HomeMy WebLinkAbout2019-03-19 Report of Public Hearing .pdf
CITY OF MAPLE RIDGE
REPORT OF PUBLIC HEARING
March 19, 2019
The Report of the Public Hearing held in the Council Chamber of City Hall, 11995 Haney Place, Maple
Ridge, British Columbia on March 19, 2019 at 7:00 p.m.
PRESENT
Elected Officials
Mayor M. Morden
Councillor J. Dueck
Councillor K. Duncan
Councillor C. Meadus
Councillor G. Robson
Councillor R. Svendsen
Councillor A. Yousef
Appointed Staff
K. Swift, Acting Chief Administrative Officer
F. Quinn, General Manager Public Works & Development
Services
L. Benson, Director of Corporate Administration
Other staff as required
D. Pollock, Municipal Engineer
C. Carter, Director of Planning
C. Goddard, Manager of Development and Environmental
Services
D. Hall, Planner 2, Development and Environmental Services
A. Kopystynski, Planner 2, Development and Environmental
Services
W. Cooper, Planner 1, Development and Environmental
Services
Mayor Morden called the meeting to order at 7:03 p.m..
Councillor Duncan entered the meeting at 7:04 p.m.
The Corporate Officer explained the procedure and rules of order of the Public Hearing and advised
that the bylaws will be considered further at the next Council Meeting on April 9, 2019.
The Mayor then called upon Planning Department staff to present the following items on the agenda:
1) 2017-184-RZ
23585 128 Avenue
Lot 24 Section 28 Township 12 New Westminster District Plan 38973
Maple Ridge Official Community Plan Amending Bylaw No. 7530-2019
To re-designate a portion of the subject property from Estate Suburban Residential to
Conservation and Forest and to add to Schedule “C” areas designated as Conservation
and Forest.
Maple Ridge Zone Amending Bylaw No. 7392-2017
A text amendment to the RS-2 (One Family Suburban Residential) zone with density bonus
provisions. The current application is to create a 5 lot subdivision.
D. Hall, Planner 2, Development and Environmental Services, gave a PowerPoint
presentation including the following information:
Applicant Information
Report of Public Hearing
March 19, 2019
Page 2 of 6
Subject Map
Official Community Plan Context
Neighbourhood Plan Context
Site Characteristics
Development Proposal site specific text amendment to create 5 lot subdivision
Proposed Site Plan
Terms and Conditions
The Mayor called three times for speakers. There being no comment, the Mayor declared this item
dealt with.
2) 2013-087-RZ
23500 and 23550 Larch Avenue
Lot 4 Section 28 Township 12 New Westminster District Plan 24142
Lot 38 Section 28 Township 12 New Westminster District Plan 40978
Maple Ridge Official Community Plan Amending Bylaw No. 7526-2018
To amend Schedule “A”, Chapter 10.3, Part VI, A – Silver Valley Area Plan, Figure 2 - Land
Use Plan, and Figure 3C - River Hamlet from Conservation and Neighbourhood Park to
Medium/High Density Residential.
To amend Schedule “A”, Chapter 10.3, Part VI, A – Silver Valley Area Plan, Figure 4 – Trails
/ Open Space to remove from Conservation and to remove from Neighbourhood Park.
To establish a defined boundary between the portion of the site to be developed and the
portion proposed to be developed as Neighbourhood Park to the west.
Maple Ridge Zone Amending Bylaw No. 7068-2014
To rezone from RS-3 (One Family Rural Residential) and RS-2 (One Family Suburban
Residential) to RM-1 (Townhouse Residential) and P-1 (Park and School). The current
application is to allow future development of approximately 19 townhouses with 0.53 ha
(1.3 acres) allocated for a future neighbourhood park and conservation lands.
A. Kopystynski, Planner 2, Development and Environmental Services, gave a PowerPoint
presentation including the following information:
Applicant Information
Subject Map
Official Community Plan Context
Neighbourhood Plan Context
Site Characteristics
Development Proposal
Proposed Site Plan
Site Cross Sections
Site Elevations
Parking revised to deal with units 1 and 2 tandem, 12 units side by side parking
Landscape Plan
Front / Back Yard Elevations
Terms and Conditions
Report of Public Hearing
March 19, 2019
Page 3 of 6
The Mayor called for speakers.
Speaker #1
The speaker noted that his property has flooded twice while construction happens to the south and
west of his property. He asked where the rain water would be going to from this development. The
Architect in attendance noted that a sump pump would be located on Larch Road. The speaker
questioned the status of Fern Crescent. Staff advised of a road right of way which is currently a horse
trail and that there are no plans to extend road. As requested by Council, staff advised that every
development has to go through the Rain Water Management Plan and that other developments will
also require a Storm Water Management plan.
The Mayor called a second and third time for speakers. There being no further comment, the Mayor
declared this item dealt with.
3) 2017-461-RZ
11641 227 Street
Lot 1 District Lot 401 Group 1 New Westminster District Plan BCP24521
Maple Ridge Official Community Plan Amending Bylaw No. 7525-2018
To amend Schedule “A”, Chapter 10.4 Town Centre Area Plan, Schedule 1: Town Centre
Area Land-Use Designation Map from Conservation to Low-Rise Apartment.
To amend Schedule “C” by removing Conservation.
To amend Schedule “A” Chapter 10.4 Town Centre Area plan, Section 3.3 Land Use
Designations, subsection 3-22 Low Rise Apartment by adding text that a low rise
apartment development be of a minimum of six (6) storeys for the subject property.
