormwater management, public art and shadow analysis. The above list is intended to be indicative only, other applications may be necessary as the assessment of the proposal progresses. -6 - CONCLUSION: The development form is generally in compliance with the OCP, noting there is policy support for density bonusing and the provision of rental and affordable housing. The Density Bonus Framework presented at the July 17, 2018 Council Workshop further reaffirms support for additional density in exchange for rental units below market rates, or with a cash-in-lieu contribution. Staff will be working with the applicant to better align their proposal with the draft Density Bonus Framework prior to second reading. In addition, compatibility of this projects design, proposed height and setbacks will also be determined prior to second reading. Therefore, it is recommended that Council grant first reading subject to additional information being provided and assessed prior to second reading. It is recommended that Council not require any further additional OCP consultation. “Original signed by Adam Rieu” _______________________________________________ Prepared by: Adam Rieu Planning Technician “Original signed by Christine Carter” _______________________________________________ Approved by: Christine Carter, M.PL, MCIP, RPP Director of Planning “Original signed by Frank Quinn” _______________________________________________ Approved by: Frank Quinn, MBA, P. Eng GM Public Works & Development Services “Original signed by Frank Quinn” for _______________________________________________ Concurrence: Paul Gill, CPA, CGA Chief Administrative Officer The following appendices are attached hereto: Appendix A – Subject Map Appendix B – Ortho Map Appendix C – Zone Amending Bylaw No. 7481-2018 Appendix D – Proposed Site Plan DATE: Jul 10, 2018 FILE: 2018-180-RZ 22057/83 Lougheed Hwy PLANNING DEPARTMENT SUBJECT PROPERTIES 2017-221-RZ 2017-221-DP 2017-230-RZ 2017-230-VP ´ Scale: 1:2,000 BY: LP Legend Ditch Centreline Active Applications (RZ/SD/DP/VP) APPENDIX A DATE: Jul 20, 2018 FILE: 2018-180-RZ 22057/83 LOUGHEED HWY City of PittMeadows District of Langley District of MissionFRASER R. ^ PLANNING DEPARTMENTYORK ST.DRIFTWOOD DR . LOUGHEED HWY.221 ST.A C A D I A S T . CLIFF PL.221 ST.SELKIRK AVE. 119 AVE. CLIFF AVE.220 ST.117632202222066219652195621960 2213611943 11942 21988220332218811952 21950 2196411952 22032220572204622058220442213821942 221272218321937 2217321948220721174322147219901 1 7 2 9 1175111850 220332210822155220041 1 7 7 72193222030220632206822071 22175220761186822077 117551185121989220882202011932 11758 11814 22057219642213711879 22165221262195221934 2 2 0 9 0 11875 219522197311783 219202215522155221271191021954 1 1 7 7 1221181188822057 2214611932 22035117272201222050 221172202311759 21955 2199111927 22023221282207311942 220562204321943221672204322048221182202322158220151173522045219762200011859 2216411926 22122219652195711945 117 2 32202321960 22141221192193822057117 6 32202011957221092197622034 11721 11949 22040219502216821980221471173 3 221371184921951 221162216422001117472202011937 11956 22056220782201221968221482195011869 21938 221182194621944 1 1 7 3 92195611887 22154117672197222031 22070221362203221948219642207821968219412208311874 SUBJECT PROPERTIES 220 STLOUGHEED HWY Aerial Imagery from the Spring of 2016´ Scale: 1:2,500 BY: PC APPENDIX B CITY OF MAPLE RIDGE BYLAW NO. 7481-2018 A Bylaw to amend Map "A" forming part of Zoning Bylaw No. 3510 - 1985 as amended ______________________________________________________________________________ WHEREAS, it is deemed expedient to amend Maple Ridge Zoning Bylaw No. 3510 - 1985 as amended; NOW THEREFORE, the Municipal Council of the City of Maple Ridge enacts as follows: 1.This Bylaw may be cited as "Maple Ridge Zone Amending Bylaw No. 7481-2018." 2.Those parcels or tracts of land and premises known and described as: Lot 3 District Lot 397 Group 1 New Westminster District Plan 11251 Lot 4 District Lot 397 Group 1 New Westminster District Plan 11251 and outlined in heavy black line on Map No. 1766 a copy of which is attached hereto and forms part of this Bylaw, are hereby rezoned to RM-2 (Medium Density Apartment Residential). 3.Maple Ridge Zoning Bylaw No. 3510 - 1985 as amended and Map "A" attached thereto are hereby amended accordingly. READ a first time the day of , 20 READ a second time the day of , 20 PUBLIC HEARING held the day of , 20 READ a third time the day of , 20 APPROVED by the Ministry of Transportation and Infrastructure this day of , 20 ADOPTED, the day of , 20 _____________________________ ____________________________ PRESIDING MEMBER CORPORATE OFFICER APPENDIX C LOUGHEED HWY.221 ST.AC A D I A S T . CLIFF PL.221 ST.SELKIRK AVE. 119 AVE. CLIFF AVE.220 ST.117632202222066219652195621960 221362219121988220332218821950 2196422032220572204622044220582213821942 21937 221272218322173219482207211743221472199011850 2203311751221082215522004219322203022063220682217522076220711186822077 1175511851219892208822020 11929 11758 11814 22057219642213711879 22126221652195221934 2 2 0 9 0 11901 11875 219522197311783 2192022155221552212711910 221182205711888 22146220352201222050221172202321955 2199111927 2202322128220732205622043219431186722167 22043220482211822023221582201522045219762200011859 2216411926 22122219652195722023219602214122119219382205722020220342210921976 2204021950221682198022147221371173 3 1184921951 22164221162200122020117472205611841 2201222078219682214811869 21938 221182194621944 1 1 7 3 92195611887 221542203121972 22136220702203221948219642207821968219412208311874 A 1 18 4 25 135 19 910 139 13 7 47 2 160 45 36 31 31 37 27 1 21 54 6 15 86 14 40 32 191 51 73 195 21 53 6 11 5 35 48 A 138 29 18 8 46 85 55 14 23 60 68 3 28 43 29 194 162 Park 48 30 20 50 22 6 34 84 27 B Rem 158 58 137 12 42 3 192 32 Rem 74 33 Rem 161 39 6919 38 56 136 52 Rem 38 26 140 6 46 20 50 38 17 16 52 163 39 ' 7 39 27 56 16 45 22 37 30 242 171 61 5 26 1894 75 59 40 24 13 1 28 193 5 ' 24 247 134 47 2517 2 7 159 53 28 15 Rem 66 6 26 4957 67 12 8 41 59 173 23 49 Rem 190 11 174 7 4 248 40 54 P 69427 P 52495 P 8728P 14113P 62365 P 67821 P46564P 9218 P 11251 P 8728P 11251 P 11251 P 1 7 1 8 5 P 6 0 0 7 1P 12965P 69427 *LMP10226 P 14049 P 8614 P 14049 P17 6 2 9 P 46 5 6 4 P 8614 P 37074P 12965P 46564*LMP 43508 P 47796 P 14891 P 9218 P 9218 P 1 7 1 8 5 P 15564P 68759 P 62478 (P 11251)P 15564P 30365 P 25970P 11251 P 11251 *PP072 P 8614 P 61550 P 9218 P 9218 EP 67823 EP 81642 EP 69426 E P 6 0 0 7 2 BCP 5928 (lease) E P 4 6 5 6 5P 34609EP 69426 BCP 30626 RW 44519 EP 67822 WI C K L O W W A Y LOUGHEED HWY.220 ST.´ SCALE 1:2,500 MAPLE RIDGE ZONE AMENDINGBylaw No. Map No. From: To: RS-1 (One Family Urban Residential) RM-2 (Medium Density Apartment Residential) 7481-20181766 APPENDIX D City of Maple Ridge TO: Her Worship Mayor Nicole Read MEETING DATE: July 24, 2018 and Members of Council FILE NO: 2018-231-RZ FROM: Chief Administrative Officer MEETING: Council SUBJECT: First Reading Zone Amending Bylaw No. 7483-2018 28621 104 Avenue and 10455 287 Street EXECUTIVE SUMMARY: An application has been received to rezone the subject properties from A-1 (Small Holdings Agriculture) and A-2 (Upland Agricultural) to RS-3 (One Family Rural Residential) to permit a 4 lot rural residential subdivision. The proposed RS-3 Zone aligns with the Rural Residential land use designation of the subject properties, therefore bringing the subject properties into compliance. The minimum parcel size in the proposed RS-3 One Family Rural Residential Zone is 2 hectares (5 acres) when served by well. With rezoning, a four lot subdivision will be possible on these properties, which have an assembled area of 8.8 hectares (22 acres). A watercourse traverses the site at 28621 104th Avenue, which will require further ground truthing. To proceed further with this application additional information is required as outlined below. This proposal is subject to the Community Amenity Contribution, which is $5100.00 per lot for single family development, amounting to $20,400.00 total contribution. RECOMMENDATIONS: In respect of Section 475 of the Local Government Act, requirement for consultation during the development or amendment of an Official Community Plan, Council must consider whether consultation is required with specifically: i.The Board of the Regional District in which the area covered by the plan is located, in the case of a Municipal Official Community Plan; ii.The Board of any Regional District that is adjacent to the area covered by the plan; iii.The Council of any municipality that is adjacent to the area covered by the plan; iv. First Nations; v.Boards of Education, Greater Boards and Improvements District Boards; and vi. The Provincial and Federal Governments and their agencies. and in that regard it is recommended that no additional consultation be required in respect of this matter beyond the early posting of the proposed Official Community Plan amendments on the City’s website, together with an invitation to the public to comment, and; That Zone Amending Bylaw No. 7483-2018 be given first reading; and That the applicant provide further information as described on Schedules (A, B, F, and J) of the Development Procedures Bylaw No. 5879–1999, along with the information required for a Subdivision application. 1103 -2 - DISCUSSION: a)Background Context: Applicant: Alair Homes Justin Endresen Legal Description: Lot: 5, Section: 9, Township: 15, Plan: NWP66081 & Lot: 13, Section: 9, Township: 15, Plan: NWP66392 OCP: Existing: RURRES (Rural Residential) Proposed: Rural Residential Zoning: Existing: A-2 (Upland Agricultural) Proposed: RS-3 (One Family Rural Residential) Surrounding Uses: North: Use: Rural Residential Zone: A-2 (Upland Agricultural) Designation: Rural Residential South: Use: Rural Residential Zone: A-2 (Upland Agricultural) Designation: Rural Residential East: Use: Rural Residential Zone: A-1 (Small Holding Agricultural) Designation: Rural Residential West: Use: Rural Residential Zone: A-2 (Upland Agricultural) Designation: Rural Residential Existing Use of Property: Rural Residential Proposed Use of Property: Rural Residential. Site Area: 8.8 Ha. (22 acres) Access: 287 Street Servicing requirement: Rural Standard b)Site Characteristics: The subject site is located in East Maple Ridge, a rural area reliant on on-site water and sewer. An indeterminant watercourse exists on the property at 28621 104th Avenue. The subject site slopes gradually from west to 287th Street, which marks its highest point. - 3 - c) Project Description: This proposal is to rezone the subject properties from their current agricultural zones (A-1 and A-2) to RS-3 (One Family Rural Residential), in compliance with the land use designation of the subject properties. A 4 lot rural subdivision with minimum 2 hectare (5 acre) lots is proposed, with access from 104th Avenue for 2 of the proposed lots, with the remainder to be taken from 287th Street. At this time the current application has been assessed to determine its compliance with the Official Community Plan (OCP) and provide a land use assessment only. Detailed review and comments will need to be made once full application packages have been received. A more detailed analysis and a further report will be required prior to Second Reading. Such assessment may impact proposed lot boundaries and yields, OCP designations and Bylaw particulars, and may require application for further development permits. d) Planning Analysis: Official Community Plan: The development site is designated Rural Residential and the proposed development is in compliance with this designation. A watercourse is indicated on the subject parcel at 28621 104th Avenue. Ground truthing will indicate the extent of the required dedication and/or covenant protection area. Dedicated areas will require an OCP amendment to a Conservation designation. Zoning Bylaw: The current application proposes to rezone the properties located at 28621 104 Avenue and 10455 287 Street from A-1 (Small Holding Agriculture) and A-2 (Upland Agricultural) to RS-3 (One Family Rural Residential) to permit a 4 lot subdivision. The minimum lot size for the current A-1 zone is 2 hectares (5 acres), the minimum lot size for the current A-2 zone is 4 hectares (10 acres) and the minimum lot size for the proposed RS-3 zone is 2 hectares (5 acres) if served by well. Any variations from the requirements of the proposed zone will require a Development Variance Permit application. Development Permits: Pursuant to Section 8.9 of the OCP, a Watercourse Protection Development Permit application is required to ensure the preservation, protection, restoration and enhancement of watercourse and riparian areas. Pursuant to Section 8.12 of the OCP, a Wildfire Development Permit application is required for all development and subdivision activity identified in wildfire risk areas. The purpose of the Wildfire Development Permit is for the protection of life and property in designated areas that could be at risk for wildland fire; and where this risk may be reasonably abated through implementation of appropriate precautionary measures. The subject property is located within the Wildfire Development Permit Area, identified on Map 1 in Section 8.12 of the Official Community Plan. Prio r to second reading a Registered Professional Forester’s Report will be required to determine wildfire mitigation requirements. -4 - Development Information Meeting: As there are fewer than 5 lots proposed, a Development Information Meeting is not required for this application. e)Interdepartmental Implications: In order to advance the current application, after First Reading, comments and input, will be sought from the various internal departments and external agencies listed below: a)Engineering Department; b) Operations Department; c)Fire Department; d)Building Department; e)Fisheries & Oceans Canada; and f)Ministry of Environment. The above list is intended to be indicative only and it may become necessary, as the application progresses, to liaise with agencies and/or departments not listed above. This application has not been forwarded to the Engineering Department for comments at this time; therefore, an evaluation of servicing requirements has not been undertaken. We anticipate that this evaluation will take place between First and Second Reading. f)Early and Ongoing Consultation: In respect of Section 475 of the Local Government Act for consultation during an Official Community Plan amendment, it is recommended that no additional consultation is required beyond the early posting of the proposed OCP amendments on the City’s website, together with an invitation to the public to comment. g)Development Applications: In order for this application to proceed the following information must be provided, as required by Development Procedures Bylaw No. 5879–1999 as amended: 1.An OCP Application (Schedule A); 2.A complete Rezoning Application (Schedule B); 3.A Watercourse Protection Development Permit Application (Schedule F); 4.A Wildfire Development Permit Application (Schedule J); and 5.A Subdivision Application. The above list is intended to be indicative only, other applications may be necessary as the assessment of the proposal progresses. CONCLUSION: The development proposal is in compliance with the OCP; therefore, it is recommended that Council grant First Reading subject to additional information being provided and assessed prior to Second Reading. - 5 - It is recommended that Council not require any further additional OCP consultation. It is expected that once complete information is received, Zone Amending Bylaw No.7483-2018 will be amended and an OCP Amendment to adjust the Conservation boundary may be required. The proposed layout has not been reviewed in relation to the relevant bylaws and regulations governing subdivision applications. Any subdivision layout provided is strictly preliminary and must be approved by the City of Maple Ridge’s Approving Officer. “Original signed by Diana Hall” _______________________________________________ Prepared by: Diana Hall, M.A, MCIP, RPP Planner “Original signed by Christine Carter” _______________________________________________ Approved by: Christine Carter, M.PL, MCIP, RPP Director of Planning “Original signed by Frank Quinn” _______________________________________________ Approved by: Frank Quinn, MBA, P. Eng GM Public Works & Development Services “Original signed by Paul Gill” _______________________________________________ Concurrence: Paul Gill, CPA, CGA Chief Administrative Officer The following appendices are attached hereto: Appendix A – Subject Map Appendix B – Ortho Map Appendix C – Zone Amending Bylaw No. 7483-2018 Appendix D – Proposed Subdivision Plan DATE: Jun 5, 2018 FILE: 2018-231-RZ 28621 104 AVENUE 10455 287 STREET PLANNING DEPARTMENT SUBJECT PROPERTIES2015-047-DP 2013-056-DP ´ Scale: 1:9,000 BY: LP Legend Stream Ditch Centreline Edge of Marsh Indefinite Creek Lake or Reservoir Marsh Major Rivers & Lakes APPENDIX A DATE: Jun 5, 2018 FILE: 2018-231-RZ 28621 104 AVENUE 10455 287 STREET City of PittMeadows District of Langley District of MissionFRASER R . ^ PLANNING DEPARTMENT286 ST108 AVE284 ST04 AVE 108 AVE 104 AVE 108 AVE 288 ST287 STSUBJECT PROPERTIES Aerial Imagery from the Spring of 2016´ Scale: 1:9,000 BY: LP APPENDIX B CITY OF MAPLE RIDGE BYLAW NO. 7483-2018 A Bylaw to amend Map "A" forming part of Zoning Bylaw No. 3510 - 1985 as amended ______________________________________________________________________________ WHEREAS, it is deemed expedient to amend Maple Ridge Zoning Bylaw No. 3510 - 1985 as amended; NOW THEREFORE, the Municipal Council of the City of Maple Ridge enacts as follows: 1.This Bylaw may be cited as "Maple Ridge Zone Amending Bylaw No. 7483-2018." 2.Those parcels or tracts of land and premises known and described as: Lot 5 Section 9 Township 15 New Westminster District Plan 66081 Lot 13 Section 9 Township 15 New Westminster District Plan 66392 and outlined in heavy black line on Map No. 1767, a copy of which is attached hereto and forms part of this Bylaw, is/are hereby rezoned to RS-3 (One Family Rural Residential). 3.Maple Ridge Zoning Bylaw No. 3510 - 1985 as amended and Map "A" attached thereto are hereby amended accordingly. READ a first time the day of , 20 READ a second time the day of , 20 PUBLIC HEARING held the day of , 20 READ a third time the day of , 20 ADOPTED, the day of , 20 _____________________________ ____________________________ PRESIDING MEMBER CORPORATE OFFICER APPENDIX C 10480 2855528500/4210455 28550287022862110570 2848510420 28511286502847110530 285943 4 1 A 2 3 13 N 1/2 SE 1/4 2 1 B 1 2 5 LMP 46072 P 66081 BCP 46967 P 68785 P 62840 P 66392 EPP 53451 P 68785 P 68785 287 ST287 ST104 AVE BCP 46971 EPP 27774 BCP 46969 BCP 46970EP 68786BCP 46969EP 68786BCP 46968 BCP 46968 BCP 46968 EP 80591 EP 66391 BCP 46969 BCP 46966 LMP 46073 BCP 46968 ´ SCALE 1:4,500 MAPLE RIDGE ZONE AMENDINGBylaw No. Map No. From: To: A-1 (Small Holding Agricultural)A-2 (Upland Agricultural)RS-3 (One Family Rural Residential) 7483-20181767 District of Mission City of Maple Ridge TO: Her Worship Mayor Nicole Read MEETING DATE: July 24, 2018 and Members of Council FILE NO: 2018-243-RZ FROM: Chief Administrative Officer MEETING: Council SUBJECT: First Reading Zone Amending Bylaw No. 7484-2018 21963 Dewdney Trunk Road & 12029 220 Street EXECUTIVE SUMMARY: An application has been received to rezone the subject property from RS-1 (One Family Urban Residential) to RM-5 (Low Density Apartment Residential) to permit a 12 unit multi-family development. This zone allows both townhouse and apartment uses. The format of this development resembles townhouses. As road dedication is anticipated along both frontages (220th Street and Dewdney Trunk Road), the resulting lot size will be reduced, and the proposed density may be slightly higher than the maximum prescribed under the zone. Given these circumstances, a density bonus may be appropriate at this location. To proceed further with this application additional information is required as outlined below. The project is subject to Community Amenity Contribution Policy 6.31, which establishes a $4100.00 contribution per unit for ground oriented multi-family projects for a total of $49,200.00. RECOMMENDATIONS: That Zone Amending Bylaw No. 7484-2018 be given first reading; and That the applicant provide further information as described on Schedules C, D and E of the Development Procedures Bylaw No. 5879–1999 DISCUSSION: a)Background Context: Applicant: Robert Salikan Architect Legal Description: Lot: 2, D.L.: 396, Plan: NWP15883 & Lot: 3, D.L.: 396, Plan: NWP15883 OCP: Existing: Urban Residential Proposed: Urban Residential Zoning: Existing: RS-1 (One Family Urban Residential) Proposed: RM-5 (Low Density Apartment Residential) 1104 -2 - Surrounding Uses: North: Use: Single Family Residential Zone: RS-1 One Family Urban Residential Designation: Urban Residential South: Use: Single Family Residential Zone: RS-1 One Family Urban Residential Designation: Urban Residential East: Use: Apartment Zone: RM-2 Low Rise Apartment Designation: Urban Residential West: Use: Single Family Residential Zone: RS-1 One Family Urban Residential Designation: Urban Residential Existing Use of Property: Single Family Residential Proposed Use of Property: Townhouse Site Area: 0.23 Ha. (0.57acres) Access: 220th Street Servicing requirement: Urban Standard b)Site Characteristics: The subject site is west of the Town Centre, at the northwest corner of 220th Street and Dewdney Trunk Road. Its location off Dewdney Trunk Road and the overall site context includes large lot single family with relatively low improvement values along the north side of 220th Street, and an apartment building with RM-2 Zoning to its east across 220th Street. c)Project Description: This proposal is unique. The format is a 12 unit townhouse development with underground parking. The common underground parking will include private 2 car garages (side by side) for each unit with stairway access to the dwelling unit above. This arrangement frees up space for private outdoor areas at grade. All units have 3 bedrooms and are 154.5 square metres (1663.3 square feet) in area. With road dedication, the net floor area ratio is estimated at 0.83, slightly higher than the 0.8 maximum in the RM-5 Zone. At this time the current application has been assessed to determine its compliance with the Official Community Plan (OCP) and provide a land use assessment only. Detailed review and comments will need to be made once full application packages have been received. A more detailed analysis and a further report will be required prior to second reading. Such assessment may impact proposed lot boundaries and yields, OCP designations and Bylaw particulars, and may require application for further development permits. -3 - d) Planning Analysis: Official Community Plan: The development site is located to the west of the Town Centre Area Plan and is designated Urban Residential. Given the site context, and the frontage along Dewdney Trunk Road, this application meets the requirements for Major Corridor Residential Infill development, described in Policies 3-20 and 3-21 with excerpts as follows: 3 - 20 Major Corridor Residential Infill developments must be designed to be compatible with the surrounding neighbourhood and will be evaluated against the following criteria: a) building forms such as single detached dwellings, duplexes, triplexes, fourplexes, townhouses, apartments, and small lot intensive residential developments subject to Policy 3-21; … c) a maximum height of four storeys for apartments; … 3 - 21 All Neighbourhood and Major Corridor Residential infill developments will respect and reinforce the physical patterns and characteristics of established neighbourhoods, with particular attention to: a) the ability of the existing infrastructure to support the new development; b) the compatibility of the site design, setbacks, and lot configuration with the existing pattern of development in the area; c) the compatibility between building massing and the type of dwelling units in the proposed development and the surrounding residential properties;… This proposal will be 3 storeys above grade, meeting the requirements of the RM-5 Low Density Apartment Residential Zone, and providing compatibility with surrounding single family houses. This height reflects the maximum 11 metre height that is currently permitted in the predominant single family RS-1 Zone. As noted, once road dedication is provided, the proposed density may exceed the maximum prescribed in the RM-5 Zone. To address this possibility, Council may wish to allow the applicant to utilize density bonus provisions. A formal amending formula with specific compensatory measures for density bonus provisions is currently being considered by Council. As this proposal is proceeding in advance of the completion of this work, Council may wish to utilize the provisions outlined in Policy 2-9 of the Official Community Plan, as follows: Community Amenity Contributions and density bonuses may also be considered at Council’s discretion for all Official Community Plan and Zoning Bylaw amending applications that are seeking a higher density than is envisioned in Schedule “A” and/or Schedule “B”, to help provide a variety of amenities and facilities throughout the municipality. Zoning Bylaw: The current application proposes to rezone the properties located at 21963 Dewdney Trunk Road and 12029 220 Street from RS-1 (One Family Urban Residential) to RM-5 (Low Density Apartment Residential) to permit a 12 unit ground oriented multi-family development. The minimum lot size for the current RS-1 zone is 681 m2, and the minimum lot size for the proposed RM-5 zone is 1115 m2. Any variations from the requirements of the proposed zone will require a Development Variance Permit application. -4 - As shown on Schedule D, the clustered townhouse units are integrated into a single structure through the underground parking facility. The initial layout indicates that variances may be required, for setbacks, and for one visitor parking stall. These requirements will be clarified further in the second reading report. Development Permits: Pursuant to Section 8.7 of the OCP, a Multi-Family Development Permit application is required to ensure the current proposal enhances existing neighbourhoods with compatible housing styles that meet diverse needs, and minimize potential conflicts with neighbouring land uses. Advisory Design Panel: A Multi-Family Development Permit is required and must be reviewed by the Advisory Design Panel prior to second reading. Development Information Meeting: A Development Information Meeting is required for this application. Prior to Second Reading the applicant is required to host a Development Information Meeting in accordance with Council Policy 6.20. e)Interdepartmental Implications: In order to advance the current application, after first reading, comments and input, will be sought from the various internal departments and external agencies listed below: a)Engineering Department; b) Operations Department; c)Fire Department; d)Building Department; e)Ministry of Transportation. The above list is intended to be indicative only and it may become necessary, as the application progresses, to liaise with agencies and/or departments not listed above. This application has not been forwarded to the Engineering Department for comments at this time ; therefore, an evaluation of servicing requirements has not been undertaken. We anticipate that this evaluation will take place between first and second reading. f)Development Applications: In order for this application to proceed the following information must be provided, as required by Development Procedures Bylaw No. 5879–1999 as amended: 1.A complete Rezoning Application (Schedule C); 2.A Multi-Family Residential Development Permit Application (Schedule D); and 3.A Development Variance Permit (Schedule E). - 5 - The above list is intended to be indicative only, other applications may be necessary as the assessment of the proposal progresses. CONCLUSION: The development proposal is in compliance with the OCP, therefore, it is recommended that Council grant first reading subject to additional information being provided and assessed prior to second reading. “Original signed by Diana Hall” _______________________________________________ Prepared by: Diana Hall, M.A, MCIP, RPP Planner 2 “Original signed by Christine Carter” _______________________________________________ Approved by: Christine Carter, M.PL, MCIP, RPP Director of Planning “Original signed by Frank Quinn” _______________________________________________ Approved by: Frank Quinn, MBA, P. Eng GM Public Works & Development Services “Original signed by Paul Gill” _______________________________________________ Concurrence: Paul Gill, CPA, CGA Chief Administrative Officer The following appendices are attached hereto: Appendix A – Subject Map Appendix B – Ortho Map Appendix C – Zone Amending Bylaw No. 7484-2018 Appendix D – Proposed Site Plan & Preliminary Design Concept DATE: Jul 18, 2018 FILE: 2018-243-RZ 21963 DEWDNEY TRUNK ROAD 12029 220 STREET PLANNING DEPARTMENT SUBJECT PROPERTY 2017-221-RZ 2017-221-DP 2011-100-RZ ´ Scale: 1:2,800 BY: LP Dewdney Trunk Road Legend Ditch Centreline Lake or Reservoir Parcels Active Applications (RZ/SD/DP/VP) APPENDIX A DATE: Jul 18, 2018 FILE: 2018-243-RZ 21963 DEWDNEY TRUNK ROAD 12029 220 STREET City of PittMeadows District of Langley District of MissionFRASER R. ^ PLANNING DEPARTMENT SUBJECT PROPERTY Aerial Imagery from the Spring of 2016´ Scale: 1:2,800 BY: LP Dewdney Trunk Road APPENDIX B CITY OF MAPLE RIDGE BYLAW NO. 7484-2018 A Bylaw to amend Map "A" forming part of Zoning Bylaw No. 3510 - 1985 as amended ______________________________________________________________________________ WHEREAS, it is deemed expedient to amend Maple Ridge Zoning Bylaw No. 3510 - 1985 as amended; NOW THEREFORE, the Municipal Council of the City of Maple Ridge enacts as follows: 1.This Bylaw may be cited as "Maple Ridge Zone Amending Bylaw No. 7484-2018." 2.Those parcels or tracts of land and premises known and described as: Lot 2 District Lot 396 Group 1 New Westminster District Plan 15883 Lot 3 District Lot 396 Group 1 New Westminster District Plan 15883 and outlined in heavy black line on Map No. 1768, a copy of which is attached hereto and forms part of this Bylaw, is/are hereby rezoned to RM-5 (Low Density Apartment Residential). 