HomeMy WebLinkAbout2019-04-09 Workshop Agenda and Reports.pdfCity of Maple Ridge COUNCIL WORKSHOP AGENDA April 9, 2019 1:30 PM Blaney Room, 1st Floor, City Hall The purpose of the Council Workshop is to review and discuss policies and other items of interest to Council. Although resolutions may be passed at this meeting, the intent is to make a consensus decision to send an item to Council for debate and vote or refer the item back to staff for more information or clarification. The meeting is live streamed and recorded by the City of Maple Ridge. REMINDERS DATE Council Meeting 7:00 p.m. 1. APPROVAL OF THE AGENDA 2. ADOPTION OF MINUTES -Nil 3. PRESENTATIONS AT THE REQUEST OF COUNCIL 4. UNFINISHED AND NEW BUS/NESS 4.1 Metro Vancouver -Katzie Pump Station Upgrades & North Langley Sewage Treatment Plant Update -Presentation • Paul Wilting, P.Eng., Program Manager -Northwest Langley Wastewater Treatment Projects Project Delivery, Liquid Waste Services, Metro Vancouver 4.2 Draft Farm Protection Development Permit Area Guidelines (FPDP) and Consultation Process Staff report dated April 9, 2019 recommending that the attached report titled "Draft Farm Protection Development Permit Area Guidelines (FPDP) and Consultation Process" be forwarded to the next Council meeting. 4.3 Updated Maple Ridge Zoning Bylaw No. 7600-2019; First Reading Staff report dated April 9, recommending that the attached report titled "Updated Maple Ridge Zoning Bylaw No. 7600-2019; First Reading" be forwarded to the next Council meeting.
Council Workshop Agenda April 9, 2019 Page 2 of 3 5. CORRESPONDENCE 5.1 District of Kitimat -Request for Local Governments to Support C.O.R.E.Y Motorcycle Safety Correspondence from Mayor Phillip Germut, District of Kitimat, requesting letters of support be written to the Province to finalize and implement the Graduated Licensing Program for Motorcycles (GLP-M), including Power Restrictions and Mandatory Training. Options: • For information only (no resolution); • That a letter of support be written to the Province. 5.2 Upcoming Events By Invitation to Mayor and Council: Tuesday, April 9 1:00 -3:00 pm Thursday, April 11 8:30 am -2:30 pm Saturday, April 13 10:00 am -2:00 pm General Community Events: Wednesday, April 10 4:00 -8:00 pm Thursday, April 11 7:00 -8:30 pm Saturday, April 13 9:00 am -2:00 pm Saturday, April 13 10:00 am -2:00 pm Saturday, April 13 10:30 am -12:30 pm Maple Ridge Seniors Activity Centre Re-Opening Celebration 12150 224 Street MRSS Graduation Transition Presentations MRSS -21911122 Ave Earth Day Celebrations Memorial Peace Park Lougheed Transit Corridor Study Open House Glenwood Elementary School Gymnasium Alouette River Management Society AGM Maple Ridge Public Library Maple Ridge Lawn Bowling Open House 11445 232 Street Maple Ridge Celebrates National Volunteer Week Memorial Peace Park Resisting Peer Pressure and Bully Proofing Your Child Colleen Findlay Place I I
Council Workshop Agenda April 9, 2019 Page 3 of 3 6. BRIEFING ON OTHER ITEMS OF INTEREST/QUESTIONS FROM COUNCIL 7. MATTERS DEEMED EXPEDIENT 8. ADJOURNMENT Checked bye e-Date: Pr~c f}h ~ r
MAPLE RIDGE ··········~··--····· British Columbia City of Maple Ridge TO: FROM: mapleridge.ca His Worship Mayor Michael Morden and Members of Council Chief Administrative Officer MEETING DATE: April 9, 2019 FILE NO: MEETING: Council Workshop SUBJECT: Draft Farm Protection Development Permit Area Guidelines (FPDP) and Consultation Process EXECUTIVE SUM MARY: The attached report is scheduled to be on the next Council Meeting agenda for discussion and consideration of the recommendation. The Council Workshop forum provides an extended opportunity for Council to seek additional information if required, prior to decision-making. RECOMMENDATION: That the attachment to the April 9, 2019 Council Workshop report titled "Draft Farm Protection Development Permit Area Guidelines (FPDP) and Consultation Process" be forwarded to the next Council Meeting. Approv~e Officer Attachment: • Draft Farm Protection Development Permit Area Guidelines (FPDP) and Consultation Process -staff report dated April 9, 2019 Doc# 2105964 Page 1of 1 4.2 I. I
[~-TO: mapleridge.ca City of Maple Ridge His Worship Mayor Michael Morden and Members of Council MEETING DATE: FROM: Chief Administrative Officer FILE NO. MEETING: April 9, 2019 2017-361-CP Council Workshop SUBJECT: Draft Farm Protection Development Permit Area Guidelines (FPDP) and Consultation Process EXECUTIVE SUMMARY: On October 25, 2016, Council provided direction to the Agricultural Advisory Committee (MC) for its 2017 work plan. The resolution was as follows: That Option 2 identified in the report dated October 17, 2016 and titled "Agricultural Plan Facilitated Session -Next Steps" be selected as the basis for the Agricultural Advisory Committee actions in 2017, which includes: a) Preparation of Development Permit Area (DPA) guidelines to protect agricultural land. b) Exploration of the feasibility of an agro-industrial strategy (food hub); and c) Evaluation of the remaining actions items in Table 1 for Council consideration in the 2017 Business Planning process. This report presents draft Farm Protection Development Permit Area Guidelines (FPDP) towards completing the MC's work plan in item (a) above. The FPDP (Appendix A) would apply to proposed development (with some exceptions) on non-farm lands adjacent to the ALR, with the intent of protecting the farming of such agricultural lands and minimizing impacts/nuisances for residential property owners. Also included is a draft FPDP Submission Checklist (Appendix B) intended to clarify the currently required Agricultural Impact Assessment (AIA) study for proposed development on non-farm use lands. The FPDP and the AIA are intended to work in concert, with the FPDP providing guidance in development design that is informed by mitigative measures identified through outcomes of the AIA study. This report also includes a review of best practices recommended by the B.C. Ministry of Agriculture. Drafts of the FPDP have been presented to the MC on September 28, 2017 and March 28, 2019 and the comments received are included in this report. Public consultation in the form of a public open house is proposed for the draft DPA Guidelines. Some discussion has already been undertaken with the Agricultural Advisory Committee (MC) and the development community and Comments from these discussions are included in this report. Further consultation with these two groups will be scheduled in the coming weeks. It is important to note that the FPDP is in draft form and it is anticipated that changes will be made once the public has had an opportunity to review the FPDP components through the public consultation process and provide feedback. Page 1 of 14 rr I I
RECOMMENDATION: 1. In respect of Section 4 75 of the Local Government Act, requirement for consultation during the development or amendment of an Official Community Plan, Council must consider whether consultation is required with specifically: i. The Board of the Regional District in which the area covered by the plan is located, in the case of a Municipal Official Community Plan; ii. The Board of any Regional District that is adjacent to the area covered by the plan; iii. The Council of any municipality that is adjacent to the area covered by the plan; iv. First Nations; v. Boards of Education, Greater Boards and Improvement District Boards; and vi. The Provincial and Federal government and their agencies. and in that regard, it is recommended that the only additional consultation to be required in respect of this matter beyond the engagement strategy and timeline process outlined in the report titled "Farm Protection Development Permit Area Guidelines (FPDP)", dated April 9, 2019 is the early posting of the proposed Official Community Plan amendments on the City's website, together with an invitation to the public to comment; 2. That Section 5.0 "Next Steps -Public Open House" in the report titled "Farm Protection Development Permit Area Guidelines (FPDP)", dated April 9, 2019 be endorsed. 1.0 BACKGROUND: On July 5, 2016 Council undertook a prioritization process in order to provide direction to the MC for its 2017 work plan. Attending members of Council identified 27 out of a possible 94 actions that could be further explored and developed. Staff compared the 27 actions to the results from three previous prioritization exercises. These exercises were conducted by the MC, Council and staff respectively over a period of approximately eight months in fall/winter 2015 and spring/2016. Council passed the following resolution: That Option 2 identified in the report dated October 17, 2016 and titled "Agricultural Plan Facilitated Session -Next Steps" be selected as the basis for the Agricultural Advisory Committee actions in 2017, which includes: d) Preparation of Development Permit Area (DPA) guidelines to protect agricultural land. e) Exploration of the feasibility of an agro-industrial strategy (food hub); and f) Evaluation of the remaining actions items in Table 1 for Council consideration in the 2017 Business Planning process. 1.1 Agricultural Plan Alignment In 2009, Council endorsed the Maple Ridge Agricultural Plan to address agricultural issues in Maple Ridge. The Plan identifies three key challenges to the agricultural sector: 1) deteriorating agricultural infrastructure; 2) declining knowledge base about agriculture; and 3) loss of agricultural land. Thirteen Goals are identified in the Plan to address challenges to the agricultural sector. Goal 9 addresses the issue of "stress in the agriculture-residential interface", and states that, "in order for working agriculture to flourish, it must be provided with space, respect, and understanding that Page 2 of 14
farming operations employing good management practices are accepted in the community." The development and implementation of farm protection guidelines is identified as the primary recommendation of Goal 9. It is as follows: "Implement Development Permit Area guidelines to minimize non-agricultural encroachment on agriculturally designated lands and farming activities, including specific provisions for buffer zones, appropriate landscaping, subdivision design, and building location." Since the adoption of the Agricultural Plan, the importance and need for an agricultural development permit is to not only protect agriculture from urban development, but to also minimize the impacts of farming activity on residential property owners. 1.2 Existing Municipal Tools to Protect Agriculture 1.2.1 Official Community Plan Section 6.2 of the Official Community Plan contains several policies aimed at supporting agriculture in its contribution to the local economy, food security, and community character. Policies 6-7, 6-10 and 6-12 identify how Maple Ridge is currently encouraging compatibility between farming activities, the natural environment, and residents within the urban interface: 6-7 Maple Ridge will promote sustainable agriculture and consider the inclusion of the following in its Economic Development Strategy: a) Increasing public awareness of farming values and practices; b) Emphasizing the local and Regional importance of agriculture; c) Emphasizing the importance of preserving and supporting access to locally grown food; d) Encouraging farmers to implement Environmental Farm Plans; e) Emphasizing the importance of agricultural land on the District's social and environmental values. 6-10 Maple Ridge will strive to maintain its agricultural land base in Maple Ridge through the following mechanisms: a) Supporting the Metro Vancouver Regional Growth Strategy, which includes designated agricultural land; b) Respecting the integrity of the urban area boundary by establishing a distinct separation between rural and urban designated areas; c) Designating all lands outside of the Urban Area Boundary that are within the ALR as Agriculture in the Official Community Plan. Non-farm uses approved by the Agricultural Land Commission and the District will be permitted on all land designated Agricultural; d) Striving for a balance between farming activity and conservation lands. 6-12 Maple Ridge will protect the productivity of its agricultural land by: a) Adopting a guiding principle of "positive benefit to agriculture" when making land use decisions that could affect the agricultural land base, with favourable recognition of initiatives including but not limited to supportive non-farm uses, infrastructure improvements for farmland, or the inclusion of land elsewhere in the Agricultural Land Reserve; b) Requiring Agricultural Impact Assessments (AIAs) and Groundwater Impact Assessment of non-farm development and infrastructure projects and identifying measures to off-set impacts on agricultural capability; Page 3 of 14
c) Preserving larger farm units and areas by using appropriate buffers such as roads, topographic features, watercourses, ditching, fencing, or gradually reduced residential densities on properties adjacent to agricultural land; d) Discouraging subdivision of agricultural land into smaller parcels, except where positive benefits to agriculture can be demonstrated; e) Reinforcing the concept that the Agricultural Land Reserve is intended for agricultural use by increasing the minimum lot size for ALR properties that are zoned Rural Residential; f) Encouraging the amalgamation of smaller parcels of farmland into larger, more cohesive parcels. Additionally, policy 6-13 discusses developing DPA Guidelines for the protection of farming: 6-13 As part of the Agricultural Planning process, Development Permit Area Guidelines for the protection of farming will be developed to: a) Reduce impacts on farmland and maintain compatibility between farm and non-farm uses; b) Guide the form and character of future adjacent non-farm development; c) Place conditions on title to inform non-farming rural residents of normal incidents encountered when living in an active agricultural areas (e.g. noise, odours, crop spraying, traffic). Through policy 6-12 (b), the protection of farms is currently achieved through the requirement of AIAs and Groundwater Impact Assessments for non-farm development adjacent to agricultural lands. A professional agrologist has the required expertise to prepare these two studies, which are often combined into one report. While this current approach is helpful in identifying potential impacts to farm use and mitigative strategies, the proposed approach is intended to ensure greater clarity for applicants in undertaking the AIA study and identifying mitigative measures in complying with the following FPDP design guidelines for: • Stormwater management; • Subdivision design (if applicable); • Site layout and design; and • Landscape buffers. 1.2.2 Zoning Bylaw Farm Home Plate requirements are provided in the General Regulations section of the Maple Ridge Zoning Bylaw for properties located within the Agricultural Land Reserve. These requirements limit the size of residential development on agricultural parcels with the intent that much of the parcel is preserved for farming activity. There are no restrictions, however, on non-farm uses adjacent to farms in the ALR. 1.3 BC Ministry of Agriculture -The Guide to Edge Planning The British Columbia Ministry of Agriculture's Guide to Edge Planning (the Guide) provides information on best practices in planning for development to promote compatibility between non-farm and farm uses. This document has been utilized as a reference tool in the preparation of a draft FPDP. The link to the Ministry document is provided below. Page 4 of 14
Guide to Edge Planning: https://www2 .gov .be .ca/gov/content/ind ustry/agri cu ltu re-seafood/agricultural-land-and-envi ron ment/strengthen i ng-fa rm i ng/ edge-planning The Guide characterizes the conflicts that arise between farm and non-farm uses as follows: Farms often experience trespass, property and equipment vandalism, crop damage and theft, livestock harassment, and litter. Flooding of farm land by rainwater runoff from upland urban development is another impact many farmers have experienced. All of these problems result in significant financial losses for farmers. On the urban side of the 'fence', complaints can be related to odour, pesticide spraying, dust, aesthetics, and noise from different farm activities. Urban neighbours might complain about unfamiliar (to them) but normal and accepted farm practices, even if they are carried out in compliance with established regulations and standards. For planning new development on the non-farm side edge to agriculture land, the Guide provides the following five key "Performance Goals and Objectives" that the proposed design should aim to meet: • Within 300 metres of the ALR boundary, create farm-friendly urban development which promotes compatibility with agriculture and stabilizes the ALR boundary. Within that goal, design performance objectives include: • Use subdivision layouts which limit potential, future urban encroachment into the ALR or other farming areas; • Limit the effects of urban development on farming by managing water, pedestrians, and traffic; • Minimize the effects of farm activities on urban development through visual and spatial separation, reduction of risks, and public awareness of normal farm practices; • Ensure the edge location is stable over time. 1.3.1 Mitigative Approach to Planning & Design In meeting the above goals and objectives, the Guide provides a range of best practices for mitigating the impacts of non-farm use through the planning and design of new development. The areas of planning and design that the Guide focusses on include: • Subdivision design: density, road, and lot patterns • Building design and layout • Open space and landscape design • Storm and groundwater management • Urban-side (non-farm use) landscape buffer design -the Guide recommends utilizing Restrictive Covenants to enforce the maintenance of the landscape buffer and also to create awareness of the buffer benefits. While there are various tools that may enable local governments to establish best practices for planning and design, through bylaws or development permit areas, the Guide does not provide any specific recommendations on which regulatory tools to use, but does include an example of development permit area provisions for the protection of farming. Page 5 of 14