To amend the Conservation Boundary and to amend the Low Rise Apartment land use
designation to permit a 6 storey development.
Maple Ridge Zone Amending Bylaw No. 7401-2017
To rezone the subject property from RS-1 (One Family Urban Residential) to RM-2 (Medium
Density Apartment Residential). The current application is to permit the future construction
of two residential apartment buildings with approximately 153 residential units. To
accommodate the project, site specific changes to the RM-2 (Medium Density Residential)
zone are required. They are as follows:
1) To increase the permitted net density from 1.8 to 2.0 FSR, and
2) To increase the building height from 15 metres (4 storeys) to 22 metres (6 storeys).
W. Cooper, Planner 1, Development and Environmental Services gave a PowerPoint
presentation including the following information:
Applicant Information
Subject Map
Official Community Plan Context
Neighbourhood Plan Context
Site Characteristics
Report of Public Hearing
March 19, 2019
Page 4 of 6
Development Proposal to construct two residential apartment buildings with
approximately 153 residential units
File History
Zoning Site Specific
Site Plan
Perspective Vignettes
Landscape Plan
Proposed Public Access
Proposed Variances
Terms and Conditions
The Mayor called for speakers.
The Corporate Officer advised that there were 218 letters sent out and that 4 written responses were
received expressing various concerns.
Speakers #1
The speaker spoke against the proposed bylaw noting that the payment in lieu of rental units is far
below that received in other municipalities. The speaker advised that neighbours had originally
supported the development as it would have assisted with the affordable housing crisis in Maple Ridge.
The speaker asked what the final number of storeys was going to be and why neighbours were being
asked to give up their views when the developer was not having to give up the rental units.
Speaker #2
The speaker spoke against the proposed development siting the lack of a clear understanding of the
total number of storey’s proposed, the lack of parking and transportation in the area, and the change
to the character of the area. Staff advised of the process the application will go through in response
to the concerns raised.
Speaker #3
The speaker raised concerns with the lack of housing for those in Maple Ridge who don’t have
privileges we all have. The speaker noted the need for a rental housing component in all developments
and encouraged council to take the concerns of the voter’s into consideration.
Speaker #4
The speaker supports high density housing in Maple Ridge but spoke against the cash in lieu
settlement offered to the developer. The speaker suggested that Council would not be able to build
affordable housing with the cash in lieu payment. The speaker raised concerns with the development
process for this application noting that consultation with the neighbourhood originally showed 4
storeys and expressed concern with the change in storeys and rental housing until the project received
2nd reading. The speaker noted that the compensation for the density bonus and cash in lieu of rental
housing was not adequate.
Speaker #5
The speaker opposed the development noting the increase in storeys and loss of green space. The
speaker raised concerns with the cash in lieu paid for the elimination of the rental housing originally
proposed.
The Mayor called for speakers a second and third time.
Report of Public Hearing
March 19, 2019
Page 5 of 6
Speaker #1
The speaker advised that the development on the site has already started and that the earth piled up
is an eyesore and that water running through the site is running into conservation areas.
Speaker #6
The speaker inquired as to whether the building was going to be wood frame or concrete and what the
provincial building code allowed.
Speaker #7
The speaker raised concerns with Council building purpose built rental housing in one area of the city
versus incorporating rental units in every development and expressed concern that this approach may
result in another Northumberland situation. The speaker suggested in termixing affordable housing
into all future developments. The speaker noted concern with the cash in lieu proposed for this
application noting the need for rental housing.
The architect for the application, Mr. Wayne Bissky of Bissky Architecture provided the following
information in response to the concerns raised:
Rezoning and the Development Permit happen concurrently;
The building was never 4 storeys, the same drawings presented tonight were presented at the
neighbouhood meeting;
The building will be comprised of a steel frame;
The number of parking stalls would be 1.72 per unit which is in excess of the bylaw requirement;
Fire access would be provided in accordance with the bylaw and fire department consultation
and approval; and,
Affordable housing is needed in Maple Ridge and that bylaws have not been amended to keep
up with the demand
Speaker #8
The speaker requested clarification relative to the 4 storeys presented and noted agreement with other
speakers for the need to have mixed housing in all developments.
Mr. Ron Davis of Concordia Homes, the developer for the site, spoke to the difficulty to build affordable
rental units. He advised that the intent is for his family to rent out suites as part of the family portfolio.
He advised that the steel and concrete building design will be similar to that of Emerald Manor which
is largely fire proof. He advised that the building will be fully sprinkled, it will include green features,
outsulation versus insulation, and heat pumps which will result in a very attractive building for
purchase to rent investors.
Speaker #9
The speaker advised that future generations will not be able to afford homes and suggested affordable
housing is needed for both the young and elderly. The speaker expressed con cerns with the cash in
lieu proposed for not delivering the rental housing component.
The Mayor called a final time for speakers.
Speaker #10
The speaker raised the need for affordable housing and suggested that the city look at the model in
Vienna. The speaker urged council not to forgo the rental units originally proposed.
Report of Public Hearing
March 19, 2019
Page 6 of 6
Speaker #11
The speaker raised concerns that the cash in lieu payments will not allow the city to build affordable
integrated housing without ghetto’s being created and the need to address density bonus processes.
The Mayor called again for speakers. Having given all those persons whose interests were deemed
affected by the matters contained herein a chance to be heard, the Mayor adjourned the Public
Hearing at 7:15 p.m.
____________________________
M. Morden, Mayor
Certified Correct
______________________________
L. Benson, Corporate Officer