3.Maple Ridge Zoning Bylaw No. 3510 - 1985 as amended and Map "A" attached thereto are hereby amended accordingly. READ a first time the day of , 20 READ a second time the day of , 20 PUBLIC HEARING held the day of , 20 READ a third time the day of , 20 APPROVED by the Ministry of Transportation and Infrastructure this day of , 20 ADOPTED, the day of , 20 _____________________________ ____________________________ PRESIDING MEMBER CORPORATE OFFICER APPENDIX C ACADIA ST.YORK ST.DOVER ST.YORK ST.220 ST.WICKLOW WAYDOVER ST. A C A D I A S T .DOVER ST.221 ST.221 ST.220 ST.221 ST.SEATON PL. 119 AVE.ACADIA ST.12110 11996 12046 12060 2196512020 120851193611941 12085 11943 12016 11942 2203311952 12122 11961 1208011952 12040 11963 12100 12101 12040 12029 220581203112024 12010 12110 12028 21948219632206712041 12014 12055 119702185912069 220681203912105 12060 11993 2207711979 12050 11960 12037 2198912087 11958 12065 2210612113 11930 12050 11932 12108 119 2 0 1206312047 11999 12095 12118 11968 12106 11971 12039 12069 12030 11957 12047 12029 11989 12079 11953 12108 12042 12019 12030 2208311988 11970 12127 12093 2202012014 2207411962 12095 11967 12042 12080 12090 12115 12053 12125 2195411973 12059 12100 12029 2205712025 11975 11932 12096 12104 12097 12009 22041/4312041 12066 11927 2202312110 11961 11964 12034 119 3 0 12071 1193511942 12006 1211612120 12109 1192812067 12075 11970 220482200711990 12131/33 2195112070 11947 11987 12070 12115 12086 11926 12088 219572195011945 1212912115 12049 12090 12057 2202012050 11957 11949 12047 11956 11931 12050 2205212050 11951 21951218431206711965 12109 2192412105 2185711937 11956 12060 120401207612116 12046 11996 2203021950119 3 9 12096 11988 11962 119881198521861 1192211989 1192311948 11973 12040 2203212113 12020 220782205812 144 2 110 17 S 25 1 10 1523 22 43 69 64 12 19 10 277 4 6 2 3 14 6 42 6 119 1 A 8 43183168 20 5 15 65 120 4 40 41 7 1 33 1 5 Rem 15 6 121 23 60 11 63 8 2 5 7Rem 28 103 63 233 6 109 46 62 2 1 16 60 Rem 165 182 27 13 10 11 4 9 44 234 2 10 14 107 68 7 Rem 145 22 2 38 11 37 21 43 2614A8 W1 251 3 2 8 181 235 1 14 6 180 20 123 11 2 29 12 W 14 64 3 10 7 5 276 2 237 1 42 238 61 31841 16 17 72 5 45 12 61 3 26 65' 30 7 59 12 18 3 T 232 235 B 8 1 11 11 17 142 21 143 250 19 24 16 166 9 18 236 Rem 29 47 5 9 71 13 34 9 4 14 15 2 65 67 66 4 18 8 167 21 13 36 231 13 1 10 4 7 62 9 3 39P 19958P 15564P 28929 P 29594 P 15319P 15883P 20943P 15564P 14113LMP 18569P 15319 P 14571 LMP 32969 P 15564P 22958 P 31725P 21229P 20943P 20943P 22656P 8728P 1 7 1 8 5 P 15883P 23167 P 69281P 20943P 29143P 49300P 33574(EPS 2819)P 14571P 21229P 70228P 70327P 87480P 30352P 15883LMP 36308 P 830P 14049P 3 5712 P 15883P 22656P 28803P 14571 P 21229 P 15564P 14685 P 31908 P 44386 P8728 P 15564 P 14113P 14113 P 6395P 8728*PP060 P 14685P 35712 P 2 1 2 2 9P 70327P 13419P 61499EP 22994 RW 27912 RW 73777 EP 72341 RP 71667 EPP 21951RP 71818 RW 27132EP 22994 P 18394 EP 2299 4 P 4 4 3 8 7 EPP 21945´ SCALE 1:2,500 MAPLE RIDGE ZONE AMENDINGBylaw No. Map No. From: To: RS-1 (One Family Urban Residential) RM-5 (Low Density Apartment Residential) 7484-20181768 APPENDIX D -1 - City of Maple Ridge TO: Her Worship Mayor Nicole Read MEETING DATE: July 24, 2018 and Members of Council FILE NO: 2012-023-RZ FROM: Chief Administrative Officer MEETING: Council SUBJECT: First and Second Reading Official Community Plan Amending Bylaw No. 7482-2018; Second Reading Zone Amending Bylaw No. 7313-2017; 11240 238 Street EXECUTIVE SUMMARY: A rezoning application has been received to rezone the subject property, located at 11240 238th Street from RS-3 (One Family Rural Residential) zone to P-6 (Civic Institutional) zone to permit the future development of Fire Hall No. 4 with an associated fire/rescue training centre and Community Park. Staff also recommends two housingkeeping changes amongst the amendments. Firstly, amending the defintion of Civic Use in the Zoning Bylaw to include park with uses listed. Secondly, to replace the term “Civic Institutional” in Section 901 Permitted Use of the P-6 (Civic Institutional) zone with “Civic” use for better alignment with the terminology used in the Interpretation section of the Zoning Bylaw. To accommodate the proposed P-6 (Civic Institutional) Zone, the portion of the site for the fire/rescue training centre and Community Park is being redesignated to Institutional from Park. In addition, a boundary adjustment will be required to enlarge the Conservation Designation to reflect the ground truthing and the LIDAR mapping of the Environmental Sensitive Area, which is subject to a Watercourse Protection Development Permit. Institutional developments are not subject to a form and character development permit or Advisory Design Panel review; however, the project was informally reviewed by the Advisory Design Panel, who provided suggestions on improving the project’s design. Council granted first reading to Zone Amending Bylaw No. 7313-2017 and considered the early consultation requirements for the Official Community Plan (OCP) amendment on April 24, 2017. The Council policy respecting Community Amenity Contributions is not applicable to institutional projects. RECOMMENDATIONS: 1)That, in accordance with Section 475 of the Local Government Act, opportunity for early and on-going consultation has been provided by way of posting Official Community Plan Amending Bylaw No. 7060-2014 on the municipal website and requiring that the applicant host a Development Information Meeting (DIM), and Council considers it unnecessary to provide any further consultation opportunities, except by way of holding a Public Hearing on the bylaw; 1105 - 2 - 2) That Official Community Plan Amending Bylaw No. 7482-2018 be considered in conjunction with the Capital Expenditure Plan and Waste Management Plan; 3) That it be confirmed that Official Community Plan Amending Bylaw No. 7482-2018 is consistent with the Capital Expenditure Plan and Waste Management Plan; 4) That Official Community Plan Amending Bylaw No. 7482-2018 be given first and second readings and be forwarded to Public Hearing; 5) That Zone Amending Bylaw No. 7313-2017 be given second reading, as amended, and be forwarded to Public Hearing; and 6) That the following terms and conditions be met prior to final reading: i) Registration of a Rezoning Servicing Agreement as a Restrictive Covenant and receipt of the deposit of a security, as outlined in the Agreement; ii) Amendment to Official Community Plan Schedules "B" and “C”; iii) Subdivision of the subject property into two lots and the dedication of the conservation area as Park; iv) Construction of walkways and removal of all debris and garbage from the park being dedicated; v) Issuance of a Natural Feature Development Permit, including associated security for restoration work in the Environmentally Sensitive Area; vi) Registration of a Restrictive Covenant for the Geotechnical Report, which addresses the suitability of the subject property for the proposed development; vii) Registration of a Restrictive Covenant for the protection of the Environmentally Sensitive areas (wetlands) on the subject property that is not dedicate as Park; viii) Registration of a Restrictive Covenant for Stormwater Management; and ix) In addition to the site profile, a disclosure statement must be submitted by a Professional Engineer advising whether there is any evidence of underground fuel storage tanks on the subject property. If so, a Stage 1 Site Investigation Report is required to ensure that the subject property is not a contaminated site. - 3 - DISCUSSION: 1) Background Context: Applicant: Maple Ridge Fire Department (Michael Van Dop) Legal Description: Parcel “P” (Reference Plan 1224) of the South East Quarter Section 16 Township 12 New Westminster District OCP: Existing: Park and Conservation Proposed: Park, Institutional and Conservation Zoning: Existing: RS-3 (One Family Rural Residential) Proposed: P-6 (Civic Institutional) With a Zoning Bylaw Text Amendment to replace “Civic Insitutional” with “Civic” in the P-6 zone and add “Park” in the definition of Civic Use. Surrounding Uses: North: Use: Single Family Residential Zone: RS-1b (One Family Urban (medium density) Residential Designation: Urban Residential South: Use: Single Family Residential Zone: CD-1-93 (Amenity Residential District) Designation: Urban Residential East: Use: Townhouse Development Zone: RM-1 (Townhouse Residential District) Designation: RS-1b (One Family Urban (medium density) Residential West: Use: Single Family Residential Zone: RS-3 (One Family Rural Residential) Designation: Urban Residential Existing Use of Property: Vacant land. Proposed Use of Property: Fire Hall with accompanying training centre and a Community Park to be located to the northern portion of the site. Dedication of the Environmentally Sensitive Area. Site Area: 4.060 ha. (10.03 acres) Access: 238 Street and 112 Avenue Servicing requirement: Urban Standard 2) Background: This location was selected for the Fire Hall No. 4 and its associated training centre as a result of studies which determined this property will provide an acceptable response time for rapid fire and rescue to the Cottonwood/Albion area, which is currently underserved. The service area for Fire Hall No. 4 is approximately 232 Street to 256 Street and River Road to Alouette River. -4 - 3)Project Description: The subject property is located at the corner of 238th Street and Kanaka Way. As shown in the diagram below, Rainbow Creek is located on the east side of the property with a north-south alignment. The site slopes west to east from 238th Street and north to south with a plateau along 238th Street. The site was the location of a residential house with a former greenhouse operation. The greenhouses and residential house have been removed. At the north end of the site will be the future Community Park; to the south is Kanaka Way and to the south side of Kanaka Way single family residential homes; to the west is a new single family subdivision subject to a restrictive covenant requiring additional sound attenuation measures included in the construction of the homes; and to the east across the ravine are Townhouses and a neighbourhood commercial centre beyond. The proposed Fire Hall No. 4 site will occupy approximately 2.25 ha. (5.575 acres) of the 3.82 ha. (9.45 acres) site. The remainder of the site will accommodate Community Park and Conservation area. The Fire Hall No. 4 site is proposed to have the following elements: •Fire hall building with bays for fire engine parking, classroom and office space; •Structures designed to accommodate ladder and stair training; •Outdoor water spray training area; •An area to practice the use of the jaws of life on vehicles; and •The use of propane fueled fires via props that will not emit smoke (see Appendix F). - 5 - 4) Planning Analysis: i) Official Community Plan: The subject property is currently designated Park and Conservation. The proposed application requires amendments to the current designation to expand the Conservation Designation and to redesignate a portion of the site from Park to Institutional (see Appendix D). The OCP identifies that growth should be integrated with services and infrastructure and it is recognized that the Institutional designation includes diverse uses to meet community needs and serve the local population. Policy 4-31 supports locally servicing facilities such as fire halls to be located through the Community. The policy reads: "4 - 31 Small scale or locally serving institutional facilities that can be located throughout the community include: schools, community halls, parks and recreation facilities, museums, fire halls, and places of worship. These uses will be permitted in rural and urban areas subject to parking requirements, access, compliance with zoning bylaws, and compatibility with adjacent land uses." In order to mitigate potential impacts on surrounding land uses the following measures have been incorporated:  A covenant has been placed on the lands to the west of the site requires the houses to be constructed with sound attenuation;  The Community Park to the north of the subject property will create a buffer between the residential homes and the fire hall training/centre;  The protection of the Environmentally Sensitive Area (ESA) and the future enhancement and restoration plan for the ESA area through the Watercourse Protection Development Permit will enhance the existing natural buffer for the townhouses to the east.  The building component of the site is located to the south of the property which will buffer the residence to the South that are separated from the subject property by Kanaka Way. Amendment to the Conservation DesignationbBoundary is also required to reflect ground truthing. The proposed OCP amendments are in compliance with the OCP. ii) Zoning Bylaw: The application proposes to rezone the subject property from RS-3 (One Family Rural Residential) to P-6 (Civic Institutional) zone to permit the development of a Community Park and Fire Hall No. 4 with an associated fire/rescue training centre. Two housekeeping, amendments to the Zoning Bylaw are also included; firstly, to clarify that “Park” is a permitted use; and secondly, replacing the term “Civic Institutional” use in the P-6 (Civic Institutional) zone with the term “Civic” use to align with the terminology used in the Interpretation section. The minimum lot size for the current RS-3 zone is 0.80 ha. and there is no minimum lot size for the proposed P-6 zone. At this time a review of any variances to the Zoning Bylaw have not been undertaken as the final designs of the building have not been completed. Since the proposed Fire Hall is not subject to a development permit for form and character, Development Permit level detailed designs have not been prepared; however, advanced conceptual plans were circulated to members of the Advisory Design Panel. If any variations from the requirements of the P-6 (Civic Institutional) zone are required an additional report to Council will be required with the associated Development Variance Permit application. -6 - iii)Development Permits: Pursuant to Section 8.9 of the OCP, a Watercourse Protection Development Permit application is required for this development because a portion of the site is within 50 metres of an area designated Conservation on Schedule “B”, and a portion of the site has an average natural slope of greater than 15 percent. The development permit will ensure the preservation, protection, restoration and enhancement of the natural environment and for development that is protected from hazardous conditions. iv) Advisory Design Panel: The Advisory Design Panel (ADP) reviewed the form and character of the proposal and the landscaping plans through an informal review process. Institutional developments are not subject to form and character Development Permit applications or Advisory Design Panel review. However, due to location and significance of this proposal, the project was forwarded to the Advisory Design Panel to have an independent review of the project and provide ways in which to enhance it. The comments about the project were very positive and a number of minor modifications improving the design were made to the project’s plans. v)Development Information Meeting: A Development Information Meeting was held at Albion Elementary School on June 27, 2018. 24 people attended the meeting. A summary of the main comments and discussions with the attendees was provided by the applicant and include the following main points: Likes the proposal, wants the trail built at the start. Likes the look “Go for it”. Would like to see a light/crosswalk and or emergency flashing lights at the intersection with Kanaka Way to allow the trucks ease of access and hopefully reduce the use of sirens. Would appreciate any efforts to keep sirens to a minimum. Concerned about the noise in the middle of a dense residential area. Why do we need a training centre when there is one on 256th Street. Will there be night training and what other locations were considered. Would hope that better noise barrier be added to east side of training area such as berm and thicker foliage/trees). Would hope that training activities be restricted to daylight hours. (no later than 7:00pm) like is required for construction. Keep as a park. Does not need to be there. Non Conforming and non compliant. It looks like all of the hard work to do this Planning really is working well. The vision for this to be a major step toward serving our community is much appreciated. Of course I am biased, yet having as many services for the training areas as possible seems a good idea. I was surprised to see there are not currently plans for a hose tower. That addition would get my vote. Thanks for all of your hard work. The following are provided by the applicant in response to some of the issues raised by the public: The Fire Department in coordination with the Engineering Department will install a similar traffic control light to enter onto Kanaka Way to the ones at Fire Hall No. 1. However, this will not negate the use of sirens. The BC Motor Vehicle Act, Section 122 requires Fire Departments when responding to emergences to use BOTH emergency lights and sirens. Our Paid or Volunteer members work their regular daytime jobs; therefore, their training takes place in the evening. -7 - Fire Hall No. 4 when completed will host a Neighbourhood Open House to invite their neighbours to the centre. The neighbours will be able to interact with the personnel that will be operating the facility which will field any questions or concerns that they may have with respect to the facility. Although Institutional projects do not require form and character development permits, Development Permit level plans will be required for the project to be submitted as part of a future Building Permit application. There will be no Development Permit report to Council respecting the final design as is the case for other projects like Multi-family or Commercial. Instead, work is in progress between Planning, Fire Department and the project Architect (the coordinating professional) and Landscape Architect to address matters raised that may be resolved through further design changes as part of the Building Permit. 5)Environmental Implications: The subject property has steep slopes and Rainbow Creek is located on the east side of the site running north to south. Any development of the site will require a Watercourse Protection Development Permit. The applicant’s Qualified Environmental Professional is working with staff of the City’s Environmental Section to address environmental considerations. It has been determined that additional land will be dedicated as Park for the protection of the environmental features. The land that is being dedicated will also be designated as Conservation through the amendment to the Official Community Plan (Appendix C). The City’s Environmental Section have been working with the applicant’s coordinating professional for the site with respect to Stormwater Management; Geotechnical Engineer and the Qualified Environmental Professional. These details and reports will be finalized as third reading condition. The drawings that were displayed at the Development Information Meeting indicated that there would be wetland features on the Park site for stormwater treatment. After review, by the City’s Environmental Section, it was identified that these proposed wetland features were at such an elevation that stormwater from the fire hall site would not naturally flow in to them; therefore, they have been removed. 6)Interdepartmental Implications: i)Engineering Department: Through the rezoning of the property directly west of the site under application 2012-004-RZ , 238th Street was constructed and serviced. The detailed servicing design of the site has not been done; therefore, Engineering has not received engineering design drawings. ii)Parks, Recreation and Culture Department: The Parks and Leisure Services Department has been engaged throughout the rezoning process to facilitate the future Park use at the North end of the site. 7)Intergovernmental Issues: i)Local Government Act: An amendment to the OCP requires the local government to consult with any affected parties and to adopt related bylaws in compliance with the procedures outlined in Section 477 of the Local Government Act. The amendment to the Official Community Plan requires that a portion of the property be designated to Institutional to facilitate the P-6 (Civil Institutional) zone and a boundary adjustment to enlarge the Conservation Designation for the protection of the Environmentally -8 - Sensitive Area, is considered to be minor in nature. It has been determined that no additional consultation beyond existing procedures is required, including referrals to the Board of the Regional District, the Council of an adjacent municipality, First Nations, the School District or agencies of the Federal and Provincial Governments. The amendment has been reviewed with the Financial Plan/Capital Plan and the Waste Management Plan of the Greater Vancouver Regional District and determined to have no impact. CONCLUSION: In addition to rezoning the site from RS-3 (One Family Rural Residential) zone to P-6 (Civic Institutional) zone, this application requires housekeeping amendments to the Section 901 of the P-6 (Civic Institutional) zone by replacing the “Civic Institutional” Use to “Civic” Use to alignment with the Interpretation Section of the Zoning Bylaw and the inclusion of “Park” in the “Civic” definition. The application is supported by the policies of the Official Community Plan. The designation of the subject property requires an expansion of the Conservation Designation and re-designation from Park to Institutional Designation for those portion of the site with the fire hall/training centre. It is recommended that first and second reading be given to OCP Amending Bylaw No. 7482-2018, that second reading be given to Zone Amending Bylaw No. 7313-2017 and that application 2012- 023-RZ be forwarded to Public Hearing. “Original signed by Wendy Cooper” _______________________________________________ Prepared by: Wendy Cooper, MCIP,RPP Senior Planning Technician “Original signed by Christine Carter” _______________________________________________ Approved by: Christine Carter, M.PL, MCIP, RPP Director of Planning “Original signed by Frank Quinn” _______________________________________________ Approved by: Frank Quinn, MBA, P.Eng GM Public Works & Development Services “Original signed by Paul Gill” _______________________________________________ Concurrence: Paul Gill, CPA, CGA Chief Administrative Officer The following appendices are attached hereto: Appendix A – Subject Map Appendix B – Ortho Map Appendix C – OCP Map Appendix D – OCP Amending Bylaw No. 7482-2018 Appendix E – Zone Amending Bylaw No. 7313-2017 Appendix F – Site Plan DATE: Jul 12, 2018 FILE: 2012-023-RZ 11240 238 STREET PLANNING DEPARTMENT 23863 SUBJECT PROPERTY 2017-208-SD ´ Scale: 1:2,500 BY: LP Legend Stream Ditch Centreline Indefinite Creek River Centreline Lake or Reservoir Active Applications (RZ/SD/DP/VP) APPENDIX A DATE: Jul 12, 2018 FILE: 2012-023-RZ 11240 238 STREET City of PittMeadows District of Langley District of MissionFRASER R. ^ PLANNING DEPARTMENT 111A AVE.238 ST.238 ST.LANE 113B AVE.39 ST.L ANE KANAKA WAY 11 1A AVE .239A ST.KANA K A W A Y 113 AVE.237731114623844 2 3 7 8 323730 2393211151238992 3 8 2 6 2393611402 11349 111812380211295 23766 2392211405 11235 11253 239072 3 7 9 1 2391511143 2395311159238361124723841 23906239502371023884 238482381811126 11365 2 3 8 3 3 11156 11119239122389311325 11340 23868 11229 11330 2388 5 11217 23760 238822238 92 2380111379 2395811350 11370 238572 3 8 0 9 2390223878 237702385 8 2 3 7 6 3 11205 11357 11135 11341 2 3 8 2 5 113 0 9 239422 3 7 4 0 11241 11130 113 1 7 2 3 8 0 8 11223 23757 237202 3 8 2 0 2 3 8 2 1 2 3 7 6 7 2385422380611136 11259 11132 2 3 8 1 3 11169 11277 2387 1 237511373 237 4 6 2394511333 2372611135 2386 3 11240 113 0 3 1112423237162387 9 2 3 8 0 5 23756 2 3 8 3 2 11187 2 3 8 1 2 2 3 8 2 9 2375 3 11211 11283 11175 11360 237 5 0 2 3 8 3 7 2384923882 3 8 0 4 238422 3 8 0 0 23962239252386423862 23872239282384811289 11195 2391611271 2 3 8 1 6 11120 1116623810239352 3 8 4 0 2 3 8 1 7 2382811127 2 3 8 3 6 2 3 8 4 5 11265 237 3 6 2 3 7 7 5 23863 SUBJECT PROPERTY Aerial Imagery from the Spring of 2016´ Scale: 1:2,500 BY: LP APPENDIX B DATE: Jul 12, 2018 FILE: 2012-023-RZ 11240 238 STREET PLANNING DEPARTMENT 111A AVE.238 ST.238 ST.LANE 113B AVE.39 ST.L ANE KANAKA WAY 11 1A AVE .239A ST.KANA K A W A Y 113 AVE.237731114623844 2 3 7 8 323730 2393211151238992 3 8 2 6 2393611402 11349 111812380211295 23766 2392211405 11235 11253 239072 3 7 9 1 2391511143 2395311159238361124723841 23906239502371023884 238482381811126 11365 2 3 8 3 3 11156 11119239122389311325 11340 23868 11229 11330 2388 5 11217 23760 238822238 92 2380111379 2395811350 11370 238572 3 8 0 9 2390223878 237702385 8 2 3 7 6 3 11205 11357 11135 11341 2 3 8 2 5 113 0 9 239422 3 7 4 0 11241 11130 113 1 7 2 3 8 0 8 11223 23757 237202 3 8 2 0 2 3 8 2 1 2 3 7 6 7 2385422380611136 11259 11132 2 3 8 1 3 11169 11277 2387 1 237511373 237 4 6 2394511333 2372611135 2386 3 11240 113 0 3 1112423237162387 9 2 3 8 0 5 23756 2 3 8 3 2 11187 2 3 8 1 2 2 3 8 2 9 2375 3 11211 11283 11175 11360 237 5 0 2 3 8 3 7 2384923882 3 8 0 4 238422 3 8 0 0 23962239252386423862 23872239282384811289 11195 2391611271 2 3 8 1 6 11120 1116623810239352 3 8 4 0 2 3 8 1 7 2382811127 2 3 8 3 6 2 3 8 4 5 11265 237 3 6 2 3 7 7 5 CONSRVC PARK CONSRVCONSRVCONSRV 23863 SUBJECT PROPERTY ´ Scale: 1:2,500 BY: LP Legend Land Use Boundaries Parcels Park Urban Residential Commercial Conservation APPENDIX C CITY OF MAPLE RIDGE BYLAW NO. 7482-2018 A Bylaw to amend the Official Community Plan Bylaw No. 7060-2014 _______________________________________________________________________________ WHEREAS Section 477 of the Local Government Act provides that the Council may revise the Official Community Plan; AND WHEREAS it is deemed expedient to amend Schedules "B" & "C" to the Official Community Plan; NOW THEREFORE, the Municipal Council of the City of Maple Ridge, enacts as follows: 1.This Bylaw may be cited for all purposes as "Maple Ridge Official Community Plan Amending Bylaw No. 7482-2018 2.Schedule "B" is hereby amended for that parcel or tract of land and premises known and described as: Parcel “P” (Reference Plan 1224) Of The South East Quarter Section 16, Township 12 New Westminster District, Except Plan EPP62575 and outlined in heavy black line on Map No. 978, a copy of which is attached hereto and forms part of this Bylaw, is hereby designated/amended as shown. 3.Schedule “C” is hereby amended for that parcel or tract of land and premises known and described as: Parcel “P” (Reference Plan 1224) Of The South East Quarter Section 16, Township 12 New Westminster District, Except Plan EPP62575 and outlined in heavy black line on Map No. 979, a copy of which is attached hereto and forms part of this Bylaw, is hereby amended by adding Conservation and Institutional. 4.Maple Ridge Official Community Plan Bylaw No. 7060-2014 is hereby amended accordingly. READ a first time the day of , 20 READ a second time the day of , 20 PUBLIC HEARING held the day of , 20 READ a third time the day of , 20 ADOPTED, the day of ,20 . ___________________________________ _____________________________ PRESIDING MEMBER CORPORATE OFFICER APPENDIX D 111A AVE.238 ST.238 ST.LANE KANAKA WAY 111A AVE . KANA K A W A Y 113 AV E.237731114623844 23 7 8 3 2 3 7 3 0 23932111512389923 8 2 6 2393611349 111812380211295 23766 2392211235 11253 239072 3 7 9 1 2391511143 2395311159 11247 2384123906239502371023884 238482381811365 23 8 3 3 11156 239122389311325 11340 23868 11229 11330 11217 23885 23760 238822380123892 2395811350 11370 2 3 8 0 9 238572390223878 23770237 6 3 23858 11205 11357 11135 11341 23 8 2 5 11309 239422 3 7 4 0 11241 11317 11223 23757 23 720 23 8 2 0 23 8 2 123806 11136 11259 23 8 1 3 11169 11277 23871 237 4 6 2394511333 2 3 7 2 6 11240 11303 23863 2371623879 2 3 8 0 5 23756 23 8 3 2 11187 23 8 1 2 23 8 2 9 23753 11211 11283 11175 23750 11360 23 8 3 7 23849239622392523862 23872239282370611289 11195 2391611271 23 8 1 6 11166238102393523 8 4 0 23 8 1 7 23 8 3 6 23 8 4 5 11265 2 3 7 3 6 1 PARK 2 26 3 15 15 1 9 29 6 17 3 27 12 2 20 26 4 12 21 25 8 11 7 1 6 29 8 13 25 24 B 11 5 27 21 20 10 3 10 16 28 11 15 32 1 2 13 19 13 5 19 20 23 23 4 20 22 5 53 17 9 54 8 33PARK 9 28 4 25 23 22 14 21 24 PARK 5 7 22 PARK 4 16 17 18 27 Rem. Pcl. 'P' 18 2 16 16 55 Rem. Pcl. 'P' 12 29 PARK 30 37 7 8 3 38 21 Rem A 2 19 31 22 7 28 26 1 23 52 PARK 6 18 9 30 14 15 14 6 24 LMP 2 6 4 8 3 LMP 337 9 7 EPP 62576(EPS 2572) EPP 25279 BCP 3 3 2 2 2 EPP 45993 EPP 25279 RP 6260 EPP 45994LMP 33797EPP 62576EPP 32520LMP 33797LMP 337 9 7 LMP 38552LMP 24722 EPP 62575 (EPS 1815)LMP 33797LMP 2 6 4 8 3 EPP 62575 LMP 2 6 4 8 3 RP 1224 BCP 33223EPP 25280LMP 41836EPP 71011 EP P 3 5 7 4 3 EPP 77289RP 75056 EPP 32538EPP 32537EPP 77289EPP 35743EPP 35743EPP 35743EPP 26772EPP 63944 EPP 25280 LMP 30218 LMP 26487EPP 252801.83EPP 45993 EPP 45971 EPP 40843 ´ SCALE 1:2,500 MAPLE RIDGE OFFICIAL COMMUNITY PLAN AMENDINGBylaw No. Map No. From: To: Park and Conservation Institutional Conservation 7482-2018978 111A AVE.238 ST.238 ST.LANE KANAKA WAY 111A AVE . KANA K A W A Y 113 AV E.237731114623844 23 7 8 3 2 3 7 3 0 23932111512389923 8 2 6 2393611349 111812380211295 23766 2392211235 11253 239072 3 7 9 1 2391511143 2395311159 11247 2384123906239502371023884 238482381811365 23 8 3 3 11156 239122389311325 11340 23868 11229 11330 11217 23885 23760 238822380123892 2395811350 11370 2 3 8 0 9 238572390223878 23770237 6 3 23858 11205 11357 11135 11341 23 8 2 5 11309 239422 3 7 4 0 11241 11317 11223 23757 23 720 23 8 2 0 23 8 2 123806 11136 11259 23 8 1 3 11169 11277 23871 237 4 6 2394511333 2 3 7 2 6 11240 11303 23863 2371623879 2 3 8 0 5 23756 23 8 3 2 11187 23 8 1 2 23 8 2 9 23753 11211 11283 11175 23750 11360 23 8 3 7 23849239622392523862 23872239282370611289 11195 2391611271 23 8 1 6 11166238102393523 8 4 0 23 8 1 7 23 8 3 6 23 8 4 5 11265 2 3 7 3 6 1 PARK 2 26 3 15 15 1 9 29 6 17 3 27 12 2 20 26 4 12 21 25 8 11 7 1 6 29 8 13 25 24 B 11 5 27 21 20 10 3 10 16 28 11 15 32 1 2 13 19 13 5 19 20 23 23 4 20 22 5 53 17 9 54 8 33PARK 9 28 4 25 23 22 14 21 24 PARK 5 7 22 PARK 4 16 17 18 27 Rem. Pcl. 'P' 18 2 16 16 55 Rem. Pcl. 'P' 12 29 PARK 30 37 7 8 3 38 21 Rem A 2 19 31 22 7 28 26 1 23 52 PARK 6 18 9 30 14 15 14 6 24 LMP 2 6 4 8 3 LMP 337 9 7 EPP 62576(EPS 2572) EPP 25279 BCP 3 3 2 2 2 EPP 45993 EPP 25279 RP 6260 EPP 45994LMP 33797EPP 62576EPP 32520LMP 33797LMP 337 9 7 LMP 38552LMP 24722 EPP 62575 (EPS 1815)LMP 33797LMP 2 6 4 8 3 EPP 62575 LMP 2 6 4 8 3 RP 1224 BCP 33223EPP 25280LMP 41836EPP 71011 EP P 3 5 7 4 3 EPP 77289RP 75056 EPP 32538EPP 32537EPP 77289EPP 35743EPP 35743EPP 35743EPP 26772EPP 63944 EPP 25280 LMP 30218 LMP 26487EPP 252801.83EPP 45993 EPP 45971 EPP 40843 ´ SCALE 1:2,500 MAPLE RIDGE OFFICIAL COMMUNITY PLAN AMENDINGBylaw No. Map No. Purpose: To Amend Schedule C as shown To Add To Conservation 7482-2018979 CITY OF MAPLE RIDGE BYLAW NO. 7313-2017 A Bylaw to amend Map "A" forming part of Zoning Bylaw No. 3510 - 1985 as amended ______________________________________________________________________________ WHEREAS, it is deemed expedient to amend Maple Ridge Zoning Bylaw No. 3510 - 1985 as amended; NOW THEREFORE, the Municipal Council of the City of Maple Ridge enacts as follows: 1.This Bylaw may be cited as "Maple Ridge Zone Amending Bylaw No. 7313-2017." 2.That Part 2, INTERPERTATION, CIVIC is hereby amended by The addition of the word “park” following the words “golf courses and firehalls”. 3.That Part 9, INSTITUTIONAL ZONES, Section 901 PERMITTED USES OF LAND, BUILDINGS AND STRUCTURES IN INSTITUTIONAL ZONES , PERMITTED USE is hereby amended by replacing “Civic Institutional” with “Civic”; 4.That parcel or tract of land and premises known and described as: Parcel “P” (Reference Plan 1224) of the South East Quarter Section 16 Township 12 New Westminster District and outlined in heavy black line on Map No. 1705 a copy of which is attached hereto and forms part of this Bylaw, is hereby rezoned to P-6 (Civic Institutional). 5. Maple Ridge Zoning Bylaw No. 3510 - 1985 as amended and Map "A" attached thereto are hereby amended accordingly. READ a first time the 24th day of April, 2018 READ a second time the day of , 20 PUBLIC HEARING held the day of , 20 READ a third time the day of , 20 ADOPTED, the day of , 20 _____________________________ ____________________________ PRESIDING MEMBER CORPORATE OFFICER APPENDIX E 111A AVE.238 ST.238 ST.LANE KANAKA WAY 111A AVE . KANA K A W A Y 113 AV E.237731114623844 23 7 8 3 2 3 7 3 0 23932111512389923 8 2 6 2393611349 111812380211295 23766 2392211235 11253 239072 3 7 9 1 2391511143 2395311159 11247 2384123906239502371023884 238482381811365 23 8 3 3 11156 239122389311325 11340 23868 11229 11330 11217 23885 23760 238822380123892 2395811350 11370 2 3 8 0 9 238572390223878 23770237 6 3 23858 11205 11357 11135 11341 23 8 2 5 11309 239422 3 7 4 0 11241 11317 11223 23757 23 720 23 8 2 0 23 8 2 123806 11136 11259 23 8 1 3 11169 11277 23871 237 4 6 2394511333 2 3 7 2 6 11240 11303 23863 2371623879 2 3 8 0 5 23756 23 8 3 2 11187 23 8 1 2 23 8 2 9 23753 11211 11283 11175 23750 11360 23 8 3 7 23849239622392523862 23872239282370611289 11195 2391611271 23 8 1 6 11166238102393523 8 4 0 23 8 1 7 23 8 3 6 23 8 4 5 11265 2 3 7 3 6 1 PARK 2 26 3 15 15 1 9 29 6 17 3 27 12 2 20 26 4 12 21 25 8 11 7 1 6 29 8 13 25 24 B 11 5 27 21 20 10 3 10 16 28 11 15 32 1 2 13 19 13 5 19 20 23 23 4 20 22 5 53 17 9 54 8 33PARK 9 28 4 25 23 22 14 21 24 PARK 5 7 22 PARK 4 16 17 18 27 Rem. Pcl. 'P' 18 2 16 16 55 Rem. Pcl. 'P' 12 29 PARK 30 37 7 8 3 38 21 Rem A 2 19 31 22 7 28 26 1 23 52 PARK 6 18 9 30 14 15 14 6 24 LMP 2 6 4 8 3 LMP 337 9 7 EPP 62576(EPS 2572) EPP 25279 BCP 3 3 2 2 2 EPP 45993 EPP 25279 RP 6260 EPP 45994LMP 33797EPP 62576EPP 32520LMP 33797LMP 337 9 7 LMP 38552LMP 24722 EPP 62575 (EPS 1815)LMP 33797LMP 2 6 4 8 3 EPP 62575 LMP 2 6 4 8 3 RP 1224 BCP 33223EPP 25280LMP 41836EPP 71011 EP P 3 5 7 4 3 EPP 77289RP 75056 EPP 32538EPP 32537EPP 77289EPP 35743EPP 35743EPP 35743EPP 26772EPP 63944 EPP 25280 LMP 30218 LMP 26487EPP 252801.83EPP 45993 EPP 45971 EPP 40843 ´ SCALE 1:2,500 MAPLE RIDGE ZONE AMENDINGBylaw No. Map No.From: To: RS-3 (One Family Rural Residential) P-6 (Civic Institutional) 7313-20171705 APPENDIX F -1 - City of Maple Ridge TO: Her Worship Mayor Nicole Read MEETING DATE: July 24, 2018 and Members of Council FILE NO: 2013-117-RZ FROM: Chief Administrative Officer MEETING: Council SUBJECT: Rescinding second and third readings Second reading Zone Amending Bylaw No. 7055-2014; 12182 228 Street EXECUTIVE SUMMARY: This is an application for the property at 12182 228 Street to be rezoned from RS-1 (One Family Urban Residential) to R-3 (Special Amenity Residential District) for a future subdivision of approximately 3 lots, a lane, and a remnant portion. The property is at third reading granted by Council on April 26, 2016, with an extension granted October 23, 2017. Over the course of this application’s life, the land has changed hands two times and was faced by a number of hurdles beyond the control of the applicant, including a legal challenge. The current owner has been pursuing this application and has acquired multiple lands surrounding the subject property, allowing the applicant to achieve an improved lot yield for the subject property. However, the rezoning application extension expired on April 26, 2018 and the revised rezoning submission is still at the referral stage, so is unable to be completed at this time. As the applicant is pursuing completion of application 2013-117-RZ, and the layout concept plus house designs are a departure from the previous one presented, achieving better coordination with surrounding lands, the applicant is requesting that the application be taken back to second reading and Public Hearing to allow for the time necessary to complete the application. Ordinarily there is an 18 month period after third reading (with a 6 month extension at the discretion of the Director of Planning) to complete terms and conditions and to seek final adoption. This full period may not be required in this instance and staff is recommending that the applicant be limited to six months to complete this project. The process to achieve the applicant’s request would be for Council to take the following actions respecting Bylaw No. 7055-2014: rescind second and third readings to the bylaw; grant second reading again to the bylaw; and forward the bylaw to a new Public Hearing. This request is supportable as the applicant has been actively working on the application, but more importantly the request will allow the neighbours to comment on the revised proposal, recognizing that ownership in the neighbourhood may change. The proposed R-3 (Special Amenity Residential District) zoning complies with the Official Community Plan. This application was previously exempt from Policy 6.31 regarding the Community Amenity Contribution Program, however will be subject to this policy, should Council repeal second reading of the bylaw. The subject program applies to all development of all residential buildings, with an exemption that where 3 or less single family lots are proposed, the original lot is exempt. Since 3 single family lots are proposed, the original lot is exempt, resulting in a voluntary contribution in the 1106 -2 - amount of $10,200.00 ($5,100.00 x 2) be provided in keeping with the Council Policy with regard to Community Amenity Contributions. Further contributions for the future rezoning and subdivision into the remainder 19 lots will be collected under future applications. RECOMMENDATIONS: 1)That second and third readings for Bylaw No. 7055-2014 be rescinded; 2)That Zone Amending Bylaw No. 7055-2014 be given second reading, and be forwarded to Public Hearing; 3)That an additional fee will be required for the second Public Hearing in the amount of $882.00, as described in the approved fee schedule; 4)That the following terms and conditions be met prior to final reading: i)Registration of a temporary Statutory Right of Way on the proposed northern portion of lot 3, to provide temporary access to the rear lane, until such time as alternative access is provided via a lane system; ii)Registration of a Restrictive Covenant for Stormwater Management; iii)Removal of existing structures; iv) Dedication of the 7.5m wide lane, to be projected on the Subdivision plan as per Subdivision and Servicing Amending Bylaw No. 7093-2014. v)Registration of a temporary ‘No Build’ Restrictive Covenant on lot 3, both over the northern portion and over the eastern remnant portion; vi) In addition to the site profile, a disclosure statement must be submitted by a Professional Engineer advising whether there is any evidence of underground fuel storage tanks on the subject property. If so, a Stage 1 Site Investigation Report is required to ensure that the subject property is not a contaminated site; and vii)That a voluntary contribution, in the amount of $10,200.00 be provided in keeping with the Council Policy with regard to Community Amenity Contributions. 