1.4 Comparison with Other BC Municipalities Eight British Columbia municipalities that utilize best practices for the protection of agriculture, each utilizing DP Areas, were reviewed. Table 1 below lists each of these municipalities and the components of their DP Guidelines that correspond with the recommendations within the Ministry of Agriculture Guide. Also included are the components within the Maple Ridge draft FPDP and each are discussed in Section 2.2 of this report. Table 1: Municipal Scan Ministry of Agriculture Guidelines Surrey Abbotsford Richmond Electoral Area A (Cowichan RD) Oliver Rural (Okanagan RD) Kelowna Arrowsmith (Nanaimo RD) Courtenay Proposed Maple Ridge FPDP 300m SOm Adjacent Adjacent 30m 150m Adjacent Adjacent Adjacent 30m 15m 15-24m (depending on use) 3-lSm {depending on use) "Approx. lSm" 15m Sm "Consistent with Min of Ag Guidelines" 15m 10m 3-30m (depending on use and site context) Buffers 30m 30m ~buffer width None ~buffer width, "maximized" 30m "maximized" None None Follow Zoning Bylaw regs Yes Yes Yes No Yes No Yes Yes No Yes Subdivision Layout .... ::::, g. .!9 l{l C .5 0 <ii ·;;:; 32 :2i ::::, "C C, ..c ::::, VI Yes Yes Yes No Yes Yes Yes Yes No Yes Yes Yes Yes No No Yes Yes No No Yes Covenants Yes Yes No No No No Yes No No Yes Page 6 of 14
There is a broad range of what other municipalities are doing in terms of best practices in planning and design with respect to new development on the non-farm use edge, although each does show some alignment with the Ministry of Agriculture Guide in the sense that through their respective DPs, all of the municipalities reviewed required landscape buffers and most had requirements for a residential building setback, subdivision layout, stormwater management, and a restrictive covenant for buffer maintenance and awareness of benefits. It is also possible that other tools may be utilized in some of these municipalities for implementing best practices, such as utilizing a regulatory bylaw approach. 2.0 DISCUSSION: 2.1 Current Policy Limitations Through policy 6-12(b) in the OCP, development applications for a rezoning or subdivision on property adjacent to farmland are currently required to undertake an AIA and a Groundwater Impact Assessment. While this current approach is beneficial for these types of applications, it does not address the redevelopment of lands that only require a building permit or a development permit for form and character, environmental features, etc. Additionally, while the current requirements are sound, they are not tied to any specific goals, objectives, or design guidelines, which assist in articulating the larger picture of what a particular regulatory tool is trying to achieve. The aim of the FPDP is to provide applicants with better guidance on the best approach in the planning and design of a non-farm use adjacent to farmlands. The draft AIA requirements (which are contained within a Submission Checklist) have been updated from the current version with more refined details on expectations for an AIA study (including a Groundwater Impact Assessment) and an outline for the contents of the AIA report that align directly with the requirements of the FPDP. The aim of the AIA study is to identify potential negative impacts to the adjacent farmland and include recommendations for mitigation that will inform the applicant in fulfilling the requirements of the FPDP during the planning and design of the proposed development. 2.2 Draft Farm Protection Development Permit (FPDP) While the FPDP is not aimed at restricting any of the current land use designations within the OCP, the current land use designations of non-farm lands adjacent to ALR are primarily residential and vary from small lot urban residential to acreage lots on rural lands. Many of these "edge" lands are built out and future development will be mainly through redevelopment, infill, or additions to existing buildings. Some potential for new development remains, but this is not expected to be substantial. A recognition of the variation in future edge development has resulted in a draft FPDP that is less of a "one size fits all" approach recommended by the Ministry of Agriculture Guide and more of a "situational" approach that depends on the site context of new development being proposed. At a high level, the draft DPA Guidelines for the Protection of Farming (attached as Appendix A) include: I. Will apply to any development application on a property that is within 30 metres from the ALR boundary (on the non-farm use side); II. Planning and Design Guidelines for: a. Stormwater Management; b. Subdivision layout; c. Site layout and design; d. Building siting and setbacks (proposed to follow Zoning Bylaw requirements); Page 7 of 14
Ill. A landscape buffer to be determined based on one of five development types, including appropriate buffer width and plant materials to be determined through completion of an AIA (discussed in further detail 2.3.1 below); IV. Several exemptions for the draft DP are proposed, including placement of impermanent structures, regular property maintenance, alteration or reconstruction of existing legal buildings, and farm activities under the Farm Practices Protection (Right to Farm) Act; For applications that involve a rezoning and/or a subdivision, a restrictive covenant will be required on the property title that prescribes ongoing maintenance requirements of the landscape buffer and will also help create awareness on the benefits of maintaining it. 2.2.1 Proposed FPDP Area While it is recommended in the Provincial Guide that a farm protection DP area should cover all non-farm use lands within 300 meters of the ALR boundary, it is recognized that in Maple Ridge that would include many properties that are not located adjacent to the ALR and because many of the existing lands are largely built out and many of these are urban sized lots, it was determined that many of the FPDP requirements would not apply. As such, it was determined that a 30 metre DP area would capture adjacent lands and those that may fall into any potential future subdivision developments. 2.2.2 Proposed for Stormwater Management Maple Ridge currently requires the provision of stormwater management for all new development. The Guide recommends that changes to water cycles be avoided and to consider whether some stormwater flows may benefit the adjacent farm lands. These recommendations have been incorporated into the FPDP, along with the following best practices deemed to be beneficial in ensuring appropriate stormwater design adjacent to farm uses: • Open spaces with landscaped buffers that are designed with water retention capacity or an adequate rainwater/storm drainage system shall be located along the ALR edge (as these will help ensure a large capacity for stormwater infiltration and exfiltration to adjacent farm lands); • Avoiding alteration of natural drainage systems that disrupt the natural hydrological cycle; • Ensure design reduces the impacts of pollution of the surface or groundwater supplies. 2.2.3 Proposed for Subdivision Layout and Design Several best practices are recommended in the Guide to encourage an effective subdivision layout that minimizes non-farm use impact on agriculture. For instance, most communities with these requirements do not permit road stubs (i.e. "dead-ends") or half-roads adjacent to agricultural land (as shown in Figure 1 below) as these imply further development into agricultural land. Page 8 of 14
Figure 1: Road Patterns to Avoid in Subdivision Design AVOID AL R CAVOID Road Stubs Half-Roads Along Edge From "Guide to Edge Planning", BC Ministry of Agriculture The Guide recommends designing cul-de-sacs, where appropriate, and complete roads that direct non-farm use traffic away from the farm edge, as shown in Figure 2 below. Figure 2: Road Patterns Compatible with Adjacent Farmland I ROAD --·--,-·-, ! I I B!B!B1 I I I I _ _j. -· -f--·..i ! I I iSIBIBI ! ! I ! --·~·___J ROAD ·---I i i ~!BiBiB!Bi j ·--· ·- -· ·9 FARML.AND C8:I !YI I L._. __ J._. __ -·---· Page 9 of 14 r
The additional approaches discussed in Figures 1 and 2 above are also included in the draft FPDP as well as the following Guide recommendations: • Utilities, such as water and sewer are not permitted to be extended into the ALR lands; • Aim to accommodate longer/deeper rear or side yard single-family lots to be created adjacent to the ALR lands to allow for creation of the landscape buffer and sufficient space for rear or side yard enjoyment. • Passive public and strata open spaces should be located next to the ALR boundary, with the provision of a landscape buffer. Note that the requirements of the Subdivision and Development Servicing Bylaw will also apply under a FPDP application. Other approaches recommended in the Guide for subdivision that were not included in the draft FPDP include: • Density transfer and creation of housing clusters: The OCP has existing policies for these, which may be considered on a site by site basis; • Incorporating park dedication along farm edge: This may be considered through rezoning or subdivision on a site by site basis, as the farm edge may not be the most appropriate location for establishing park land; • Encouraging smaller lots and denser development forms along farm edge, as these uses coincide with an expectation for more activity and noise in the vicinity: The residential lands located along the extent of the ALR lands are designated for a range of lot sizes, with many being small lot residential within the urban area boundary, but many others being large lot suburban and rural outside of the urban area boundary. 2.2.4 Proposed for Site Layout and Design Several of the Guide recommendations for site layout and design were incorporated into the draft FPDP, including: • Aim to locate patios and decks (i.e. active outdoor space) away from the edge of the ALR; • Locate passive parks and passive open spaces for multi-family developments directly adjacent to the ALR boundary and active parks and open spaces as far away from the ALR as possible; • Aim to design surface parking areas away from ALR edge and if not possible, design using a permeable surface and a landscape buffer between parking area and ALR land. Recommendations within the Guide that were deemed not appropriate for the Maple Ridge context include: • A 30 metre setback for residential buildings from the ALR edge: For many residential properties adjacent to the ALR, this would be challenging if not impossible. As such, it has been determined that following the setbacks in the Zoning Bylaw is the most appropriate approach for Maple Ridge; • A minimum 15 metre landscape buffer width for residential uses, 8 metres for commercial use, and 15 metres for an institutional use: Similar to the rationale for the building setback above, this would not be feasible in many situations, so the five landscape buffer types are proposed, with the AIA outcomes providing the final recommendation on exact buffer widths. Page 10 of 14
2.2.5 Proposed Landscape Buffers Design Criteria According to the research undertaken in preparing the Guide, providing a vegetated buffer between farmland and residential areas helps establish a barrier that can significantly reduce complaints regarding farming activity from nearby residents by minimizing the noise, light, dust, or spray drift that is part of regular farming activity. For residential lands located adjacent to an agriculture boundary, the Guide recommends a minimum 15 metre wide vegetated buffer with a dwelling unit building setback of 30 metres -both of these to be measured perpendicular from the farm edge boundary. The Guide also states that 8 metres is an appropriate buffer width for commercial or industrial use and 15 metres is recommended for an institutional use. As discussed in Section 2.2.4 above, it has been determined that strict adherence to these recommended buffer width setbacks are not feasible within the Maple Ridge context. As such, five buffer types are proposed for the FPDP, wherein the outcomes of the AIA study will identify and recommend an appropriate landscape buffer width and tree and plant species. The proposed landscape buffer requirements in the FPDP include: • Provision of a landscape plan that identifies one of the following five landscape buffer types that are appropriate for the site conditions and type of development application: o Minimum landscape buffer -Required for a building permit application with a buffer width between 3 and 15 metres (to be determined through AIA); o Moderate landscape buffer -Required for a rezoning or subdivision application on a parcel less than 2,000m2 with a buffer width between 8 and 15 metres; o Maximum landscape buffer -Required for a rezoning or subdivision application on a parcel size greater than 2,000m2 with a minimum 15 metre buffer; o Street edge landscape buffer -Where a proposed non-farm use includes a road or parking area directly adjacent to the ALR boundary, the buffer width will be between 3 and 6 metres, as the space in the road right-of-way allows; o ESA edge buffer -Required where a development application requires a Watercourse DP, a Natural Features DP, and/or a Wildfire DP and the buffer width will be determined through the AIA and other related environmental studies (with the greatest recommended width to apply if discrepancy between studies). o Alternative to above landscape buffer options: A provision is proposed to enable flexibility where an alternative buffer design to the above options is the best approach. This provision requires that the agrologist provide a written rationale for the alternative buffer option for City staff to review and confirm whether the proposed alternative is supportable. ~O!<rARN! USE Alitil Sae<!nfJ1~ ;:1nd trc!:,p~s.,ln.bibhing ~ !.i'hrubs;ccnti1inuou~ p!.,n.!lng_ The graphic to the left shows the "minimum landscape buffer" from the draft FPDP. Page 11 of 14 --------~
• The guidelines require that the buffer be designed: o Parallel and continuous to the edge of the ALR; o Utilization of plant materials appropriate for the soil, site, and climate conditions with an aim to include indigenous species wherever possible and feasible. • Utilization of existing mature trees/shrubs within the buffer area; • Construction of adequate fencing (if not currently provided on site); • Inclusion of trails in the landscape buffer if less than one-third of the width of the buffer and located away from the ALR boundary. 2.2.6 Restrictive Covenants For non-farm use lands located directly adjacent to the agricultural boundary that are undergoing a rezoning and/or subdivision, a restrictive covenant is recommended in the Guide as an effective tool for ensuring compliance with the DPA Guidelines, particularly the long-term protection and maintenance of a landscape buffer on non-farm use lands. Additionally, a restrictive covenant can help provide awareness to potential purchasers of non-farm use properties that they will be residing close to farmland and can expect to experience some effects of farming activity. It is discussed in the Guide that the impacts of farm activity have a reach of approximately 300 metres beyond the agricultural lands into non-farm use areas. Roadside signage is recommended in agricultural areas as another approach to help provide awareness in informing local residents that they live within a farmland area and can expect to experience farming activity effects. This will be explored wherever possible and will involve future discussions with the MC for potential funding and implementation. 2.3 Draft Development Submission Checklist Requirements To support the FPDP, a draft Submission Checklist (Appendix B) is also proposed. The Checklist is intended to be incorporated into the existing Development Procedures Bylaw 5879-1999. This Bylaw also contains submission checklists for other DPs, such as the Wildfire DP and the Watercourse Protection DP, to help ensure applicants are informed on the process and procedures prior to making a development application. The draft FPDP Submission Checklist requires that an AIA be undertaken by a professional agrologist with at least two years experience in preparing AIAs. The final AIA report must identify the following: • Description of the development proposal; • How it will comply with other applicable planning policies and regulations; • On-site and surrounding area physical resource inventory -that includes potential drainage impacts, septic systems, wells, stormwater infiltration, groundwater, etc. and where a Groundwater Impact Assessment will be required; • Potential impacts to agriculture through: o Noise and emissions; o Off-site impacts; o Effects on flexibility of future farm uses. • Mitigative Measures that includes recommended strategies to m1nim1ze residentialjagricultural use conflicts and discussion on the how the recommendations and design of the landscape buffer (the landscape plan must be attached to the report) will help mitigate the non-farm and the farm uses. • Recommendations on providing notification signage within the neighbourhood in the vicinity of the farmland. Page 12 of 14 I 1_