5)That the terms and conditions for Zone Amending Bylaw No. 7055-2014 be satisfied within 6 months of receiving third reading of the Bylaw. Failure to satisfy the conditions within this prescribed timeframe will result in the closure of file 2013-117-RZ. There will not be an option for extension. DISCUSSION: 1)Background Context: Applicant: Bahal Holdings Inc., Ronnie Jagday Legal Description: Lot 1, except firstly the north 75 feet, and secondly part subdivided by plan 44214, Section 20, Township 12, New Westminster District Plan 4836 -3 - OCP: Existing: Single-Family Residential Proposed: Single-Family Residential Zoning: Existing: RS-1 (One Family Urban Residential) Proposed: R-3 (Special Amenity Residential District) Surrounding Uses: North: Use: Single Family Residential Zone: RS-1 (One Family Urban Residential) Designation: Single Family Residential South: Use: Single Family Residential Zone: RS-1 (One Family Urban Residential) Designation: Single Family Residential East: Use: Single Family Residential Zone: RS-1 (One Family Urban Residential) Designation: Single Family Residential West: Use: Single Family Residential Zone: RS-1 (One Family Urban Residential) and RM-1 (Townhouse Residential) Designation: Single Family Residential Existing Use of Property: Single Family Residential Proposed Use of Property: Single Family Residential Site Area: 0.138 ha (0.34 acres) Access: 228 Street Servicing: Urban Standard Companion Applications: 2013-117-SD and 2013-117-DP The original application received first reading on February 11, 2014, and second reading on March 8, 2016. In March 2016 the property changed ownership. Public Hearing was held on April 19, 2016 and third reading was granted April 26, 2016. Due to legal implications beyond control of the owners, they requested a 6 month extension, and were granted such on October 23, 2017, to be valid until April 26, 2018. Mid December 2017 the property was sold again, and the current owner took over the application. Due to circumstances outside control of the new owner, a new consultant team needed to be assembled, working on both the subject property as well as the full development of acquired adjacent properties, ultimately proposing 22 lots (3 of which on the subject property, 19 on the acquired adjacent sites), accessing through a lane connected to Greenwell Street. 2)Project Description: The property at 12182 228 Street is proposed to be rezoned from RS-1 (One Family Urban Residential) to R-3 (Special Amenity Residential District) for a future subdivision of approximately 3 lots, a lane, and a remnant portion. The application was initially granted third reading on April 26, 2016. Since that time, the number of proposed lots remains at 3; however; the revised layout is for narrower lots that are reduced in the size (not less than the 213 m2 lot size for the R-3 Zone) with a larger remnant to accommodate the wider subdivision pattern to be part of a separate rezoning application in the future. - 4 - 3) Site Characteristics: The subject property is situated in a block bound by 122 Avenue to the north, Greenwell Street to the east, Purdey Avenue to the south, and 228 Street to the west (see Appendix A and B). The subject property fronts 228 Street, and is located in the Town Centre Area Plan. A single family home is currently located on the property. No watercourses or steep slopes exist on the subject property. The applicant is proposing to develop 3 single family lots with detached homes. Detached garages are projected in the rear yards, with rear lane access. Also included in the project is a portion of remnant land that will be consolidated for future subdivision with the adjacent property to the east. The rear lane will be extended and accessed by way of Greenwell Street. 228 Street is designated as a collector road intended to accommodate both a high volume of vehicle traffic and on-street parking. Providing a rear lane will eliminate driveway letdowns, maximizing the available on-street parking for new developments on 228 Street. 4) Planning Analysis: i) Official Community Plan: The subject site is located within the North View Precinct of the Town Centre Area Plan and is currently designated Single-Family Residential, which allows for intensive single family and duplex development as a transition from higher densities in the downtown area to existing larger lot single family residential areas outside of the Town Centre Area. The North View Precinct of the Town Centre encompasses a range of land uses. The highest residential densities, such as high-rise apartments, are permitted adjacent to the civic core and transition down to lower single family residential densities closer to the area plan boundaries. The Town Centre Area Plan states the following in the Single-Family Residential designation: The Single-Family Residential designation in the Town Centre provides options for increasing density and choice of housing form, while retaining the single family character in these established neighbourhood blocks. Policy 3-17 To enable some densification in areas designated for Single-Family Residential, Maple Ridge will consider: a. A Detached Garden Suite, subject to consistency with the Maple Ridge Detached Garden Suites policy; b. A Secondary Suite within a principle single-family use dwelling, subject to consistency with the existing Maple Ridge Secondary Suite Bylaws. c. Lot size of 213m2 to 370m2 is permitted, where vehicle access is from a rear lane only. d. Minimum lot size of 371m2 is permitted, where driveway access is located from the rear lane or the street. e. Duplex development will be permitted on a corner lot or a lot with lane access to concealed parking. The minimum lot size for duplex development is 557m2 and the character of the development should be similar to a single-family development in its size, scale, and massing. Policy 5-9 Maple Ridge will encourage the retention of laneways and the creation of new laneways should be considered, where appropriate and feasible. -5 - The proposed single detached form with vehicle access from the lane is consistent with the Town Centre Area Plan policies. ii)Zoning Bylaw: The current application proposes to rezone the subject property located at 12182 228 Street from RS-1 (One Family Urban Residential) to R-3 (Special Amenity Residential District) to permit future subdivision into approximately three single family lots, a lane, and a remnant lot. (see Appendix C). The minimum area requirement for R-3 (Special Amenity Residential District) is 213 m2, and a minimum width of 7.9m is required when there is access off a lane. This is in compliance with the regulations in the R-3 Zone. iii)Off-Street Parking And Loading Bylaw: Schedule A of the Off-Street Parking and Loading Bylaw states that for a building with One Family Residential, and Two Family Residential uses, 2.0 parking spaces for each unit is required. The proposed plan shows double garages on each lot. iv) Development Permits: Pursuant to Section 8.8 of the OCP, an Intensive Residential Development Permit application is required to ensure the current proposal provides emphasis on high standards in aesthetics and quality of the built environment. Compliance with the key guidelines will be the subject of a future report to Council for application 2013-117-DP. The proposed form and character of the buildings consist of detached 2 storey residences with basement. v)Parkland Requirements: As there are fewer than three additional lots proposed to be created, the developer will not be required to comply with the park dedication requirements of Section 510 of the Local Government Act prior to subdivision approval. 5)Interdepartmental Implications: i)Engineering Department: The Subdivision and Servicing Amending Bylaw No. 7093-2014 requires a right-of-way width of 7.5 m for a lane. It is noted that the property can accommodate a 7.5m wide lane in line with the conceptual lane design for this block. The Engineering Department therefore would not support any variance to reduce the lane width. Consistent with the Town Centre Area Plan and the intended functionality of a collector road, the Engineering Department supports the lane access requirement for newly created lots less than 370m2 in area. At this time, a statutory right-of-way will be required over one of the proposed lots until such time that lane access can be connected through to Greenwell Street, or the lane is extended and a new temporary access is provided on an adjacent property. - 6 - The original Stormwater Management Plan was prepared by Civic Consultants in Abbotsford, received November 26, 2015. Due to changed layout, an updated plan needs to be prepared by the applicant for review by the City. ii) Fire Department: A Statutory Right of Way is required on one of the lots, to provide temporary access to the rear lane way, as also noted in the Engineering comments. Temporary access on the lot is to be constructed to similar standard as the regular municipal lanes. A sign stating ‘Fire Lane – No Parking’ is required to be posted on the lane. III) Alternative: Should Council deny the request, the file will be closed, as the opportunity to be kept open through the Development Procedures Bylaw No. 5879-1999, has expired after April 26, 2018. It is then recommended that Zone Amending Bylaw No. 7055-2014, be rescinded, and file 2013-117-RZ and its affiliated files be closed. The applicant will have an opportunity to re-apply for rezoning of the subject property to get subdivided into 3 proposed lots, or apply for the full project site to be rezoned and subdivided into 22 proposed lots. CONCLUSION: The original proposed application is to permit future subdivision into three (3) single family lots in the North View Precinct of the Town Centre Area Plan. Three (3) lots are still proposed; however, they have been reduced in size and width. The revised proposal is in compliance with the OCP. It is recommended that second and third reading be rescinded, that Second Reading be given to Zone Amending Bylaw No.7055-2014, and that application 2013-117-RZ be forwarded to Public Hearing. “Original signed by Adrian Kopystynski” for _______________________________________________ Prepared by: Therese Melser Planning Technician “Original signed by Christine Carter” _______________________________________________ Approved by: Christine Carter, M.PL, MCIP, RPP Director of Planning “Original signed by Frank Quinn” _______________________________________________ Approved by: Frank Quinn, MBA, P.Eng GM Public Works & Development Services “Original signed by Paul Gill” _______________________________________________ Concurrence: Paul Gill, CPA, CGA Chief Administrative Officer The following appendices are attached hereto: Appendix A – Subject Map Appendix B – Ortho Map Appendix C – Zone Amending Bylaw No. 7055-2014 Appendix D – Site Plan DATE: Jul 18, 2018 FILE: 2013-117-RZ 12182 228 STREET PLANNING DEPARTMENT SUBJECT PROPERTY FLETCHER STGREENWELL ST2016-219-RZ 2016-219-DP 2016-219-SD 2017-376-RZ 2018-277-DP ´ Scale: 1:2,500 BY: PC Legend Ditch Centreline APPENDIX A DATE: Jul 18, 2018 FILE: 2013-117-RZ 12182 228 STREET City of PittMeadows District of Langley District of MissionFRASER R . ^PLANNING DEPARTMENT SUBJECT PROPERTY FLETCHER STGREENWELL STAerial Imagery from the Spring of 2016´ Scale: 1:2,500 BY: PC APPENDIX B CITY OF MAPLE RIDGE BYLAW NO. 7055-2014 A Bylaw to amend Map "A" forming part of Zoning Bylaw No. 3510 - 1985 as amended WHEREAS, it is deemed expedient to amend Maple Ridge Zoning Bylaw No. 3510 - 1985 as amended; NOW THEREFORE, the Municipal Council of the City of Maple Ridge enacts as follows: 1.This Bylaw may be cited as "Maple Ridge Zone Amending Bylaw No. 7055-2014." 2.That parcel or tract of land and premises known and described as: Lot 1 Except: Firstly: The North 75 Feet and Secondly: Part Subdivided by Plan 44214; Section 20 Township 12 New Westminster District Plan 4836 and outlined in heavy black line on Map No. 1607 a copy of which is attached hereto and forms part of this Bylaw, is hereby rezoned to R-3 (Special Amenity Residential District). 3.Maple Ridge Zoning Bylaw No. 3510 - 1985 as amended and Map "A" attached thereto are hereby amended accordingly. READ a first time the 11th day of February, 2014. READ a second time the 8th day of March, 2016 PUBLIC HEARING held the 19th day of April, 2016. READ a third time the 26th day of April, 2016. ADOPTED the day of , 20 _____________________________ ____________________________ PRESIDING MEMBER CORPORATE OFFICER APPENDIX C 12121 12169 12201 12243 2280622871229022291112140 12143 12147 12151 12160 12238 2287212141 12183 12120 228332288212131 12229 228182282412157 12167 12185 121552291212151 12191 12194 1216122836 12150 228802287512145 12203 12166 12128 228122288122882121352288812139 12182 12208 12240 12140 12166 22874228812289112161 12211 12154 12195 12180 12192 12224 122 AVE.GREENWELL ST. 122 AVE. 331 279 334 P 11845 402 N 50' 5 BCS 569 P 82923 339 1 2 337 335 103 128 116 338 P 62578 340 10 1 Rem. 1 288 353 236 113 215 104 129 P 11845336P 14396S. 52.5' 2 A BCP 21032 P 44858 340 3 338 4 6 237 225 213 252 228P 11845P 13667336P 57241214 127 114 102 P 56987 S 1/2 10 N 1/2 10 6P 14396 P 57607 *PP090 B 75' of 1 P 52578P 41774 227 105 S 1/2 9 280 2P 71970 339 BCP 23946 Rem 2 2 401 294 341 P 4836 3 250 251 115 N 1/2 9P 42772LMP 4065 P 58171 P 45792 P 67081 8 A 295P 44214289 126 P 62211 333 1 9 P 81396Rem. N P 52578303 P 44396 P 13667 304 235 226 216 RW 45948 EP 42655 228 ST.GREENWELL ST.´ SCALE 1:1,500 MAPLE RIDGE ZONE AMENDINGBylaw No. Map No. From: To: RS-1 (One Family Urban Residential) R-3 (Special Amenity Residential District) 7055-20141607 APPENDIX D -1 - City of Maple Ridge TO: Her Worship Mayor Nicole Read MEETING DATE: July 24, 2018 and Members of Council FILE NO: 2017-031-RZ FROM: Chief Administrative Officer MEETING: Council SUBJECT: Second Reading Zone Amending Bylaw No. 7348-2017 21333 River Road EXECUTIVE SUMMARY: An application has been received to rezone the subject property, located at 21333 River Road, from RS-1 (One Family Urban Residential) to RT-2 (Ground-Oriented Residential Infill), a newly created zone (Bylaw No. 7312-2017), to permit the development of courtyard residential housing. This project proposes a total of 4 dwelling units, clustered around a common courtyard. Council granted first reading to Zone Amending Bylaw No. 7348-2017 on June 13, 2017. Note that Official Community Plan Amending Bylaw No. 7349-2017, Zone Amending Bylaw No. 7312-2017, and Off Street Parking and Loading Amending Bylaw No. 7350-2017 text amendments in conjunction with creating the new RT-2 (Ground-Oriented Residential Infill) zone, were given first reading on June 13, 2017. These amending bylaws, if approved, will create the policy and regulatory basis to permit new ground-oriented infill housing such as courtyard, fourplex and triplex forms in accordance with the action items of the Housing Action Plan Implementation Framework that were prioritized by Council. This courtyard application applies the draft requirements of the proposed RT-2 zone and Off Street Parking and Loading Bylaw for courtyard developments, which will also be considered for second reading at the July 24, 2018 Council meeting. Pursuant to Council Policy 6.31, this application is subject to the Community Amenity Contribution Program at a rate of $4,100.00 per new dwelling unit; for an estimated amount of $12,300.00. RECOMMENDATIONS: 1)That Zone Amending Bylaw No. 7348-2017 be given second reading, and be forwarded to Public Hearing; 2)That the following terms and conditions be met prior to final reading: i)Registration of a Rezoning Servicing Agreement as a Restrictive Covenant and receipt of the deposit of a security, as outlined in the Agreement; ii)Approval from the Ministry of Transportation and Infrastructure; iii)Road dedication on River Road, as required; iv) Registration of a Restrictive Covenant for the Geotechnical Report, which addresses the suitability of the subject property for the proposed development; 1107 - 2 - v) Registration of a Restrictive Covenant for Stormwater Management; vi) Registration of a Restrictive Covenant prohibiting secondary suites; vii) Removal of existing building; viii) In addition to the site profile, a disclosure statement must be submitted by a Professional Engineer advising whether there is any evidence of underground fuel storage tanks on the subject property. If so, a Stage 1 Site Investigation Report is required to ensure that the subject property is not a contaminated site; and ix) That a voluntary contribution, in the amount of $12,300.00 ($4,100.00 per unit excluding the original) be provided in keeping with the Council Policy with regard to Community Amenity Contributions. DISCUSSION: 1) Background Context: Applicant: Kevin Urbas Legal Description: Lot 49 District Lot 248 Group 1 New Westminster District Plan 27106 OCP: Existing: Urban Residential Zoning: Existing: RS-1 (One Family Urban Residential) Proposed: RT-2 (Ground-Oriented Residential Infill) Surrounding Uses: North: Use: Hospital (Ridge Meadows) Zone: P-6 (Civic Institutional), RS-1 (One Family Urban Residential) Designation: Institutional, Conservation, Urban Residential South: Use: Single Family Residential Zone: RS-1 (One Family Urban Residential) Designation: Urban Residential East: Use: Apartment Zone: RS-1 (One Family Urban Residential) Designation: Urban Residential West: Use: Hospital (Ridge Meadows), Single Family Residential Zone: P-6 (Civic Institutional), RS-1 (One Family Urban Residential) Designation: Institutional, Conservation, Urban Residential Existing Use of Property: Single Family Residential Proposed Use of Property: Multi-Family Residential (Courtyard) Site Area: 0.12 ha (0.31 acres) Access: River Road Servicing requirement: Urban Standard - 3 - 2) Background and Context: On June 13, 2017, Council received a staff report presenting policy and zoning amendments to the OCP, Zoning Bylaw, and Off Street Parking and Loading Bylaw to create a new RT-2 (Ground-Oriented Residential Infill) zone for the triplex, fourplex and courtyard residential housing forms. Based on this information, Council gave first reading to OCP Amending Bylaw No. 7349-2017, Zone Amending Bylaw No. 7312-2017, and Off Street Parking and Loading Amending Bylaw No. 7350-2017 on June 13, 2017 to create the new RT-2 zone. Those three policy and zone amending bylaws are also being presented to Council for second reading at this time under a separate staff report (2017-233-RZ). It is important to note that, should those three policy and zone amending bylaws not be approved, this courtyard development application would not be able to complete and the file would be closed. As discussed under the staff report for the policy and zone amending bylaws (2017-233-RZ), it was intended that new RT-2 (Ground-Oriented Residential Infill) projects integrate sensitively into existing neighbourhoods with housing forms that are similar in scale and massing to a detached single-family dwelling, and not replicate townhouse or rowhouse housing form. Dwelling units may be in one building with shared party walls to create triplexes or fourplexes. In the case of courtyard residential development, dwelling units may be arranged individually or attached in groups of buildings that still resemble single family dwellings, but clustered around a shared open space (courtyard) in a village- style residential pattern. In all cases, units should take advantage of site context to create uniqueness, orient entrances towards the street where possible, and utilize landscaping and screening to create private or semi-private yard spaces. 3) Project Description: The subject property, located at 21333 River Road, is 1,250 m² (0.31 acres) in size, and is bound by single family lots to the west and south, Ridge Meadows Hospital to the north, and a 3-storey non- conforming apartment to the east. The subject property is relatively flat, with a few trees located to the south along River Road (see Appendices A and B). The current application proposes to rezone the subject property from RS-1 (One Family Urban Residential) to RT-2 (Ground-Oriented Residential Infill) to permit the construction of a courtyard development. The proposed courtyard development provides a total of 686 m² (7,384 ft²) of gross floor area in two buildings, each with two units for a total of four dwelling units. Three of the dwelling units contain three bedrooms, each approximately 184 m² (1,981 ft²) in size, and one unit contains two bedrooms, approximately 134 m² (1,442 ft²) in size. All units face the central courtyard, which is designed to be a flexible and interactive common outdoor space for residents. The courtyard area contains both hardscaping (permeable pavers and stamped concrete) and softscaping (plants and shrubs) (see Appendix G). A common barbeque area on the northern portion of the courtyard will be included, along with a basketball hoop, both of which to facilitate social gathering and community interaction for the residents of the development. Units are oriented with common rooms facing the courtyard to encourage a connection between indoor and outdoor space, subsequently creating both a sense of community, as well as a sense of safety. Units 1 and 3 are also oriented to River Road , which helps create a positive relationship to the street, and encourages the buildings to appear as single family dwellings (see Appendix E). The courtyard area also provides vehicle access and egress to residential garages. Each unit also has private outdoor space in the form of a roof top patio and a fenced yard. -4 - 4)Planning Analysis: i)Official Community Plan: The OCP designates the subject property Urban Residential – Major Corridor, and development of the property is subject to the Major Corridor infill policies of the OCP. The Major Corridor Residential category identifies the types of ground-oriented housing forms, which are encouraged along major road corridors. These policies also require that development be compatible with the surrounding neighbourhood, with particular attention given to site design, setbacks, and lot configuration with the existing pattern of development in the area. It is noted that one of the underlying principles in the OCP is to encourage growth within the Urban Area Boundary (UAB) and to accommodate growth through infill by promoting a mix of housing types and tenures (Policy 3-1). The proposed rezoning of the subject property to RT-2 (Ground-Oriented Residential Infill) aligns with the proposed amendments to the OCP to accommodate courtyard developments along Major Corridors. As mentioned above, the site is located on River Road, which is a Major Corridor as identified on Figure 4 of the OCP. This site lends itself well to surrounding ground-oriented residential infill, given the varying forms of development surrounding the subject property. While the surrounding developments vary in character, the proposed development references a single family housing form by separating the dwelling units into two groups to face each other in a courtyard style. The result of the two buildings, along with the scale and massing, allows this courtyard development to read as single family dwellings from the street level. For these reasons, the proposed courtyard development aligns with the land use, residential infill, and compatibility policies of the OCP. It also aligns with the goals of the Housing Action Plan (HAP) and Implementation Framework, notably Strategy #1, which articulates the importance of a diverse housing mix and innovation and supports the development of a mix of housing forms. ii)Zoning Bylaw: The current application proposes to rezone the subject property from RS-1 (One Family Urban Residential) to RT-2 (Ground-Oriented Residential Infill) to permit the development of courtyard housing. The minimum lot size for the current RS-1 (One Family Urban Residential) zone is 668 m² and the minimum lot size for Courtyard Housing in the RT-2 (Ground-Oriented Residential Infill) zone is 950 m2. As mentioned earlier in the report, Bylaw No. 7312-2017 creates the new RT-2 zone and the Bylaw will run concurrently with the application. Courtyard residential development is supported on this property because it will be similar in scale to the surrounding, established neighbourhood. The maximum height requirements for courtyard residential developments has been set to 9.5 m to fit within the context of established neighbourhoods, with a recognition that existing homes in the area were built to a lower height. Each dwelling unit is also provided with ample greenspace, along with one shared driveway for all units to access their individual garages. The density permitted for courtyard residential is set at 0.75 FSR. iii)Off-Street Parking And Loading Bylaw: An amendment to the Off-Street Parking and Loading Bylaw is being proposed, under a parallel report, along with the proposed amendment to the OCP and Zoning Bylaw to create the new RT-2 (Ground-Oriented Residential Infill) zone. The amendment clarifies that two off street parking spaces will be required for each dwelling unit for triplex, fourplex and courtyard residential developments. This courtyard development conforms to the parking requirements for the new RT-2 (Ground- Oriented Residential Infill) zone. Each unit is provided with two concealed parking stalls in the -5 - principal building or detached garage structure. A common driveway provides access to the parking stalls. iv) Proposed Variances: A Development Variance Permit application has been received for this project and involves relaxations to the front yard setbacks from 6.0 m to 4.6 m to the building face for Units 1 and 3; as well as a minor relaxation to the side yard setback on the east side of the development site. The requested variances to the RT-2 (Ground-Oriented Residential Infill) zone will be the subject of a future report to Council. v)Development Permits: Pursuant to Section 8.7 of the OCP, a Multi-Family Development Permit application is required to ensure the current proposal enhances existing neighbourhoods with compatible housing styles that meet diverse needs, and minimize potential conflicts with neighbouring land uses. The Proposed Triplex, Fourplex and Courtyard Housing Forms Overview report from April 18, 2016 stated that applications for triplex, fourplex and courtyard housing will use the Multi-Family Development Permit guidelines until such time that specific Development Permit guidelines are created for this new housing form. The current application has been reviewed by the Advisory Design Panel (ADP), with comments outlined below. vi) Advisory Design Panel: The ADP reviewed the form and character of the proposed development and the landscaping plans at a meeting held on May 16, 2018 (see Appendix E and F). Following presentations by the project Architect and Landscape Architect, the ADP made the following resolution that: Consider changing the unit pavers to another level play surface at the Basketball hoop courtyard and relocate the catch basin; Consider utilizing private courtyard for Units 4 and 2 as amenity space; North perimeter of property - consider adding slats to open chain link fence; add taller plant material and vines in front of the chain link fence; Reduce the variety of paving treatments used in central driveway area to two types; Expand and continue the decorative treatment through the central driveway area; Consider using a fence that would bring unity/link to property; Use the front yard elevations palette on the remainder of the elevations; ADP has consistently requested that vinyl materials not be applied; Integrate a lighting plan both on buildings and in landscaping; Establish uniform datum heights for fenestration; and Indicate location of Fire Department directional signage. The ADP concerns have been addressed and are reflected in the current plans (see Appendix D). A detailed description of how these items were incorporated into the final design will be included in a future development permit report to Council. vii) Development Information Meeting: A Development Information Meeting was not required for this application because there is no OCP amendment and the proposal is less than 5 dwelling units. - 6 - 5) Traffic Impact: As the subject property is located within 800 metres of the Lougheed Highway, a referral has been sent to the Ministry of Transportation and Infrastructure. Ministry approval of the Zone Amending Bylaw will be required as a condition of final reading. At this time, the Ministry has granted preliminary approval of the development application. 6) Interdepartmental Implications: i) Engineering Department: New concrete curb, gutter and sidewalk will be required across the frontage of the subject property. A new sanitary sewer, storm sewer and water service connection will be required as part of development. Street lighting and street trees are also required along with road dedication of approximately 3.0 m across the property frontage. ii) Building Department: The subject property is located within the Fraser River Escarpment area, where stormwater must be directed to Municipal storm sewer, as per Council Policy 6.23. This has been incorporated into the Stormwater Management Plan and registration of a Stormwater Covenant will be required as a condition of final reading. 