• Ongoing care and maintenance of the landscape buffer -that includes recommendations on establishment of the vegetation for the first three years after planting and a cost estimate to determine the landscape security amount. 2.3.1 Potential Impacts to Existing Property Owners The proposed DP area extends into several residential land use designations, including the Silver Valley Area (see map attached to Appendix A), as well as some institutional lands. It also applies to lands within and outside of the Urban Area Boundary, ranging from small lot urban lands to acreage lands in Rural Residential designated areas. Most lands within the proposed FPDP area are built-out, although some property owners may choose to create new additions, redevelop, or subdivide where potential exists. As such, the proposed DP for the Protection of Farming will likely have an effect on a wide range of property owners. 3.0 PUBLIC INPUT: On September 15, 2017, staff presented an early draft of the FPDP to members of the development community. No comments were received from the meeting with developers. On September 28, 2017 staff presented an early draft of the FPDP to the Agricultural Advisory Committee (MC). Staff attended a subsequent MC meeting on March 28, 2019 and presented the most recent draft of the FPDP and the Submission Checklist. Comments received from the MC at both of these meetings, along with the staff responses are attached as Appendix C. Further consultation with the development community and the MC will be scheduled in the coming weeks. 4.0 INTERGOVERNMENTAL INPUT: The Ministry of Agriculture and the Agricultural Land Commission provided comments on an early draft of FPDP and the Submission Checklist in January 2018. Comments from these agencies are primarily focussed on recommendations for best practices in the Guide, such as 15 metre wide landscape buffers and 30 metre building setbacks for all residential buildings. As discussed in Sections 2.2.4 and 2.2.5 above, due to the many small urban lot residential developments adjacent to the ALR boundary, the recommended buffer widths and building setbacks were not feasible within a significant portion of the Maple Ridge context. As such, the draft FPDP defers to existing Zoning Bylaw setback requirements. Staff from the Ministry of Agriculture were in attendance at the March 28, 2019 MC meeting and offered to provide additional comments on the latest draft. An electronic version of the draft was sent to the Ministry on March 29th and no comments have been received to date. 5.0 NEXT STEPS -PUBLIC OPEN HOUSE: It is proposed that the draft components of the FPDP be presented at a public open house for community discussion and input in late Spring 2019. The MC has agreed to co-host the open house event with the Planning department. The open house will include a questionnaire for open house participants to provide input at the event and this will be made available for approximately three weeks after the event. The open house event will be advertised in the usual manner, such as newspaper ads, website promotion, and mail outs. Page 13 of 15
AG DP-DRAFT OCP -Chapter 8 8.3 Justification (the following will be added to this section in the OCP) • Protection of farmland and farm activities within the ALR from no, -farm uses. 8.4 Exemptions: 5. A Farm Protection Development Permit (FPDP) is not require a) Any construction occurring outside of the FPDP Ar b) The placement of impermanent structures s provided they are not located within a requi~ c) Repair, maintenance, alteration or reconstruct, utilities, including those that are legal non-confor footprint. d) Farm operations as defined in the as defined in Section 2(2), (3), (4) an, Procedure Regulation. APPENDIX A e) Construction, repair, maintenance or al · n-farm use land located outside f) g) INTENT of the required lands uffer width ar uilding such as a pump house, gazebo, garden utside o e required landscape buffer width area; ·n the required landscape buffer width area are removed to uilding; and accessory building is less than 10m2• elopment Permit Area Guidelines The intent of the Farm Protection Development Permit Area Guidelines (FPDP) is to protect farmland in the Agricultural Land Reserve (ALR) from impacts associated with non-farm development, located outside but adjacent (within 30 metres) to the ALR boundary, and reduce conflicts between farm activities and non-farm land uses. The area covered under the FPDP, identified on attached Map 1 is designated a development permit area pursuant to Section 488(1)(c) of the Local Government Act for the protection of farming. The BC Agricultural Land Commission (ALC) and the BC Ministry of Agriculture (BCMA) have acknowledged that the development of lands adjoining or reasonably adjacent to
farmlands may compromise the agricultural use of ALR lands. These lands therefore require protection in order to ensure long-term agricultural use. A FPDP application will be required for any development of lands identified on Map 1 to ensure adherence to best practices in farm and non-farm edge compatibility. Exemptions to a Farm DPAG are listed in the Development Permit Exemptions, Section 8.4, Item 5. The FPDP is intended to work in concert with all other guidelines, regulations and bylaws in effect. 8.14.1 Key Guideline Concepts Applications for a FPDP will be assessed against the following key guide · 1. a. b. residential, commercial, industrial, a c. Help provide greater definition of the AL d. Visually screen farmland from adjoining non e. Mitigate adverse effects of agricultural oper nearby non-farm use lands. f. Increase the compatibility of g. Protect agricultural water sup landscape. h. Work in cone potential of , regulations and bylaws. 2. Completion of an Checklist requ· impacts identi t complies with the FPDP Submission to address potential negative 8.14.2 2. anag ormwater onsite as required by the Watercourse Protection Natural Features Development Permit, the Watercourse Protection and Development Servicing Bylaw. evelopment, particular attention should be paid to ensuring that any ot result in detrimental impacts such as flooding or reduced groundwater ltural lands. 3. Open spaces h landscaped buffers that are designed with water retention capacity or an adequate rainwater/storm drainage system shall be located along the edge of agricultural lands. 4. Alteration of natural drainage systems that disrupt the natural hydrological cycle shall not be permitted. 5. Development must be designed to reduce the impacts of pollution of surface or groundwater supplies.
B. Subdivision Design: 1. Subdivision layout and design will be prepared in accordance with the Subdivision and Development Servicing Bylaw. 2. Road endings or "dead-ends" which terminate at the edge of the ALR shall not be permitted except where required for farm vehicle access only. 3. Half roads and half cul-de-sacs along the boundary of the ALR are discouraged. 4. The road pattern shall be designed to direct non-farm traffic away from routes used by farmers to move equipment. 5. Utilities such as water and sewer lines and stormwater conve the ALR. 6. For single-family and multi-family developments with rea planned adjacent to the ired that will allow for ALR boundary, aim to accommodate longer or deeper, et cks than adequate space, outside of the buffer area, to en tfr:e • >,p)rty owner enjoy these yard areas. 7. Passive public parks and passive private ope teated next pace and the to the boundary of the ALR, with a landscape bu ALR boundary. C. Site layout and Design: 1. wherever possible. 2. Building siting ands Ridge .. g Bylaw requirements. 3. 4. 1. 2. aces, locafed directly adjacent to the ALR should such as playing fields, playgrounds, patios and ge . . ALR is discouraged and only permitted if: able surface; and ovided to separate the parking use from the farmland, in ,ffer requirements below. Ian for one of five possible landscape buffer types is a requirement for the five landscape buffer types in Table 1 below). r type provides guidance in appropriate buffer design for a non-farm use development o ands directly adjacent to the ALR boundary. 3. The landscape plan design details will be based on the mitigative measures identified in the AIA report that will be prepared for the proposed development. The AIA is to include verification of the appropriate landscape buffer type from Table 1 below and include a recommendation on appropriate buffer width. 4. The design and construction of a landscape buffer must meet the Canadian Landscape Standard (CLS), most recent edition.
5. A maximum landscape buffer width, as identified for each of the five types in Table 1, will be utilized wherever possible. Table 1: Landscape Buffer Types For guidance in buffer design for non-farm use lands directly adjacent to the ALR boundary 1. Minimum Landscape Buffer • Required as part of a building permit application; • Buffer width to be determined through AIA (permitted minimum is 3m and maximum is 15m); • Provision of a single or double row of trees (deciduous or coniferous) to be determined through AJA; • See fencing requirements in Section E below. 2. Moderate Landscape Buffer • Required where a rezonin subdivision is required proposed new devel on a parcel size le 2,000m2; • Width to be coniferous); • See fencing req Section E below. NON FARM USE AREA 3-15m 2mmln. Screening and trespass-Inhibiting shrubs; continuous planting Continuous fencing Double row of deciduous or coniferous trees Screening and trespass-Inhibiting shrubs; continuous planting Continuous fencing NONFARM ~~-+-~~~~~~~1~~~)1~ USE AREA 2 m min. ALR 8 m -15 m as space permits
3. Maximum Landscape Buffer • Where a rezoning/ subdivision is required for proposed new development on a parcel size greater than 2,000m2; • Minimum 15 metre wide buffer; • Provision of a continuous berm or detention ponds will be determined through AIA; • Minimum three rows of trees (deciduous and coniferous); • See fencing requirements in Section E below. 4. Street Edge Landscape Buffer • Where proposed non-farm use development involves road or parking area construction (including upgrades) directly adjacent to ALR boundary. • Provisi street tree inhibiting shr drainage swale 1 garden(s)) to be de through AIA; • See fencing requirements in Section E below. Trall locallon on urban NONFARM I USE AREA 2mmt;t<-15mmlnlmum NONFARM ~~~~~~-+-~~~~-4 USE AREA 3 - 4 rows of trees as space permits; must include conifers; with continuous shrub planting Continuous berm; 2 m high OR Detention ponds forming continuous barrier Continuous fencing ALR Drainage swale or ditch OR Single row of deciduous street trees Continuous fencing ALR
5. ESA Edge Landscape Buffer • Required where a development application requires a Watercourse DP, a Natural Features DP, and/or a Wildfire DP; • AIA to be completed in concert with other required DP(s). • Buffer width will be determined through recommendations from AIA and environmental studies -Note: Where a discrepancy in recommended buffer widths occurs between studies, the greatest width will apply 6. Trail location on urban side of buffer only 5-30m as determined by environmental study Continuous fencing whether the proposed alternative is 7. The landscape plan, including buffer t ·-fw and final approval by E. 1. 2. the City of Maple Ridge. · m activity; I and physical barrier, using plant material and ent and farmland that also helps to reduce noise, ,15 species that are appropriate for the soil, site, and climate tree and shrub species wherever possible and appropriate. a. ons that identify appropriate month(s) of the year for ensuring the best s al for the plant materials; and b. 1gation is recommended as part of a strategy for ensuring plant survival in the firs.. hree years and thereafter for supporting plant health and vibrancy over the long-term. 3. Any existing mature trees and/or shrubs within the buffer area shall be incorporated into the buffer design wherever possible.
~ --------------------_ -~------4. If adequate fencing is not currently provided on site, fencing must be constructed on non-farm use side at the edge of the ALR boundary. The proposed fence design and construction to be approved by the City of Maple Ridge. 5. Where paths and/or recreational uses are necessary to complete a trail network or will form part of parks or trail planning, a path may be included as part of a landscape buffer if designed to be less than one-third of the width of the buffer and located away from the ALR boundary. The remaining two-thirds of the buffer shall be designed with special attention to inhibiting trespass onto farmland.
6
N
:cale: 1 :50,000
City Boundary
-+-+-Railway (Gen eralized)
Major Ri vers & Lakes
CJ Urban Development Area
-ALR
c:J FPDP Area (30 m from ALR Boundary)
The City of Maple Ridge makes no guarantee
regarding the accuracy or present statu s of
the in formation sh own on this m ap.
·~ I T"\LI'\ -,.JU I V l 'C,Ll 'C, UUIIC,J I
~ PLANNING DEPARTMENT
1.~ 11mJJMtt'itt
mapleridge.ca
BY:AC
-;;;.----------DRAFT Development Procedures Bylaw No. 5879-1999 Schedule K APPENDIX 8 Farm Protection Development Permit Submission Checklist The City encourages applicants to meet with stafffrom the appropriate departments prior to submitting an application for a Development Permit. An application for a Farm Protection Development Permit (FPDP) Department and must include the following: 1. A complete application form with the prescribed fee. 2. Site information based on a survey plan prepared by 3. Current state of title certificate and copies of all relevant schedules. 4. Site location map. 5. Map or plan of the infrastructure, surface drainage, parcel 6. Detailed site plan and/or air photo over structures, landscape buffer, fences, tral 7. aws, and must include: ndscape buffer types, as identified and discussed n and implementation of the landscape plan, which will be used 8. rity. r the proposed development project, which identifies the roject Coordinator. This should be prepared in a letter format, ct Coordinator.
CITY OF MAPLE RIDGE PLANNING DEPARTMENT Agricultural Impact Assessment Guidelines An Agricultural Impact Assessment (AIA) is required as part of a Farm Protection Development Permit (FPDP) application. These guidelines have been created to assist applicants wi, necessary for completing an AIA. A. PREPARATION OF AIA An AIA must be prepared by a professional agrologist with a AIA reports. All reports shall be submitted in a digital for must be submitted in a format that is compatible with reports and attachments must also be provided at , and plans shall be signed, sealed, and dated by the approp A Coordinated Assessment Strategy for the p member who will act as the Project Coordinat signed by the Project Coordinator (see Appendix C. COMPONENTS OFT erience in preparing ping components r opies of all s, opinions, hich identifies the project n a letter format, written and .~ Planning Department, the AIA report must 1. 2. a. appropriate far velopment proposal; associated with the proposal and indicate the range of ay cause adverse impacts on agriculture. lanning Policies and Regulations ion 8.14 of Official Community Plan) for guidance and identify the b. Read through rel nt provisions of the: i. Official Community Plan: Specifically, for guidance on related agricultural policies in Chapter 6, Section 6.2 Agricultural Opportunities. Also, ensure AIA compliance with the following OCP sections, where applicable: • Watercourse Protection Development Permit Area Guidelines; • Natural Features Development Permit Area Guidelines; • Wildfire Development Permit Area Guidelines. ii. Zoning Bylaw; iii. Subdivision and Development Servicing Bylaw;
iv. Watercourse Protection Bylaw; v. Tree Protection and Management Bylaw; vi. Development Procedures Bylaw; vii. any other applicable municipal bylaws. c. Discuss how the proposed development is consistent with the above applicable policies and bylaws. If the application is for a rezoning or an Official Community Plan amendment, include a discussion on what, if any, impacts to farm activities, on the adjacent agricultural land, may be caused or intensified by a land use change on the subject site. 3. On-Site and Surrounding Area Physical Resource Inventory 4. a. Describe potential drainage impacts that can lead to flooding, er, how existing drainage patterns will be affected, and how ro control will be handled so as not to impact adjoining land b. Describe proposed on-site land improvements and downstream well water and septic systems. If any including on i. identify and explain appropriate mitigati ii. C. irrigation water. See t unique site conditions. in the Urban Reserve and areas pt, Assessment (GIA) will be cting groundwater recharge or age contamination of well and n preparing a GIA study. d. In some cases, th llowing areas: II. b. i. blowdo ii. iii. acts s that the proposal will generate and the effects that noise generated proposed , . velopment may have on production for farm animals and birds. , lume and concentration of air emissions that the proposal will generate y may have on crops and animals. a. Describe how the site is served by transportation routes and how accessibility to neighbouring farm properties by farm machinery and farming efficiencies may be affected by the proposed non-farm development. Include consideration of any anticipated restrictions on the movement of farm vehicles and access to fields, impacts on safety with regard to traffic volumes and speeds, contaminants from road run-off or ditch irrigation water, and the use of pesticides for weed control along roads.