7) School District No. 42 Comments: A referral was sent to School District No. 42 with the following information: “The proposed application would affect the student population for the catchment areas currently served by Maple Ridge Elementary and Westview Secondary School. Maple Ridge Elementary has an operating capacity of 480 students. For the 2017-18 school year the student enrolment at Maple Ridge Elementary is 381 students (82% utilization) including 98 students from out of catchment. Westview Secondary School has an operating capacity of 1,200 students. For the 2017-18 school year the student enrolment at Westview Secondary School is 765 students (64% utilization) including 137 students from out of catchment.” -7 - CONCLUSION: This courtyard development application is the first of its kind under the new proposed RT-2 (Ground- oriented Residential Infill) zone. The proposed zone aligns with the land use and compatibility policies of the OCP. It also aligns with the goals of the Housing Action Plan and Implementation Framework to provide greater housing mix and innovation. The applicant has worked with City staff, incorporated the City’s Advisory Design Panel’s comments, and developed a project, building design, scale and massing which is sensitive to the existing, surrounding neighbourhood, and conforms to the intent and provisions of the new RT-2 zone for residential infill projects. Therefore, it is recommended that second reading be given to Zone Amending Bylaw No.7348-2017 and that application 2017-031-RZ be forwarded to Public Hearing. “Original signed by Adam Rieu” _______________________________________________ Prepared by: Adam Rieu Planning Technician “Original signed by Christine Carter” _______________________________________________ Approved by: Christine Carter, M.PL, MCIP, RPP Director of Planning “Original signed by Frank Quinn” _______________________________________________ Approved by: Frank Quinn, MBA, P.Eng GM Public Works & Development Services “Original signed by Paul Gill” ______________________________________________ Concurrence: Paul Gill, CPA, CGA Chief Administrative Officer The following appendices are attached hereto: Appendix A – Subject Map Appendix B – Ortho Map Appendix C – Zone Amending Bylaw No. 7348-2017 Appendix D – Site Plan Appendix E – Building Elevation Plans Appendix F – Building Rendering Appendix G – Landscape Plan DATE: Feb 9, 2017 2017-031-RZ BY: JV PLANNING DEPARTMENT SUBJECT PROPERTY RIVER RO A D ´ Scale: 1:1,500 21333 River RoadLegend Stream Indefinite Creek River Major Rivers & Lakes APPENDIX A DATE: Feb 9, 2017 2017-031-RZ BY: JV PLANNING DEPARTMENT SUBJECT PROPERTY RIVER RO A D ´ Scale: 1:1,500 21333 River Road Aerial Imagery from the Spring of 2011 Legend Stream Indefinite Creek River Major Rivers & Lakes APPENDIX B CITY OF MAPLE RIDGE BYLAW NO. 7348-2017 A Bylaw to amend Map "A" forming part of Zoning Bylaw No. 3510 - 1985 as amended ______________________________________________________________________________ WHEREAS, it is deemed expedient to amend Maple Ridge Zoning Bylaw No. 3510 - 1985 as amended; NOW THEREFORE, the Municipal Council of the City of Maple Ridge enacts as follows: 1.This Bylaw may be cited as "Maple Ridge Zone Amending Bylaw No. 7348-2017." 2.That parcel or tract of land and premises known and described as: Lot 49 District Lot 248 Group 1 New Westminster District Plan 27106 and outlined in heavy black line on Map No. 1704 a copy of which is attached hereto and forms part of this Bylaw, is hereby rezoned to RT-2 (Ground-Oriented Multi- Family). 3.Maple Ridge Zoning Bylaw No. 3510 - 1985 as amended and Map "A" attached thereto are hereby amended accordingly. READ a first time the 13th day of June, 2017. READ a second time the day of , 20 PUBLIC HEARING held the day of , 20 READ a third time the day of , 20 APPROVED by the Ministry of Transportation and Infrastructure this day of , 20 ADOPTED the day of , 20 _____________________________ ____________________________ PRESIDING MEMBER CORPORATE OFFICER APPENDIX C PINE ST.LAITY ST.MORRIS ST.FIR ST . RIVER RO A D WOOD ST.ANDERSON PL . 11556 11683 11527 11618 11543 11606 11628 212562 1 3 2 8 11520 11641 2143611594 11664 11551 11663 11626 11640 11667 2137811587 115572121111641 11670 1159921270 2137411515 2126011678 11555 11567 11520 21428214591157011528 2139921369214322 1 2 9 8 11584 11558 11550 2133311542 11562212311157721239 1158411688 11543 11681 11673 11657 11530 11692 11682 11656 11537 1159211672 11674 11604 11721 21404212991165311651 115781154011666 214372142411569 11640 213961158321232 11662 21382213032136221352212492142111530 2141211685 11631 11671 21442214072138111679 2125411616 11563 11661 2141611684 11559 2133611593 1150111580 11654 11676 11566 11601 11762 115302146611502 2125811520115272122111657 2131511547 11691/93 2 1 2 9 0 11632 11544 11624 1164021222 2145011531 11560 115192 1 3 0 8 267 A 2 8 292 265 118 10 124 2 Rem 34 384 274 Rem 381 272 95 18 270 53 2 48 149 283 210 2 Rem 2 259 101 A 271 1 19/ 102 307 268 260 255 2 273 1 2 1 D Rem A 331 7 1 3 2 Rem A 258 3 103 7 9 104 2 103 269 2 8 385 B 119 11 100 9 49 71 291 F 266 6 5 B C B 282 52 9 3 11 269 4 122 94 284 50 270 261 3 271 1 12 2 3 1 1 121 123 211 256 8 257 123 5 1 264 263 120 211 2 A 1 150 6 92 3 105 PARK 262 2 A 281 268 4 E Rem 1 1 35 267 122 Rem 7 4 10 93 280 P 32547 *PP169 P 26538P 35355P 14425P 57878 P 63026P 26538P 80407P 12268P 1597 1 40207P 9387 P 45737 P 2807 2 LMS 1692 P 10272 P 40734 P 36923P 12186P 58126 EP 13448 P 58286 P 29132P 692 P 14425P 27403P 77422P 78165 P 7510 P 35088LMP 16445P 58126P 31651P 21596P 10206P 34338 P 11611 P 36923RP 30767C LMP 42977P 30633 P 1581 9P 692*LMP 27079P 21596BCPP 40734 BCP 16066P 692P 82848P 24973 P 4469 P 9773P 10213P 14493RP11291P 65523 P 27106RW 56468 BCP 16067BCP 21377 RW 58127 BCP 16997LMP 2910 1 RP 59454P22664 LM P 2 4 8 9 9 EP 36946 RW 62665RW 58128LMP 3211 8 ´ SCALE 1:2,500 MAPLE RIDGE ZONE AMENDINGBylaw No. Map No.From: To: RS-1 (One Family Urban Residential) RT-2 (Ground-Oriented Multi-Family) 7348-20171704 APPENDIX D APPENDIX E APPENDIX F APPENDIX G -1 - City of Maple Ridge TO: Her Worship Mayor Nicole Read MEETING DATE: July 24, 2018 and Members of Council FILE NO: 2017-221-RZ FROM: Chief Administrative Officer MEETING: Council SUBJECT: Second Reading Zone Amending Bylaw No. 7355-2017; 22032 119 Avenue EXECUTIVE SUMMARY: An application has been received to rezone the subject property located at 22032 119 Avenue from RS-1 (One Family Urban Residential) to RT-2 (Ground-Oriented Residential Infill), to permit the future construction of a triplex. Council granted first reading to Zone Amending Bylaw No. 7355-2017 on July 11, 2017 to change the subject property’s zoning. Note that Official Community Plan Amending Bylaw No. 7349-2017, Zone Amending Bylaw No. 7312-2017, and Off Street Parking and Loading Amending Bylaw No. 7350-2017 text amendments to create the new RT-2 (Ground-Oriented Residential Infill) zone were given first reading on June 13, 2017. These text amending bylaws, when approved, will create the policy and regulatory basis to permit new ground-oriented infill housing such as courtyard, fourplex and triplex forms in accordance with the action items of the Housing Action Plan Implementation Framework that were prioritized by Council. These text amending bylaws are being presented for consideration of second reading at the July 24, 2018 Council Meeting. Pursuant to Council Policy 6.31, which was updated on December 12, 2017, a Community Amenity Contribution (CAC) charge of $8,200 is requested for this application ($4,100 per attached ground- oriented dwelling unit, excluding the first unit). The applicant has worked with City staff, and has received comments from the City’s Advisory Design Panel regarding the proposed triplex. It conforms with the intent of the new RT-2 zone, and provides a sensitive, infill project that is compatible with the surrounding neighbourhood. For these reasons, this application is being forwarded to Council for consideration of second reading and referral to Public Hearing. RECOMMENDATIONS: 1)That Zone Amending Bylaw No. 7355-2017 be given second reading, and be forwarded to Public Hearing; 2)That the following terms and conditions be met prior to final reading: i)Registration of a Rezoning Servicing Agreement as a Restrictive Covenant and receipt of the deposit of a security, as outlined in the Agreement; ii)Approval from the Ministry of Transportation and Infrastructure; 1108 - 2 - iii) Road dedication on the lane to the south of the subject property as required; iv) Removal of existing building; v) Registration of a Restrictive Covenant for Stormwater Management; vi) Registration of a Restrictive Covenant prohibiting secondary suites; vii) In addition to the site profile, a disclosure statement must be submitted by a Professional Engineer advising whether there is any evidence of underground fuel storage tanks on the subject property(ies). If so, a Stage 1 Site Investigation Report is required to ensure that the subject property is not a contaminated site; viii) That a voluntary contribution, in the amount of $8,200 ($4,100/unit, excluding the first one) be provided in keeping with the Council Policy with regard to Community Amenity Contributions. DISCUSSION: 1) Background Context: Applicant: 1119300 BC LTD., Grace Yu Legal Description: Lot 56, D.L. 397, New Westminster Plan 14049 OCP: Existing: Urban Residential Proposed: No change Zoning: Existing: RS-1 (One Family Urban Residential) Proposed: RT-2 (Ground-Oriented Residential Infill) Surrounding Uses: North: Use: Single Family Residential Zone: RS-1 (One Family Urban Residential) Designation: Urban Residential South: Use: Single Family Residential Zone: RS-1 Designation: Urban Residential East: Use: Single Family Residential Zone: RS-1 Designation: Urban Residential West: Use: Single Family Residential Zone: RS-1 Designation: Urban Residential Existing Use of Property: Single Family Residential Proposed Use of Property: Multi-Family Residential (Triplex) Site Area: 899 m2 (0.22 acres) - 3 - Access: 119 Avenue and lane south of property Servicing: Urban standard 2) Background and Context: On June 13, 2017, Council received a staff report presenting policy and zoning amendments to the OCP, Zoning Bylaw, and Off Street Parking and Loading Bylaw to create a new RT-2 (Ground-Oriented Residential Infill) zone for the triplex, fourplex and courtyard residential housing forms. Based on this information, Council gave first reading to OCP Amending Bylaw No. 7349-2017, Zone Amending Bylaw No. 7312-2017, and Off Street Parking and Loading Amending Bylaw No. 7350-2017 on June 13, 2017 to create the new RT-2 zone. Those three policy and zone amending bylaws are also being presented to Council for second reading at this time under a separate staff report (2017-233-RZ). It is important to note that, should those three policy and zone amending bylaws not be approved, this triplex application would not be able to complete and the file would be closed. As discussed under the staff report for the policy and zone amending bylaws (2017-233-RZ), it was intended that new RT-2 (Ground-Oriented Residential Infill) projects integrate sensitively into existing neighbourhoods by proposing forms that are similar in scale and massing to a detached single-family dwelling and not replicate townhouse or rowhouse housing form. Dwelling units may be in one building with shared party walls to create triplexes or fourplexes. In the case of courtyard residential development, dwelling units may be arranged individually or attached in groups of buildings that still resemble single family dwellings, but are clustered around a shared open space in a village-style residential pattern. In all cases, units should take advantage of site context to create uniqueness, orient entrances towards the street where possible, and utilize landscaping and screening to create private or semi-private yard spaces. It is upon this founding basis that the current triplex application has been developed. 3) Project Description: The subject property, located at 22032 119 Avenue, is a rectangular shaped lot that is 899 m2 (0.22 acres) in size (see Appendix A). The subject property and surrounding lots are characterized by one storey single family dwellings. There is a lane behind (south) the subject property. The subject property is relatively flat with a few trees along its edges and in the back yard (see Appendix B). The current application proposes to rezone the subject property from RS-1 (One Family Urban Residential) to RT-2 (Ground-Oriented Residential Infill) to permit the development of a triplex. The proposed triplex provides 702 m2 (7,556 sf) of gross floor area in a building resembling a single family house with two storeys and a basement. Each dwelling unit contains three bedrooms with an overall unit size around 230 m2 (2,476 sf). All units share a common landscaped front yard with an access walkway from the street, while each unit is provided with semi-private back yard space. Each unit is also provided with two off-street parking spaces (see Appendix D, E and F). 4) Planning Analysis: i) Official Community Plan: The subject property is located in the general urban area just to the west of the Town Centre Area. It is currently designated Urban Residential, and the OCP’s neighbourhood residential infill policies apply to the current application. Under the infill policies, unit types such as duplexes and triplexes are allowed, with an emphasis on street oriented buildings (Policy 3-19, b). These policies also -4 - require proposed developments to respect and reinforce the physical patterns and characteristics of established neighbourhoods, with particular attention paid to site design, setbacks, and lot configuration of the existing pattern of development, as well as compatibility between building massing and the types of dwelling units (Policy 3-21). It is noted that one of the underlying principles in the OCP is to encourage growth within the Urban Area Boundary (UAB), and to accommodate that growth through infill by promoting a mix of housing types and tenures (Policy 3-1). The proposed triplex aligns with the intent of these OCP and neighbourhood residential infill and compatibility policies. Since first reading, the applicant has worked with staff to develop a design which is sensitive to the existing, surrounding neighbourhood. For example, the street façade picks up design cues from surrounding single family houses such as the front sloping roof to promote compatibility. The front and sides of the building have been articulated through the use of varying materials and colours, building projections, and roof accents to create visual interest. The height of the building has been reduced to 8.8 m (29 ft) in recognition of the low, single storey houses around it. Finally, the interior side setbacks of the triplex, with the exception of two small cantilevered projections for bedrooms, have been increased from 1.5 m (4.9 ft), which is typical in single family zones, to 2.25 m (7.4 ft) to increase the distance from neighbouring houses. The footprint of the building and detached garage structures, which covers approximately 34% of the lot, is not significantly larger than the single family lots around the subject property. It should also be recognized that most of the houses in the surrounding area are underbuilt compared to what could be built under the current zoning bylaw for new single family dwellings (e.g. 11 m height, 40% lot coverage). For these reasons, the proposed triplex aligns with the land use, residential infill, and compatibility policies of the OCP. It also aligns with the goals of the Housing Action Plan (HAP) and Implementation Framework, notably Strategy #1, which articulates the importance of a diverse housing mix and innovation and supports the development of a mix of housing forms. ii)Zoning Bylaw: The current application proposes to rezone the subject property located at 22032 119 Avenue from RS-1 (One Family Urban Residential) to RT-2 (Ground-Oriented Residential Infill) to permit the development of a triplex. This application applies the draft zoning provisions of the new RT-2 Zone Amending Bylaw No. 7312-2017 that is being considered by Council for second reading under a separate staff report (see 2017-233-RZ). The subject property, after dedication, is 884 m2 (9,515 sf) in size, which is larger than the 800 m2 (8,611 sf) minimum lot size required by the new RT-2 zone for triplexes in the Urban Area Boundary. No variances are requested to the requirements of the proposed RT-2 zone to accommodate this project. iii)Off Street Parking And Loading Bylaw: The Off Street Parking and Loading Amending Bylaw 7349-2017 of the new RT-2 zone is being considered by Council for second reading under a separate staff report (see 2017-233-RZ). The proposed amendments require two off street parking spaces be provided per unit for RT-2 projects. The current application meets this requirement by providing one covered parking stall in a detached garage, and one outdoor parking pad, for each dwelling units. All of the parking spaces are accessed - 5 - from the lane to the south of the development property (see Appendix D). The applicant has also offered one energized Level 2 parking space for each dwelling unit in the detached garages (i.e. installed panel capacity, circuit breaker, conduit and wiring, but excluding charging station). Bicycle parking spaces can be accommodated within each garage. iv) Community Amenity Contribution: Pursuant to Council Policy 6.31, a voluntary Community Amenity Contribution (CAC) charge of $8,200 is requested for this application. This is derived from the value of $4,100 per attached ground-oriented dwelling unit, excluding the first unit. For information, the CAC exemption for the first unit applies to duplexes, triplexes, fourplexes and courtyard developments as per Council Policy 6.31, updated in December 2017. v) Development Permits: Pursuant to Section 8.7 of the OCP, a Multi-Family Development Permit application is required to ensure the current proposal enhances existing neighbourhoods with compatible housing styles that meet diverse needs, and minimize potential conflicts with neighbouring land uses. The Proposed Triplex, Fourplex and Courtyard Housing Forms Overview report from April 18, 2016 stated that applications for triplex, fourplex and courtyard housing will use the Multi-Family Development Permit guidelines for these types of applications until specific tailored guidelines are developed. The current application has been reviewed by the Advisory Design Panel (ADP), with comments outlined below. vi) Advisory Design Panel: The ADP reviewed the form and character of the proposed development at a meeting held on June 20, 2018 (see Appendix D, E and F). Following a presentation by the applicant, the ADP made the following resolution:  Consider sidewalk re-alignment to the front entrances so that the sidewalk is more central to the property and less dominant towards one specific entrance;  Provide column detailing at the base of the column and at the top of the column;  The design of the bay window needs to be addressed for building envelope purposes in order to allow for the insulation;  Review the orientation of entry closets;  Re-evaluate the projections along each side of the residences; consider articulation through use of different material;  Add chimney cap detail to faux chimney;  Move the west window so that it does not align with the faux chimney;  If possible, consider adding street vegetation to buffer between each garage and gravel parking spaces to vitalize the lane;  Provide foundation planting along West and East elevations;  Provide additional shrubbery between bushes and rear elevation;  Treat entrances similarly with the stone and wood column detailing;  Consider coordinating mutton bars so they do not obstruct sightlines and show window openings. -6 - All of ADP’s concerns have been addressed and are reflected in the current plans. A detailed description of how these items were incorporated into the final design will be included in a future development permit report to Council. vii) Development Information Meeting: A Development Information Meeting was not required for this application because there is no OCP amendment for this application, and the proposal is less than 5 dwelling units. 5)Traffic Impact: As the subject property is located within 800 metres of the Lougheed Highway, a referral has been sent to the Ministry of Transportation and Infrastructure. Ministry approval of this application’s Zone Amending Bylaw No. 7355-2017 will be required as a condition of final reading. At this time, the Ministry has granted preliminary approval of the development application. 6)Interdepartmental Implications: i)Engineering Department: New concrete curb, gutter, and asphalt paving would be required across the property frontage and lane to the south. A sidewalk, street trees and street lighting would also be required across the property frontage. However, as this property sits in the middle of the block, cash in lieu of construction will be taken. A new storm sewer must be constructed across the property frontage because it does not currently exist. While a sanitary sewer exists in the lane behind the subject property, the applicant’s engineer will need to review its condition and capacity in support of this rezoning application. A Rezoning Servicing Agreement detailing these upgrades must be completed and registered as a restrictive covenant on title as a condition of final reading. Finally, lane dedication of approximately 0.75 m is required. ii)Building Department: The project’s stormwater management plan must conform with the City’s 3-tier stormwater management requirements as well as restrictions on groundwater infiltration under Council Policy 6.23, which controls infiltration in the area of influence of the Fraser River escarpment. Registration on title of a Restrictive Covenant of an approved Stormwater Management Plan will be required as a condition of final reading. Any Tier A requirements such as bio-filtration and absorbent topsoil must be reflected in the landscaping plans in the development permit for this project. 7)School District No. 42 Comments: This application was referred to School District No. 42 for comment. The School District returned the following information: The proposed application would affect the student population for the catchment areas currently served by Glenwood Elementary and Westview Secondary School. Glenwood Elementary has an operating capacity of 364 students. For the 2017-18 school year the student enrolment at Glenwood Elementary is 354 students (97.25% utilization) including 95 students from out of catchment. -7 - Westview Secondary School has an operating capacity of 1,200 students. For the 2017-18 school year the student enrolment at Westview Secondary School is 776 students (64.67% utilization) including 137 students from out of catchment. CONCLUSION: This triplex application is the first of its kind under the new proposed RT-2 (Ground-oriented Residential Infill) zone. The proposed triplex aligns with the land use, residential infill, and compatibility policies of the OCP. It also aligns with the goals of the Housing Action Plan and Implementation Framework to provide greater housing mix and innovation. The applicant has worked with City staff, incorporated the City’s Advisory Design Panel’s comments, and developed a project, building design, scale and massing which is sensitive to the existing, surrounding neighbourhood. This proposed triplex conforms with the intent and provisions of the new RT-2 zone for sensitive, residential infill projects. Therefore, it is recommended that second reading be given to Zone Amending Bylaw No. 7355-2017 and that this application be forwarded to Public Hearing. “Original signed by Chee Chan” _______________________________________________ Prepared by: Chee Chan, MCIP, RPP, BSc Planner 1 “Original signed by Christine Carter” _______________________________________________ Approved by: Christine Carter, M.PL, MCIP, RPP Director of Planning “Original signed by Frank Quinn” _______________________________________________ Approved by: Frank Quinn, MBA, P.Eng GM Public Works & Development Services “Original signed by Paul Gill” _______________________________________________ Concurrence: Paul Gill, CPA, CGA Chief Administrative Officer The following appendices are attached hereto: Appendix A – Subject Map Appendix B – Ortho Map Appendix C – Zone Amending Bylaw No. 7355-2017 Appendix D – Site Plan Appendix E – Building Elevation Plans Appendix F – Landscape Plan City of Pitt Meadows District of Langley District of MissionFRASER R. ^ DATE: May 31, 2017 FILE: 2017-221-RZ BY: PC PLANNING DEPARTMENTYORK ST.221 ST.AC AD I A S T . DE 221 ST.221 ST.LOW W A Y 220 ST.SELKIRK AVE. SEATON PL. 119 AVE.220 ST.219202215021965219562196011943 2213611942 2203311952 21950 2196411961 11952 11963 22057219082205821948220722199011970 220331185022004 2193222030220632206811993 1186822077 11851 11960 2198922020220882210611932 92 0 11999 11814 2205711971 11989 11879 11953 2193911970 11875220202207411962 11910 221272195411973 221182205711888 11932 2211711927 22023221282207311 9 3 0 11942 220562204321943220432204811970 2202311990 1185921951 11926 2212221965219572195011945 220232202011957 2210911949 2204021980220521184921951 11965 21924221142212811937 11956 11996 219502203011869 11988 221182194411989 11887 11973 22031220322207821968220582208311874 SUBJECT PROPERTY ´ Scale: 1:2,000 22032 119 AVENUE LOUGHEED HWY DEWDNEY TRUNK RD APPENDIX A City of Pitt Meadows District of Langley District of MissionFRASER R. ^ DATE: May 31, 2017 FILE: 2017-221-RZ BY: PC PLANNING DEPARTMENTYORK ST.221 ST.AC AD I A S T . DE 221 ST.221 ST.LOW W A Y 220 ST.SELKIRK AVE. SEATON PL. 119 AVE.220 ST.219202215021965219562196011943 2213611942 2203311952 21950 2196411961 11952 11963 22057219082205821948220722199011970 220331185022004 2193222030220632206811993 1186822077 11851 11960 2198922020220882210611932 92 0 11999 11814 2205711971 11989 11879 11953 2193911970 11875220202207411962 11910 221272195411973 221182205711888 11932 2211711927 22023221282207311 9 3 0 11942 220562204321943220432204811970 2202311990 1185921951 11926 2212221965219572195011945 220232202011957 2210911949 2204021980220521184921951 11965 21924221142212811937 11956 11996 219502203011869 11988 221182194411989 11887 11973 22031220322207821968220582208311874 SUBJECT PROPERTY Aerial Imagery from the Spring of 2016 ´ Scale: 1:2,000 22032 119 AVENUE LOUGHEED HWY DEWDNEY TRUNK RD APPENDIX B CITY OF MAPLE RIDGE BYLAW NO. 7355-2017 A Bylaw to amend Map "A" forming part of Zoning Bylaw No. 3510 - 1985 as amended ______________________________________________________________________________ WHEREAS, it is deemed expedient to amend Maple Ridge Zoning Bylaw No. 3510 - 1985 as amended; NOW THEREFORE, the Municipal Council of the City of Maple Ridge enacts as follows: 1.This Bylaw may be cited as "Maple Ridge Zone Amending Bylaw No. 7355-2017." 2.That parcel or tract of land and premises known and described as: Lot 56 District Lot 397 Group 1 New Westminster District Plan 14049 and outlined in heavy black line on Map No. 1719 a copy of which is attached hereto and forms part of this Bylaw, is/are hereby rezoned to RT-2 (Ground-Oriented Residential Infill). 3.Maple Ridge Zoning Bylaw No. 3510 - 1985 as amended and Map "A" attached thereto are hereby amended accordingly. READ a first time the 11th day of July, 2017. READ a second time the day of , 20 PUBLIC HEARING held the day of , 20 READ a third time the day of , 20 APPROVED by the Ministry of Transportation and Infrastructure this day of , 20 ADOPTED the day of , 20 _____________________________ ____________________________ PRESIDING MEMBER CORPORATE OFFICER APPENDIX C YORK ST.221 ST.A C A D I A S T .221 ST.221 ST.WIC K L OW W A Y 220 ST.SELKIRK AVE. SEATON PL. 119 AVE.220 ST.219202215021965219562196011943 2213611942 2203311952 21950 2196411961 11952 11963 22057219082205821948220722199011970 11850 22033220042193222030220632206811993 1186822077 11851 11960 2198922020220882210611932 119 2 0 11999 11814 2205711971 11989 11879 11953 2193911970 11875220202207411962 11910 221272195411973 221182205711888 11932 2211711927 220232212822073119 3 0 11942 220562204321943220432204811970 2202311990 1185921951 11926 2212221965219572195011945 220232202011957 2210911949 2204021980220521184921951 11965 21924221142212811937 11956 11996 219502203011869 11988 221182194411989 11887 11973 220312203222078219682205811874 220831 25 135 10 22 43 13 139 7 6419 104 133 2 27 6 42 6 86 43 14 20 15 51 65 4 21 53 16 5 48 138 18 8 85 55 23 60 11 3 8 7 50 63 A 6 62 B 16 Rem 137 3 Rem 33 Rem 2 39 19 11 136 52 Rem 38 8 W1 26 140 2038 14 141 29 39 12 W 7 5 27 56 16 22 3 61 3 65' 4 59 40 12 18 B 1 17 21 5 24 Rem 134 25 5 9 17 2 28 15 Rem 14 66 2 26 67 8 12 13 173 13 49 1 11 174 7 4 40 9 54P 15564P 1 7 1 8 5 P 52495 P 8728P 15564P 14113P 15564BCP 22636 P 11251 P 8728P 1 7 1 8 5 P 11251 P 11251 P 14049 EP 10195P 1 7 6 2 9 P 47796 NWS 2844P 14049 P 14891 P 77447P 1 7 1 8 5 P 15564(P 11251)P 15564P 14685 P8728 P 15564 P 14113P 14113 P 6395P 8728P 8728P 11251 P 14685 P 13419 EP 78713RW 27912 EP 78713RW 44519 EP 67822 ´ SCALE 1:2,000 MAPLE RIDGE ZONE AMENDINGBylaw No. Map No.From: To: RS-1 (One Family Urban Residential) RT-2 (Ground-Oriented Residential Infill) 7355-20171719 SITE PLAN1119300 BC LTDLEGAL DESCRIPTIONLOT 56, PLAN NWP 14049CIVIC ADDRESS22032 - 119 AVENUE, MAPLE RIDGELOT AREAACTUAL: 900.0 sq. m.LESS LANE DEDICATION: 15.3 sq.m.NET TOTAL: 884.7 sq.m.LOT COVERAGEHOUSE: 239.21 sq.m. DETACHED GARAGES - 63.89 sq.mTOTAL BUILDINGS: 303.10 (34.25%)BUILDING HEIGHT:PRINCIPAL: 8.84 m (W/ CHIMNEY: 9.44 m)GARAGE: 4.00 mGROSS FLOOR AREA:DENSITY:FLOOR SPACE RATIO:552.53 / 884.90 = 62.44%OPENPARKINGSPACE20.42m67.0'.75m LANE DEDICATION119th AVENUESINGLEGARAGE11'-0" x 21'-0"SINGLEGARAGE11'-0" x 21'-0"SINGLEGARAGE11'-0" x 21'-0"PROPOSEDRESIDENCEPROPOSEDRESIDENCEPROPOSEDRESIDENCEMAX 10%SLOPES 89° 16' 15"ELOT 57MAX 10%SLOPEOPENPARKINGSPACEGARAGE TOTAL:688.65SF (63.9SM)49'-7" (15.11m)7'-3" (2.21m)24'-3" (7.44m)17'-2" (5.23m)7'-4 12 "(2.22m)7'-4 12 "(2.22m)17'-6" (5.33m)20.42mS 89° 16' 15"E.75m LANE DEDICATIONMAX 10%SLOPE20.42m67.0'MAX 10%SLOPE52'-3" (15.92m)17'-7" (5.36m)9'-10" (3.00m)5'-0" (1.52m)7'-2" (2.21m)7'-5" (2.26m)3'-10"(1.17m)2'-7"(.79m)OPENPARKINGSPACE44.05m144.67'44.09m144.52'S 0° 19'30"WS 0° 19'30"W129.96 SFBALCONY12.07 sq.m.27'-4" (8.35m)10'-6" (3.20m)PROPOSED REZONINGFROM RS-1 TO RT-2(TRIPLEX)61'-1" (18.62m)33'-9" (10.29m)5'-0" (1.52m)5'-0" (1.52m)16'-0" (4.88m)LOT 55LESS BASEMENT ALLOWANCEBASEMENTFLOORUNIT 1UNIT 2TOTALMAINUPPER80.6486.58(SQ. M)71.99UNIT 3239.2171.00 80.91234.4986.7882.58702.5371.99 228.8370.06TOTAL150.0GROSS FLOOR AREA552.538'-0"(2.44m)11'-0" (3.36m)10-11"(3.33m)8'-6" 2.60m)10-11" (3.33m)8'-0" (2.44)4'-11"(1.51m)4'-7"(1.39m)LOT 56PAVERSSPACEUNIT 1UNIT 2TOTALLAWN &LANDSCAPEPATIO88.9622.0587.42198.43UNIT 311.892.6417.172.648.9110.4129.7310.41TOTAL102.0142.85100.47245.33AMENITY SPACE (USEABLE OPEN SPACE):BACKYARDFRONT YARDPERMEABLE & IMPERMEABLE SURFACES:IMPERMEABLE SURFACES:PERMEABLE SURFACES:ZONINGRS-1 TO BE REZONED TO RT-2 (TRIPLEX)CONCRETESPACEUNIT 1UNIT 2TOTALLAWN &LANDSCAPEPATIO152.04UNIT 33.95--20.3216.3724.16TOTAL196.52SHARED SPACESHARED SPACESPACEPERMEABLEFRONT YARDTOTALBACK YARDPARKING AREAIMPERMEABLE152.0424.16198.4329.7322.9280.38430.8576.8115.13%84.87%(SQ. M)(SQ. M)(SQ. M)** GRAVEL & LANDSCAPED AREAS7'-3" (2.21m)PEDESTAL W/ STREET ADDRESS(SEE DETAILS ON P.15)DRAWING TITLEPROJECT NAME AND ADDRESSDRAWNDATESCALEPAGEFILE # 2017-221-RZ22032-119 AVE, MAPLE RIDGE1119300 B.C. LTD.AS NOTEDPROPOSED TRIPLEXSITE PLANG.Y.LOT 56 PLAN NWP 140492770 NADINA DRIVECOQUITLAM, B.C. V3C 6A5778-688-0505THE DRAWINGS COMPLY TOTHE 2012 BCBC INCLUDINGDEC. 2014 REVISIONSNO.REVISION / ISSUEDATE4 OF 15JULY 7, 2018APPENDIX D DRAWING TITLEPROJECT NAME AND ADDRESSDRAWNDATESCALEPAGEFILE # 2017-221-RZ22032-119 AVE, MAPLE RIDGEFRONT PERSPECTIVE FROM 119 AVENUE1119300 B.C. LTD.AS NOTED0 OF 15PROPOSED TRIPLEXCOVER PAGEG.Y.JULY 03, 2018LOT 56 PLAN NWP 140491119300 B.C. L.T.D.PROPOSED TRIPLEXFILE #2017-221-RZ22032 119 AVENUEMAPLE RIDGELIST OF DRAWINGS:2770 NADINA DRIVECOQUITLAM, B.C. V3C 6A5778-688-05051. SITE / NEIGHBOURHOOD CONTEXT PLAN2. STREETSCAPE -- PLAN & PERSPECTIVE3. STREETSCAPE -- PERSPECTIVES4. SITE PLAN5. MAIN FLOOR PLAN6. UPPER FLOOR PLAN7. BASEMENT FLOOR PLAN8. BUILDING SECTIONS9. EXTERIOR ELEVATIONS10. GARAGE PLAN AND ELEVATIONS11. PERSPECTIVES12. LANDSCAPE PLAN13. LANDSCAPE SECTION DRAWINGS 114. LANDSCAPE SECTION DRAWINGS 215. LANDSCAPE LIGHTING PLAN & DETAILSTHE DRAWINGS COMPLY TOTHE 2012 BCBC INCLUDINGDEC. 2014 REVISIONSNO.REVISION / ISSUEDATE 22023 220231192622023 22020119102204822033220572207722058220681188722078SITE OF NEWTRIPLEXDRAWING TITLEPROJECT NAME AND ADDRESSDRAWNDATESCALEPAGEFILE # 2017-221-RZ22032-119 AVE, MAPLE RIDGE1119300 B.C. LTD.AS NOTED1 OF 15CONTEXT PLANG.Y.LOT 56 PLAN NWP 140492770 NADINA DRIVECOQUITLAM, B.C. V3C 6A5778-688-0505THE DRAWINGS COMPLY TOTHE 2012 BCBC INCLUDINGDEC. 2014 REVISIONSNO.REVISION / ISSUEDATE119262202322033119102202022068220482205822077220572207811887MOST HOUSES ON THE STREET HAVEROOF LINES THAT SLOPE TOWARDTHE STREET. THIS CHARACTERISTIC HASBEEN USED IN THE DESIGN OF THENEW TRIPLEX.AS WITH 22068, THE USEDOUBLE DOORSWALKING OUT ONTO APATIO HAS BEEN IMPLEMENTEDIN THE TRIPLEX DESIGN.WHILE MOST HOUSES HAVE FRONTSETBACKS FARTHER THAN THEREQUIRED 7.5m, 22077 221stAVENUE, HAS A SETBACK ON 119thAVENUE SIGNIFICANTLY LESS THAN 7.5m.THE LOT COVERAGE OF THE HOUSE ON 11910220th STREET IS FAIRLY MASSIVE RELATIVETO THE OTHER HOUSES ON THE BLOCK. ITSLOT COVERAGE IS FAIRLY SIMILAR TO THAT OFTHE PROPOSED TRIPLEX. SEE P.2 FOR STREETPLAN VIEW WITH TRIPLEX RENDERED IN.SITE / NEIGHBOURHOOD CONTEXTJUNE 27, 2018P2SEEP3SEEP3SEE DRAWING TITLEPROJECT NAME AND ADDRESSDRAWNDATESCALEPAGEFILE # 2017-221-RZ22032-119 AVE, MAPLE RIDGE1119300 B.C. LTD.AS NOTEDSITE CONTEXTPLAN & PERSPECTIVEG.Y.LOT 56 PLAN NWP 140492770 NADINA DRIVECOQUITLAM, B.C. V3C 6A5778-688-0505THE DRAWINGS COMPLY TOTHE 2012 BCBC INCLUDINGDEC. 2014 REVISIONSNO.REVISION / ISSUEDATETRIPLEX IN CONTEXT OF NEIGHBOURHOOD PLAN VIEWTRIPLEX IN CONTEXT NW PERSPECTIVE2 OF 15JUNE 29, 2018 DRAWING TITLEPROJECT NAME AND ADDRESSDRAWNDATESCALEPAGEFILE # 2017-221-RZ22032-119 AVE, MAPLE RIDGE1119300 B.C. LTD.AS NOTEDCONTEXT PLANPERSPECTIVESG.Y.LOT 56 PLAN NWP 140492770 NADINA DRIVECOQUITLAM, B.C. V3C 6A5778-688-0505THE DRAWINGS COMPLY TOTHE 2012 BCBC INCLUDINGDEC. 2014 REVISIONSNO.REVISION / ISSUEDATETRIPLEX IN CONTEXT NE PERSPECTIVETRIPLEX IN CONTEXT BACK LANE PERSPECTIVE3 OF 15JUNE 27, 2018 81281281212" WOOD FASCIABOARD TYPIN BM OC-150BRILLIANT WHITEFIBREGLASS SHINGLECAMBRIDGE DRIFTWOOD10" WOOD POSTPTD IN OC-150WHITE ALUMINUMRAILINGMINERETBLUFFSTONE(MANUFACTUREDLEDGESTONE)CEDAR SHAKESPAINTED IN DULUXZEPPELIN30YY 46/036UNIT 1 ENTRANCEFIBREGLASS DOORPAINTED IN BM BLACK2132-10WOOD FASCIABOARD PTD INDULUX ZEPPELIN30YY 46/0364" FLAT STOCKTRIM AROUND ALLWINDOWS &DOORS TYP12" WOOD FASCIABOARD TYP PTD INBM OC-150BRILLIANT WHITEWHITE ALUMINUMRAILINGWINDOW WELLSEE P.7 FORDETAILSUNITS 2 & 3 ENTRANCEFIBREGLASS DOORSPAINTED IN OC-150BRILLIANT WHITEPRESSURE-TREATEDPINE DECKING W/ LATTICEBELOW. SEE DETAILS P.12.NON-FUNCTIONING CHIMNEY6" WOOD TRIMIN BM OC-150BRILLIANT WHITECEDAR SHAKESPAINTED IN DULUXZEPPELIN30YY 46/036WALL SCONCESEE P.15MAILBOX TYPWALL SCONCESEE P.152'-6"(0.76m)HARDIEPLANKLAPSIDINGCEDARMILLAGED PEWTERHARDIEPLANKLAPSIDINGCEDARMILLAGED PEWTERHARDIEPLANK LAPSIDING CEDARMILL AGED PEWTER10" WOOD TRIM (OC-150)METAL CAP BELOW AS PER BCBCWINDOW WELLSEE P.7 FORDETAILSWINDOW WELLSEE P.7 FORDETAILSHARDIEPLANK LAPSIDING CEDARMILL AGED PEWTERWHITE ALUM. RAILINGPRESSURE-TREATED PINEDECKING LATTICE BELOW(DETAILS OF LATTICE ON P.12)12' WOOD FASCIABOARD PTDIN BM OC-150BRILLIANT WHITE812812812MINERETBLUFFSTONE(MANUF.LEDGESTONE)FIBREGLASSSHINGLECAMBRIDGEDRIFTWOODCEDAR SHAKEPAINTED IN DULUXZEPPELIN30YY 46/036NON-FUNCTIONING CHIMNEYFIBREGLASS SHINGLECAMBRIDGE DRIFTWOODWOOD FASCIABOARD PTD INDULUX ZEPPELIN30YY 46/0364" WOOD TRIMBOARD PAINTED INBM OC-150BRILLIANT WHITE6" WOOD TRIMPAINTED INBM OC-150BRILLIANT WHITE8128126" WOOD TRIM PAINTED INBM OC-150 BRILLIANT WHITEHARDIEPLANKLAPSIDINGCEDARMILLAGED PEWTERMOTION SENSITIVE WALLSCONCE TYP (SEE P.15)MOTIONSENSITIVEWALL SCONCEWALL SCONCESEE P.15WALL SCONCESEE P.15MAILBOXHARDIEPLANK LAPSIDINGCEDARMILL AGED PEWTERCEDAR SHAKESPAINTED IN DULUXZEPPELIN30YY 46/03610" WOOD TRIM (OC-150)METAL CAP BELOW AS PER BCBCWOOD FASCIABOARD PAINTEDIN BM OC-150BRILLIANT WHITEWHITE ALUMINUM RAILINGSEE P.15 FOR DETAILSPRESSURE-TREATEDPINE DECKING W/LATTICE BELOW (SEEP.12 FOR LATTICEDETAILS)WINDOW WELLSEE P.7 FORDETAILSWINDOW WELLSEE P.7 FORDETAILS812812812NON-FUNCTIONING CHIMNEY6" WOOD TRIM PAINTED IN BMOC-150 BRILLIANT WHITEWINDOW WELLSEE P.7 FORDETAILSMOTIONSENSITIVEWALL SCONCEFIBREGLASSSHINGLESCAMBRIDGEDRIFTWOODWALL SCONCETYP SEE P.15MAILBOXMOTION SENSITIVEWALL SCONCESEE P.15 FOR DETAILSHARDIEPLANKCEDARMILLAGED PEWTERHARDIEPLANK LAPSIDINGCEDARMILL AGED PEWTERCEDAR SHAKES PTDIN DULUX ZEPPELIN30YY 46/036CEDAR SHAKESPAINTED IN DULUXZEPPELIN30YY 46/03610" WOOD TRIM (OC-150)METAL CAP BELOW AS PER BCBCWOOD FASCIABOARD PAINTEDIN DULUX ZEPPELINWHITE ALUMINUMRAILING (SEE P.15FOR DETAILS)PRESSURE-TREATEDPINE DECKING W/LATTICE BELOWWINDOW WELLSEE P.7 FORDETAILSFIBREGLASS SHINGLECAMBRIDGE DRIFTWOOD412WINDOW WELLSEE P.7 FORDETAILS28'-6" (8.70m)2'-6"(0.76m)31'-0" (9.44m)412412SKYLIGHTWOOD FASCIA BOARD (BM OC-150)NON-FUNCTIONING CHIMNEY6" WOOD TRIM PAINTED IN BMOC-150 BRILLIANT WHITEMOTION SENSITIVEHARDIEPLANKCEDARMILLAGED PEWTERHARDIEPLANK LAPSIDINGCEDARMILL AGED PEWTER10" WOOD TRIM(OC-150)DRAWING TITLEPROJECT NAME AND ADDRESSDRAWNDATESCALEPAGEFILE # 2017-221-RZ22032-119 AVE, MAPLE RIDGE1119300 B.C. LTD.AS NOTED9 OF 15PROPOSED TRIPLEXEXTERIOR ELEVATIONSG.Y.LOT 56 PLAN NWP 140492770 NADINA DRIVECOQUITLAM, B.C. V3C 6A5778-688-0505THE DRAWINGS COMPLY TOTHE 2012 BCBC INCLUDINGDEC. 2014 REVISIONSNO. REVISION / ISSUE DATESOUTH ELEVATIONNORTH ELEVATIONWEST ELEVATIONEAST ELEVATIONJULY 3, 2018APPENDIX E 8'-7" (2.62m)11'-0" (3.35m)21'-0" (6.40m)10'-11" (3.33m)10'-11" (3.33m)UNIT 1GARAGEUNIT 2GARAGEUNIT 3GARAGE21'-10" (8.94m)UNIT 1GARAGEUNIT 2GARAGEUNIT 3GARAGE41241211'-0" (3.35m)8'-4 1/2"(2.55m)21'-10" (8.94m)11'-4" (3.46m)13'-312" (4.05m)MOTION SENSITIVEWALL SCONCE (SEEP.15 FOR DETAILS)12' WOOD FASCIABOARD PTDIN BM OC-150BRILLIANT WHITEGARAGE DOOR PTDIN BM OC-150HARDIEPLANKCEDARMILLAGED PEWTER21'-0" (6.40m)FIBREGLASS SHINGLECAMBRIDGE DRIFTWOODMOTION SENSITIVEWALL SCONCE (SEEP.15 FOR DETAILS)12' WOOD FASCIABOARD PTDIN BM OC-150BRILLIANT WHITEHARDIEPLANKCEDARMILLAGED PEWTER21'-0" (6.40m)FIBREGLASS SHINGLECAMBRIDGE DRIFTWOODMOTION SENSITIVEWALL SCONCE (SEEP.15 FOR DETAILS)12' WOOD FASCIABOARD PTDIN BM OC-150BRILLIANT WHITEHARDIEPLANKCEDARMILLAGED PEWTER21'-10" (8.94m)11-'0" (3.35m)11'-4" (3.46m)UNIT 1GARAGEUNIT 2GARAGEUNIT 3GARAGE41241212' WOOD FASCIABOARD PTDIN BM OC-150BRILLIANT WHITE4" WOOD TRIM PTD INBM 0C-150MOTION SENSITIVE WALLSCONCE TYP (SEE P.15)8'-4 1/2"(2.55m)13'-312" (4.05m)HARDIEPLANKCEDARMILLAGED PEWTERDRAWING TITLEPROJECT NAME AND ADDRESSDRAWNDATESCALEPAGEFILE # 2017-221-RZ22032-119 AVE, MAPLE RIDGE1119300 B.C. LTD.AS NOTEDPROPOSED TRIPLEXLANDSCAPE SECTIONS 1G.Y.LOT 56 PLAN NWP 140492770 NADINA DRIVECOQUITLAM, B.C. V3C 6A5778-688-0505THE DRAWINGS COMPLY TOTHE 2012 BCBC INCLUDINGDEC. 2014 REVISIONSNO. REVISION / ISSUEDATEGARAGE FLOOR PLANSGARAGE SOUTH ELEVATIONGARAGE EAST ELEVATIONGARAGE WEST ELEVATIONGARAGE NORTH ELEVATIONGARAGE SOUTH ELEVATION W/ LANDSCAPE10 OF 15JULY 7, 2018 DRAWING TITLEPROJECT NAME AND ADDRESSDRAWNDATESCALEPAGEFILE # 2017-221-RZ22032-119 AVE, MAPLE RIDGE1119300 B.C. LTD.AS NOTEDPROPOSED TRIPLEXEXTERIOR PERSPECTIVESG.Y.LOT 56 PLAN NWP 140492770 NADINA DRIVECOQUITLAM, B.C. V3C 6A5778-688-0505THE DRAWINGS COMPLY TOTHE 2012 BCBC INCLUDINGDEC. 2014 REVISIONSNO. REVISION / ISSUEDATENW PERSPECTIVENE PERSPECTIVESW PERSPECTIVESE PERSPECTIVE11 OF 15JULY 7, 2018 67.0'.75m LANE DEDICATIONLANE119th AVENUESINGLEGARAGE11'-0" x 21'-0"SINGLEGARAGE11'-0" x 21'-0"SINGLEGARAGE11'-0" x 21'-0"PROPOSEDRESIDENCEPROPOSEDRESIDENCEPROPOSEDRESIDENCE 6 FT (1.83m) CEDAR PANEL FENCEMAX 10%SLOPES 89° 16' 15"EMAX 10%SLOPELANDSCAPE PLANGARAGETOTAL:688.65 s.f.(63.9 sq.m.)49'-7" (15.11m)24'-3" (7.44m)7'-3"(2.21m)17'-2"(5.23m)7'-412"(2.22m)7'-412"(2.22m)17'-6" (5.33m)20.42mS 89° 16' 15"E.75m LANE DEDICATIONLANEMAX 10%SLOPE20.42m67.0'MAX 10%SLOPE52'-3"(15.92m)17'-7" (5.36m)5'-0"(1.52m)2'-6"(.76m)44.05m144.52'S 0° 19'30"W144.67'44.09mS 0° 19'30"W33'-9" (10.29m)PRUNUS x YEDOENSISAKEBONO (CHERRY)CORNUS EDDIEWHITE WONDERACER RUBRUMRED SUNSETENTRANCE9'-10" x 7'-3"6.10 sq.m.27'-4" (8.35m)61-1" (18.62m)PICEA GLAUCACONICAPICEA ABIESNIDIFORMISACER RUBRUMOCTOBER GLORYDWARFIMPEDITUMRHODODWARFIMPEDITUMRHODO12'-5" (3.78m)O/C OF TREE7'-3"(2.18m)WALKWAYCHERRY TREE INNEIGHBOURINGPROPERTYREQUIRINGPROTECTIONDURINGDEVELOPMENT(LOCATION APPROX.)CONCRETE(EXPOSEDAGGREGATE)WALKWAY24.16 sq.m.22'-8" (6.91m)LAWN & LANDSCAPING61.18 sq.m.BUXUS SEMPERVIRENSSUFFRITICOSA ONMULCHPICEA GLAUCACONICA7'-8"(2.31m)CORNUSALBAELEGANTISSIMA8'-10" (2.69m)O/C OF TREECORNUSALBAELEGANTISSIMA18'-3" (7.77m)LAWN & LANDSCAPING83.49 sq.m.PAVERS27'-0" (8.23m)5'-712"(1.71m) 6 FT (1.83m) CEDAR PANEL FENCE5'-712 (1.71m)7'-5"(2.29m)3'-10"(1.16m)7'-5" (2.29m)CONCRETEDRIVEWAYCONCRETEDRIVEWAYGRAVELPARKINGSPACEGRAVELPARKINGSPACERHODODECORUMRHODODECORUMRHODODECORUMMULCH24'-8"(7.51m)17'-8"(7.52m)24'-7"(7.51m)20'-10" (6.35m)UNIT 1:PAVERS: 10.41 sq.m.PATIO: 2.64 sq.m.BACK LAWN: 62.95 sq.m.SIDE LAWN & LANDSAPING:26.01 sq.m.UNIT 2:PAVERS: 8.91 sq.m.PATIO: 11.89 sq.m.BACK LAWN: 22.05 sq.m.UNIT 3:PAVERS: 10.41 sq.m.PATIO: 2.64 sq.m.BACK LAWN: 62.03sq.m.SIDE LAWN & LANDSCAPING:25.39 sq.m.PATIO21'-4" x 10'-3"20.32 sq.m.PATIO17'-5" x 7'-3"11.89 sq.m.PATIO7'-5" x 3'-10"11.89 sq.m.PATIO7'-5" x 3'-10"11.89 sq.m.20'-9" (6.32m)20'-0" (6.10m)6'-3" (1.91m)16'-7" (5.05m)19'-9" (6.02m)3'-0"(0.89m)11'-9" (3.58m)O/C OF TREE7'-2"(2.16m)43'-0 1/2" (13.12m)15.67 sq.m20.42 sq.m20.58 sq.m22.92 sq.m8'-0"(2.44m)11'-0" (3.36m)10-11"(3.33m)8'-6" 2.60m)10-11" (3.33m)8'-0" (2.44)4'-11"(1.51m)4'-7"(1.39m)42" CEDARPANEL FENCE42" CEDARPANEL FENCE3'-11"1.19m5'-8"(1.71m)6'-5 1/2" (1.97m)27'-0" (8.23m)5'-7 1/2"(1.71m)5'-8"(1.71m)5'-8"(1.71m)5'-8"(1.71m)2'-6"(0.76m)2'-6"(0.76m)1'-3"(0.38m)2'-6"(0.76m)4'-11"1.50m2'-6"(0.76m)2'-6"(0.76m)2'-6"(0.76m)2'-6"(0.76m)2'-6"(0.76m)PEDESTAL W/ STREET ADDRESS(SEE DETAILS ON P.15)240VRECTRASHBIKE ONWALL8' LENGTH OF 48" HIGHLATTICE TO BE INSTALLEDABOVE FENCE FORADDITIONAL PRIVACYALONG BALCONYSEE DETAILS TO RIGHT (P.12)APPROXIMATELOCATIONOF ELECTRICALPOLEAPPROXIMATELOCATIONOF ELECTRICALPOLE240VRECTRASHBIKE ONWALL240VRECTRASHBIKE ONWALLRHODOGRAVELPARKINGSPACEMULCHMULCHMULCH2'-6"BUXUS SEMPERVIRENS SUFFRITICOSAYEWYEWYEWHYDRANGEAHYDRANGEAHYDRANGEAAZALEADWARFAZALEAHOSTADWARFIMPEDITUMRHODODWARFIMPEDITUMRHODODWARFAZALEAHOSTADWARFIMPEDITUMRHODODWARFAZALEAHOSTADWARFIMPEDITUMRHODODWARFAZALEAHOSTADWARFIMPEDITUMRHODOMULCHMULCH7'-3" (2.21m)18'-3" (5.56m)20'-6" (6.25m)LAWNLAWNAZALEARHODOHONEYSUCKLE HALLIANAHONEYSUCKLE HALLIANABUXUS SEMPERVIRENS SUFFRITICOSADRAWING TITLEPROJECT NAME AND ADDRESSDRAWNDATESCALEPAGEFILE # 2017-221-RZ22032-119 AVE, MAPLE RIDGE1119300 B.C. LTD.AS NOTEDPROPOSED TRIPLEXLANDSCAPE PLANG.Y.LOT 56 PLAN NWP 140492770 NADINA DRIVECOQUITLAM, B.C. V3C 6A5778-688-0505THE DRAWINGS COMPLY TOTHE 2012 BCBC INCLUDINGDEC. 2014 REVISIONSNO. REVISION / ISSUEDATE>8" PIT RUN TOPPED WITH34"- CRUSHED ROCKCONCRETEOPEN PARKING SPACE:EXPOSED AGGREGATE CONCRETEDRIVEWAYS & WALKWAYSINSTANT LAWNSUPREME BLUEGRASS SODALL EXTERIOR AREASBLEND (UN-NETTED) ON 12" PROCESSEDTOP SOILDECKINGPRESSURE TREATED WOOD DECKING(UNIFORM HIGH QUALITY LODGEPOLE PINE)PAVERSEXPOSED AGGREGATE CONCRETE24" X 24" SQUARE PAVERSTREES & SHRUBSMULCHCEDAR BARK CHIPS AROUNDTREES AND SHRUBS12 OF 15JULY 7, 2018CEDAR LATTICE DETAILSWOOD: RED WESTERN CEDARTHICKNESS: 1/2"GRID OPENING: 1 34"MATERIALS LEGEND:APPENDIX F ON REFERENCECEDARFENCINGHT: 6 FT(1.83m)CEDARFENCINGHT: 6 FT(1.83m)DRAWING TITLEPROJECT NAME AND ADDRESSDRAWNDATESCALEPAGEFILE # 2017-221-RZ22032-119 AVE, MAPLE RIDGE1119300 B.C. LTD.AS NOTEDPROPOSED TRIPLEXLANDSCAPE SECTIONS 1G.Y.LOT 56 PLAN NWP 140492770 NADINA DRIVECOQUITLAM, B.C. V3C 6A5778-688-0505THE DRAWINGS COMPLY TOTHE 2012 BCBC INCLUDINGDEC. 2014 REVISIONSNO. REVISION / ISSUEDATELANDSCAPE SECTION 1LANDSCAPE SECTION 2SECTION REFERENCE13 OF 15JULY 7, 2018 CEDARFENCINGHT: 6 FT(1.83m)ALUMINUMRAILINGHT: 3'-6"(1.07m)CEDAR FENCINGHT: 3'-6"T (1.02m)CEDAR FENCINGHT: 3'-6"T (1.02m)8 FT (2.44m) LENGTHOF 4 FT (1.22m) HIGHLATTICE ABOVE FENCEBETWEEN UNITSALUMINUM RAILINGHT: 3'-6" (1.07m)CEDAR FENCINGHT: 6 FT (1.83m)CEDAR FENCINGHT: 3'-6" (1.07m)ALUMINUM RAILINGHT: 3'-6" (1.07m)N REFERENCEDRAWING TITLEPROJECT NAME AND ADDRESSDRAWNDATESCALEPAGEFILE # 2017-221-RZ22032-119 AVE, MAPLE RIDGE1119300 B.C. LTD.AS NOTED14 OF 15PROPOSED TRIPLEXLANDSCAPE SECTIONS 2G.Y.LOT 56 PLAN NWP 140492770 NADINA DRIVECOQUITLAM, B.C. V3C 6A5778-688-0505THE DRAWINGS COMPLY TOTHE 2012 BCBC INCLUDINGDEC. 2014 REVISIONSNO.REVISION / ISSUEDATELANDSCAPE SECTION 3LANDSCAPE SECTION 4SECTION REFERENCEJULY 7, 2018 -1 - City of Maple Ridge TO: Her Worship Mayor Nicole Read MEETING DATE: July 24, 2018 and Members of Council FILE NO: 2017-331-RZ FROM: Chief Administrative Officer MEETING: Council SUBJECT: Second Reading Zone Amending Bylaw No. 7385-2017; 12260 Laity Street EXECUTIVE SUMMARY: An application has been received to rezone the subject property located at 12260 Laity Street from RS-1 (One Family Urban Residential) to RS-1b (One Family Urban (Medium Density) Residential), to permit a future subdivision of approximately 3 lots. Council granted first reading to Zone Amending Bylaw No. 7385-2017 and considered the early consultation requirements for the Official Community Plan (OCP) amendment on September 17, 2017. The minimum lot size for the current RS-1 (One Family Urban Residential) zone is 668m2. This application is in compliance with the OCP. Pursuant to Council policy, this application is subject to the Community Amenity Contribution Program at a rate of $5,100.00 per single family lot, for an estimated amount of $10,200.00. RECOMMENDATIONS: 1)That Zone Amending Bylaw No. 7385-2017 be given second reading, and be forwarded to Public Hearing; 2)That the following terms and conditions be met prior to final reading: i)Registration of a Rezoning Servicing Agreement as a Restrictive Covenant and receipt of the deposit of a security, as outlined in the Agreement; ii)Registration of a Restrictive Covenant for Stormwater Management and Fraser River Escarpment restrictions; iii)Removal of existing building/s with a valid demolition permit; iv)In addition to the site profile, a disclosure statement must be submitted by a Professional Engineer advising whether there is any evidence of underground fuel storage tanks on the subject property. If so, a Stage 1 Site Investigation Report is required to ensure that the subject property is not a contaminated site; v)Payment for street trees along Laity Street; and 1109 -2 - vi)That a voluntary contribution, in the amount of $10,200.00 ($5,100.00 per lot) be provided in keeping with the Council Policy with regard to Community Amenity Contributions. DISCUSSION: 1)Background Context: Applicant: H & T Quality Homes Ltd. Legal Description: Lot 12 District Lot 248 New Westminster District Plan LMP11733 Group 1. OCP: Existing: Urban Residential Proposed: Urban Residential Zoning: Existing: RS-1 (One Family Urban Residential) Proposed: RS-1b (One Family Urban (Medium Density) Residential) OCP: Existing: Urban Residential Proposed: Urban Residential Zoning: Existing: RS-1 (One Family Urban Residential) Proposed: RS-1b (One Family Urban (Medium Density) Residential) Surrounding Uses: North: Use: Single Family Residential Zone: RS-1 (One Family Urban Residential) Designation: Urban Residential South: Use: Single Family Residential Zone: RS-1 (One Family Urban Residential) Designation: Urban Residential East: Use: Single Family Residential Zone: RS-1 (One Family Urban Residential) Designation: Urban Residential West: Use: Single Family Residential Zone: RS-1 (One Family Residential) Designation: Urban Residential Existing Use of Property: Single Family Residential Proposed Use of Property: Single Family Residential Site Area: 0.180 Hectares (0.44 acres) Access: 122 B Avenue Servicing requirement: Urban Standard -3 - 2)Project Description: The application is to rezone the subject property from RS-1 (One Family Urban Residential) to RS- 1b (One Family Urban (Medium Density) Residential) to facilitate a 3 lot subdivision (Appendix D). The proposed subdivision will require the removal of the existing single family dwelling and accessory building that is located on the subject property. The RS-1b zone (One Family Urban (Medium Density) Residential) zone requires a minimum parcel size of 557 m2 with a minimum width of 15 m and depth of 27 m. 3)Planning Analysis: i)Official Community Plan: The development site is currently designated Urban Residential. This designation permits a range of housing types, densities and infill opportunities within the Urban Area boundary in which the subject property is located. The Urban Residential Designation is broken into two categories and the subject property is located within the Major Corridor Residential category. The Major Corridor Residential category provides for a variety of housing forms which include single detached dwellings. The proposed development is in compliance with the OCP. ii)Zoning Bylaw: The current application proposes to rezone the property located at 12260 Laity Street from RS-1 (One Family Urban Residential) to RS-1b (One Family Urban (Medium Density) Residential) to permit the subdivision of the property into approximatley 3 residential lots. The minimum lot size for the current RS-1 (One Family Residential) zone is 668m2, and the minimum lot size for the proposed RS-1b (One Family Urban (Medium Density) Residential) zone is 557m2.. 4)Interdepartmental Implications: i)Engineering Department: The subject property fronts onto 122B Street and Laity Street. Access to the proposed lots will be limited to 6m wide driveways of off 122B Street. There is sanitary sewer and storm mains fronting along 122B Street and water mains on Laity Street and 122 B Avenue. ii)Fire Department: The house and accessory structures located on the subject property will be removed and need to be done under a valid demolition permit. Once, the current structures are vacated they must be secured in accordance with Maple Ridge Vacant / Abandoned Building Bylaw No. 6958-2012. iii)Building: The subject property is located within the Fraser River Escarpment area; therefore,no infiltration is permitted. A comprehensive site grading plan will be required. -4 - CONCLUSION: It is recommended that second reading be given to Zone Amending Bylaw No. 7385-2017, and that application 2017-331-RZ be forwarded to Public Hearing. “Original signed by Wendy Cooper” _______________________________________________ Prepared by: Wendy Cooper, MCIP,RPP Senior Planning Technician “Original signed by Christine Carter” _______________________________________________ Approved by: Christine Carter, M.PL, MCIP, RPP Director of Planning “Original signed by Frank Quinn” _______________________________________________ Approved by: Frank Quinn, MBA, P.Eng GM Public Works & Development Services “Original signed by Paul Gill” _______________________________________________ Concurrence: Paul Gill, CPA, CGA Chief Administrative Officer The following appendices are attached hereto: Appendix A – Subject Map Appendix B – Ortho Map Appendix C – Zone Amending Bylaw No. 7385-2017 Appendix D – Proposed Subdivision layout DATE: Jul 31, 2017 FILE: 2017-331-RZ 12260 LAITY STREET City of PittMeadows District of Langley District of MissionFRASER R . ^PLANNING DEPARTMENT 214 ST.CARLTON ST122B AVE.LAITY ST.212 ST.123 AVE. CAMPBELL AVE. ONEHOUSE AVE. McCALLUM CT. 122 AVE.2118021191212202132112291 213102130512240 21298 12245 21293212222132812343 213342120321191211932121412282 2130221196122092117012230 2129 4 12366 12294 12239 12350 12218 213602129521377212252137221291213322121012277 2132012255 213012120712250 21314212411235512287 2132812336 21228 12353 2119512370 2123821296 21297 12277 213112124012234 2130312259 21359211902131121297213272132112350 213192137012200 12375 2119912167 21229 1219121292122632124712323/25 213711215721216212901232321340122422128212237213301226721295213022118912355 12225 12217 213081234321194 12222 2130012186 12331 12213 2136412219 2121121206/0821290212972135121314212133321213212822129221196/981225712295 27 12267 21199211228521190/92212062123512209 21241213212136512212 2120121367212301233021 12196 /2321231123651226021222 2131112322 12264 12324 2134421221212982310 12161 12171 2128812358 SUBJECT PROPERTY ´ Scale: 1:2,000 BY: PC APPENDIX A DATE: Jul 31, 2017 FILE: 2017-331-RZ 12260 LAITY STREET City of PittMeadows District of Langley District of MissionFRASER R . ^PLANNING DEPARTMENT 214 ST.CARLTON ST122B AVE.LAITY ST.212 ST.123 AVE. CAMPBELL AVE. ONEHOUSE AVE. McCALLUM CT. 122 AVE.2118021191212202132112291 213102130512240 21298 12245 21293212222132812343 213342120321191211932121412282 2130221196122092117012230 2129 4 12366 12294 12239 12350 12218 213602129521377212252137221291213322121012277 2132012255 213012120712250 21314212411235512287 2132812336 21228 12353 2119512370 2123821296 21297 12277 213112124012234 2130312259 21359211902131121297213272132112350 213192137012200 12375 2119912167 21229 1219121292122632124712323/25 213711215721216212901232321340122422128212237213301226721295213022118912355 12225 12217 213081234321194 12222 2130012186 12331 12213 2136412219 2121121206/0821290212972135121314212133321213212822129221196/981225712295 27 12267 21199211228521190/92212062123512209 21241213212136512212 2120121367212301233021 12196 /2321231123651226021222 2131112322 12264 12324 2134421221212982310 12161 12171 2128812358 SUBJECT PROPERTY Aerial Imagery from the Spring of 2016´ Scale: 1:2,000 BY: PC APPENDIX B CITY OF MAPLE RIDGE BYLAW NO. 7385-2017 A Bylaw to amend Map "A" forming part of Zoning Bylaw No. 3510 - 1985 as amended ______________________________________________________________________________ WHEREAS, it is deemed expedient to amend Maple Ridge Zoning Bylaw No. 3510 - 1985 as amended; NOW THEREFORE, the Municipal Council of the City of Maple Ridge enacts as follows: 1.This Bylaw may be cited as "Maple Ridge Zone Amending Bylaw No. 7385-2017." 2.That parcel or tract of land and premises known and described as: Lot 12 District Lot 248 Group 1 New Westminster District Plan LMP11733 and outlined in heavy black line on Map No. 1731 a copy of which is attached hereto and forms part of this Bylaw, is hereby rezoned to RS-1b (One Family Urban (Medium Density) Residential). 3.Maple Ridge Zoning Bylaw No. 3510 - 1985 as amended and Map "A" attached thereto are hereby amended accordingly. READ a first time the 19th day of September, 2017. READ a second time the day of , 20 PUBLIC HEARING held the day of , 20 READ a third time the day of , 20 ADOPTED the day of , 20 _____________________________ ____________________________ PRESIDING MEMBER CORPORATE OFFICER APPENDIX C 214 ST.CARLTON ST. 122B AVE.LAITY ST.212 ST.123 AVE. CAMPBELL AVE. STONEHOUSE AVE. 122 AVE.2118021191212202132112291 213102130512240 21298 12245 21293212222132821203211932121412282 2130221196122092117012230 21294 12294 12239 12350 12218 213602129521377212252137221291213322121012277 2132012255 213012120712250 21314212411235512287 2132812336 12353 21195211832123821296 21297 12277 213112124012234 2130312259 21359211902131121297213272132112350 21319213701220021199 121912129212263212471223 1 12323/25 21371212162129012323 12242 213402128212237 2133012267 21295213022118912225 12217 213081234321194 12222 2130012186 12331 12213 213641221921206/08212902129721351213142133321213212922128221196/9812257 211881229512227 12267 211991228521190/92212062123512209 213212136512212 213672123012330 12196 /23123651226021222 2131112322 12264 12324 21344211762129812310 12171 21288276 278 1 12 6 21 342 8 5 352 112 153 319 224 2 17 3 Rem 2 277 7 152 10 2 350 20 Pcl. 7 351 355 221 12 375 25 Rem 4 313 345 222 26 56 2 3 3Rem 3532 344 8 149 57 348 360 10 220 4 318 1 7 13 358 314 2 2 10 223 12 3 374 341 4 Rem 4 6 1519 347 Rem 5 225365312 315 7 354 11 150 280 226 8 14 22 16 1 357 9 2 11 281 5 339 9 349 34 5 3 321 18 376 340 353 148 320 1 14 279 22 6 1 5 1 2 23 11069 16 Rem 34 A2 21 11 316 4 346 359 373 24 2 343 33 13 317 35 7 17 P 15784 P 60659P 9922 P 15784 LMP 11733LMS 2173P 60659P 62355 P 17823 P 37928 P 20089 P 32892 P 24856 P 58583 P 77954 P 14686P 48094 P 67224 P 14302P 63795P 60659P 14112 P 56039 P 56896 P 17823P 20711P 67224 P 17823 BCP 24100 P 31223 P 24856P 73894 LMP 11733 NWS 1462P 56896 BCP26209 P 5330 P 31354P 80424P 73894P 20711P 14302P 14686LMP 35282 P 62150RW 17412 EP 73895 EP 46260 LMP 35291 LMP 35283LMP 38963LMP 35019 LMP 39238 EP 60661 ´ SCALE 1:2,000 MAPLE RIDGE ZONE AMENDINGBylaw No. Map No. From: To: RS-1 (One Family Urban Residential) RS-1b (One Family Urban (Medium Density) Residential) 7385-20171731 City of Maple Ridge TO: Her Worship Mayor Nicole Read MEETING DATE: July 24, 2018 and Members of Council FILE NO: 2015-297-DVP FROM: Chief Administrative Officer MEETING: Council SUBJECT: Development Variance Permit 23025, 23054, 23060 and 23075 Lougheed Highway EXECUTIVE SUMMARY: Development Variance Permit application (2015-297-DVP) has been received in conjunction with a application for the properties at 23025, 23054, 23060 and 23075 Lougheed Highway (Appendix A and B) to construct an approximately 125 unit townhouse complex. The requested variance is to relax the setback along the cul-de-sac from 7.5 metres to 6 metres to the front face of the units, with further reductions for the front covered porches and roof projections. The property is zoned RM-1 (Townhouse Residential) and a separate report is before Council to issue Development Permit 2015- 297-DP in conjunction with OCP Section 8.7 Multi-Family Development Permit Area Guidelines. It is recommended that Development Variance Permit 2015-297-DVP be approved. RECOMMENDATION: That the Corporate Officer be authorized to sign and seal 2015-297-DVP respecting property located at 23025, 23054, 23060 and 23075 Lougheed Highway. DISCUSSION: a)Background Context Applicant: Polygon Development 309 Ltd. (Craig Simms) Legal Description: Parcel "One" (Explanatory Plan 8328) of Parcel "J" (Reference Plan 3829) Except: Part on Statutory Right of Way Plan 71204; District Lots 402 and 403 Group 1 New Westminster District; Parcel "L" (Reference Plan 3957) of Parcel "J" (Reference Plan 3829), Except: Firstly : Part on Statutory Right Of Way Plan 4834; Secondly: Part Lying South of Road Shown on Statutory Right Of Way Plan 4834; Thirdly : Part On Statutory Right of Way Plan 71204; District Lots 402 and 403 Group 1 New Westminster District; Lot 31 District Lots 402 and 403 Group 1 New Westminster District Plan 61595; and Lot 32 District Lots 402 and 403 Group 1 New Westminster District Plan 61595 OCP : Existing: Urban Residential and Conservation Zoning: Existing: RM-1 (Townhouse Residential) 1110 Surrounding Uses North: Use: Park and School Zone: CD-1-89 (Assembly, Civic, Park & School) Designation Institutional South: Use: Townhouse Site (Vacant) Zone: RM-1 (Townhouse Residential) Designation: Urban Residential East: Use: Commercial with Rental Apartments, Park and Townhouse Sites (vacant) Zone: C-1(Neighbourhood Commercial), P-1 (School and Park) and RM-1 (Townhouse Residential) Designation: Commercial and Urban Residential West: Use: Residential and Conservation Zone: R-2 (Urban Residential District) and RS-3 (One Family Rural Residential) Designation: Urban Residential and Conservation Existing Use of Property: Vacant Proposed Use of Property: Residential Site Area: 2.96 Ha. (7.3 Acres) Access: Cul-de-sac (Palarina Place) Servicing: Urban Previous Applications: 2015-297-RZ a)Project Description: This proposal is for a 125 unit townhouse development, consisting of 25 buildings, ranging between two (2) and five (5) units in a building. There will be three (3) separate colour schemes to bring variety and create a better sense of place. It is part of a comprehensively planned community to be developed in a series of phases with pedestrian trails, a public plaza, parks, commercial use, single residential lots and a common recreational facility. b)Variance Analysis: The Zoning Bylaw establishes general minimum and maximum regulations for development. A Development Variance Permit allows Council some flexibility in the approval process. The requested variances and rationale for support are described below (see Appendix C). The following is proposed: 1.Maple Ridge Zoning Bylaw No. 3510-1985, 602 RM-1 Townhouse Residential District Section 6. Siting a) - to vary the exterior side setback (to the cul-de-sac) for Building 3 and 4 from 7.5 metres to: 6.19 metres to the closer front faces and 6.95 m to the further front faces; 5.58 metres for the building overhangs; 4.33 metres to the front balcony posts; and 4.15 metres to the front balcony overhang. This will allow for a stronger pedestrian environment being created along the cul-de-sac and the public plaza developed as part of this phase at the corner of Lougheed Highway and the cul-de- sac, the future commercial / apartment rental building and amenity facility both to be built across the street as part of future phases of this comprehensively planned development. 2.Maple Ridge Zoning Bylaw No. 3510-1985, 602 RM-1 Townhouse Residential District Section 6. Siting a) - to vary the front setback (to Lougheed Highway) for Buildings 25 from 7.5 metres to: 4.72 metres to the closer front faces and 4.42 for its associated overhang; and 5.67 metres to the further front faces and 5.37 for its associated overhang. This is necessitated by environmental and geotechnical constraints shifting units in the area north closer to the Lougheed Highway to enhance environmental protection. Measures including thicker landscaping and triple glazing will be introduced to mitigate the noise impact from Lougheed Highway. 3.Maple Ridge Zoning Bylaw No. 3510-1985, 602 RM-1 Townhouse Residential District Section 6. Siting a) - to vary the front setback (to Lougheed Highway) for Buildings 26 from 7.5 metres to: 5.04 metres to the closer front faces and 4.74 for its associated overhang; and 6.00 metres to the further front faces and 5.70 for its associated overhang. This is necessitated by environmental and geotechnical constraints shifting units in the area north closer to the Lougheed Highway to enhance environmental protection. Measures including thicker landscaping and triple glazed windows or a similar acoustic rated window on the bedroom that faces on to Lougheed will be introduced to mitigate the noise impact from Lougheed Highway. 4.Maple Ridge Zoning Bylaw No. 3510-1985, 602 RM-1 Townhouse Residential District Section 6. Siting a) - to vary the interior side setback to Unit 125 in Building 28 from 6.0 metres to: 4.52 metres to the south lot line; 4.00 metres to the closer face and 4.87 m to the further face to the south lot line; 4.87 metres to the building overhangs to the south lot line; 3.78 metres to the balcony posts to the south lot line; and 3.42 metres to the balcony overhang to the south lot line. This is necessitated by environmental and geotechnical constraints to accommodate one unit at the south end of this building containing five (5) townhouse units. 5.Maple Ridge Zoning Bylaw No. 3510-1985, 602 RM-1 Townhouse Residential District Section 8. Other Regulations d) - to vary the minimum required open space for 3 bedroom units from a minimum of 45 square metres to a minimum of not less than 28.2 square metres as specified for each lot in the table in Appendix C: The bullets below summarize the proposed townhouse yard reductions. They propose to balance this by increasing the minimum requirement of 5% common open space required for the overall site by the amount reduced for the individual yards. This will allow a hillside area to be preserved as passive open space, an east-west pedestrian trail to give the general public from the residential area to the west (e.g. Telosky Avenue / Harrison Street area) access the new Central Park and commercial area as well as townhouse residents access their Clubhouse in the future phase and to develop the Public Plaza at the corner of Dewdney Trunk Road and the cul-de-sac for public use. The yard breakdown is: •6.4% (8 yards) will exceed the minimum area; •39.2% (49 yards) will be between 80% – 99% of the minimum; •17.6% (22 yards) will be between 70% - 79% of the minimum; and •36.8% (46 yards) will be between 63% – 69% of the minimum. The smallest yard will be 28.2 square metres or just over 300 square feet. In accordance with the Development Procedures Bylaw No. 5879-1999, notice of Council consideration of a resolution to issue a Development Variance Permit was mailed to all owners or tenants in occupation of all parcels, any parts of which are adjacent to the property that is subject to the permit. CONCLUSION: The proposed variances are justified to support the future pedestrian environment along the cul-de- sac, accommodate environmental constraints on the northern part of the site and to create a higher level of public access to the open spaces associated with this development. It is therefore recommended that this application be favourably considered and the Corporate Officer be authorized to sign and seal Development Variance Permit 2015-297-DVP. “Original signed by Adrian Kopystynski” _______________________________________________ Prepared by: Adrian Kopystynski, MCIP, RPP, MCAHP Planner “Original signed by Christine Carter” _______________________________________________ Approved by: Christine Carter, M.PL, MCIP, RPP Director of Planning “Original signed by Frank Quinn” _______________________________________________ Approved by: Frank Quinn, MBA, P.Eng GM Public Works & Development Services “Original signed by Paul Gill” _______________________________________________ Concurrence: Paul Gill, CPA, CGA Chief Administrative Officer The following appendices are attached hereto: Appendix A – Subject Map Appendix B – Ortho Map Appendix C – Key Plan and details about requested Variances DATE: Jul 10, 2018 FILE: 2015-297 23025/23054/23060/23075 LOUGHEED HWY PLANNING DEPARTMENT SUBJECT PROPERTIES ´ Scale: 1:4,700 BY: LP Legend Stream Ditch Centreline Edge of Marsh Indefinite Creek Lake or Reservoir Marsh APPENDIX A DATE: Jul 10, 2018 FILE: 2015-297 23025/23054/23060/23075 LOUGHEED HWY City of PittMeadows District of Langley District of MissionFRASER R. ^ PLANNING DEPARTMENT SUBJECT PROPERTIES Aerial Imagery from the Spring of 2016´ Scale: 1:4,700 BY: LP APPENDIX B City of Maple Ridge TO: Her Worship Mayor Nicole Read MEETING DATE: July 24, 2018 and Members of Council FILE NO: 2015-297-DP FROM: Chief Administrative Officer MEETING: Council SUBJECT: Development Permit 23025, 23054, 23060 and 23054 Lougheed Highway EXECUTIVE SUMMARY: Council considered rezoning application 2015-297-RZ and granted final reading on May 22, 2018. This development permit application 2015-297-DP is for 125 townhouse units in phase 1 of the multi-phased Polygon development at 23025, 23054, 23060 and 23054 Lougheed Highway (Appendix A and B) referred to as Roslyn Ridge. Each future phase of this development will be forwarded to Council in separate development permit reports. RECOMMENDATION: That the Corporate Officer be authorized to sign and seal 2015-297-DP respecting property located at 23025, 23054, 23060 and 23054 Lougheed Highway. DISCUSSION: a)Background Context: Applicant: Polygon Development 309 Ltd. (Craig Simms) Legal Description: Parcel "One" (Explanatory Plan 8328) of Parcel "J" (Reference Plan 3829) Except: Part on Statutory Right of Way Plan 71204; District Lots 402 and 403 Group 1 New Westminster District; Parcel "L" (Reference Plan 3957) of Parcel "J" (Reference Plan 3829), Except: Firstly: Part on Statutory Right Of Way Plan 4834; Secondly: Part Lying South of Road Shown on Statutory Right Of Way Plan 4834; Thirdly: Part On Statutory Right of Way Plan 71204; District Lots 402 and 403 Group 1 New Westminster District; Lot 31 District Lots 402 and 403 Group 1 New Westminster District Plan 61595; and Lot 32 District Lots 402 and 403 Group 1 New Westminster District Plan 61595 OCP : Existing: Urban Residential and Conservation) Zoning: Existing: RM-1 (Townhouse Residential) 1111 - 2 - Surrounding Uses North: Use: Park and School Zone: CD-1-89 (Assembly, Civic, Park & School) Designation Institutional South: Use: Townhouse Site (Vacant) Zone: RM-1 (Townhouse Residential) Designation: Urban Residential East: Use: Commercial with Rental Apartments, Park and Townhouse Sites (vacant) Zone: C-1(Neighbourhood Commercial), P-1 (School and Park) and RM-1 (Townhouse Residential) Designation: Commercial and Urban Residential West: Use: Residential and Conservation Zone: R-2 (Urban Residential District) and RS-3 (One Family Rural Residential) Designation: Urban Residential and Conservation Existing Use of Property: Vacant Proposed Use of Property: Residential Site Area: 2.96 Ha. (7.3 Acres) Access: Cul-de-sac (Palarina Place) Servicing: Urban Previous Applications: 2015-297-RZ Concurrent application: 2015-297-DVP b) Project Description: Context: The overall site is subject to a comprehensive development concept (Appendix C). The first and the second phases are for a townhouse community, built around a one acre city park and a private Amenity Facility in the second phase. The third phase is a mixed use commercial / rental apartment building under a Housing Agreement. In parallel are two single family subdivisions; one with 27 lots to complete the Telosky Avenue / Harrison Street neighbourhood west of the development and the other a 47 lot single residential subdivision in the eastern part of the site along 232 Street. This subject development permit application is for the first phase of 125 townhouses. Development permit applications for the second and third parts will be brought forward to Council at a later date. Subject Proposal: This proposal is for a 125 unit townhouse development, consisting of 25 buildings, ranging between two (2) and five (5) units in a building (Appendix D). There will be three (3) separate colour schemes to bring variety and create a better sense of place (Appendix E). This phase is congruent with a comprehensively planned open space and circulation concept having three major pedestrian elements as follows:  A pedestrian network interconnecting the commercial area, Central Park, passive open spaces and a potential future pedestrian bridge over the Haney Bypass / CR Rail right of way with the residences within the development and to neighbourhoods beyond. - 3 -  A Public Plaza with public art at the southwest corner of Lougheed Highway and the cul-de- sac. This portion of the site may be subject to adjustments to the landscaping and hardscaping through the Public Art Selection Process agreed upon between the developer and the City. The Maple Ridge Public Art Steering Committee will have a role in selecting the final public art piece displayed at this location.  