Ill. b. Discuss any need to upgrade roads to serve both the proposed use and the farming community. Impacts to Flexibility in Future Farm Uses a. Discuss the effects of the proposed development on flexibility of adjacent agricultural lands to accommodate changes in types of farming, for example, from cash crops to livestock, expansion of livestock facility, or to farming activity that requires construction of greenhouse(s) or warehouse building(s). b. Generally discuss the potential cumulative impacts to farming of he proposed development in the context of other nearby (within 30m of non-farm use 0,..-,,,.,.~n""~isting and future non-farm developments. 5. Mitigative Measures a. Recommend strategies to minimize residential/ag · b. i. trespass onto farmland; ii. theft of crops; iii. bird and animal harassment; iv. vandalism to land, buildings and equip V. vi. -of five types discussed in ed development and include r the landscape buffer. i. If an altern · agrolog· able 1 of FPDP, is identified by the priate des· n and width for the subject site and adja but. ay be supportable. To propose an alternative .r the alternative buffer must be prepared and for review and confirmation on whether the s that are commended for the proposed development and also the FPDP. Include discussion on how potential impacts to te to nature of development and/or land use, additional or measi s are recommended to prevent conflicts. , , ions on notification signs that could be included, as a condition of ure that the presence of surrounding agricultural operations are vise future land owners that those operations may be subject to future in production. 6. Ongoing Care and aintenance of Landscape Buffer a. Include recommendations on the ongoing care and maintenance of the landscape buffer* and include discussion on: i. the first three years after planting; ii. implementation of best practices that will ensure long-term survival and effectiveness of the landscape buffer; · I r
* b. Include a cost estimate for construction of the landscape buffer, which will be used to determine the landscape security amount. The landscape security will be provided as a requirement for approval and issuance of the FPDP. The establishment and inspection of the landscape buffer will follow the process outlined below for release of the landscape security. c. A Letter of Inspection from the professional who completed the landscape buffer design, confirming that the landscape buffer plant materials are deemed to be healthy and that any maintenance requirements are being followed, is a requirement for return of the security provided (see Appendix B). None of the landscape security is to be released until a report is received stating that all of the landscape tree and plant materials re healthy. The inspection process that will determine release of the security will be as foll~, s., i. 151 Year Landscape Buffer Report: One year after pla . · has been completed, the City will expect an inspection report from the professi ,. designed the buffer on the health of all trees and plant materials. If the re II are healthy, 50% of the landscape buffer will be released. ii. 2nd Year Landscape Buffer Report: Two ':I. .a s iii. City will expect an inspection report, a plant materials are healthy, 90% o mount will be released. nviron ental studies are required as part of a n B above, Coordination of Development P process o mes is most appropriate for determining the step is intended to ensure a coordinated communication ects of a complex development application and ensure that
APPENDIX A Coordinated Assessment Strategy Statement (CASS) All applications for a Rezoning, Subdivision, or Development Permit must include the assignment of one member of the development team to act as a Project Coordinator. The Project Coordinator must be identified when the supporting applications and detailed submissions are made prior to second reading of the rezoning applic tion. The role of the Project Coordinator is to ensure that the work the development is coordinated in all aspects of the propo sign-offs, etc. do not conflict, but are coordinated. The ex not make a recommendation for a design or activit consultant's recommendations for the developme brought to the applicant's attention by staff, oft because key sign-offs cannot be given, or revisj) 1. 3. nd signed by the Project Coordinator, and .-nvironmental Services, and include the Coordinator that he/she has reviewed all of the there are no incompatibilities with regard to dards, policies, or guidelines resulting from the work/reports sultants; 4. The letter is to be copied to the professional consultants who are part of the coordinated team, and submitted as part of the detailed submission of consultant reports, plans and other supporting materials when detailed information is submitted with required applications prior to second reading. Note: Failure to prepare a CASS as described above may result in a delay to processing your development application.
APPENDIX B Letter of Inspection from the Professional Agrologist To: The City of Maple Ridge From: (insert name and company of Professional Agrologi RE: Final Inspection for Development located at This is to certify that in accordance with Official Comm Development Permit Guidelines, dated • , and p the Professional Agrologist identified in thi 1. 2. Professional Agrologist Signature Protection
TO: FROM: J. • • • British Columbia City of Maple Ridge mapleridge.ca His Worship Mayor Michael Morden and Members of Council Chief Administrative Officer MEETING DATE: April 9, 2019 FILE NO: MEETING: Council Workshop SUBJECT: Updated Maple Ridge Zoning Bylaw No. 7600-2019; First Reading EXECUTIVE SUM MARY: The attached report is scheduled to be on the next Council Meeting agenda for discussion and consideration of the recommendation. The Council Workshop forum provides an extended opportunity for Council to seek additional information if required, prior to decision-making. RECOMMENDATION: That the attachment to the April 9, 2019 Council Workshop report titled "Updated Maple Ridge Zoning Bylaw No. 7600-2019; First Reading" be forwarded to the next Council Meeting. Approved b~cer Attachment: • Updated Maple Ridge Zoning Bylaw No. 7600-2019; First Reading-staff report dated April 9, 2019 Doc # 2186330 Page 1 of 1 4.3
TO: FROM: City of Maple Ridge His Worship Mayor Michael Morden and Members of Council Chief Administrative Officer MEETING DATE: FILE NO: ATTN: April 9, 2019 2018-394-RZ Council Workshop SUBJECT: Updated Maple Ridge Zoning Bylaw No. 7600-2019; First Reading EXECUTIVE SUMMARY: The Planning Department is pleased to submit for Council's consideration the updated Maple Ridge Zoning Bylaw No.7600-2019 (Schedule A). The bylaw is the result of an extensive, complicated and lengthy review and consultation process geared towards achieving a modern and user friendly update of the current Zoning Bylaw No. 3510-1985, which is over three decades old. We believe we have achieved these goals with this amended bylaw and are proud of the hard work and tenacity of all staff who have worked on the project. In summary the bylaw applies to all lands in the City and consists of the following regulations: • Definitions and Interpretations; • Basic Provisions of Uses, Zones, Parking and Loading, Enforcement and Prohibitions; • General Regulations for the Use of Lands, Buildings and Structures; • Specific Regulations for the Use of Lands, Buildings and Structures; • Regulations for Size, Shape and Siting of Buildings and Structures; • Waste and Energy Regulations, Landscaping, Fencing and Screening Regulations; • Land Use Zones (Agricultural, Residential, Commercial, Industrial, Institutional and CD zones; and Schedules. RECOMMENDATION: 1. That Maple Ridge Zoning Bylaw No. 7600-2019 be given first reading. BACKGROUND: The Zoning Bylaw is, by its very nature, a complicated document being both regulatory in nature, rich in detail and extensive in length and content. The bylaw's impact is significant; influencing directly the form our community takes and the opportunities, activities and land uses permitted. The Zoning Bylaw is essentially the engine that powers and gives form to the vision outlined in the Official Community Plan. Given these characteristics, the Zoning Bylaw should be described as a living document. As a living document it must remain both relevant and flexible enough to respond to new initiatives by Council, the community and other interested parties. Therefore, a Zoning Bylaw is never truly complete or finished. Page 1 of 6
The existing Zoning Bylaw No. 3510-1985 has been amended in various ways on a regular basis. It can be expected that changes and challenges to provisions of the new Zoning Bylaw No. 7600-2019 will also occur frequently. In fact, provincial legislation envisions the need and grants the power to make such change via: bylaw amendments, Development Variance Permits; Board of Variance appeals and legal court challenges. It should also be expected that normal housekeeping amendments to the Zoning Bylaw will be required to keep the bylaw relevant. New Council initiatives are also examples of positive change that will impact the new Zoning Bylaw. DISCUSSION The new Zoning Bylaw is a significant piece of work and therefore, it is useful to briefly review the history, goals, and efforts in the past that have culminated in the new bylaw. The City has had three comprehensive Zoning Bylaws since the early 1960s, each of which acted as a foundation for the next and introduced new components that were relevant at that time. Zoning Bylaws are technical and "organic "in nature (i.e. always evolving or reacting to new trends and policies) and are expected to ensure consistency for implementation. The City's current Zoning Bylaw is no exception to this and has been amended innumerable times since 1985. The goal of the Zoning Bylaw review has always been to achieve an updated bylaw that: • Aligns with current regulatory language, Provincial legislation and policies in the Official Community Plan; • Identifies and resolves issues/concerns raised by the public, the development community and City Departments; • Responds to new market trends and the City's sustainability goals and vision; • Improves consistency and a format that is user-friendly, easily interpreted, enforceable and effective in regulating land use in the City; and • Reduces the number of variance requests. To achieve these goals the following steps have occurred: • Council has continued to support a Zoning Bylaw modernization effort; • Early efforts focused on important background work such as: information gathering; research of issues and problem identification; coordinating with other departments for their specific areas of concern; tracking historical bylaw revisions; looking at various alternative bylaw formats; testing other formats as examples and identifying key deficiencies and inconsistencies. This ground work was accomplished internally with existing resources to streamline the review process; • In general, the scope of the review included the following: identification of issues, concerns and discrepancies; reformatting for ease of use and language; review of all zones (except CD Zones) and definitions for consistency and modernization; introduction of graphics and illustrations to improve ease of use and understanding; introduction of new provisions that reflect the goals and objectives of Council and the Official Community Plan; Page 2 of 6 I I
• Countless staff meetings, formal joint departmental working group meetings, and a number of technical and workshop sessions were held with developer representatives. They provided both useful feedback and constructive input some of which has already been implemented such as the adoption of a uniform building height for single family dwellings to reduce the number of Development Variance Permits requested; • Consultation sessions were held with the public, developer's representatives, and Council; • A complete legal review of the bylaw has been completed to ensure its enforceability; • Moving the bylaw forward as one entire project has proven difficult given heavy development workloads, limited staff resources and new and competing priorities. Therefore, it was decided to incrementally move elements of the new Zoning Bylaw forward as applications are received, opportunities arose and Council priorities dictated. The following provisions of the existing Zoning Bylaw have already been updated: enlarged use of secondary suites in residential zones; increased building heights for residential zones; new fence provisions, prohibition of certain uses such as payday loans, M-2 zone Auto Wrecking, shipping containers; updated Home Based Business Regulations; Farm Home Plate and numerous text amendments. These past incremental changes have reduced the scope and significance of the new changes being introduced with the new bylaw; and • There is also work recently completed or currently underway on Council priority items such as: new duplex, triplex, four-plex and court yard housing provisions, additional secondary suite and detached garden suite regulations, and rental housing and density bonus provisions that will carry on through to the new bylaw. In addition, existing and new Council initiatives in the future will also trigger additional Zoning Bylaw amendments pertaining to the implementation of the: Housing Action Plan; Agricultural Plan; and other policy work. It is important to note that there have been countless changes that can best be described as housekeeping and updating but there are also some significant changes. Most significant is the reorganization and rationalizing of the bylaw to be user friendly, consistent, updated and logical in organization and modern in look, format and language. There are many minute changes in the bylaw that cannot be noted in a simple staff report. Therefore, the new bylaw should be read by those interested in its entirety. An additional housekeeping item is to correct small zoning boundary irregularities for approximately 200 properties to bring the zoning boundary in line with the property boundaries, and to rezone a few properties for which the zoning is not consistent with the existing uses. The list of properties is attached as Appendix C. Another significant addition is the introduction of Floor Space Ratio (FSR) restrictions to the single-family residential zones to regulate the size, scale and massing of residential development. Such restrictions are a key component of all modern bylaws and very common throughout the region. In Maple Ridge this restriction previously only applied to multi-family development. Other important changes are: a table of contents of the bylaw for ease of use; a comprehensive definition section with graphic displays and links to the related bylaw section, one consistent bylaw format; consolidated landscape requirements for all zones; consolidated General Regulations section in alphabetical order; new Waste and Energy Regulations; separate zoning sheets for each zone all reproduced in the same style and format; and reorganized bylaw schedules with the resulting updated zoning map and diagrams. Page 3 of 6