A shared private amenity facility, referred to by the developer as a Clubhouse, will be in the second phase of this development. This proposal will be brought forward to Council as a separate report when the application for the phase 2 townhouse complex is submitted to the City. This Clubhouse will have a floor area of approximately 560 square metres and will feature a great room, fitness studio, pool, hot tub and resident manager dwelling, within a landscaped setting. The overall appearance of the development from the street is shown in Appendix F. Through variances described below, street facing units have individual gates and have a sympathetic front yard relationship to the public realm. Townhouse building blocks are varied with two (2) to six (6) dwelling units in a building. Samples of townhouse buildings (and their associated floor plans and elevations) are attached as Appendix G and H for flatter and sloping areas of the site, respectively. Appendix I shows the cul-de-sac road and the proposed Public Plaza at the corner of Lougheed Highway. This corner plaza (Appendix J) in phase 1 is subject to a statutory right-of-way allowing for unrestricted public access. Its design will be a combination of hardscaping and landscaping, designed to accommodate a monument sign identifying the community and featuring a piece of public art in fulfillment of one of the Council conditions for rezoning. (There is elaboration provided in the Financial Implications section.) Variances: Variances are being sought for the following purposes:  to allow about a dozen of the units, including their associated front porches, to be brought out closer to the sidewalk;  to reduce interior setbacks for one unit where the site is pinched by ESA areas; and  to reduce the minimum required yard space for a majority of the units in exchange for providing at least an equal amount of addition common or passive open space thus having more common open space than required by the zone regulations, a public plaza and a public trail through the townhouse development. These variances will be the subject of a separate report to Council accompanying this report under application number 2015-297-DVP. c) Planning Analysis: The proposal for the first phase of the former MOTI / Cottonwood site being developed by Polygon is in accordance with the overall development concept of these lands as required in the Supplementary Design Guidelines registered on the site and the OCP Development Design Guidelines for Multi- family projects and described in d). It has been assessed by the Architect and apart from the three (3) variances describes in b), complies with the RM-1 zone. - 4 - d) Advisory Design Panel: This proposal was presented to the Advisory Design panel on two occasions – firstly on on February 15, 2017 and secondly on June 13, 2017. The following is a description provided by the project Architect about how each matter raised by the ADP was addressed: February 15, 2017 ADP Meeting The following are the 11 comments provided by the ADP and the corresponding responses by the Project Architect: 1. Provide dimensional material in lieu of vinyl. Architect’s Response: Painted and hardie panels are now added to more surfaces of the facades, so that the use of vinyl is limited to a small percentage of the building surfaces. 2. Provide further articulation on the rear elevation. Architect’s Response: Upper level bedroom bays now at the rear elevations will be cladded with painted hardie panels to give it a distinct surface texture and character. 3. Consider more uniform composition of glazing. Architect’s Response: Window sizes and locations are made consistent throughout individual unit types. The style of the windows are also made consistent for all unit types. 4. Show more details and locations how the building responds to grade change. Architect’s Response: How buildings step in response to the grade change is now illustrated individually in elevations. 5. Provide details and sections of tiered retaining wall including landscape treatment. Architect’s Response: Tiered retaining walls are described in section and plan. Details of retaining walls are included. 6. Provide details for acoustic and landscape treatment along Lougheed Highway. Consider acoustic fence. Architect’s Response: Details for solid wood fencing used for sound attenuation have been provided. Solid wood fencing and dense coniferous planting along Lougheed Highway are employed to mitigate noise and the visual impacts of traffic. Staff Comment: The majority of the sound attenuation will be required for the units in the phase 2 portion of this development where the townhouse units are closer to the Haney Bypass and the CP Rail line. This will be part of the development permit application to be made by the developer and brought to Council at a future date to consider. 7. Provide landscape treatments and planting in detail. Architect’s Response: Soft landscape and rain garden areas have been clarified with hatch patterns and a shrub line in plan. Planting selections have been refined and presented in a plant schedule. 8. Provide legend or schedule of hard scape treatment. Architect’s Response: Paving types have been clarified with a hatch pattern. A corresponding hardscape legend has been provided. - 5 - 9. Use native trees and plants near the conservation area and forest edge. Architect’s Response: Tree selections at the interface with conservation areas and existing forests have been refined. Trees and understory planting in these areas is composed of native and adaptive species. 10. Show the overall layout of the park in relation to the building layout adjacent to Lot D. Architect’s Response Park layout is shown in the context of the overall building layout in plan. 11. Provide more details regarding public art and place making. Architect’s Response Opportunities for public art and place making locations have been identified in plan. Integration of rain gardens into landscape to increase storm water capacity, and control infiltration while also providing social spaces and integrated rain garden landscape planting. June 13, 2017 ADP Meeting: The following is the comment provided by the ADP and the corresponding response by the Project Architect: 1. Consider where necessary transitional elements for connection between stepped units. Architect’s Response Incorporated into the overall design in these areas are, not only low, stepped, landscape walls, but public walkways, landscaped hedges and trees, as well as low fences for privacy of rear yards. As well, Landscaping is used extensively, where possible to assist with any transitions occurring at building edges. All changes have been reflected in the final plans for this development proposal. Financial Implications: In accordance with Council’s Landscape Security Policy, a refundable security for the estimated landscape cost will be provided to ensure satisfactory provision of landscaping in accordance with the terms and conditions of the Development Permit. The securities are being collect for a number of purposes:  $1,488,773.00 for on-site landscaping requirements secured at about 125% for a security submitted of $1,829,545.00;  $67,318.75 for the hardscaping and landscaping of the Public Plaza (secured at 100% of the estimate); and  $41,283.75 for the hard and soft landscaping of east-west public trail on the site (secured at 100% of the estimate). The proposed public art piece to be situated on this property at the corner of Lougheed Highway and the cul-de-sac is subject to a Statutory Right-of-Way and Restrictive Covenant providing for public access to the public plaza and collecting a further security of $100,000 towards the creation and placement of a public art piece through a Public Art Selection process involving the City, developer, ADP representative and the Maple Ridge Public Art Steering Committee. This is not duplicated under this development permit’s security. - 6 - CONCLUSION: This development permit is for the first phase of the development of the former MOTI / Cottonwwod site with about 125 Townhouses. This phase complies with overall comprehensive scheme for the site development and the OCP DP guidelines. Therefore, it is in order for Development Permit 2015- 297-DP to be issued by Council. “Original signed by Adrian Kopystynski” _______________________________________________ Prepared by: Adrian Kopystynski, MCIP, RPP, MCAHP Planner “Original signed by Christine Carter” _____________________________________________ Approved by: Christine Carter, M.PL, MCIP, RPP Director of Planning “Original signed by Frank Quinn” _______________________________________________ Approved by: Frank Quinn, MBA, P.Eng GM Public Works & Development Services “Original signed by Paul Gill” _______________________________________________ Concurrence: Paul Gill, CPA, CGA Chief Administrative Officer The following appendices are attached hereto: Appendix A – Subject map Appendix B – Ortho Map Appendix C – Comprehensive Polygon Development Plan Appendix D - Site Plan and Site Statistics Appendix E – Character and Colour Schemes (three variations) Appendix F – Streetscape Appendix G – Sample Plan and Elevations of Building on flat area of site Appendix H – Sample Plan and Elevations of Building on sloping area of site Appendix I – Landscaping Plans and details Appendix J – Cul-de-sac with Public Plaza DATE: Jul 10, 2018 FILE: 2015-297 23025/23054/23060/23075 LOUGHEED HWY PLANNING DEPARTMENT SUBJECT PROPERTIES ´ Scale: 1:4,700 BY: LP Legend Stream Ditch Centreline Edge of Marsh Indefinite Creek Lake or Reservoir Marsh APPENDIX A DATE: Jul 10, 2018 FILE: 2015-297 23025/23054/23060/23075 LOUGHEED HWY City of PittMeadows District of Langley District of MissionFRASER R. ^ PLANNING DEPARTMENT SUBJECT PROPERTIES Aerial Imagery from the Spring of 2016´ Scale: 1:4,700 BY: LP APPENDIX B APPENDIX C APPENDIX D APPENDIX E APPENDIX F APPENDIX G APPENDIX H APPENDIX I APPENDIX J City of Maple Ridge TO: Her Worship Mayor Nicole Read MEETING DATE: July 24, 2018 and Members of Council FILE NO: 2016-105-DVP FROM: Chief Administrative Officer MEETING: Council SUBJECT: Development Variance Permit 13245 236 Street EXECUTIVE SUMMARY: Development Variance Permit application 2016-105-DVP has been received for the subject property, located at 13245 236 Street, in conjunction with a Rezoning application, Multi-Family Development Permit application, Wildfire Development Permit application and Natural Features Development Permit application. The requested variances are to: 1.Reduce the minimum front yard setback for Blocks 1 and 2 from 7.5m (24.6 ft.) to 2.1m (6.9 ft.) to the building face and 1.4m (4.6 ft.) to the roof overhang; 2.Reduce the minimum rear yard setback for Block 6 (Unit 22C1) from 7.5m (24.6 ft.) to 5.7m (18.7 ft.) to the building face; 3.Reduce the minimum interior yard setback for Blocks 2 and 3 from 6.0m (20 ft.) to 3.8m (12.5 ft.) to the deck; and to 4.7m (15.4 ft.) to the deck for Block 3; 4.Reduce the minimum exterior yard setback for Blocks 6 and 7 from 7.5m (24.6 ft.) to 5.5m (18.0 ft.) to the building face; and 4.4m (14.4 ft.) to the decks; 5.Increase the maximum building height for Blocks 1, 3, 4 and 5 from 11m (36 ft.) to 11.76m (38.6 ft.) at its tallest point; 6.Reduce the minimum required Useable Open Space minimum dimension of not less than 6m (20 ft.) for Blocks 1, 3, 5, 6 and 7 to 4.5m (15 ft.); 7.Increase the maximum retaining wall height from 1.2m (4 ft.) to 4.1m (13.5 ft.) at its highest point. Council will be considering final reading for Rezoning application 2016-004-RZ on July 24, 2018. It is recommended that Development Variance Permit 2016-105-DVP be approved. RECOMMENDATION: That the Corporate Officer be authorized to sign and seal 2016-105-DVP respecting property located at 13245 236 Street DISCUSSION: a)Background Context Applicant: Archstone Projects Ltd. Legal Description: Lot 39 Section 28 Township 12 New Westminster District Plan 40978 1112 - 2 - OCP: Existing: Medium/High Density Residential Zoning: Existing: RS-3 (One Family Rural Residential) and RS-2 (One Family Suburban Residential) Proposed: RM-1 (Townhouse Residential) Surrounding Uses: North: Use: Multi-Family Residential Zone: RST-SV (Street Townhouse) Designation: Medium/High Density Residential South: Use: Single Family Residential Zone: RS-2 (One Family Suburban Residential), under application for RM-1 (Townhouse Residential) Designation: Medium/High Density Residential East: Use: Multi-Family Residential Zone: RM-1 (Townhouse Residential) Designation: Medium/High Density Residential West: Use: Single Family Residential Zone: RS-3 (One Family Rural Residential) and RS-2 (One Family Suburban Residential), under application for RM-1 (Townhouse Residential) Designation: Neighbourhood Park; Medium/High Density Residential; Conservation Existing Use of Property: Single Family Residential Proposed Use of Property: Multi-Family Residential Site Area: 0.78 ha (1.93 acres) Access: 236 Street Servicing requirement: Urban Standard b) Project Description: The subject property is located in the River Village of the Silver Valley Area Plan and is approximately 0.78 ha (1.93 acres) in size. The subject property is bound by a proposed townhouse development to the south, a proposed townhouse development to the west, Larch Avenue and street townhouses to the north, and a townhouse development to the east. Larch Avenue has been constructed in a new alignment further north of the property; therefore, the adjacent road right-of-way to the north of the property will be maintained as a trail. The north-eastern portion of the subject property is higher in elevation and slopes down towards the south-west. There is a considerable amount of vegetation and tree cover on the subject property (see Appendices A and B). The applicant is proposing a townhouse development consisting of 31 units to be accessed from 236 Street. A common activity area is proposed along the northern property boundary. There are significant trees located on the western property boundary that will be retained through a tree protection covenant. Retaining walls will be required to mitigate the grade changes on site. The - 3 - architectural aesthetics of the proposed development will utilize ‘West Coast’ inspiration, incorporating the natural environment into the design. c) Variance Analysis: The Zoning Bylaw establishes general minimum and maximum regulations for Multi-Family developments. A Development Variance Permit allows Council some flexibility in the approval process. The requested variances and rationale for support are described below (see Appendix C): 1. Zoning Bylaw No. 3510 -1985, Part 6, Section 602, 6. a): To reduce the minimum front yard setback from 7.5m (24.6 ft.) to: i. 4.5m (15 ft.) to the building face for all units in Block 1; ii. 2.2m (7.2 ft.) to the decks for Block 1; iii. 2.1m (6.9 ft.) to the building face for Unit 5C1 in Block 2; iv. 1.4m (4.6 ft.) to the roof overhang for Unit 5C1 in Block 2. The front yard setback is supported as it improves the street presence and aesthetics of the development; as well, the variance to Block 2 allows for the significant trees in the south west corner to be retained. 2. Zoning Bylaw No. 3510 -1985, Part 6, Section 602, 6. a): To reduce the minimum rear yard setback from 7.5m (24.6 ft.) to: i. 5.7m (18.7 ft.) to the building face for Unit 22C1 in Block 6. The rear yard setback is supported as it allows adequate area for a central outdoor amenity space. 3. Zoning Bylaw No. 3510 -1985, Part 6, Section 602, 6. a): To reduce the minimum exterior yard setback from 7.5m (24.6 ft.) to: i. 5.5m (18 ft.) to the building face for Blocks 6 and 7; ii. 4.4m (14.4 ft.) to the deck for Blocks 6 and 7. The exterior yard setback is supported to enable a functional buildable area and appropriate rear yard space, due to the setbacks created with the significant trees on the western section of the development. 4. Zoning Bylaw No. 3510 -1985, Part 6, Section 602, 6. b): To reduce the maximum interior yard setback from 6.0m (20 ft.) to: i. 3.8m (12.5 ft.) to the deck for Block 2; ii. 4.7m (15.4 ft.) to the deck for Block 3. The side yard setback is supported from a liveablity perpective for future residents to allow decks for Blocks 2 and 3. 5. Zoning Bylaw No. 3510 -1985, Part 6, Section 602, 7. a): To increase the maximum building height from 11m (36 ft.) to: i. 11.76m (38.6 ft.) for Block 1, and 4; ii. 11.36m (37.3 ft.) for Block 3 and Block 5. - 4 - These increases in height are supported as there are steep grades on the property and grade differences between the front and back of each unit. Generally, the building faces along the street side (236 Street) are below the allowable building height requirement with minor sections of roof gable peaks extending beyond the 11m maximum allowable height. Adjacent neighbours will not be impacted by the height increases due to the higher grades … 6. Zoning Bylaw No. 3510 -1985, Part 6, Section 602, 8. d) and Part 2, Interpretation: To reduce the minimum required Usable Open Space per 3 bedroom unit from 45m² (454 ft²), with a minimum dimension of not less than 6m (19.7 ft.) to: i. 4.5m (15 ft.) for Block 1; ii. 5.4m (17.7 ft.) for Block 5; iii. 5.2m (17.1 ft.) for Unit 12C in Block 3; iv. 4.9m (16.1 ft.) for Unit 13C2 in Block 3; v. 5.8m (19 ft.) for Block 6; and vi. 5.9m (19.4 ft.) for Block 7. These variances are supported as the shortfall of 26m² (280 ft²) of Usable Open Space is provided in Community Amenity Space. Overall, the required amount of Community Amenity Space is 155m² (1,668 ft²) and 184m² (1,980 ft²) is being provided. 7. Zoning Bylaw No. 3510 -1985, Part 4, Section 403, (8): To increase the maximum retaining wall height from 1.2m (4 ft.) to 4.1m (13.5 ft.) at its higest point. This increase in retaining wall height is supported due to the sloping grades on the site. Best efforts were made to minimize grading differences along the perimeter and adjacent property lines. The retaining walls along the west side of the site, adjacent to the significant trees, are proposed to protect the grades as much as possible. d) Citizen/Customer Implications: In accordance with the Development Procedures Bylaw No. 5879-1999, notice of Council consideration of a resolution to issue a Development Variance Permit was mailed to all owners or tenants in occupation of all parcels, any parts of which are adjacent to the property that is subject to the permit. - 5 - CONCLUSION: The proposed variances are supported as there are steep grades on the property and significant trees to be retained on site. Supported variances also contribute to desirable street presence and functional buildable areas within the development. It is therefore recommended that this application be favourably considered and the Corporate Officer be authorized to sign and seal Development Variance Permit 2016-105-DVP. “Original signed by Adam Rieu” _______________________________________________ Prepared by: Adam Rieu Planning Technician “Original signed by Christine Carter” _______________________________________________ Approved by: Christine Carter, M.PL, MCIP, RPP Director of Planning “Original signed by Frank Quinn” _______________________________________________ Approved by: Frank Quinn, MBA, P.Eng GM Public Works & Development Services “Original signed by Paul Gill” _______________________________________________ Concurrence: Paul Gill, CPA, CGA Chief Administrative Officer The following appendices are attached hereto: Appendix A – Subject Map Appendix B – Ortho Map Appendix C – Proposed Variances DATE: Jul 9, 2018 2016-105-VP.2 13245 236 Street PLANNING DEPARTMENT SUBJECT PROPERTY 2018-111-DP2013-087-RZ 2013-087-VP 2013-087-DP 2016-207-DP 2016-208-DP 2015-373-RZ 2015-373-VP 2016-306-DP 2016-031-RZ 2016-370-DP 2015-373-DP 2015-155-RZ 2017-134-DP 2016-031-DP 2017-133-DP 2018-190-RZ 2016-149-DP ´ Scale: 1:2,500 BY: LP Legend Stream Indefinite Creek River Major Rivers & Lakes APPENDIX A DATE: Apr 11, 2016 2016-105-VP BY: JV PLANNING DEPARTMENT SUBJECT PROPERTY ´ Scale: 1:2,530 13245 236 Street Aerial Imagery from the Spring of 2011 Legend Stream Indefinite Creek River Centreline Major Rivers & Lakes APPENDIX B -1 - City of Maple Ridge TO: Her Worship Mayor Nicole Read MEETING DATE: July 24, 2018 and Members of Council FILE NO: 2016-105-DP FROM: Chief Administrative Officer MEETING: Council SUBJECT: Wildfire Development Permit 13245 236 Avenue EXECUTIVE SUMMARY: Wildfire Development Permit application 2016-105-DP has been received in conjunction with a Rezoning application, Development Variance Permit application, Form and Character Development Permit application and a Natural Features Development Permit application for a townhouse development, under the RM-1 (Townhouse Residential) zone, located within the Silver Valley Area Plan. A Wildfire Development Permit (WFDP) is required because the subject property is located within the Wildfire Development Permit area. This application has been reviewed in relation to the Key Guideline Concepts (Section 8.12.1) and Guidelines (Section 8.12.2) of the Wildfire Development Permit, and in consideration of the Home Owners FireSmart Manual (BC Forest Service Protection Program). RECOMMENDATION: That the Corporate Officer be authorized to sign and seal 2016-105-DP respecting property located at 13245 236 Avenue. DISCUSSION: a)Background Context: Applicant: Archstone Projects Ltd. Legal Description: Lot 39 Section 28 Township 12 New Westminster District Plan 40978 OCP: Existing: Medium/High Density Residential Zoning: Existing: RS-3 (One Family Rural Residential) and RS-2 (One Family Suburban Residential) Proposed: RM-1 (Townhouse Residential) Surrounding Uses: North: Use: Multi-Family Residential Zone: RST-SV (Street Townhouse) Designation: Medium/High Density Residential 1113 - 2 - South: Use: Single Family Residential Zone: RS-2 (One Family Suburban Residential), under application for RM-1 (Townhouse Residential) Designation: Medium/High Density Residential East: Use: Multi-Family Residential Zone: RM-1 (Townhouse Residential) Designation: Medium/High Density Residential West: Use: Single Family Residential Zone: RS-3 (One Family Rural Residential) and RS-2 (One Family Suburban Residential), under application for RM-1 (Townhouse Residential) Designation: Neighbourhood Park; Medium/High Density Residential; Conservation Existing Use of Property: Single Family Residential Proposed Use of Property: Multi-Family Residential Site Area: 0.78 ha (1.93 acres) Access: 236 Street Servicing requirement: Urban Standard Companion Applications: 2016-004-RZ, 2016-004-DP, 2016-106-DP, 2016-105-DVP b) Project Description: The subject property is located in the River Village of the Silver Valley Area Plan and is approximately 0.78 ha (1.93 acres) in size. The property is bound by a proposed townhouse development (2016- 031-RZ) to the south, a proposed townhouse development to the west (2016-087-RZ), Larch Avenue and street townhouses to the north, and an existing townhouse development to the east. Larch Avenue has recently been constructed in a new alignment further north of the property; therefore, the adjacent road right-of-way to the north of the property will be maintained as a trail (see Appendix A). The north-eastern portion of the subject property is higher in elevation and slopes down towards the south-west. There is a considerable amount of vegetation and tree cover on the subject property (see Appendix B). The applicant is proposing a townhouse development consisting of 31 units to be accessed from 236 Street. A common activity area is proposed along the northern property boundary. There are significant trees located on the western property boundary that will be retained through a tree protection covenant, as well as a row of hedges along the northern property boundary. Retaining walls will be required to mitigate the grade changes on site. A Wildfire Hazard Assessment has been received from Diamond Head Consulting Ltd. and was prepared by a Registered Professional Forester qualified by training or experience in fire protection engineering, with at least two years of experience in fire protection engineering and with assessment and mitigation of wildfire hazards in British Columbia. c) Planning Analysis: The Wildfire Development Permit Area Guidelines are intended for the protection of life and property in designated areas that could be at risk for wildland fire and where this risk, in some cases, may be reasonably abated through implementation of appropriate precautionary measures. - 3 - A Wildfire Development Permit is required for all development and subdivision activity or building permits for areas within the Wildfire Development Permit area, as identified in the OCP. The Wildfire Development Permit Guidelines are to work in concert with all other regulations, guidelines and bylaws in effect. This development respects the key guidelines as outlined in this section with comments provided by the Registered Professional Forester: 1. Locate development on individual sites so that, when integrated with the use of mitigating construction techniques and landscape management practices, the risk of wildfire hazards is reduced; The proposed development plan involves limited tree retention. Treatments, in the form of specific tree removal and pruning, have been recommended to mitigate wildfire hazard. 2. Mitigate wildfire impacts while respecting environmental conservation objectives and other hazards in the area; There are no significant environmental conservation areas on the development site. Pruning of the significant trees has been recommended in the southwest corner of the subject property. 3. Ensure identified hazard areas are recognized and addressed within each stage of the land development process; All forested areas have been assessed and delineated into fuel types. Fire behaviour potential of these areas has been analysed. These findings have driven the recommended fuel treatments. 4. Manage the interface forest fuel components, including vegetation and structures, thereby increasing the probability of successful fire suppression, containment and minimize adverse impacts. Recommendations include pruning of trees, as well as appropriate removal and dispersal of slash material and woody debris. d) Financial Implications A security in the amount of $600.00 will be taken as a condition of the Wildfire Development Permit to ensure the removal of a hazard tree. - 4 - CONCLUSION: This application is consistent with the Wildfire Development Permit Key Guideline Concepts (Section 8.12.1) and Guidelines (Section 8.12.2), and in consideration of the Home Owners FireSmart Manual (BC Forest Service Protection Program). Therefore, it is recommended that this Wildfire Development Permit 2016-105-DP be approved. “Original signed by Adam Rieu” _______________________________________________ Prepared by: Adam Rieu Planning Technician “Original signed by Michael Van Dop” _______________________________________________ Approved by: Michael Van Dop Deputy Fire Chief “Original signed by Christine Carter” _____________________________________________ Approved by: Christine Carter, M.PL, MCIP, RPP Director of Planning “Original signed by Frank Quinn” _______________________________________________ Approved by: Frank Quinn, MBA, P.Eng GM: Public Works & Development Services “Original signed by Paul Gill” _______________________________________________ Concurrence: Paul Gill, CPA, CGA Chief Administrative Officer The following appendices are attached hereto: Appendix A – Subject Map Appendix B – Ortho Map Appendix C – Site Plan DATE: Apr 11, 2016 2016-105-DP BY: JV PLANNING DEPARTMENT SUBJECT PROPERTY ´ Scale: 1:2,500 13245 236 StreetLegend Stream Indefinite Creek River Centreline Major Rivers & Lakes APPENDIX A DATE: Apr 11, 2016 2016-105-DP BY: JV PLANNING DEPARTMENT SUBJECT PROPERTY ´ Scale: 1:2,530 13245 236 Street Aerial Imagery from the Spring of 2011 Legend Stream Indefinite Creek River Centreline Major Rivers & Lakes APPENDIX B APPENDIX C City of Maple Ridge TO: Her Worship Mayor Nicole Read MEETING DATE: July 24, 2018 and Members of Council FILE NO: 2016-004-DP FROM: Chief Administrative Officer MEETING: Council SUBJECT: Development Permit 13245 236 Street EXECUTIVE SUMMARY: A Multi-Family Development Permit application has been received for the subject property, located at 13245 236 Street, for a 31 unit townhouse development consisting of seven buildings, under the RM-1 (Townhouse Residential) zone. This application is subject to the Multi-Family Residential Development Permit Area Guidelines, which establish the form and character of multi-family development, with the intent to enhance the existing neighbourhood with compatible housing styles that meet diverse needs and minimize potential conflicts on neighbouring land uses. RECOMMENDATION: That the Corporate Officer be authorized to sign and seal 2016-004-DP respecting property located at 13245 236 Street. DISCUSSION: a)Background Context: Applicant: Archstone Projects Ltd. Legal Description: Lot 39 Section 28 Township 12 New Westminster District Plan 40978 OCP: Existing: Medium/High Density Residential Zoning: Existing: RS-3 (One Family Rural Residential) and RS-2 (One Family Suburban Residential) Proposed: RM-1 (Townhouse Residential) Surrounding Uses: North: Use: Multi-Family Residential Zone: RST-SV (Street Townhouse) Designation: Medium/High Density Residential South: Use: Single Family Residential Zone: RS-2 (One Family Suburban Residential), under application for RM-1 (Townhouse Residential) Designation: Medium/High Density Residential 1114 - 2 - East: Use: Multi-Family Residential Zone: RM-1 (Townhouse Residential) Designation: Medium/High Density Residential West: Use: Single Family Residential Zone: RS-3 (One Family Rural Residential) and RS-2 (One Family Suburban Residential), under application for RM-1 (Townhouse Residential) Designation: Neighbourhood Park; Medium/High Density Residential; Conservation Existing Use of Property: Single Family Residential Proposed Use of Property: Multi-Family Residential Site Area: 0.78 ha (1.93 acres) Access: 236 Street Servicing requirement: Urban Standard Companion Applications: 2016-105-DP, 2016-004-RZ, 2016-106-DP, 2016-105-DVP b)Project Description: The subject property is located in the River Village of the Silver Valley Area Plan and is approximately 0.78 ha (1.93 acres) in size. The subject property is bound by a proposed townhouse development to the south (2016-031-RZ), a proposed townhouse development to the west (2013-087-RZ), Larch Avenue and street townhouses to the north, and an existing townhouse development to the east. Larch Avenue has been constructed in a new alignment further north of the property; therefore, the adjacent road right-of-way to the north of the property will be maintained as a trail (see Appendix A). The north-eastern portion of the subject property is higher in elevation and slopes down towards the southwest. There is a considerable amount of vegetation and tree cover on the subject property (see Appendix B). The applicant is proposing a townhouse development consisting of 31 units to be accessed from 236 Street. A common activity area is proposed along the northern property boundary. There are significant trees located on the western property boundary that will be retained through a tree protection covenant, as well as a row of cedar hedges along the northern boundary. Retaining walls will be required to mitigate the grade changes on site. The architectural aesthetic of the proposed development will utilize ‘West Coast’ inspiration, incorporating the natural environment into the design. c)Planning Analysis: Official Community Plan The subject property is located just north of the intersection of 236 Street and 132 Avenue, within the River Village of the Silver Valley Area Plan. The Official Community Plan (OCP) designation for the subject property is Medium/High Density Residential, which allows both single family and multi- family housing forms. Silver Valley Area Plan Policy 5.2. states: River Village is located along a main arterial route in the Silver Valley area, on Fern Crescent, between Maple Ridge Park to the south and an escarpment to the north and east. Principle 5.2.2 a) identifies that the “River Village is to be a complete community, with a main shopping street, integrated multi-family housing, mixed-use buildings, civic buildings and community facilities, including a high school, and an elementary school.” - 3 - Densities of 30-50 units per hectare are encouraged for the River Village area and may include attached as well as detached fee-simple housing. The proposed RM-1 (Townhouse Residential) development, at 31 units per 0.78 hectare, is approximately 40 units per hectare, and therefore complies with the Medium/High Density Residential designation of the Silver Valley Area Plan. A Multi-Family Residential Development Permit is required for all new multi-family development. Section 8.7, Multi-Family Development Permit Area Guidelines of the OCP aims to regulate the form and character, as outlined below. This development respects the key guideline concepts as outlined in this section: 1. New development into established areas should respect private spaces, and incorporate local neighbourhood elements in building form, height, architectural features and massing. “This proposed infill project is complementary to the many new townhouse projects in the area. It respects the existing context (neighbourhood in transition with setbacks, solid fencing, landscaping and compatible massing).” 