Council Endorsed Process Prior to commencing the Zoning Bylaw review, staff prepared a process report which identified the key steps and process for reviewing the bylaw. The following chart illustrates the process: Next Steps: We are here-Pursuant with the Council endorsed process, once first reading is granted to the Zoning Bylaw No. 7600-2019, referrals for comments should be made to the Urban Development Institute (UDI) and Canadian Home Builders Association of BC, the School District, the Agricultural Land Commission and the Ministry of Transportation and Infrastructure (MOTi). A public open house with newspaper notification will occur before second reading. Any comments received may require revisions to the bylaw. Once completed, second reading will be considered by Council and a Public Hearing date set. Third reading and final adoption could then occur at Council's discretion. Staff would then engage in some updating of documents and staff training sessions to bring employees of the various departments up to speed on the changes within Zoning Bylaw 7600-2019. As with all zoning bylaw changes the normal notification process required by provincial legislation should be followed to adopt this new bylaw. The normal notification process of newspaper notification and a public hearing will occur. This will permit all interested parties an opportunity to review the new bylaw and to understand any possible impacts. To remind Council, there have been a number of meetings with the development community in the past to make them aware of the new bylaw and its content. A number of stakeholder meeting or workshops were held with interested parties as shown as Appendix B. They were supportive of the bylaw update effort and its contents. Again it should be noted that many of the bylaw changes first envisioned have been already implemented incrementally over time. Page 4 of 6
------=-~=------,·-·~------------~ Transition Process from Old to New Zoning Bylaw The transition from an old zoning bylaw to a new zoning bylaw can be tricky due to the fact that there are many amending bylaws at various stages making their way through the bylaw approval process. Amending bylaws that reference the existing Zoning Bylaw (3510-1985) could be stranded in the approval process if no transitioning strategy is considered when the new Zoning Bylaw (7600-2019) is adopted. Making this transition even more difficult is the fact that timing is often determined by the applicant's decision to provide the necessary information, securities and legal documents to proceed. The City always has some older zoning amendment bylaws siting for long periods of time without being able to be approved. A zoning amendment bylaw that cannot proceed because the underlying bylaw has been repealed becomes orphaned and in limbo. Therefore, to avoid this, it is proposed that Maple Ridge Zoning Bylaw No. 3510-1985 not be rescinded immediately with the adoption of the new Maple Ridge Zoning Bylaw No. 7600-2019. This approach will leave the City with two zoning bylaws for a short period of time. This will essentially allow all existing amending bylaws amending the old Zoning Bylaw (3510-1985) to complete as normal. This will avoid a lengthy review of all the existing bylaws and the necessary work to bring them into conformity with the new Zoning Bylaw (7600-2019) or having to process many new variance applications. The new Zoning Bylaw (7600-2019) will be used for all new rezoning applications made after the bylaw adoption, which is when it comes into legal force. Council will be asked to pass a resolution authorize this transition strategy in the final reading report for the new Zoning Bylaw (7600-2019). All existing applications will be monitored to determine, depending on where they are in the approval process, if they can be transitioned to the new Zoning Bylaw (7600-2019) or not. Typically, a bylaw that has been given third reading under the old Zoning Bylaw (3510-1985) will proceed under the old Zoning Bylaw (3510-1985), thus avoiding the need for a second Public Hearing on solely technical grounds. Applications that have only received first and second reading can still be amended to reference the New Zoning Bylaw No. 7600-2019 and proceed to Public Hearing. However, care will need to be taken by staff to ensure each proposal conforms in every way to the new Zoning Bylaw (7600-2019), if not, the old Zoning Bylaw (3510-1985) will be used. Eventually the existing amending bylaws currently in the approval process will either complete or expire and the old Zoning Bylaw (3510-1985) will be repealed. Thus, leaving the City again with only one Zoning Bylaw (7600-2019). CONCLUSION: The importance of a clear, concise, legally enforceable and user-friendly Zoning Bylaw is the goal of Council and this review. The Zoning Bylaw Review is a significant piece of work that will need to be continually monitored into the future as circumstances change for the City. However, the proposed new bylaw is a significant improvement over the existing bylaw and one we can be proud of. Page 5 of 6
APPENDIX B OUTSIDE AGENCY CONTACT LIST (Local Developers, Realtors, Architects, Surveyors, Builders) I ··.;~;iJ:~;\•.\i.-•~\· ,;-,,-.: COMPANY. .(:."' .. ;·.\ .~: -~· .... ,:-: ,. ,,. ~ :.!--;~ ~f ~. : TITLE :·;~ .:.~_~: 1 Valley Geotechnical Engineer Remax Realty Realtor I Wayne Bissky Architecture Architect D K Bowlns & Associates Surveyor Consultant Past Employee Consultant Progressive Construction Project Manager Di Giovanni Land Surveyors Surveyor Slade Oyer & Associates Consultant Concordia Homes Developer Qakvale Homes Builder Renlsary Homes Builder Falcon Homes Builder/Developer Garcia Zunino Architects Architect Heffelfinger Designs Ltd. Designer Graham Hoffart Mathiason Architecture Architect Damax Consultants Ltd. Engineer Parklane Homes Portrait Homes Builder/Developer ' Coldwell Banker. Realtor Stan Wade & Associates Surveyor Realtor I I Realtor/Builder I I Builder ABM Engineering Engineer Epic Homes Developer
ITEM# HOUSE# STREET
1 24652 lOOAAVE
2 east of 24225 104 AVE
3 24185 106B AVE
4 24185 106B AVE
5 24185 106BAVE
6 . 24185 106B AVE
7 24185 106B AVE
8 24185 106B AVE
9 24185 106B AVE
10 24185 106BAVE
11 24185 106B AVE
12 24185 106B AVE
13 24185 106B AVE
PID
028-946-553
PARK
027-063-950
027-063-968
027-063-976
027-063-984
027-063-992
027-064-000
027-139-921
027-330-991
027-331-008
0 27-331-016
027-331-024
LEGAL DESCRIPTION
LT 8, SEC 3, TWP 12, NWD, EPP23645
SEC 10, TWP 12, NWD, BCP48970 DEDICATED PARK
LT 3, SEC 10, TWP 12, GP 1, BCS2331 TOGETHER WITH AN INTERE ST IN TH E COMMON
PROPERTY IN PROPORTION TO THE UNIT ENTITLEMENT OF THE STRATA LT AS SHOWN ON
FORM V.
LT 4, SEC 10, TWP 12, GP 1, BCS2331 TOGETH ER WITH AN INTEREST IN THE CO MMON
PROPERTY IN PROPORTION TO THE UNIT ENTITLEMENT OF TH E ST RATA LT AS SHO W N ON
FORM V.
LT 5, SEC 10, TWP 12, GP 1, BCS2331 TOGE TH ER WITH AN I NTERE ST IN THE COMMON
PROPERTY IN PROPORTI ON TO THE UNIT EN TI TLEMENT OF THE ST RATA LT A S SHOWN ON
FORM V .
LT 6, SEC 10, TWP 12, GP 1, BCS2331 TOGETHER WITH AN INTEREST IN THE COMMON
PROPERTY IN PROPORTION TO THE UNIT ENTITLEMENT OF THE STRATA LT AS SHO WN ON
FORM V.
LT 7, SEC 10, TWP 12, GP 1, BCS2331 TOGETHER WITH AN INTEREST IN THE COMMON
PROPERTY IN PROPORTION TO THE UNIT ENTITLEMENT OF THE STRATA LT AS SHOWN ON
FORM V .
LT 8, SEC 10, TWP 12, GP 1, TOGETHER WITH AN INTEREST IN THE COMMON PROP ERTY IN
PROPORTION TO THE UNIT ENTITLEMENT O F THE STRATA LT AS SH OWN ON FOR M V .
LT 9, SEC 10, TWP 12, GP 1, BCS2331 TOGETHER WITH AN INTEREST IN T HE COMMON
PROPERTY IN PROPORTION TO THE UNIT ENTITLEMENT OF THE STRATA LT AS SHOWN ON
FORM V.
LT 25, SEC 10, TWP 12, GP 1, BCS2331 TOGETHER WITH AN IN TER EST IN THE COMMON
PROPERTY IN PROPORTION TO THE UNIT ENTITLEMENT OF THE STRATA LT AS SHOWN ON
FORM V.
LT 26, SEC 10, TWP 12, GP 1, BCS2331 TOGETHER WITH AN I N T ERES T IN THE COM M ON
PROPERTY IN PROPORTION TO THE UNIT ENTITLEMENT OF TH E STRATA LT AS SHO WN ON
FORM V.
LT 27, SEC 10, TWP 12, GP 1, BCS2331 TOG ET HER W ITH AN INT ER EST IN THE COMMON
PROPERTY IN PROPORTION TO THE UN IT EN T ITLEMENT OF THE ST RATA LT AS SHOWN ON
FORM V .
LT 28, SEC 10, TWP 12, GP 1, BCS2331 TOGETHER WITH AN INTEREST IN THE COMMON
PROPERTY IN PROPORTION TO THE UNIT ENTITLEMENT OF THE STR ATA LT AS SHO WN ON
FORM V.
)>
""CJ
""CJ rr, z
0
><
(")
14 24185 1068 AVE 027-331-032 LT 29, SEC 10, TWP 12, GP 1, 8CS2331 TOGETHER WITH AN INTEREST IN THE COMMON
PROPERTY IN PROPORTION TO THE UNIT ENTITLEMENT OF THE STRATA LT AS SHOWN ON
FORM V .
15 24185 1068 AVE 027-331-041 LT 30, SEC 10, TWP 12, GP 1, 8CS2331 TOGETHER WITH AN INTEREST IN THE COMMON
PROPERTY IN PROPORTION TO THE UNIT ENTITLEMENT OF THE STRATA LT AS SHOWN ON
FORM V.
16 24185 1068 AVE 027-331-059 LT 31, SEC 10, TWP 12, GP 1, 8CS2331 TOGETHER WITH AN INTEREST IN THE COMMON
PROPERTY IN PROPORTION TO THE UNIT ENTITLEMENT OF THE STRATA LT AS SHOWN ON
FORM V.
17 24185 1068 AVE 027-331-067 LT 32, SEC 10, TWP 12, GP 1, 8CS2331 TOGETHER WITH AN INTEREST IN THE COMMON
PROPERTY IN PROPORTION TO THE UNIT ENTITLEMENT OF THE STRATA LT AS SHOWN ON
FORM V.
18 24185 1068AVE 027-350-061 LT 33, SEC 10, TWP 12, GP 1, 8CS2331 TOGETHER WITH AN INTEREST IN THE COMMON
PROPERTY IN PROPORTION TO THE UNIT ENTITLEMENT OF THE STRATA LT AS SHOWN ON
FORM V.
19 24185 1068 AVE 027-350-070 LT 34, SEC 10, TWP 12, GP 1, 8CS2331 TOGETHER WITH AN INTEREST IN THE COMMON
PROPERTY IN PROPORTION TO THE UNIT ENTITLEMENT OF THE STRATA LT AS SHOWN ON
FORM V.
20 24185 1068 AVE 027-350-088 LT 35, SEC 10, TWP 12, GP 1, 8CS2331 TOGETHER WITH AN INTEREST IN THE COMMON
PROPERTY IN PROPORTION TO THE UNIT ENTITLEMENT OF THE STRATA LT AS SHOWN ON
FORM V.
21 24185 1068 AVE 027-350-096 LT 36, SEC 10, TWP 12, GP 1, 8CS2331 TOGETHER WITH AN INTEREST IN THE COMMON
PROPERTY IN PROPORTION TO THE UNIT ENTITLEMENT OF THE STRATA LT AS SHOWN ON
FORM V.
22 24185 1068 AVE 027-350-100 LT 37, SEC 10, TWP 12, GP 1, 8CS2331 TOGETHER WITH AN INTEREST IN THE COMMON
PROPERTY IN PROPORTION TO THE UNIT ENTITLEMENT OF THE STRATA LT AS SHOWN ON
FORM V .
23 24185 1068AVE 027-350-118 LT 38, SEC 10, TWP 12, GP 1, 8CS2331 TOGETHER WITH AN INTEREST IN THE COMMON
PROPERTY IN PROPORTION TO THE UNIT ENTITLEMEN T OF THE STRATA LT AS SHOWN ON
FORM V.
24 24185 1068 AVE 027-350-126 LT 39, SEC 10, TWP 12, GP 1, 8CS2331 TOGETHER WITH AN INTEREST IN THE COMMON
PROPERTY IN PROPORTION TO THE UNIT ENTITLEMENT OF THE STRATA LT AS SHOWN ON
FORM V.
25 24185 1068 AVE 027-350-134 LT 40, SEC 10, TWP 12, GP 1, 8CS2331 TOGETHER WITH AN INTEREST IN THE COMMON
PROPERTY IN PROPORTION TO THE UNIT ENTITLEMENT OF THE STRATA LT AS SHOWN ON
FORM V .
26 24185 106B AVE 027-541-398 LT 41, SEC 10, TWP 12, GP 1, BCS2331 TOGETHER WITH AN INTEREST IN THE COMMON
PROPERTY IN PROPORTION TO THE UNIT ENTITLEMENT OF THE STRATA LT AS SHOWN ON
FORM V .
27 24185 106B AVE 027-541-401 LT 42, SEC 10, TWP 12, GP 1, BCS2331 TOGETHER WITH AN INTEREST IN THE COMMON
PROPERTY IN PROPORTION TO THE UNIT ENTITLEMENT OF THE STRATA LT AS SHOWN ON
FORM V.
28 24185 106B AVE 027-541-410 LT 43, SEC 10, TWP 12, GP 1, BCS2331 TOGETHER WITH AN INTEREST IN THE COMMON
PROPERTY IN PROPORTION TO THE UNIT ENT ITLEMENT OF THE STRATA LT AS SHOWN ON
FORM V.
29 24185 106B AVE 027-541-428 LT 44, SEC 10, TWP 12, GP 1, BCS2331 TOGETHER WITH AN INTEREST IN THE COMMON
PROPERTY IN PROPORTION TO THE UNIT ENTITLEMENT OF THE STRATA LT AS SHOWN ON
FORM V.
30 24185 106B AVE 027-541-436 LT 45, SEC 10, TWP 12, GP 1, BCS2331 TOGETHER WITH AN INTEREST IN THE COMMON
PROPERTY IN PROPORTION TO THE UNIT ENTITLEMENT OF THE STRATA LT AS SHOWN ON
FORM V.
31 24185 106B AVE 027-541-444 LT 46, SEC 10, TWP 12, GP 1, BCS2331 TOGETHER WITH AN INTEREST IN THE COMMON
PROPERTY IN PROPORTION TO THE UNIT ENTITLEMENT OF THE STRATA LT AS SHOWN ON
FORM V .
32 24185 106B AVE 027-541-452 LT 47, SEC 10, TWP 12, GP 1, BCS2331 TOGETHER WITH AN INTEREST IN THE COMMON
PROPERTY IN PROPORTION TO THE UNIT ENTITLEMENT OF THE STRATA LT AS SHOWN ON
FORM V .
33 24185 106B AVE 027-541-461 LT 48, SEC 10, TWP 12, GP 1, BCS2331 TOGETHER WITH AN INTEREST IN THE COMMON
PROPERTY IN PROPORTION TO THE UNIT ENTITLEMEN T OF THE STRATA LT AS SHOWN ON
FORM V.
34 24185 106B AVE 027-541-479 LT 49, SEC 10, TWP 12, GP 1, BCS2331 TOGETHER WITH AN INTEREST IN THE COMMON
PROPERTY IN PROPORTION TO THE UNIT ENTITLEMENT OF THE STRATA LT AS SHOWN ON
FORM V.
35 24185 106BAVE 027-541-487 LT 50, SEC 10, TWP 12, GP 1, BCS2331 TOGETHER WITH AN INTEREST IN THE COMMON
PROPERTY IN PROPORTION TO THE UNIT ENTITLEMENT OF THE STRATA LT AS SHOWN ON
FORM V.
36 24185 106B AVE 027-644-511 LT 52, SEC 10, TWP 12, GP 1, BCS2331 TOGETHER WITH AN INTEREST IN THE COMMON
PROPERTY IN PROPORT ION TO THE UNIT ENTITLEMENT OF THE STRATA LT AS SHOWN ON
FORM V.
37 24185 106BAVE 027-644-596 LT 60, SEC 10, TWP 12, GP 1, BCS2331 TOGETHER WITH AN INTEREST IN THE COMMON
PROPERTY IN PROPORTION TO THE UNIT ENTITLEMENT OF THE STRATA LT AS SHOWN ON
FORM V.
38 24185 106B AVE 028-068-530 LT 61, SEC 10, TWP 12, GP 1, BCS2331 TOGETHER WITH AN INTEREST I N THE COMMON
PROPERTY IN PROPORTION TO THE UNIT ENTITLEMENT OF THE STRATA LT AS SHOWN ON
FORM V.
39 24185 106B AVE 028-068-548 LT 62, SEC 10, TWP 12, GP 1, BCS2331 TOGETHER WITH AN INTEREST IN THE COMMON
PROPERTY IN PROPORTION TO THE UNIT ENTITLEMENT OF THE STRATA LT AS SHOWN ON
FORM V .
40 24185 106B AVE 028-068-556 LT 63, SEC 10, TWP 12, GP 1, BCS2331 TOGETHER WITH AN INTEREST IN THE COMMON
PROPERTY IN PROPORTION TO THE UNIT ENTITLEMENT OF THE STRATA LT AS SHOWN ON
FORM V.
41 24185 106B AVE 028-068-564 LT 64, SEC 10, TWP 12, GP 1, BCS2331 TOGETHER WITH AN INTEREST IN THE COMMON
PROPERTY IN PROPORTION TO THE UNIT ENTITLEMENT OF THE STRATA LT AS SHOWN ON
FORM V.
42 24185 106BAVE 028-068-572 LT 65, SEC 10, TWP 12, GP 1, BCS2331 TOGETHER WITH AN INTEREST IN THE COMMON
PROPERTY IN PROPORTION TO THE UNIT ENTITLEMENT OF THE STRATA LT AS SHOWN ON
FORM V.
43 24185 106B AVE 028-068-581 LT 66, SEC 10, TWP 12, GP 1, BCS2331 TOGETHER WITH AN I NTEREST IN THE COMMON
PROPERTY IN PROPORTION TO THE UNIT ENTITLEMENT OF THE STRATA LT AS SHOWN ON
FORM V.
44 24185 106B AVE 028-068-599 LT 67, SEC 10, TWP 12, GP 1, BCS2331 TOGETHER WITH AN INTEREST IN THE COMMON
PROPERTY IN PROPORTION TO THE UNIT ENTITLEMENT OF THE STRATA LT AS SHOWN ON
FORM V.
45 24185 106B AVE 028-068-602 LT 68, SEC 10, TWP 12, GP 1, BCS2331 TOGETHER WITH AN INTEREST IN THE COMMON
PROPERTY IN PROPORTION TO THE UNIT ENTITLEMENT OF THE STRATA LT AS SHOWN ON
FORM V.
46 24185 106BAVE 028-068-611 LT 69, SEC 10, TWP 12, GP 1, BCS2331 TOGETHER WITH AN INTEREST I N THE COMMON
PROPERTY IN PROPORTION TO THE UNIT ENTITLEMENT OF THE STRATA LT AS SHOWN ON
FORM V .
47 24185 106B AVE 028-068-629 LT 70, SEC 10, TWP 12, GP 1, BCS2331 TOGETHER WITH AN INTEREST IN THE COMMON
PROPERTY IN PROPORTION TO THE UNIT ENTITLEMENT OF THE STRATA LT AS SHOWN ON
FORM V.
48 24185 106B AVE 028-275-403 LT 71, SEC 10, TWP 12, GP 1, BCS2331 TOGETHER WITH AN INTEREST IN THE COMMON
PROPERTY IN PROPORTION TO THE UNIT ENTITLEMENT OF THE STRATA LT AS SHOWN ON
FORM V.
49 24185 106B AVE 028-275-756 LT 72, SEC 10, TWP 12, GP 1, BCS2331 TOGETHER WITH AN INTEREST IN THE COMMON
PROPERTY IN PROPORTION TO THE UNIT ENTITLEMENT OF THE STRATA LT AS SHOWN ON
FORM V .
50 24185 106B AVE 028-275-764 LT 73, SEC 10, TWP 12, GP 1, BCS2331 TOGETHER WITH AN I NTEREST IN THE COMMON
PROPERTY IN PROPORTION TO THE UNIT ENTITLEMENT OF THE STRATA LT AS SHOWN ON
FORM V.
51 24185 106B AVE 028-275-772 LT 74, SEC 10, TWP 12, GP 1, BCS2331 TOGETHER WITH AN INTEREST IN THE COMMON
PROPERTY IN PROPORTION TO THE UNIT ENTITLEMENT OF THE STRATA LT AS SHOWN ON
FORM V.
52 24185 106B AVE 028-275-781 LT 75, SEC 10, TWP 12, GP 1, BCS2331 TOGETHER WITH AN INTEREST IN THE COMMON
PROPERTY IN PROPORTION TO THE UNIT ENTITLEMENT OF THE STRATA LT AS SHOWN ON
FORM V.
53 24185 106B AVE 028-275-799 LT 76, SEC 10, TWP 12, GP 1, BCS2331 TOGETHER WITH AN INTEREST IN THE COMMON
PROPERTY IN PROPORTION TO THE UNIT ENTITLEMENT OF THE STRATA LT AS SHOWN ON
FORM V.
54 24185 106B AVE 028-339-762 LT 77, SEC 10, TWP 12, GP 1, BCS2331 TOGETHER WITH AN INTEREST IN THE COMMON
PROPERTY IN PROPORTION TO THE UNIT ENTITLEMENT OF THE STRATA LT AS SHOWN ON
FORM V.
55 24185 l06B AVE 028-339-771 LT 78, SEC 10, TWP 12, GP 1, BCS2331 TOGETHER WITH AN INTEREST IN THE COMMON
PROPERTY IN PROPORTION TO THE UNIT ENTITLEMENT OF THE STRATA LT AS SHOWN ON
FORM V.
56 24185 106B AVE 028-339-789 LT 79, SEC 10, TWP 12, GP 1, BCS2331 TOGETHER WITH AN INTEREST IN THE COMMON
PROPERTY IN PROPORTION TO THE UNIT ENTITLEMENT OF THE STRATA LT AS SHOWN ON
FORM V.
57 24185 106B AVE 028-340-094 LT 80, SEC 10, TWP 12, GP 1, BCS2331 TOGETHER WITH AN INTEREST IN THE COMMON
PROPERTY IN PROPORTION TO THE UNIT ENTITLEMENT OF THE STRATA LT AS SHOWN ON
FORM V.
58 24185 106BAVE 028-355-539 LT 82, SEC 10, TWP 12, GP 1, BCS2331 TOGETHER WITH AN INTEREST IN THE COMMON
PROPERTY IN PROPORTION TO THE UNIT ENTITLEMENT OF THE STRATA LT AS SHOWN ON
FORM V.
59 24185 106B AVE LT A, SEC 10, TWP 12, GP 1, Except Plan BCS2331, EXC PH 1, 2, 3 , 4, 5, 6, 7, 8 , 9, 10, 11 & 12
BCP25215
60 24185 106B AVE 027-063-933 LT 1, SEC 10, TWP 12, GP 1, BCS2331 TOGETHER WITH AN INTEREST IN THE COMMON
PROPERTY IN PROPORTION TO THE UNIT ENTITLEMENT OF THE STRATA LT AS SHOWN ON
FORM V.
61 24185 106B AVE 027-063-941 LT 2, SEC 10, TWP 12, GP 1, BCS2331 TOGETHER WITH AN INTEREST IN THE COMMON
PROPERTY IN PROPORTION TO THE UNIT ENTITLEMENT OF THE STRATA LT AS SHOWN ON
FORM V .
62 24185 106BAVE 027-139-930 LT 10, SEC 10, TWP 12, GP 1, BCS2331 TOGETHER WITH AN INTEREST IN THE COMMON
PROPERTY IN PROPORTION TO THE UNIT ENTITLEMENT OF THE STRATA LT AS SHOWN ON
FORM V.
---~ ·l
63 24185 106B AVE 027-139-948 LT 11, SEC 10, TWP 12, GP 1, BCS2331 TOGETHER WITH AN IN T EREST IN THE COMMON
PROPERTY IN PROPORTION TO THE UNIT EN TI TLEMENT OF THE STRATA LT AS SHO WN ON
FORM V.
64 24185 106B AVE 027-139-956 LT 12, SEC 10, TWP 12, GP 1, BCS2331 TOGETHER WITH AN INTER EST IN THE CO MMO N
PROPERTY IN PROPORTION TO THE UN IT ENTITLEMENT OF T HE ST RATA LT AS SHO WN ON
FORM V .
65 24185 106B AVE 027-139-964 LT 13, SEC 10, TWP 12, GP 1, BCS2331 TOGETHER WITH AN INTEREST IN THE CO M MON
PROPERTY IN PROPORTION TO THE UNIT ENTITLEMENT OF THE ST RATA LT AS SHO WN ON
FORM V .
66 24185 106B AVE 027-139-972 LT 14, SEC 10, TWP 12, GP 1, BCS2331 TOGETHER WITH A N IN T EREST IN TH E COM M O N
PROPERTY IN PROPORTION TO THE UNIT ENTITLEMENT OF THE STRATA LT AS SHO WN ON
FORM V .
67 24185 106BAVE 027-139-981 LT 15, SEC 10, TWP 12, GP 1, BCS2331 TOGE T HER WITH AN INTEREST IN THE COM M O N
PROPERTY IN PROPORTION TO THE UNIT ENTITLEMENT OF T HE ST RATA LT AS SHO WN ON
FORM V.
68 24185 106B AVE 027-139-999 LT 16, SEC 10, TWP 12, GP 1, BCS2331 TOGETHER WITH AN INTEREST IN THE CO M MON
PROPERTY IN PROPORTION TO THE UNIT ENTITLEMENT OF THE ST RATA LT AS SHO WN ON
FORM V.
69 24185 106B AVE 027-280-047 LT 19, GP 1, PL BCS2331 TOGETHER W ITH AN INTEREST IN THE COMMON PROPERTY IN
PROPORTION TO THE UNIT ENTITLEMENT OF THE STRATA LT AS SHOWN ON FORM V .
70 24185 106B AVE 027-280-021 LT 17, GP 1, TOGETHER WITH AN INTEREST IN THE COMMON PROPERTY IN PROPORT ION TO
THE UNIT ENTITLEMENT OF THE STRATA LT AS SHOWN ON FORM V .
71 24185 106B AVE 027-280-039 LT 18, SEC 10, TWP 12, PL BCS2331 TOGETHER WITH AN INTEREST IN THE COMMON
PROPERTY IN PROPORTION TO THE UNIT ENTITLEMENT OF THE ST RATA LT AS SHO WN ON
FORM V.
72 24185 106B AVE 027-280-055 LT 20, SEC 10, TWP 12, PL BCS2331 TOGETHER WITH AN INTEREST IN THE COMMON
PROPERTY IN PROPORTION TO THE UNIT ENTITLEMENT OF THE STRATA LT AS SHO WN ON
FORM V .
73 24185 106B AVE 027-280-063 LT 21, SEC 10, TWP 12, PL BCS2331 TOGETHER WITH AN INTEREST IN THE COMMON
PROPERTY IN PROPORTION TO THE UNIT ENTITLEMENT OF THE ST RATA LT AS SHO WN ON
FORM V.
74 24185 106B AVE 027-280-071 LT 22, SEC 10, TWP 12, PL BCS2331 TOGETHER WITH AN INTEREST IN THE COMMON
PROPERTY IN PROPORTION TO THE UNIT ENTITLEMENT OF THE ST RATA LT AS SHO WN ON
FORM V.
75 24185 106BAVE 027-280-080 LT 23, SEC 10, TWP 12, PL BCS2331 TOGETHER WITH AN INTEREST IN THE COMMON
PROPERTY IN PROPORTION TO THE UNIT ENTITLEMENT OF THE STRATA LT AS SHO WN ON
FORM V.
76 24185 106B AVE 027-280-098 LT 24, SEC 10, TWP 12, PL BCS2331 TOGETHER WITH AN INTEREST IN THE COMMON
PROPERTY IN PROPORTION TO THE UNIT ENTITLEMENT OF THE ST RATA LT AS SHOWN ON
FORM V.
77 24185 106B AVE BCP25215, SEC 10, TWP 12 Except Plan BCX2331 PH 1, 2 3, 4, 5, 6, 7
78 24185 106B AVE 027-644-502 LT 51, GP 1, SEC 10, TWP 12, BCS2331 TOGETHER WITH AN INTEREST IN THE CO MMON
PROPERTY IN PROPORTION TO THE UNIT ENTITLEMENT OF THE ST RATA LT AS SHO WN ON
FORM V.
79 24185 106B AVE 027-644-529 LT 53, GP 1, SEC 10, TWP 12, BCS2331 TOGETHER WITH AN INTEREST IN THE COMMON
PROPERTY IN PROPORTION TO THE UNIT ENTITLEMENT OF THE STRATA LT AS SHOWN ON
FORM V.
80 24185 106B AVE 027-644-537 LT 54, GP 1, SEC 10, TWP 12, BCS2331 TOGE THER WITH AN INTEREST IN THE COM M ON
PROPERTY IN PROPORTION TO THE UNIT ENTITLEMENT OF THE ST RATA LT AS SHO WN ON
FORM V .
81 24185 106B AVE 027-644-545 LT 55, GP 1, SEC 10, TWP 12, BCS2331 TOGETHER WITH AN INTEREST IN THE CO MMO N
PROPERTY IN PROPORTION TO THE UNIT ENTITLEMENT OF THE ST RATA LT AS SHOWN ON
FORM V.
82 24185 106B AVE 027-644-553 LT 56, GP 1, SEC 10, TWP 12, BCS2331 TOGETHER WITH AN INTEREST IN THE COMMON
PROPERTY IN PROPORTION TO THE UNIT ENTITLEMENT OF THE STRATA LT AS SHO WN ON
FORM V.
83 24185 106B AVE 027-644-561 LT 57, GP 1, SEC 10, TWP 12, BCS2331 TOGETHER WITH AN I NTEREST IN THE COM M ON
PROPERTY IN PROPORTION TO THE UNIT EN TI TLEMENT OF THE ST RATA LT AS SHOWN ON
FORM V.