2. Transitional development should be used to bridge areas of low and high densities, through means such as stepped building heights, or low rise ground oriented housing located to the periphery of a higher density developments. “The project appears to be 2 storeys from the public street and 2.5 storeys along the property lines.” 3. Large scale developments should be clustered and given architectural separation to foster a sense of community, and improve visual attractiveness. “The development is clustered and designed as a unified form and character, yet has enough variety through material choice and colour to add visual interest.” 4. Pedestrian circulation should be encouraged with attractive streetscapes attained through landscaping, architectural details, appropriate lighting and by directing parking underground where possible or away from public view through screened parking structures or surface parking located to the rear of the property. “Extensive landscape planting is provided along entry of the project. The development entry is marked with an entry gate and low stone walls. Residential parking is concealed in garages while visitor parking is screened with landscaping.” Zoning Bylaw The current application proposes to rezone the subject property from RS-3 (One Family Rural Residential) and RS-2 (One Family Suburban Residential) to RM-1 (Townhouse Residential) to permit the future development of approximately 31 townhouse units (see Appendix C) A Development Variance Permit application has been received for this project and involves the following variances: 1. Reduce the minimum front yard setback for Blocks 1 and 2 from 7.5m (24.6 ft.) to 2.1m (6.9 ft.) to the building face and 1.4m (4.6 ft.) to the roof overhang; - 4 - 2.Reduce the minimum rear yard setback for Block 6 (Unit 22C1) from 7.5m (24.6 ft.) to 5.7m (18.7 ft.) to the building face; 3.Reduce the minimum interior yard setback for Blocks 2 and 3 from 6.0m (20 ft.) to 3.8m (12.5 ft.) to the deck; and to 4.7m (15.4 ft.) to the deck for Block 3; 4.Reduce the minimum exterior yard setback for Blocks 6 and 7 from 7.5m (24.6 ft.) to 5.5m (18.0 ft.) to the building face; and 4.4m (14.4 ft.) to the decks; 5.Increase the maximum building height for Blocks 1, 3, 4 and 5 from 11m (36 ft.) to 11.76m (38.6 ft.) at its tallest point; 6.Reduce the minimum required Useable Open Space minimum dimension of not less than 6m (20 ft.) for Blocks 1, 3, 5, 6 and 7 to 4.5m (15 ft.); 7.Increase the maximum retaining wall height from 1.2m (4 ft.) to 4.1m (13.5 ft.) at its highest point. Off-Street Parking and Loading Bylaw: The Off-Street Parking and Loading Bylaw No. 4350 – 1990 requires that the RM-1 (Townhouse Residential) zone provide two off-street parking spaces per dwelling unit, plus 0.2 spaces per dwelling unit designated for visitors. There are 31 dwelling units proposed, therefore, 62 resident parking spaces are provided and 7 visitor parking spaces, including one accessible parking space, which is in conformance with the requirements of the Off-Street Parking and Loading Bylaw. d)Advisory Design Panel: The Advisory Design Panel (ADP) reviewed the development plans for form and character of the proposed development and the landscaping plans at a meeting held on October 18, 2017. The Panel provided the following comments, which have since been resolved, as outlined below by the project architect: Provide alternate solution in case hedge row of trees won’t be saved during the construction. Hedge row of trees will be retained with a Tree Protection Covenant. Provide site sections to show transition including different types of retaining walls and transitions. Details have been provided for retaining walls. Provide exterior stairs for exit and entry. Exterior balcony stairs have been added. Show light wells where necessary for occupied basement areas. It has been determined that light wells are not necessary as the basements have windows that are above grade or units have been provided with doors into rear yards. Consider moving entrances forward where possible. Unit entrances have been moved out an additional 1.8 m to reduce the recessed alcove into the units. This will maintain a covered entry and will provide feature lighting and defined unit entrances. e)Environmental Implications: The subject property slopes from the northeast to the lowest point in the southwest corner. Review of the relevant environmental reports by the various consultants indicate that the site can support the proposed development. An approved Stormwater Management Plan and associated covenant - 5 - have been included to ensure stormwater discharge meets the appropriate criteria. Several trees will be removed to allow development to occur on the subject property; however, much consideration was given to a significant stand of trees along the west and southwest portion of the site. A Tree Protection Covenant will be registered on site to protect these significant trees as well as a row of cedar hedges along the northern property boundary. No watercourses or significant features are located on or near the subject property, with the exception of the above mentioned significant trees. f)Citizen/Customer Implications: A Development Information Meeting (DIM) was held on November 16, 2017 and Public Hearing was held on February 20, 2018. Final reading of the subject property will also be considered at the July 24, 2018 Council meeting. g)Financial Implications: In accordance with Council’s Landscape Security Policy, a refundable security equivalent to 100% of the estimated landscape cost will be provided to ensure satisfactory provision of landscaping in accordance with the terms and conditions of the Development Permit. Based on an estimated landscape cost of $428,527.00, the security will be $428,527.00. CONCLUSION: As the development proposal complies with the Multi-Family Development Permit Area Guidelines of the OCP for form and character, it is recommended that 2016-004-DP be given favourable consideration. “Original signed by Adam Rieu” _______________________________________________ Prepared by: Adam Rieu Planning Technician “Original signed by Christine Carter” _____________________________________________ Approved by: Christine Carter, M.PL, MCIP, RPP Director of Planning “Original signed by Frank Quinn” _______________________________________________ Approved by: Frank Quinn, MBA, P.Eng GM Public Works & Development Services “Original signed by Paul Gill” _______________________________________________ Concurrence: Paul Gill, CPA, CGA Chief Administrative Officer The following appendices are attached hereto: Appendix A – Subject Map Appendix B – Ortho Map Appendix C – Site Plan Appendix D – Building Elevations Appendix E – Landscape Plans DATE: Jul 9, 2018 2016-004-DP.2 13245 236 Street PLANNING DEPARTMENT SUBJECT PROPERTY 2018-111-DP2013-087-RZ 2013-087-VP 2013-087-DP 2016-207-DP 2016-208-DP 2015-373-RZ 2015-373-VP 2016-306-DP 2016-031-RZ 2016-370-DP 2015-373-DP 2015-155-RZ 2017-134-DP 2016-031-DP 2017-133-DP 2018-190-RZ 2016-149-DP ´ Scale: 1:2,500 BY: LP Legend Stream Indefinite Creek River Major Rivers & Lakes APPENDIX A APPENDIX B APPENDIX C APPENDIX D KEYDESCRIPTIONREF.HARDSCAPE MATERIALSCONCRETE PAVINGINTEGRAL COLOUREDCONCRETEColour: Autumn Gold (5844)Manufacturer: Davis ColourUNIT PAVERS (PEDESTRIAN)Type: HollandColour: Autumn BrownManufacturer: Barkman ConcreteUNIT PAVERS (VEHICULAR)Type: NavarroColour: Antique BrownManufacturer: Barkman ConcreteRUBBER SAFETY SURFACESOD5LD-012LD-013LD-011LD-011LD-01BLOCK RETAINING WALLFEATURE WALL1LD-02WOOD FENCE1LD-03BENCHModel: ModenaColour: WalnutManufacturer: Wishbone Site Furniture4LD-02WASTE RECEPTACLEModel: Freedom 32Colour: WalnutManufacturer: Wishbone Site Furniture5LD-02LOCK BLOCK RETAININGWALLRefer to Architects DrawingsGRAVEL SURFACEwith pressure treated timber edge6LD-01ALUMINUM FENCE/RAIL2LD-034LD-01PERMEABLE PAVERSType: NavarroColour: Antique BrownManufacturer: Barkman ConcreteBOLLARD LIGHTModel: Guide BollardColour: Powdercoated BlackSupplier: Landscape Forms7LD-03UP LIGHTINGModel: SL-42-PH Compostie IngroundMount: SurfaceSupplier: SLS Lighting7LD-033LD-02CONCRETE RETAINING WALLRefer to Architects DrawingsCopyright reserved. This drawing and design is the property ofvan der Zalm + associates inc. and may not be reproduced orused for other projects without permission.Location:13245 - 236th STREETMAPLE RIDGE, BCDrawn:VDZ Project #:Project:QUARTZ TOWNHOUSESNo.Drawing Title:REVISIONS TABLE FOR DRAWINGSDescriptionDateScale:Approved:Drawing #:Checked:Stamp:CONTRACTOR SHALL CHECK ALL DIMENSIONSON THE WORK AND REPORT ANYDISCREPANCYTO THE CONSULTANT BEFORE PROCEEDING.ALL DRAWINGS AND SPECIFICATIONS ARE THEEXCLUSIVE PROPERTY OF THE OWNER ANDMUST BE RETURNED AT THE COMPLETION OFTHE WORK. ALL REZONING/DP/PPA/FHA/BPDRAWINGS MUST NOT BE PRICED FORCONSTRUCTION UNLESS LABELED ISSUED FORTENDER/CONSTRUCTION.By:F 604.882.0042P 604.882.0024V1M 4B9Suite 1, 20177 97th Avenue Langley, British Columbiainfo@www.vdz.ca van der Zalm + associates inc.Landscape ArchitectureUrban DesignParks & Recreation Civil Engineering++1Feb 25, 2016ADIssued for ReviewDP2016-0624"x36"Original Sheet Size:MVDZDJPCAD2April 1, 2016ADIssued for Review3April 5, 2016ADIssued for DP Submission4Feb. 7, 2017ADIssued for DP Submission5April 11, 2017ADIssued for DP Submission6May 09, 2017PC Issued for DP Submission7Oct 6, 2017ADIssued for DP Submission8Nov 15, 2017ADIssued for DIM/DP Submission9Dec 15, 2017ADIssued for DP Submission10Mar 26, 2018ADIssued for BP Review11April 25, 2018ADIssued for BP Review12May 11, 2018ADIssued for Building Permit13July 3, 2018ADIssued for Building Permit14July 16, 2018ADIssued for Building Permit\\VDZ-SERVER\PROJECTS\DEVELOPMENT PERMITS\ACTIVE\DP2016-06 QUARTZ TOWNHOMES\DWG\SHEETS\L-08 AMENITY AREA.DWG1:50L-08AMENITY AREA01 1.5 2 2.5 3 3.5 4 4.5 5 5.5 6 6.5 7 7.50.5mPlay equipmentLD-026Rubber safety surfaceLD-0151.2m coloured concrete pathLD-011BenchLD-024Waste receptacleLD-025Pad mounted transformerPermeable unit paversLD-014Property lineRetaining wall, refer toArchitects drawingsStepping stumpLD-022Boulder retaining wallLD-0171.2m gate to match fenceFire hydrant Page 1 of 4 City of Maple Ridge TO: Her Worship Mayor Nicole Read MEETING DATE: July 24, 2018 and Members of Council FILE NO: 11-5255-70-124 FROM: Chief Administrative Officer MEETING: Council SUBJECT: Award of Contract ITT-EN-18-54 232 Street Water Main Replacement (Dewdney Trunk Road to 122 Avenue) EXECUTIVE SUMMARY: The existing 150mm diameter cast iron water main along 232 Street between Dewdney Trunk Road and 122 Avenue was installed in 1964 and has been identified for replacement as part of the City’s Annual Water main Replacement Program and is included in the 2018 Financial Plan. The 232 Street Water main Replacement Project from Dewdney Trunk Road to 122 Avenue consists of the installation of approximately 435m of 200mm diameter ductile iron water main, water service connections as necessary, installation of new hydrants and pavement surface restoration. There is optional work included in the tender to utilize the existing water main that will be abandoned for fibre optic pre-ducting, including the installation of junction boxes and pulling three 32mm ducts through the existing 150mm CI water main that is to be abandoned. City crews will complete tie-ins of the new water main to the City water system. The Invitation to Tender was issued on May 28, 2018 and closed on July 12, 2018 with two (2) bids received. The lowest compliant tender price was submitted by Sandpiper Contracting LLP of $600,475.00 excluding taxes. The water main installation is wholly funded from the Water Utility Fund, and additional funding is required for the water tie-ins to the City system, Funding to install ducting for future fibre optic expansion is available from the IT Fibre Optic Network project budget. Council approval to award the contract is required for the work to proceed. RECOMMENDATION: THAT Contract ITT-EN18-54, 232 Water main Replacement (Dewdney Trunk Road to 122 Avenue), be awarded to Sandpiper Contracting LLP in the amount of $600,475.00 excluding taxes; and THAT a construction contingency of $60,000 be approved to address potential variations in field conditions; and THAT the Financial Plan be amended to increase the 232 Street Water main Replacement budget from $600,000 to $726,475, funded from Water Utility Fund, and further THAT the Corporate Officer be authorized to execute the contract. 1115 Page 2 of 4 DISCUSSION: a)Background Context: The existing 150mm diameter cast iron water main along 232 Street between Dewdney Trunk Road and 122 Avenue was installed in 1964 and has been identified for replacement as part of the City’s Annual Water main Replacement Program and is included in the 2018 Financial Plan. The 232 Street Water main Replacement Project from Dewdney Trunk Road to 122 Avenue consists of the installation of approximately 435m of 200mm diameter ductile iron water main, water service connections as necessary, installation of new hydrants and pavement surface restoration. There is optional work included in the tender to utilize the existing water main that will be abandoned for fibre optic pre-ducting, including the installation of junction boxes and pulling three 32mm ducts through the existing 150mm CI water main that is to be abandoned. City crews will complete tie-ins of the new water main to the City water system. Tender Evaluation The Invitation to Tender was issued on May 28, 2018 and closed on July 12, 2018 with two (2) bids received, listed below from lowest to highest price. Tender Price (excluding taxes) Sandpiper Contracting LLP $600,475.00 Pedre Contractors Ltd. $663,000.00 The lowest compliant bid was $600,475.00 (excluding taxes) from Sandpiper Contracting LLP. Staff have analyzed the tenders and recommend the contract be awarded to Sandpiper Contracting LLP. b)Desired Outcome: To provide reliable fire protection and high quality drinking water to Maple Ridge residents. c)Strategic Alignment: One of the key strategies in the Corporate Strategic Plan is to manage existing infrastructure. Replacement and upgrading of the aging water main and fire hydrants on 232 Street will ensure reliability of service and provide capacity for future years. Installation of ducts in the abandoned water main will support the City’s long term plan to extend fibre optic service throughout the City and up 232 Street to connect with the Abernethy Way network. Page 3 of 4 d) Citizen/Customer Implications: The estimated construction duration is approximately eight weeks starting in August 2018. It is anticipated that traffic through the work zone will be reduced to single lane alternating. Most of the water main replacement works are on the east side of the road adjacent to the sidewalk. Some of the fronting properties may be impacted during water service connection installations, and residents will be notified in advance of the work. Every effort will be made to minimize impact to residents fronting the water main installation on 232 Street. As well, the general public will be informed of the construction progress through the City’s website and social media sources. e) Interdepartmental Implications: The Operations Department has provided input during the design stage. The Information Technology Department has worked closely with Engineering to utilize the abandoned water main as fibre optic ducting for future use. Tie-ins to the live water system will be completed by the Operations Department. A City staff inspector will provide inspection services during construction. f) Business Plan/Financial Implications: The projected expenditures excluding taxes are as follows: Consulting Design Fees Water Tie-ins by City Forces Construction Contract Cost Contract Contingency Total Projected Project Cost The project funding sources are as follows: LTC No. 18022 from Water Capital Fund (WCF) IT Department Fibre Optic Optional Work (GL no. 11-01556) Additional funding from WCF required Total Funding Sources $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ 65,000 83,000 600,475 60,000 808,475 600,000 82,000 126,475 808,475 The project expenditures include a contract contingency of $60,000 that will only be utilized if required to address to address potential variations in field conditions. Page 4 of 4 CONCLUSIONS: The tender price of $600,475.00 (excluding taxes) by Sandpiper Contracting LLP for the 232 Street Water main Replacement Project from Dewdney Trunk Road to 122 Avenue is the lowest compliant tender. It is recommended that Council approve the award of the contract to Sandpiper Contracting LLP and a contract contingency of $60,000 be approved. It is also recommended that funds be transferred from the Water Utility Fund to LTC 18022. “Original signed by Jeff Boehmer “Original signed by Trevor Thompson” Prepared by: Jeff Boehmer, PEng. Financial Trevor Thompson, BBA, CPA, CGA Manager of Design & Construction Concurrence: Chief Financial Officer “Original signed by David Pollock” Reviewed by: David Pollock, PEng. Municipal Engineer “Original signed by Frank Quinn” Approved by: Frank Quinn, MBA, PEng. General Manager: Public Works & Development Services “Original signed by Paul Gill” Concurrence: Paul Gill, CPA, CGA Chief Administrative Officer Page 1 of 3 City of Maple Ridge TO: Her Worship Mayor Nicole Read MEETING DATE: July 24, 2018 and Members of Council FILE NO: 11-5255-50-092 FROM: Chief Administrative Officer MEETING: Council SUBJECT: Award of Contract ITT-EN18-61: Sanitary Sewer Replacement by Pipe Bursting on River Road (McKay Avenue – 530m North) EXECUTIVE SUMMARY: The upsizing of the existing sanitary sewer trunk main that services the Albion Industrial Area and southern Albion residential area is required to accommodate ongoing development in Albion. The majority of the sanitary sewer main has been systematically replaced over the last four years. All that remains is upsizing of the last six sections from McKay Avenue to 530m north of McKay Avenue. The Sanitary Sewer Replacement by Pipe Bursting on River Road project is in the City’s approved 2018 Financial Plan and is largely funded by Development Cost Charges. The Sanitary Sewer Replacement by Pipe Bursting on River Road project entails the replacement and upsizing of pipe from 370mm diameter to 600mm in diameter for approximately 530 meters of sanitary sewer at a depth of 5 meters. Trenchless technology (pipe-bursting) was selected as the appropriate sewer replacement method rather than the traditional open-cut method, due to several complex site constraints. An Invitation to Tender to replace all six sections was issued on June 12, 2018 and closed on July 12, 2018. One tender was received to replace all six sections, submitted by PW Trenchless Construction Inc. at $1,497,626.75 (excluding taxes). Staff have reviewed the tender and recommend that the contract be awarded to PW Trenchless Construction Inc. for the amount of $1,497,626.75 (excluding taxes). Council approval to award the contract is required for the work to proceed. RECOMMENDATION: THAT Contract ITT-EN18-61: Sanitary Sewer Replacement by Pipe Bursting on River Road (McKay Avenue – 530m North) be awarded to PW Trenchless Construction Inc. in the amount of $1,497,626.75 excluding taxes; and THAT a contract contingency of $100,000.00 be approved to address potential variations in field conditions; and THAT the Corporate Officer be authorized to execute the contract. 1116 Page 2 of 3 DISCUSSION: a) Background Context: The upsizing of the existing sanitary sewer trunk main that services the Albion Industrial Area and southern Albion residential area is required to accommodate ongoing development in Albion. The majority of the sanitary sewer main has been systematically replaced over the last four years. All that remains is upsizing of the last six sections from McKay Avenue to 530m north of McKay Avenue. The Sanitary Sewer Replacement by Pipe Bursting on River Road project is in the City’s approved 2018 Financial Plan and is largely funded by Development Cost Charges. The Sanitary Sewer Replacement by Pipe Bursting on River Road project entails the replacement and upsizing of pipe from 370mm diameter to 600mm in diameter for approximately 530 meters of sanitary sewer at a depth of 5 meters. Trenchless technology (pipe-bursting) was selected as the appropriate sewer replacement method rather than the traditional open-cut method, due to several complex site constraints. Tender results An Invitation to Tender was issued on June 12, 2018 and closed on July 12, 2018. One compliant tender was submitted as noted below: PW Trenchless Construction Inc. is recognized as an industry leader in pipe bursting technology and they successfully completed several pipe bursting projects for the City of Maple Ridge. b) Desired Outcome: The desired outcome is to construct the necessary sewer replacement to service the Albion area for both now and in the future. c) Strategic Alignment: The Sanitary Master Plan has identified this sewer as a key piece of infrastructure for replacement. d) Citizens/Customer Implications: Construction will commence soon after the project is awarded and attempts will be made to minimize the impact to everyday traffic, residents, and businesses in the neighbourhood. River Road is expected to remain open to traffic throughout the construction. Notifications will be delivered to surrounding businesses informing of the project. The general public will be informed of the construction project, progress and with updates through the City’s website and social media sources. e) Interdepartmental Implications: The Engineering Department has worked with the Operations Department in developing this project. Tender Price (excluding taxes) PW Trenchless Construction Inc. $1,497,626.75 Page 3 of 3 f) Business Plan/Financial Implications: The projected expenditures excluding taxes are as follows: Construction Contract Cost Contract Contingency Total Projected Project Cost The project funding sources are as follows: LTC No.15018 from Development Cost Charges (DCC) LTC No. 15018 from Sewer Capital Fund (SCF) Total Funding Sources $ $ $ $ $ $ 1,497,626 100,000 1,597,626 1,584,002 15,998 1,600,000 The approved 2018 Financial Plan has $1,600,000 remaining under LTC 15018. Due to the complexity of this sanitary sewer replacement project using pipe bursting, staff recommends a contract contingency in the amount of $100,000.00 that will only be utilized if required to address unforeseen conditions. CONCLUSIONS: The replacement of sanitary sewer in the Albion Industrial Area is required to continue to serve existing businesses and for future development. It is recommended that Council approve the award to PW Trenchless Construction Inc. for the amount of $1,497,626.75 “Original signed by David Pollock” for “Original signed by Trevor Thompson Prepared by: Jeff Boehmer, PEng. Financial Trevor Thompson, BBA, CPA, CGA Manager of Design & Construction Concurrence: Chief Financial Officer “Original signed by David Pollock” Reviewed by: David Pollock, PEng. Municipal Engineer “Original signed by Frank Quinn” Approved by: Frank Quinn, MBA, PEng. General Manager: Public Works & Development Services “Original signed by Frank Quinn” for Concurrence: Paul Gill, CPA, CGA Chief Administrative Officer Page 1 of 3 City of Maple Ridge TO: Her Worship Mayor Nicole Read MEETING DATE: July 24, 2018 and Members of Council FILE NO: 11-8660-01 FROM: Chief Administrative Officer MEETING: Council SUBJECT: Lougheed Highway B-Line Initiative EXECUTIVE SUMMARY: TransLink’s Rapid bus transit initiative known as the B-Line program was introduced as part of TransLink’s 10 year vision to improve transit infrastructure both regionally and in the City of Maple Ridge. Key features of the B-Line program include shorter travel times, reliability, increased frequency and availability. Since TransLink's Mayors Council approval of Phase 1 of the 1O Year Investment Plan in September 2016, TransLink staff have made a number of presentations to Council. In addition City representatives continue to liaise with TransLink to provide input into the design and the feasibility assessment of the B-Line initiative. The purpose of this report is to provide Council with an update on the B-Line initiative as progress continues on calibrating the most efficient and optimum route connecting Maple Ridge with other municipalities in the Metro Vancouver region. This report is provided in conjunction with a scheduled presentation by TransLink representatives at the July 24, 2018 Council Meeting. RECOMMENDATION(S): THAT the Lougheed Highway B-Line initiative be endorsed, and THAT Staff work with TransLink, Ministry of Transportation and Infrastructure and other stakeholders to maximize opportunities for transit priority measures, develop stop locations, assess traffic impacts, and further THAT staff provide a report with details of recommended transit priority measures and the implications for all users on the Lougheed Highway corridor. 1117 Page 2 of 3 DISCUSSION: a) Background Context: The proposed bus transit service B-Line (Coquitlam to Maple Ridge) will be located along Lougheed Highway from the Haney Place Bus Exchange to the Coquitlam Central Station. Special B-Line bus stops in the City of Maple Ridge will be located at the intersections of 203 Street, Laity Street in both the Eastbound and Westbound directions, with a future potential stop at 222 Street. Some of the key attractions and benefits of the B-Line service include: • 30% faster- 40 minutes travel time from Haney Place to Coquitlam Central • 33% less wait- bus arrives every 10 minutes in the Peak Hour, 15 minutes Non-Peak • Available all day- from 5:00 am to midnight • Easy to Locate: -Buses and stops will have a distinct appearance -Stops will have the “Next Bus” digital signage -Route information will be provided inside the buses • High-capacity articulated buses will be provided for a faster, reliable service • Maple Ridge residents will be able to reach to more jobs • More people can reach Maple Ridge employers City staff have participated in a Working Group to review design concepts and provide comments to TransLink for the bus stop locations on Lougheed Highway at the intersections of 203 Street and Laity Street. Discussions with the Lougheed Corridor Working Group have evolved around key items such as property acquisitions for the bus pull-out locations, geometrical road design configurations, the characteristics of the distinct B- Line Bus Shelters and transit priority principles. b) Strategic Alignment Intergovernmental Relations/Partnerships Council has directed that the City develop and maintain strong positive working relationships with other governmental agencies. • Maintain and enhance a multi-modal transportation system within Maple Ridge to provide citizens with safe, efficient alternatives for the movement of individuals and goods • Promote alternative modes (pedestrian, bike, public transit) of travel to reduce reliance on the automobile • Continue to improve the walkability of the downtown, ensuring it is pedestrian friendly and accessible, particularly for those with impaired mobility. • In co-operation with other regional stakeholders, identify improvements to the inter- municipal transportation system within the Lower Mainland and the Fraser Valley Page 3 of 3 CONCLUSIONS: The proposed new transit B-Line route being planned along Lougheed Highway is scheduled for implementation in the Fall of 2019. City Staff will continue to work with TransLink as street modifications on municipal roads and Lougheed Highway will be required to successfully implement the B-Line route in the City of Maple Ridge. The B-Line project will include the construction of bus stops, news buses and transit priority measures. “Original signed by Purvez Irani”___________________ Prepared by: Purvez Irani, MS, PEng. PTOE Manager of Transportation “Original signed by David Pollock”___________________ Reviewed by: David Pollock, PEng. Municipal Engineer “Original signed by Frank Quinn”____________________ Approved by: Frank Quinn, MBA, PEng. General Manager Public Works & Development Services “Original signed by Frank Quinn” for__________________ Concurrence: Paul Gill, CPA, CGA Chief Administrative Officer REPORT: Maple Ridge-Pitt Meadows Home Show Society Request – Albion Fairgrounds Page 1 of 3 Date: July 24, 2018 City of Maple Ridge TO: Her Worship Mayor Nicole Read MEETING DATE: July 24, 2018 and Members of Council DOC NO: 1968742 FROM: Chief Administrative Officer MEETING: Council SUBJECT: Maple Ridge-Pitt Meadows Home Show Society Request – Albion Fairgrounds EXECUTIVE SUMMARY: The Maple Ridge-Pitt Meadows Home Show Society has submitted a request (Attachment 1) for the large lawn area in front of the stage at the Albion Fairgrounds to be upgraded with the construction of a load bearing surface, where concession vehicles may be staged for their annual event. The Society has advised that they would be willing to contribute up to 10% of the cost to a maximum of $10,000 towards the work. This request is in response to the poor weather conditions that have occurred during this event in the past. Specifically, this enhancement would support their event’s Food Truck Festival when wet weather makes ground conditions unfavourable. As the outcome of the Albion Flats Land Use Planning process may have an impact on areas where capital improvements are being considered, staff recommend that this request be considered after this planning process has concluded. RECOMMENDATION: That the Maple Ridge-Pitt Meadows Home Show Society’s February 7, 2018, request for municipally- funded improvements to the large grass main stage viewing area at the Albion Fairgrounds be deferred until after the Albion Flats Area Plan process has concluded; and further That after the Albion Flats Area Plan process has concluded, staff provide a report outlining a potential funding source and a detailed scope of work for proposed improveme nts at the Albion Fairgrounds based on feedback from community event organizers and the wider community. DISCUSSION: a)Background Context The Home Show Society submitted their request for improvements to the Albion Fairgrounds as a result of what occurred at the 2017 Home Show when wet weather made ground conditions unfavourable for truck setup and teardown and pedestrian access during the event, resulting in a financial loss for the Society. To address this, the Home Show Society requested that a gravel surface be put down over the large grass area in front of the main stage. However, a large gravel surface in this area would detract from the Fairgrounds park- like setting, and would likely also require dust control measures during events. The Society was receptive to staff’s suggestion of an alternate product, such as a plastic paving grid or grass-crete product which supports grass growth, to maintain the aesthetic appearance of the grounds while providing load bearing capabilities for vehicles. 