84 24185 106B AVE 027-644-570 LT 58, GP 1, SEC 10, TWP 12, BCS2331 TOGETHER WITH AN IN TEREST IN THE COMMON
PROPERTY IN PROPORTION TO THE UNIT ENTITLEMENT OF THE ST RATA LT AS SHO WN ON
FORM V.
85 24185 106B AVE 027-644-588 LT 59, GP 1, SEC 10, TWP 12, BCS2331 TOGETHER WITH AN INTEREST IN THE CO MMON
PROPERTY IN PROPORTION TO THE UNIT ENTITLEMENT OF THE ST RATA LT AS SHOWN ON
FORM V.
86 24185 106B AVE 028-355-521 LT 81, SEC 10, TWP 12, GP 1, BCS2331 TOGETHER WITH AN IN T EREST IN THE COMMON
PROPERTY IN PROPORTION TO THE UNIT ENTITLEMENT O F THE STRATA LT AS SHO WN ON
FORM V.
87 24185 106B AVE 028-355-54 7 LT 83, SEC 10, TWP 12, GP 1, BCS2331 TOGETHER WITH AN INTEREST IN THE COM MON
PROPERTY IN PROPORTION TO THE UNIT ENTITLEMENT OF THE STRATA LT AS SHOWN ON
FORM V.
88 24185 106B AVE 028-355-555 LT 84, SEC 10, TWP 12, GP 1, BCS2331 TOGETHER WITH AN INTEREST IN THE COMMON
PROPERTY IN PROPORTION TO THE UNIT ENTITLEMENT OF THE STRATA LT AS SHO WN ON
FORM V.
89 24185 106BAVE 028-355-563 LT 85, SEC 10, TWP 12, GP 1, BCS2331 TOGETHER WITH AN INTEREST IN THE COM MON
PROPERTY IN PROPORTION TO THE UNIT ENTITLEMENT OF THE ST RATA LT AS SHO WN ON
FORM V.
90 24185 106B AVE 028-355-571 LT 86, SEC 10, TWP 12, GP 1, BCS2331 TOGETHER WITH AN INTEREST IN THE COMMON
PROPERTY IN PROPORTION TO THE UNIT ENTITLEMENT OF THE ST RATA LT AS SHO WN ON
FORM V.
91 24185 106B AVE 028-355-580 LT 87, SEC 10, TWP 12, GP 1, BCS2331 TOGETHER WITH AN INTEREST IN THE COM M ON
PROPERTY IN PROPORTION TO THE UNIT ENTITLEMENT OF THE ST RATA LT AS SHOWN O N
FORM V.
92 24185 106B AVE 028-355-598 LT 88, SEC 10, TWP 12, GP 1, BCS2331 TOGETHER WITH AN INTEREST IN THE COM M ON
PROPERTY IN PROPORTION TO THE UNIT ENTITLEMENT OF THE STRATA LT AS SHO WN ON
FORM V.
93 24185 106B AVE 028-564-251 LT 89, SEC 10, TWP 12, GP 1, BCS2331 TOGETHER WITH AN INTEREST IN THE COM MON
PROPERTY IN PROPORTION TO THE UNIT ENTITLEMENT OF THE STRATA LT AS SHOWN ON
FORM V.
94 24185 106B AVE 028-564-260 LT 90, SEC 10, TWP 12, GP 1, BCS2331 TOGETHER WITH AN I NTEREST IN THE COMMON
PROPERTY IN PROPORTION TO THE UNIT ENTITLEMENT OF THE ST RATA LT AS SHOWN ON
FORM V .
95 24185 106BAVE 028-564-278 LT 91, SEC 10, TWP 12, GP 1, BCS2331 TOGETHER WITH AN INTEREST IN THE COM M ON
PROPERTY IN PROPORTION TO THE UNIT ENTITLEMENT OF THE STRATA LT AS SHO WN ON
FORM V.
96 24185 106BAVE 028-564-286 LT 92, SEC 10, TWP 12, GP 1, BCS2331 TOGE THER WITH AN INTER EST IN THE COM M ON
PROPERTY IN PROPORTION TO THE UNIT ENTITLEMENT OF THE STRATA LT AS SHO WN ON
FORM V.
97 24185 106B AVE 028-564-294 LT 93, SEC 10, TWP 12, GP 1, BCS2331 TOGETHER WITH AN INTEREST IN THE COM MON
PROPERTY IN PROPORTION TO THE UNIT ENTITLEMENT OF TH E STRATA LT AS SHO WN ON
FORM V .
98 24185 106B AVE 028-564-308 LT 94, SEC 10, TWP 12, GP 1, BCS2331 TOGETHER WITH AN INTEREST IN THE COMMON
PROPERTY IN PROPORTION TO THE UNIT ENTITLEMENT OF THE ST RATA LT AS SHO WN ON
FORM V .
99 24185 106B AVE 028-564-316 LT 95, SEC 10, TWP 12, GP 1, BCS2331 TOGETHER WITH AN INT EREST IN THE COMMON
PROPERTY IN PROPORTION TO THE UNIT ENTITLEMENT OF THE STRATA LT AS SHO WN ON
FORM V.
100 24185 1068 AVE 028-564-324 LT 96, SEC 10, TWP 12, GP 1, 8CS2331 TOGETHER WITH AN INTEREST IN THE COMMON
PROPERTY IN PROPORTION TO THE UNIT ENTITLEMENT OF THE STRATA LT AS SHOWN ON
FORM V.
101 24185 1068 AVE 028-729-854 LT 97, SEC 10, TWP 12, GP 1, 8CS2331 TOGETHER WITH AN INTEREST IN THE COMMON
PROPERTY IN PROPORTION TO THE UNIT ENTITLEMENT OF THE STRATA LT AS SHOWN ON
FORM V .
102 24185 1068AVE 028-729-862 LT 98, SEC 10, TWP 12, GP 1, 8CS2331 TOGETHER WITH AN INTEREST I N THE COMMON
PROPERTY IN PROPORTION TO THE UNIT ENTITLEMENT OF THE STRATA LT AS SHOWN ON
FORM V.
103 24185 1068 AVE 028-729-871 LT 99, SEC 10, TWP 12, GP 1, 8CS2331 TOGETHER WITH AN INTEREST IN THE COMMON
PROPERTY IN PROPORTION TO THE UNIT ENTITLEMENT OF THE STRATA LT AS SHOWN ON
FORM V.
104 24185 1068AVE 028-729-889 LT 100, SEC 10, TWP 12, GP 1, 8CS2331 TOGETHER WITH AN INTEREST I N THE COMMON
PROPERTY IN PROPORTION TO THE UNIT ENTITLEMENT OF THE STRATA LT AS SHOWN ON
FORM V .
105 24185 1068 AVE 028-729-897 LT 101, SEC 10, TWP 12, GP 1, 8CS2331 TOGETHER WITH AN I NTEREST IN THE COMMON
PROPERTY IN PROPORTION TO THE UNIT ENTITLEMENT OF THE STRATA LT AS SHOWN ON
FORM V .
106 24185 1068AVE 028-729-901 LT 102, SEC 10, TWP 12, GP 1, 8CS2331 TOGETHER WITH A N INTEREST IN THE COMMON
PROPERTY IN PROPORTION TO THE UNIT ENTITLEMENT OF THE STRATA LT AS SHOWN ON
FORM V.
107 24185 1068 AVE 028-729-919 LT 103, SEC 10, TWP 12, GP 1, 8CS2331 TOGETHER WITH AN I NTEREST IN THE COMMON
PROPERTY IN PROPORTION TO THE UNIT ENTITLEMENT OF THE STRATA LT AS SHOWN ON
FORM V .
108 24185 1068 AVE 028-729-927 LT 104, SEC 10, TWP 12, GP 1, 8CS2331 TOGETHER WITH AN INTEREST IN THE COMMON
PROPERTY IN PROPORTION TO THE UNIT ENTITLEMENT OF THE STRATA LT AS SHOWN ON
FORM V.
109 24977 109 AVE 029-899-826 LT 4, GP 1, SEC 11, TWP 12, NWD, EPP60956
110 24981 109 AVE 029-899-834 LT 5, GP 1, SEC 11, TWP 12, NWD, EPP60956
111 25215 llOAVE 028-284-879 LOT 98, GP 1, SEC 11, TWP 12, EPS234 TOGETHER WITH AN I NTEREST IN THE COMMON
PROPERTY IN PROPORTION TO THE UNIT ENTITLEMENT OF THE STRATA LT AS SHOWN ON
FORM V.
112 24359 113 AVE 029-685-478 LT 45, SEC 15, TWP 12, NWD,EPP54924
113 26795 122 AVE 028-979-745 LT 13, SEC 19, TWP 15, NWD, EPP22559
114 23164 123 AVE 025-692-577 LT 7, GP 1, SEC 20, TWP 12, NWD, PL 8CP6236
115 21944 124 AVE 008-376-328 LT 186, DL 396, NWD, GP 1, Except Plan LMP18829, Plan 37141
116 26610 124 AVE LT 9, Part SW 1/4 Except Plan 8CP33185, SEC 19, TWP15, PL 8097
117 east of 26580 124 AVE PARK SEC 19, TWP 15, EPP22887 DEDICATED PARK
-,-
118 23375 124AAVE 005-397-928 GP 1, Except Plan 85151, LT 15, SEC 21, TWP 12, NWD, PL40700
119 24011 127B AVE 030-279-569 LT 2, SEC 22, TWP 12, NWD, EPP72767
120 24019 127B AVE 030-279-577 LT 3, SEC 22, TWP 12, NWD, EPP72767
121 130A AVE at 239B ST Red Alder Park SEC 28, TWP 12, NWD, BCP42361 DEDICATED PARK
122 23862 133 AVE 023-928-689 GP 1, E 1/2, LT 40, SEC 28, TWP 12, NWD, PL LMP35466
123 23852 133 AVE 023-928-697 GP 1, E 1/2, LT 41, SEC 28, TWP 12, NWD, PL LMP35466
124 23933 133 AVE 024-791-423 LT 6, GP 1, SEC 28, TWP 12, NWD, PL LMP46247
125 east of 23933 133 AVE PARK GP 1, E 1/2 LMP35466 -PARK ADJACENT TO LT 1 & LTS 60 TO 64 SEC 28, TWP 12, NWD,
LMP46247
126 23117 134 LOOP 030-195-705 LT 15, GPl, SEC 29, TWP 12, NWD, EPP658 4 9
127 12566 223 ST 030-079-764 LT 1, GP 1, DL 400, NWD, EPP65486
128 13757 230A ST 028-350-308 LT 108, SEC 32, TWP 12, NWD, BCP46218
129 south of 12231 232 ST PARK GP 1, DEDICATED PARK ADJACENT TO LOTS 5 TO 10 OF PL BCP6236, SEC 20, TWP 12, NWD,
BCP6236
130 11160 234A ST BCS2566
131 11160 234A ST 027-253-571 LT 1, GP 1, TOGETHER WITH AN INTEREST IN THE COMMON PROPERTY IN PROPORTION TO
THE UNIT ENTITLEMENT OF THE STRATA LT AS SHOWN ON FOR M V.
132 11160 234A ST 027-253-589 LT 2, GP 1, PLAN BCS 2566 TOGETHER WITH AN INTEREST IN THE COMMON PROPERTY IN
PROPORTION TO THE UNIT ENTITLEMENT O F THE STRATA LT AS SHOWN ON FORM V .
133 11160 234A ST 027-253-597 LT 3, GP 1, PLAN BCS 2566 TOGETHER WITH AN INTEREST IN THE COMMON PROPERTY IN
PROPORTION TO THE UNIT ENTITLEMENT OF THE STRATA LT AS SHOWN ON FORM V.
134 11160 234A ST 027-253-601 LT 4, GP 1, PLAN BCS 2566 TOGETHER WITH AN INTEREST IN THE COMMON PROPERTY IN
PROPORTION TO THE UNIT ENTITLEMENT OF THE STRATA LT AS SHOWN ON FORM V .
135 11160 234A ST 027-253-619 LT 5, GP 1, PLAN BCS 2566 TOGETHER WITH AN INTEREST IN THE COMMON PROPER TY IN
PROPORTION TO THE UN IT ENTITLEMENT OF THE STRATA LT AS SHOWN ON FOR M V.
136 11160 234A ST 027-253-627 LT 6, GP 1, PLAN BCS 2566 TOGETHER WITH AN INTEREST IN THE COMMON PROPER TY IN
PROPORTION TO THE UNIT ENTITLEMENT OF THE STRATA LT AS SHOWN ON FORM V.
137 11160 234A ST 027-253-635 LT 7, GP 1, PLAN BCS 2566 TOGETHER WITH AN INTEREST IN THE COMMON PROPER TY IN
PROPORTION TO THE UNIT ENTITLEMENT OF THE STRATA LT AS SHOWN ON FORM V .
138 11160 234A ST 027-253-643 LT 8, GP 1, PLAN BCS 2566 TOGETHER WITH AN INTEREST IN THE COMMON PROPERTY IN
PROPORTION TO THE UNIT ENTITLEMENT OF THE STRATA LT AS SHOWN ON FORM V.
139 11160 234A ST 027-253-651 LT 9, GP 1, PLAN BCS 2566 TOGETHER WITH AN INTEREST IN THE COMMON PROPERTY IN
PROPORTION TO THE UNIT ENTITLEMENT OF THE STRATA LT AS SHOWN ON FORM V .
140 11160 234A ST 027-253-660 LT 10, GP 1, PLAN BCS 2566 TOGETHER WITH AN INTEREST IN THE COMMON PROPERTY IN
PROPORTION TO THE UNIT ENTITLEMENT OF THE STRATA LT AS SHOWN ON FORM V.
141 11160 234A ST 027-253-678 LT 11, GP 1, PLAN BCS 2566 TOGETHER WITH AN INTEREST IN THE COMMON PROPER TY IN
PROPORTION TO THE UNIT ENTITLEMENT OF THE STRATA LT AS SHOWN ON FORM V.
142 11160 234A ST 027-253-686 LT 12, GP 1, PLAN BCS 2566 TOGETHER WITH AN INTEREST IN THE COMMON PROPERTY IN
PROPORTION TO THE UNIT ENTITLEMENT OF THE STRATA LT AS SHOWN ON FORM V .
143 11160 234A ST 027-253-694 LT 13, GP 1, PLAN BCS 2566 TOGETHER WITH AN INTEREST IN THE COMMON PROPERTY IN
PROPORTION TO THE UNIT ENTITLEMENT OF THE STRATA LT AS SHOWN ON FOR M V.
144 11160 234A ST 027-253-708 LT 14, GP 1, PLAN BCS 2566 TOGETHER WITH AN INTEREST IN THE COMMON PROPERTY IN
PROPORTION TO THE UN IT ENTITLEMENT OF THE STRATA LT AS SHOWN ON FORM V.
145 11160 234A ST
146 11160 234A ST 027-264-840 LT 16, GP 1, BCS2566 TOGETHER WITH AN INTEREST IN THE COMMON PROPERTY IN
PROPORTION TO THE UNIT ENTITLEMENT OF THE STRATA LT AS SHOWN ON FORM V.
147 11160 234A ST 027-264-831 LT 15, GP 1, BCS2566 TOGETHER WITH AN INTEREST IN THE COMMON PROPERTY IN
PROPORTION TO THE UNIT ENTITLEMENT OF THE STRATA LT AS SHOWN ON FORM V .
148 11160 234A ST 027-264-858 LT 17, GP 1, BCS2566 TOGETHER WITH AN INTEREST IN THE CO MMON PROPERT Y I N
PROPORTION TO THE UNIT ENTITLEMENT OF THE STRATA LT AS SHOWN ON FORM V.
149 11160 234A ST 027-264-866 LT 18, GP 1, BCS2566 TOGETHER WITH AN INTEREST IN THE COMMON PROPERTY IN
PROPORTION TO THE UNIT ENTITLEMENT OF THE STRATA LT AS SHOWN ON FORM V.
150 11160 234A ST 027-264-874 LT 19, GP 1, BCS2566 TOGETHER WITH AN INTEREST IN THE COMMON PROPERTY IN
PROPORTION TO THE UNIT ENTITLEMENT OF THE STRATA LT AS SHOWN ON FORM V .
151 11160 234A ST 027-264-882 LT 20, GP 1, BCS2566 TOGETHER WITH AN INTEREST IN THE COMMON PROPERTY IN
PROPORTION TO THE UNIT ENTITLEMENT OF THE STRATA LT AS SHOWN ON FORM V .
152 11160 234A ST 027-264-891 LT 21, GP 1, BCS2566 TOGETHER WITH AN INTEREST IN THE COMMON PROPERTY IN
PROPORTION TO THE UNIT ENTITLEMENT OF THE STRATA LT AS SHOWN ON FORM V .
153 11160 234A ST 027-264-904 LT 22, GP 1, BCS2566 TOGETHER WITH AN INTEREST IN THE CO M MON PROPERTY IN
PROPORTION TO THE UNIT ENTITLEMENT OF THE STRATA LT AS SHOWN ON FOR M V .
154 11160 234A ST 027-264-912 LT 23, GP 1, BCS2566 TOGETHER WITH AN INTEREST IN THE COMMON PROPERTY I N
PROPORTION TO THE UNIT ENTITLEMENT OF THE STRATA LT AS SHOWN ON FORM V .
155 11160 234A ST 027-264-921 LT 24, GP 1, BCS2566 TOGETHER WITH AN IN T EREST IN THE CO M MON PROPERTY IN
PROPORTION TO THE UNIT ENTITLEMENT OF THE STRATA LT AS SHOWN ON FOR M V .
156 11160 234A ST 027-264-939 LT 25, GP 1, BCS2566 TOGETHER WITH AN INTEREST IN THE CO M MON PROPERT Y I N
PROPORTION TO THE UNIT ENTITLEMENT OF THE STRATA LT AS SHOWN ON FOR M V .
157 11160 234A ST 027-264-947 LT 26, GP 1, BCS2566 TOGETHER WITH AN INTEREST IN THE COMMON PROPERTY IN
PROPORTION TO THE UN IT ENTITLEMENT OF THE STRATA LT AS SHOWN ON FORM V .
158 11160 234A ST 027-264-955 LT 27, GP 1, BCS2566 TOGETHER WITH AN INTEREST IN THE CO M MON PROPERTY IN
PROPORTION TO THE UNIT ENTITLEMENT OF THE ST RATA LT AS SHOWN ON FOR M V .
159 11160 234A ST 027-264-963 LT 28, GP 1, BCS2566 TOGETHER WITH AN INTEREST IN THE COMMON PROPERTY I N
PROPORTION TO THE UNIT ENTITLEMENT OF THE STRATA LT AS SHOWN ON FOR M V .
160 13425 235 ST 028-047-486 LT 18, GPl, SEC 28, TWP 12, NWD, BCP42355
161 13443 235 ST 028-047-524 LT 22, GP 1, SEC 28, TWP 12, NWD, BCP42355
162 11962 236 ST BCS1441
163 13050 237A ST 029-931-363 LT 11, SEC 28, TWP 12, NWD, EPP60509
164 10695 239 ST 026-358-034 LT 1, GP 1, DL 408, NWD, PL BCP18894
165 13219 239B ST 026-279-711 LT 5, SEC 28, TWP 12, NWD, PL BCP17359
166 13223 239B ST 026-279-720 LT 6, SEC 28, TWP 12, NWD, PL BCP17359
167 13227 239B ST 026-279-738 LT 7, SEC 28, TWP 12, NWD, PL BCP17359
168 13231 239B ST 026-279-746 LT 8, SEC 28, TWP 12, NWD, PL BC Pl 7359
169 13245 239B ST 026-279-789 LT 12, SEC 28, TWP 12, NWD, PL BCP17359
170 13013 239B ST 028-067-185 LT 4, SEC 28, TWP 12, NWD, BCP42732
171 9996 240A ST 024-943-878 LT 16, GP 1, SEC 3, TWP 12, NWD, PL LMP4 8725
172 12530 241 ST LMS3755
173 10155 247 ST 030-083-109 LT 4, SEC 3, TWP 12, NWD, EPP68470
174 10767 248 ST 009-770-267 Parcel A, EXPL PL 17117 LT 2, SEC 10, TWP 1 2, PL 13100
175 10811 256 ST 017-501-334 Parcel A, Part NE 1/4, GP 1, SEC 11, TWP 12, PL LMP1489
176 280 ST 027-775-194 PCL A, GP 1, SEC 16, TWP 15, NWD, BCP39 4 35
177 25721 east of 24166 MCCLURE DR PARK GP 1, DEDICATED PARK BESIDE PARK BCP438, SEC 10, TWP 12, NWD, PLAN BCP 8 153
178 11843 BURNED ST 001-109-731 LT 167, Part NE 1/4, GP 1, SEC 17, TWP 12, NWD, PL 43930
179 11903 BURNETIST 009-150-587 LT 7, BLK 2, Part NE 1/4 GP 1, SEC 17, TWP 12, NWD, PL 220 4 6
180 11851 BURNETIST 009-150-650 LT 11, Part NE 1/4, GP 1, SEC 17, TWP 12, NWD, PL 2204 6,
181 11075 CARMICHAEL ST 028-284-747 LOT 85, GP 1, SEC 11, TWP 12, EPS234 TOGETHER WITH A N IN TER EST IN THE CO MMON
PROPERTY IN PROPORTION TO THE UNIT EN TITLEMENT OF TH E STRATA LT AS SHO W N ON
FORM V.
182 11043 CARMICHAEL ST 028-284-771 LOT 88, GP 1, SEC 11, TWP 12, EPS23 4 TOGETHER WITH AN INTER EST IN THE CO M M ON
PROPERTY IN PROPOR TI ON TO THE UNIT EN TITLEMENT OF TH E STRATA LT AS SHO WN ON
FORM V.
183 east of 11720 COTIONWOOD DI PARK GP 1, Dedicated PARK Adjacent to PCL A, SEC 16, TWP 12, NWD, PL LMP4 2851
184 COTIONWOOD DR/234A ST PARK BCP8026, SEC 16, TWP 12 PARK
185 22753 DEWDNEY TRUNK RD 011-333-316 Parcel A, Part W 1/2, EXP PL 12239, Except Pt Rd PL 61650, LT 1, SEC 20, TWP 12, NWD, PL
8333
186 24015 FERN CRES 002-761-289 LT 41, SEC 22, TWP 12, NWD, PL 39367
187 24003 FERN CRES 010-605-240 LT 27, GP 1, SEC 22, TWP 12, NWD, PL 21921
188 22893 GILLIS PL 004-398-696 LT 17, GP 1, DL 402, NWD, PL 71904
189 25350 GODWIN DR 028-284-674 LOT 78, GP 1, SEC 11, TWP 12, EPS234 TOGETHER WITH AN INTEREST IN THE COM M ON
PROPERTY IN PROPORTION TO THE UNIT ENTITLEMEN T OF TH E STRATA LT AS SHO WN ON
FORM V.
190 11275 HARRISON ST 004-398-548 LT 3, GP 1, DL 402, NWD, PL 71904
191 11279 HARRISON ST 004-398-556 LT 4, GP 1, DL 402, NWD, PL 71904
192 11283 HARRISON ST 004-398-564 LT 5, GP 1, DL 402, NWD, PL 71904
193 11287 HARRISON ST 004-398-581 LT 6, GP 1, DL 4 02, NWD, PL 71904
194 11291 HARRISON ST 004-398-599 LT 7, GP 1, DL 402, NWD, PL 71904
195 11295 HARRISON ST 004-398-602 LT 8, GP 1, DL 402, NWD, PL 71904
196 11299 HARRISON ST 004-398-611 LT 9, GP 1, DL 402, NWD, PL 71904
197 11301 HARRISON ST 004-398-629 LT 10, GP 1, DL 402, NWD, PL 71904
198 11305 HARRISON ST 004-398-637 LT 11, GP 1, DL 402, NWD, PL 71904
199 11309 HARRISON ST 004-398-645 LT 12, GP 1, DL 402, NWD, PL 71904
200 22718 HOLYROOD AVE 025-112-511 LT 22, GP 1, DL 402, NWD, PL LMP50997
201 11762 LAITY ST 026-329-875 LT 1, GP 1, DL 248, NWD, PL BCP18456
202 20503 LOUGHEED HWY 024-828-971 Parcel 1, GP 1, DL 222, NWD, LMP46838
203 22799 LOUGHEED HWY 002-206-587 LT 5, DL 401, NWD, GP 1, Except Plan RP80528, Plan 13497
204 23075 LOUGHEED HWY 014-508-397 Parcel L, GP 1, NWD, Except Plan 4834, REF PL 3957, O F PC L J REF PL 3829, DL 402 & 4 03, &
EXC PT S OF RD SRW PL 4834, SRW PL 71204.
205 23423 LOUGHEED HWY 011-345-853 Parcel A, GP 1, Portion OF LT 7, Except Plan SRW 65178, (RP 13150) PL8827
206 22890 PURDEY AVE 019-201-001 LOT 1, GP 1, LMS1887 TOGETHER WITH AN INTEREST IN THE COMMON PROPER TY IN
PROPORTION TO THE UNIT ENTITLEMENT OF THE STRATA LT AS SHOWN ON FOR M 1 ORV, AS
APPROPRIATE .
207 22892 PURDEY AVE 019-201-010 LOT 2, GP 1, LMS1887 TOGETHER WITH AN IN TEREST IN THE COMMON PROPERTY I N
PROPORTION TO THE UNIT ENTITLEMENT OF THE STRATA LT AS SHOWN ON FORM 1.
208 22890 PURDEY AVE LMS1887
209 13210 SHOESMITH CRES 027-586-979 LOT 8, GP 1, SEC 27, TWP 12, BCS 2979 TOGETHER WITH AN INTEREST IN THE COMMON
PROPERTY IN PROPORTION TO THE UNIT ENTITLEMENT OF THE STRATA LT AS SHOWN ON
FORM V.
210 22889 TELOSKY AVE 004-398-777 LT 22, GP 1, DL 402, NWD, PL 71904
211 22860 TELOSKY AVE PARK DL 402 7 403, GPl, NWD, PL BCP34229 DEDICATED PAR K
212 22878 TELOSKY AVE 027-431-002 LT 4, GP 1, DL 402 & 403, NWD, PL BCP34230
r-
March 25, 2019 Dear Mayor and Council VIA EMAIL KITIMAT District of Kitimat 270 City Centre Kitimat, British Columbia Canada VSC 2H7 Phone 250,632.8900 Fax 250.632.4995 On March 3, 2005, a motorcycle accident occurred that would forever change the life of Ms. Denise Lodge. Her 21-year old son Corey bought his first motorcycle, a high speed 1000cc racing sport bike. He wrote his learners license on the same day. In less than 24 hours he was involved in a fatal accident on the Mala hat Highway. Unable to navigate the turn, the worst possible outcome was realized. From this fateful event grew a movement affectionately known as The Coalition of Riders Educating Youth (C.O.R.E.Y). This alliance was organized by a mother who vowed to change an outdated system of motorcycle laws in an effort to advance motorcycle safety initiatives. Over the past 14 years C.O.R.E.Y has been working with the Government asking for them to give New Riders the Skills to have a safe ride. In 2016, C.O.R.E.Y started working with the RCMP and RoadSafetyBC, presenting to over 7,900 Grade 9 -12 high school students in Northern and Central BC. The interactive discussion brings full awareness of motorcycles to the new drivers as half of the deaths occur because the driver of the other vehicle does not see the motorcyclist. To further highlight the need of this program a recent statistic from the coroner indicates that there were thirty (30) motorcyclist deaths from January to July 2018. This is a 114% increase over the number of motorcyclist deaths occurring from January to July 2017. At the 2016 UBCM Conference the following resolution was submitted by the District, and adopted by the North Central Local Government Association at the conference in Dawson Creek. Due to time constraints the resolution was not considered by the UBCM membership; however, it was endorsed post-conference by the UBCM Community Safety Committee: Graduated Licensing for Motorcycles DISTRICT OF KITIMAT WHEREAS many changes and improvements have occurred regarding the operation of motorcycles including: increased fines for dangerous behavior while riding, mandatory approved helmet laws, and new seating regulations which require that the passenger's feet must remain on the foot pegs to prevent children who are too small from riding as passengers; AND WHEREAS motorcycles make up three per cent of BC's insured vehicles, yet they are involved in approximately eleven per cent of all road fatalities: THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED that the Provincial Government implement the final phase of the graduated licensing program for motorcycles including power restrictions and mandatory training. 5.1 [. I I
As the program has not yet been implemented, The District of Kitimat Mayor and Council are requesting letters of support be written to the Province to finalize and implement the Graduated Licensing Program for Motorcycles {GLP-M), including Power Restrictions and Mandatory Training. We ask that letters of support be forwarded to: Honourable Mike Farnworth, MLA pssg.minister@gov.bc.ca Sincerely, Mayor Phillip Germuth District of Kitimat CoreySafe Society coreysafe@outlook.com