1151 REPORT: Maple Ridge-Pitt Meadows Home Show Society Request – Albion Fairgrounds Page 2 of 3 Date: July 24, 2018 Staff then conducted preliminary explorations to determine the extent of the work requested, along with potential costs and scheduling to reduce impacts to user groups. It was determined that this improvement would require the relocation of drain lines and the installation of hose bibs to provide the ability to water the grass during re-establishment and periods of heavy use. The preliminary costs range from $85,000 to $120,000 depending on the size of the area to be improved. In addition to benefits to the Home Show, the improvement could potentially be of benefit to other major events hosted at the fairgrounds, allowing other events to set up their displays, food fair and activities in a configuration that best works for their event. Consultation with these stakeholders would need to be undertaken as part of future design work. The Albion Flats Area Plan process, which encompasses the Albion Fairgrounds within the study area boundaries, is a priority project and the broad process outline has received Council endorsement. Due to the magnitude of cost involved in these requested improvements, staff recommends waiting for the Albion Flats Area Plan process to conclude before proceeding with improvements to the Albion Fairgrounds in order to align improvements with any land use planning outcomes. Staff could then report back with a recommended scope of work based on feedback from a variety of stakeholders, with consideration given to other Society’s or stakeholders suggested upgrades including adding an additional electrical kiosk in the main stage viewing area, which would also require additional funding if considered as part of this request. b) Desired Outcome: The desired outcome is to enhance the Albion Fairgrounds in alignment with long term planning considerations for the benefit of the Fair and events that are hosted at this site, while retaining the park-like setting which makes it an attractive venue for a wide variety of events. c) Citizen/Customer Implications: The Albion Fairgrounds hosts a number of community and special events throughout the year; therefore, community consultation is important to ensure that future changes offer a benefit to the widest range of events hosted at this site. d) Interdepartmental Implications: The Albion Flats Area Plan process was endorsed by Council in October 2015. The Process focuses on a number of land uses including recreation, commercial, and business park options. Understanding the long term land use vision resulting from this process will enable Council to make an informed decision on desirable Fairgrounds improvements. e) Business Plan/Financial Implications: The estimated project cost ranges from $85,000 to $120,000 to address the original request and may increase depending on the scope of work that is ultimately identified. As this request was not anticipated in the 2018 budget, staff has not identified a funding source at this time. The Home Show Board of Directors has offered to contribute ten percent of the surface installation costs to a maximum of $10,000. REPORT: Maple Ridge-Pitt Meadows Home Show Society Request – Albion Fairgrounds Page 3 of 3 Date: July 24, 2018 CONCLUSIONS: The Home Show Society has made several improvements at the Albion Fairgrounds over the last few years that have enhanced the site for the benefit of a variety of events. It is now requesting that the City consider making further improvements at this community park to support their Food Truck Festival. To provide best value to citizens, it is recommended that any Fairgrounds improvements be aligned with the future Albion Flats Area Plan and reflect feedback from other community event organizers. “Original signed by Valoree Richmond” Prepared by: Valoree Richmond, Manager of Parks Planning and Development “Original signed by David Boag” Reviewed by: David Boag, Director of Parks and Facilities “Original signed by Kelly Swift” Approved by: Kelly Swift, MBA, BGS General Manager Parks, Recreation & Culture “Original signed by Paul Gill” Concurrence: Paul Gill, CPA, CGA Chief Administrative Officer Attachments: (1) 2018-02-07 Letter from Maple Ridge-Pitt Meadows Home Show Society presenting sponsor MNP City of Maple Ridge Mark’s Work Wearhouse The Times The News Westridge Security Speedpro Signs P and L Speed Print Johnston Meier Insurance Group Phoenix Tent and Event Rentals Orange Frog Creative Group CKNW JRfm The Well Public House Ramada Inn and Suites Quality Inn and Suites Real Canadian Superstore Outdoor Lifestyle & Leisure Show Meridian Farm Market GA Checkpoint Macdonald Realty Warm Hearth Heating Bradley’s One Stop Landscape Supply Family Fest Corporate Sponsors The Dog-Gone Grooming Salon McDonald’s Restaurants MR-PM Parks & Leisure Services Mark's Work Wearhouse Phoenix Tent & Event Rentals The Wesbrooke Seniors Living Community RE/MAX Lifestyles Realty Haney Builders’ Supplies Pitt Meadows Lions Club Rollover Premium Pet Food Lordco Parts Ltd Canadian Tire Bateson’s Martial Arts Royal Canadian Legion, Br. 88 Albion Tireland Family Fest Stage Sponsors EPR The Accounting Group Seville Mortgage Corp. Spike Imaging Inc. A1 Tri-Craft Tree Services Port Moody Auto & Air Paint Star Party Hands On Glass #4-22374 Lougheeed Highway, Maple Ridge, BC V2X 2T5 Tel 604-467-3950 Fax 604-466-6889 www.ridgemeadowshowshow.com February 7, 2018 Don Cramb Senior Recreation Manager City of Maple Ridge 11995 Haney Place Maple Ridge, BC V2X 6A9 Dear Don: The proposal to install open cell concrete block as a solution for the severe wet-weather ground instability at Maple Ridge Fairgrounds has the endorsement of the board of directors of Maple Ridge-Pitt Meadows Home Show Society. With spring, and our show, rapidly approaching, there are limits to the type of project that can be undertaken. No doubt future plans for the Albion Flats must also be considered, making a full restoration impractical. The open cell concrete blocks appear to be a good solution that will keep the grounds “green” while creating additional stable, useable area for the home show and other events impacted by wet weather. As plans move forward for addition of another arena and other fairgrounds upgrades, this system could also allow for adaptation to future needs. Councillors Bob Masse, Tyler Shymkiw and Gordy Robson toured the grounds last season and can attest to the ground saturation that eventually made a mud bog out of our Food Truck Festival and put the home show into a nancial loss position in 2017. This is the last large area on the central portion of the grounds to be “reclaimed”. As you will recall, the home show has undertaken several large grounds renovation projects and these areas are holding up well. Included in these completed projects are $50,000 in grounds improvements and a $75,000 electrical expansion that included taking lines underground, increasing power and installing light standards. In this same spirit of partnership, the board of directors has agreed to contribute ten per cent of the costs of the open cell concrete installation, with a ceiling of $10,000. Our thanks to you, David and Valoree for working to resolve the challenges of our beautiful fairgrounds. We hope you move forward with this project. Best regards, Cass Winder Executive Director Maple Ridge-Pitt Meadows Home Show Society REPORT: Award of Contract: RFP-PL18-29: Albion Community Centre Construction Management Page 1 of 3 Doc # 1987075 City of Maple Ridge TO: Her Worship Mayor Nicole Read MEETING DATE: July 24, 2018 and Members of Council DOC NO: 1987075 FROM: Chief Administrative Officer MEETING: Council SUBJECT: Award of Contract RFP-PL18-29: Albion Community Centre Construction Management EXECUTIVE SUMMARY: The City of Maple Ridge and School District No. 42 (SD42) have been working together on a joint park/school site that includes an elementary school, learning centre and community centre. Throughout the design process, the Albion Community Centre (ACC) has been designed as a flexible, multi-use facility that is sustainable and accessible for all members of our community. With the design process nearing completion and construction of the elementary school underway by School District No. 42 (SD42), a Request for Proposals (RFP) was issued by the City to prequalified firms for Construction Management Services for the ACC, and one firm submitted a proposal by the closing date of July 18, 2018. Staff have reviewed the proposal and recommend that RFP-PL18-29 be awarded to Double V Construction LTD. RECOMMENDATION: That Contract RFP-PL18-29: Albion Community Centre Construction Management be awarded to Double V Construction LTD in the amount of $5000.00 plus taxes; and That a contingency of $1250.00 be approved; and further That the Corporate Officer be authorized to execute the contract. DISCUSSION: a)Background Context: The role of the Construction Manager is to assist with design and provide the City with valuable input, real-time cost estimates, value engineering, and construction review throughout the design and preconstruction phase. The Construction Manager is expected to advise the City on the most effective strategy for procurement of construction work, and it is anticipated that the Construction Manager will transition to the role of General Contractor or Construction Manager at Risk for the construction phase of the project. During the construction phase, the General Contractor (Construction Manager at Risk) will provide the expertise required to manage the construction, coordinate the trades and ensure quality work, cost control and mitigate any construction delays. The transition from Construction Manager to General Contractor would take place upon successful negotiations with the City 1152 REPORT: Award of Contract: RFP-PL18-29: Albion Community Centre Construction Management Page 2 of 3 Doc # 1987075 and establishment of a fixed price. A fixed price contract for General Contractor Services will be presented to Council for consideration at a later date and final approval. RFP-PL18-29 was issued to four construction management firms that pre-qualified through a Request for Qualifications (RFQ) process conducted by SD42, with the City’s participation. The RFP was issued by the City on July 4, 2018, and one firm submitted a proposal by the closing date of July 18, 2018. Staff evaluated the proposal according to the criteria outlined in the RFP, which considers qualifications, price, experience and value added services. Double V met the listed criteria and scored well in each of the rankings. b) Desired Outcome: The desired outcome is to initiate the construction process for the ACC project in tandem with the new elementary school being developed by SD42. Delivering these facilities together will support both the City and SD42 in meeting the need for additional learning and recreation services in the Albion area. c) Strategic Alignment: The Albion Community Centre co-location project aligns with the Strategic Facilities Plan produced in 2015 by SD42, with the Parks, Recreation and Culture Master Plan, and with the Master Agreement on the Cooperation for the Joint Use of Public Facilities and Coordination of Services between the City and SD42. The project is also consistent with the City’s Official Community and Albion Area plans. The programs and services that will be offered at the ACC will encourage active and healthy living among citizens through the provision of a variety of recreational, educational and social activities. d) Citizen/Customer Implications: Infrastructure projects like the ACC support citizens in maintaining healthy lifestyles through their participation in sport, recreation, arts and culture in venues that allow them to connect with their neighbours and communities of common interest. Facility development partnerships and co-location opportunities like this one between the City and SD42 help address local and neighbourhood infrastructure needs more effectively. e) Business Plan/Financial Implications: Total project funding in the amount of $10,000,000 is included in the adopted Financial Plan for the construction of the ACC, and accounts for the cost of construction management services. Overall funding consists of $1 million from the Albion Amenity Reserve, $500,000 from Community Amenity Contributions and $8.5 million from approved borrowing. CONCLUSIONS: The Albion Community Centre project is an important part of the vision for enhanced services in the Albion neighbourhood that includes an elementary school, community centre, sports fields, playground, natural areas and trails. To support this project moving forward in a timely manner and in tandem with the co-located South Albion Elementary School, it is recommended that the contract for construction management services for the ACC be awarded to Double V Construction LTD as it met the RFP criteria, scored well during the evaluation process, represents good value and was the only proposal received through the RFP process. REPORT: Award of Contract: RFP-PL18-29: Albion Community Centre Construction Management Page 3 of 3 Doc # 1987075 “Original signed by Don Cramb” Prepared by: Don Cramb, Senior Recreation Manager “Original signed by David Boag” Reviewed by: David Boag, Director of Parks & Facilities “Original signed by Trevor Thompson” Reviewed by: Trevor Thompson, CPA, CGA Chief Financial Officer “Original signed by Danielle Pope for Kelly Swift” Approved by: Kelly Swift, MBA General Manager Parks, Recreation & Culture “Original signed by Paul Gill” Concurrence: Paul Gill, CPA, CGA Chief Administrative Officer REPORT: Pickleball Update - Garibaldi Secondary School Sport Courts Renovation Page 1 of 3 Doc # 1984483 City of Maple Ridge TO: Her Worship Mayor Nicole Read MEETING DATE: July 24, 2018 and Members of Council DOC NO: 1984483 FROM: Chief Administrative Officer MEETING: Council SUBJECT: Pickleball Update – Garibaldi Secondary School Sport Courts Renovation EXECUTIVE SUMMARY: The Garibaldi Secondary School (GSS) sport courts are well-used by the school and community for both tennis and pickleball. The local pickleball groups are requesting additional courts to support the significant increase in pickleball participation. To address this need, it is recommended that the City undertake the costs of the full renovation of the sport courts at GSS in exchange for School District No. 42 (SD42) permitting the City to convert one of the three existing tennis courts to pickeball courts to add additional capacity for the community. Two tennis courts would remain available for school and community use and the proposed court reconfiguration would allow for six pickleball courts to be constructed, as shown on the attached concept. Senior staff at SD42 has confirmed their approval in principle for this project. However, it would still need to be approved by the Board of Education in September 2018 to allow work to proceed on time to ensure the new courts are in playable condition for April 2019 in advance of the pickleball season. RECOMMENDATION: That staff proceed to seek endorsement from School District No. 42 Board of Education to conduct a full renovation of the sport courts at Garibaldi Secondary School at full cost to the City of Maple Ridge, including the conversion of one existing tennis court to accommodate a total of six pickleball courts, to be completed by the beginning of the pickleball season in April 2019. DISCUSSION: a)Background Context: The surface of the sport courts at GSS has deteriorated significantly in recent years and an upgrade is needed imminently to ensure a safe, playable surface. Following repair work to the athletic surfacing in 2011, a geotechnical investigation recently undertaken indicates that a full renovation will be necessary to address the ongoing surface cracking, drainage and subgrade deficiencies, and provide a long term fix for these courts. Community pickleball groups currently operate informal leagues at the GSS sport courts in the mornings and afternoons during the week, as well as in the mornings on weekends. These local groups are requesting additional pickleball courts to accommodate both the growth in participation, and to provide an opportunity to host regional and provincial tournaments. 1153 REPORT: Pickleball Update - Garibaldi Secondary School Sport Courts Renovation Page 2 of 3 Doc # 1984483 If the recommendation is endorsed, the City could undertake detailed design work through the summer and early fall. Upon approval from SD42 Board of Education and the establishment of a construction agreement, tendering and construction could proceed in February or March 2019. The intent is to have the renovated courts in playable condition for April 2019, in advance of the pickleball season. Additional consultation with the pickleball community would be undertaken as part of the detailed design work. b) Desired Outcome: The desired outcome is to provide the additional pickleball courts requested by community pickleball players to accommodate the significant growth in their sport and to allow them to host regional and provincial tournaments. c) Citizen/Customer Implications: There will be a significant benefit to the existing pickleball players who participate in league play as well as casual users as they would have additional courts available during peak times when players currently have to wait 20 to 30 minutes for a court to become available. d) Business Plan/Financial Implications: The GSS sport courts land is jointly owned by SD42 and the City of Maple Ridge. The Garibaldi Secondary School Tennis Court Maintenance Agreement indicates that the School District is responsible for routine court maintenance, while the School District and City are to share major repair and lifecycle replacement costs equally. The preliminary project cost estimate is in the order of $400,000 to address the subgrade drainage deficiencies, replace the play surface, and install new fencing, posts and nets. Under the Agreement, this would require the City and SD42 to each commit $200,000 towards the project. However, SD42 has indicated that they do not have sufficient funds at this time to co -fund this project. The benefit of the City funding the full cost of the renovation projec t is that we can achieve an increase from 2 to 6 pickleball courts in advance of the 2019 pickleball season, and minimize the potential for temporary closure of the sport courts for public and school use. The contribution of new pickleball courts is included in the 2018 approved Financial Plan in the amount of $150,000, and the additional $250,000 can be accommodated in the Parks and Facilities Infrastructure Replacement Budget for 2019. e) Alternatives: An alternative option is that the project be deferred until SD42 has funding available to contribute an equal share of the $400,000 to replace and renovate the GSS courts. Should the project be deferred, staff are concerned that the courts may need to be temporarily closed to public and school use. CONCLUSIONS: The Garibaldi sport courts are in dire need of renovation to address subgrade and drainage deficiencies. Therefore, the recommended approach is for the City to seek endorsement from SD42 Board of Education to replace the existing three tennis courts with two new tennis courts and six dedicated pickleball courts, representing a significant increase in supply to address the pickleball community’s request for additional courts to accommodate the growth in participation. SD42 staff is supportive of forwarding a request from the City to the Board of Education for approval to enter into a construction agreement should Council wish to advance the work. REPORT: Pickleball Update - Garibaldi Secondary School Sport Courts Renovation Page 3 of 3 Doc # 1984483 “Original signed by Valoree Richmond” Prepared by: Valoree Richmond, Manager of Parks Planning & Development “Original signed by David Boag” Reviewed by: David Boag, Director of Parks & Facilities “Original signed by Trevor Thompson” Reviewed by: Trevor Thompson, Chief Financial Officer “Original signed by Kelly Swift” Approved by: Kelly Swift, MBA General Manager Parks, Recreation & Culture “Original signed by Paul Gill” Concurrence: Paul Gill, CPA, CGA Chief Administrative Officer Attachments: (1) Garibaldi Secondary School Sports Court Renovation Concept DATE: Oct 12, 2017FILE: Untitled Garabaldi City of PittMeadows District ofLangley District of Mission FRASER R . ^PARKS & LEISURE SERVICES DEPT.´The City of Maple Ridge makes no guaranteeregarding the accuracy or present status ofthe information shown on this map. Scale: 1:500 BY: CNAerial Imagery from the Spring of 2016 Dewdney Trunk Road SD 42 Owned SD 42 and CMR Owned Existing Size 2121m2 Proposed Size 2064m2 Two Tennis, Six Pickleball Garibaldi Courts DATE: Oct 12, 2017FILE: Untitled Garabaldi City of PittMeadows District ofLangley District of Mission FRASER R . ^PARKS & LEISURE SERVICES DEPT.´The City of Maple Ridge makes no guaranteeregarding the accuracy or present status ofthe information shown on this map. Scale: 1:500 BY: CNAerial Imagery from the Spring of 2016 Dewdney Trunk Road SD 42 Owned SD 42 and CMR Owned 2.25 2.3 23.8611.12 3.11 13.56.2 4.652.454.26 5.9 6.096.38Existing Size 2121m2 Existing Site Garibaldi Courts Doc # 1985088 Page 1 of 4 City of Maple Ridge TO: Her Worship Mayor Nicole Read MEETING DATE: July 24, 2018 and Members of Council FILE NO: 1985088 FROM: Chief Administrative Officer MEETING: Council SUBJECT: Youth Wellness Centre Update EXECUTIVE SUMMARY: On March 27, 2018 Council agreed to provide long-term use of the land adjacent to Greg Moore Youth Centre (GMYC) and a financial contribution of $500,000 toward the construction of a Youth Wellness Centre (YWC), contingent on the balance of funding being secured. Maple Ridge/Pitt Meadows Community Services (MRPMCS), who is the lead agency overseeing this project, have advised of financial commitments made to date by senior levels of government and others; however, it appears that the project is unlikely to achieve the funding level required in order to proceed. MRPMCS and the Foundry have advised staff that an extensive property search for a suitable space in the community was conducted. Unfortunately, an alternative space has not been identified. MRPMCS is concerned that the operating funding commitment made by the Foundry may be at risk. MRPMCS has requested that Council reconsider their initial request and that the City provide the gap in funding (estimated at $4.3 million inclusive of $1 million in contingency funds for a total contribution of $4.8 million from the City). The challenge with this initiative is that the services that are proposed are health services and fall within the Province’s purview. The City of Maple Ridge, with its heavy reliance on property taxes is not structured to pay for health services. In this scenario, the City would be providing capital infrastructure to support agencies providing health services. Should Council support this request, staff suggests that the funding could be provided from a combination of General Revenue Accumulated Surplus and Gaming Revenues; however, this would introduce a risk to the City’s capacity to deal with other emerging municipal priorities. This report is intended to seek Council direction. RECOMMENDATION: Option 1: That the request by Maple Ridge/Pitt Meadows Community Services for additional funding for the proposed Youth Wellness Centre facility be respectfully declined and that the City write to the Province of BC asking them to provide full capital funding for this crucial youth wellness service; or Option 2: That staff be directed to support Maple Ridge/Pitt Meadows Community Services in a fund raising campaign intended to raise the balance of construction costs for the Youth Wellness Centre project; or 1154 Doc # 1985088 Page 2 of 4 Option 3: That staff be directed to amend the Financial Plan to contribute an additional capital investment toward the Youth Wellness Centre project to lessen the current funding gap. DISCUSSION: a) Background Context: On March 27, 2018, Council considered a request from MRPMCS and the Foundry to fund a YWC concept which had a Class “D” estimate of $4.6 million (not including land costs). At this meeting, Council raised concerns that the services that are proposed are health services and fall within the Province’s purview. The City of Maple Ridge, with its heavy reliance on property taxes is not structured to pay for health services. In this scenario, the City would be providing capital infrastructure to support agencies providing health services. With those concerns in mind, Council agreed to allow use of the land adjacent to GMYC valued at approximately $500,000 plus a cash contribution of $500,000, contingent on the balance of the funding required to construct the YWC being secured by MRPMCS. It was hoped that senior levels of government would also provide a capital contribution that would allow MRPMCS to construct an YWC; however, at this time $1.4 million (including the $500,000 cash contribution from the City, $400,000 from the Province and $500,000 from local fundraising) has been secured. Given the capital funding shortfall, MRPMCS and the Foundry confirmed that an extensive search for an appropriate space was conducted and it was determined that there is no suitable space currently available in Maple Ridge from which they could provide this service. Consequently, MRPMCS engaged HCMA Architects to provide concepts of smaller footprints with the goal of closing the funding gap for this project. It was determined by MRPMCS and the Foundry that the original concept presented to Council earlier this year remains the preferred option in order to achieve and deliver the full Foundry model. This exploration also identified an escalation in the Class “D” cost estimate to construct the original concept, which has grown from $4.6 to $5.3 million, for a total of $6.3 million including contingency. Therefore, MRPMCS have made a follow-up request to the City to provide a funding contribution to close the gap between the fundraising amount and proposed project costs. MRPMCS proposes they can contribute a total of $1.5 million (not inclusive of the City’s previous $500,000 cash contribution) once their capital fundraising campaign kicks off in the fall and commit to a long-term lease with an annual lease payment of $100,000 per year. In this scenario, the City would be providing a total of $4.3 million in capital plus $500,000 in-kind of the land contribution and would retain ownership of the building. Project Cost (Class D estimate) $5.3 million Contingency Funds $1.0 million Less City Cash Contribution $0.5 million Less MRPMCS Fundraising Contribution $1.5 million Remaining Capital Funding Required $4.3 million Estimated Value of in-kind Land Contribution $0.5 million Doc # 1985088 Page 3 of 4 If the City were to proceed with constructing the facility, the annual lease payment of $100,000 per year would recoup this investment over an estimated 40+ year term, not including carrying costs or any further cost-escalation that may occur. Further, at this time, these payments are dependent on Foundry funding. The $4.3 million funding gap could be sourced from General Revenue Accumulated Surplus and Gaming Revenues; however, this would put the City at a risk in its ability to respond to any risks and cost overruns for this project as well as our ability to respond to other emerging municipal needs. If Council directed staff to support MRPMCS in a fundraising campaign, further work would be required between staff and MRPMCS fundraising committee to define the role of the City. This may or may not include issuing donation receipts, marketing and communications support, or development contributions etc. Staff would report back to Council should this direction be supported. b) Desired Outcome: The desired outcome is that Council is fully informed to consider options towards a purpose- built YWC adjacent to the GMYC to provide youth and families with ongoing access to health care, mental health and addictions services. c) Strategic Alignment: Construction of this facility would advance a key objective identified in the Maple Ridge Youth Strategy which was endorsed by Council in 2017 to support youth wellness in the community. d) Citizen/Customer Implications: MRPMCS has advised that during the YWC/Foundry pilot project underway at Greg Moore Youth Centre, a reduction in wait times for services was realized by making support for mental health and substance use challenges more accessible to youth in our community. Expansion to a full Foundry model within a purpose-built facility would further expand the services and benefits to youth. e) Business Plan/Financial Implications: To meet the new funding request, the City would be required to invest approximately $4.8 million inclusive of contingency funds and the existing $0.5 million cash contribution approved on March 27, 2018 and the use of the land (valued at an additional $0.5 million) that has been committed to the project. At this time, costs are based on Class “D” estimates, which can vary by plus or minus 25%. If this request is supported by Council, the balance of funding required can be provided equally from Gaming Revenues and General Revenue Accumulated Surplus. I t should be noted that this would mean that the risk associated with this project would rest with the City. Further, the City’s capacity to deal with other emerging issues would be restricted. Doc # 1985088 Page 4 of 4 CONCLUSIONS: MRPMCS reports that the YWC pilot project has increased access to youth wellness services and has decreased wait lists for local youth and their families, yet it provides a small sample of the breadth of service that could be achieved through a full Foundry model. This full model requires a larger space than MRPMCS has been able to secure. Furthermore, there is a concern that if MRPMCS is unable to secure the required space requirements, the $500,000 annual funding provided by the Foundry may be re-allocated to another community. “Original signed by Tony Cotroneo” Prepared by: Tony Cotroneo, Manager of Community Services “Original signed by Catherine Nolan” Reviewed by: Catherine Nolan, Corporate Controller “Original signed by Danielle Pope” Reviewed by: Danielle Pope, Director of Recreation & Community Services “Original signed by Kelly Swift” “Original signed by David Boag for Kelly Swift” Approved by: Kelly Swift, MBA General Manager Parks, Recreation & Culture ““Original signed by Paul Gill” Concurrence: Paul Gill, CPA, CGA Chief Administrative Officer Attachments: (1) 2018-07-12 Letter from Maple Ridge Pitt Meadows Community Services (2) 2018-07-17 Letter from Foundry July 12, 2018 Kelly Swift Community Services Manager City of Maple Ridge Re: Youth Wellness Centre/Foundry Infrastructure Dear Kelly, On behalf of youth, parents and the multiple community partners and agencies with the Ridge Meadows Youth Wellness Centre (YWC), I want to express our sincere gratitude for the Mayor and Council’s recent decision to extend the lease arrangements within the Greg Moore Youth Centre. The location continues to be ideally situated for youth and young adults seeking support services with substance use and mental health support. Although programs and services are thriving, there is an urgency to open a full Foundry in our community as we have reached capacity and the ability to expand the program with much needed complimentary services. Through an extensive search, we have not been able to source comparable commercial space that is available or of adequate size to facilitate all the programs within the Foundry model. As you know, Mayor and Council had previously approved the use of city land adjacent to the Greg Moore Youth Centre with an additional investment of $500,000.00 towards construction of a 9,000 sq. ft. purpose built facility to support the location of a permanent Foundry site. Since that decision, Community Services has worked diligently to secure additional funding and I’m very proud to share that, in concert with the YWC Fund Development Team and Foundry Central Office, we have secured close to $2,000,000.00 in capital funding inclusive of the $500,000.00 from the City. Please accept my request to consider an alternative proposal for proceeding with the city’s construction and ownership of a purpose-built facility. I’m proposing that the YWC allocate $2,000,000.00 towards the city’s construction of a facility on the land adjacent to the Greg Moore Youth Centre and within a defined operating agreement with the city, Community Services would contribute an additional monthly lease payment as a long-term tenant. Our preference is for the development of Option #3, approximately 8,000 SF where we could co-locate with partners offering complimentary services. This will help to ensure we can offer the best wraparound service for our youth and young adults. Sincerely, Vicki Kipps Executive Director Maple Ridge/Pitt Meadows Community Services 22718 Lougheed Highway, Maple Ridge BC V2X 2V6 T 604.467.6911 F 604.463.2988 www.comservice.bc.ca