HomeMy WebLinkAbout2022-09-27 Council Workshop Agenda and Reports.pdfCity of Maple Ridge
COUNCIL WORKSHOP AGENDA
September 27, 2022
9:00 a.m.
Virtual Online Meeting including Council Chambers
The purpose of the Council Workshop is to review and discuss policies and other items of interest to
Council. Although resolutions may be passed at this meeting, the intent is to make a consensus decision
to send an item to Council for debate and vote or refer the item back to staff for more information or
clarification.
The meeting is live streamed and recorded by the City of Maple Ridge.
1. APPROVAL OF THE AGENDA
2. ADOPTION OF MINUTES
2.1 Minutes - September 6, 2022
3. PRESENTATIONS AT THE REQUEST OF COUNCIL
4. UNFINISHED AND NEW BUSINESS
4.1 Port Haney Land Use Policy Review - Engagement Outcomes
Staff report dated September 27, 2022, presenting outcomes from the public
enagagement process and noting next steps in the process.
4.2 Scoping Report for Permitting Secondary Suites in all Single
Detached and Ground -Orientated Duplex Zones
Staff report dated September 27, 2022, recommending that the public
engagement process be endorsed.
4.3 Scoping Report for Short -Term Accommodation Regulatory &
Enforcement Framework
Staff report dated September 27, 2022, recommending that the public
engagement process be endorsed.
5. CORRESPONDENCE
6. BRIEFING ON OTHER ITEMS OF INTEREST/QUESTIONS FROM COUNCIL
7. MATTERS DEEMED EXPEDIENT
Council Workshop Agenda
Tuesday, September 27, 2022
Page 2 of 2
8. NOTICE OF CLOSED COUNCIL MEETING
The meeting will be closed to the public pursuant to Sections 90(1) and 90(2)
of the Community Charter as the subject matter being considered related to the
following;
Section 90(1)(d) the security of property of the municipality; and
Section 90(1)(e) the acquisition, disposition or expropriation of land
of improvements, if the council considers that
disclosure could reasonably be expected to harm
the interests of the municipality.
Any other matter that may be brought before the Council that meets the
requirements for a meeting closed to the public pursuant to Sections 90(1) and
90(2) of the Community Charter or Freedom of Information and Protection of
Privacy Act.
9. ADJOURNMENT
l J I
APPROVED BY:
DATE:
PREPARED BY:
DATE:
CHECKED BY:
DATE: 3 1 2
City of Maple Ridge
COUNCIL WORKSHOP MINUTES
September 6, 2022
The Minutes of the City Council Meeting held on September 6, 2022 at 9:00 a.m. held
virtually and hosted in the Council Chambers of the City Hall, 11995 Haney Place,
Maple Ridge, British Columbia for the purpose of transacting regular City business.
PRESENT
Appointed Staff
Elected Officials
S. Hartman, Chief Administrative Officer
Mayor M. Morden
C. Crabtree, General Manager Corporate Services
Councillor J. Dueck
S. Labonne, General Manager Parks, Recreation & Culture
Councillor C. Meadus
D. Pollock, General Manager Engineering Services
Councillor G. Robson
P. Hlavac-Winsor, General Counsel and Executive Director,
Councillor A. Yousef
Legislative Services, Acting Corporate Officer
A. Nurvo, Deputy Corporate Officer
ABSENT
Councillor K. Duncan
Other Staff as Required
Councillor R. Svendsen
W. Dupley, Director of Economic Development
C. Goddard, Director of Planning
K. Gowan, Planner
F. Smith, Director of Engineering
T. Thompson, Director of Finance
L. Zosiak, Manager of Community Planning
H. Singh, Computer Support Specialist
These Minutes are posted on the City Web Site at www.mapleridge.ca
1. APPROVAL OF THE AGENDA
R/2022-WS-051
It was moved and seconded
That the agenda of the September 6, 2022 Council Workshop Meeting be
approved with amendments removing Item 8 and 9 and renumbering Item 10
as Item 8.
2. ADOPTION OF MINUTES
2.1 Minutes of the July 25 and 26, 2022 Council Workshop Meetings.
R/2022-WS-052
CARRIED
2.1
Council Workshop Minutes
June 14, 2022
Page 2 of 3
It was moved and seconded
That the minutes of the Council Workshop Meetings of July 25 and 26, 2022
be adopted as circulated.
CARRIED
3. PRESENTA TONS A T THE REQUEST OF COUNCIL - N i I
4. UNFINISHED AND NEW BUSINESS
4.1 Post -Secondary Demand
Presentation by Alan Davis, President & Vice Chancellor, Kwantlen Polytechnic
University.
Note: Councillor Robson left the meeting at 9:13 a.m. and returned at 9:14 a.m.
4.2 Parking Bylaw Regulations Review
Staff report dated September 6, 2022, identifying topics within the existing
Parking Bylaw that are likely to see the most change on a preliminary review of
best practices and seeking Council's high-level comments at this stage in the
review process.
L. Zosiak, Manager of Community Planning and K. Gowan, Planner, presented
the recommendations and answered questions from Council. Council provided
feedback and comments on the proposed revisions to the Bylaw.
Note: Councillor Robson left the meeting at 10:08 a.m. and returned at 10:09 a.m.
4.3 Municipal Insurance Association of British Columbia (MIABC) - Voting Delegate
Staff report dated September 6, 2022, recommending appointments for the
Municipal Insurance Association of B.C. 2022 Annual General Meeting.
P. Hlavac-Winsor, General Counsel and Executive Director, Legal & Legislative
Services, Acting Corporate Officer, presented the recommendation and
answered questions from Council.
R/2022-WS-053
It was moved and seconded
That the Chief Administrative Officer be appointed as the voting delegate, the
General Counsel/Acting Corporate Officer as the first alternate and the Policy
Council Workshop Minutes
June 14, 2022
Page 3 of 3
Coordinator as the second alternate for the Municipal Insurance Association of
B.C. 2022 Annual General Meeting.
CARRIED
5. CORRESPONDENCE - N i I
6. BRIEFING ON OTHER ITEMS OFINTEREST/QUESTIONS FROM COUNCIL - N i I
7. MA TIERS DEEMED EXPEDIENT
C. Crabtree provided a brief overview of recent upgrades to the Council
Chambers and advised that staff will provide a more detailed update later in
the fall when the electronic voting system is in place.
8. ADJOURNMENT- 10:33 a.m.
M. Morden, Mayor
Certified Correct
P. Hlavac-Winsor, Acting Corporate Officer
MAPLE RIDGE
��..British Columbia
mapleridge.ca City of Maple Ridge
TO: His Worship Mayor Michael Morden MEETING DATE: September 27, 2022
and Members of Council FILE NO: N/A
FROM: Chief Administrative Officer ATTN: Workshop
SUBJECT: Port Haney Land Use Policy Review - Engagement Outcomes
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY:
The Port Haney and Waterfront Area (Appendix A) represents approximately 11 hectares (27 acres) of
land. The area boundary is set out by the land use designation and policies of the Town Centre Area
Plan. Port Haney is a historic community of Maple Ridge and has recently been experiencing renewed
interest.
Council approved the 'Port Haney Land Use Policy Review' through the endorsement of the 2022
Business Plan at the December 14, 2021 Regular Council Meeting. Subsequently, at the February 8,
2022 Council Workshop, Council endorsed an alternative recommendation and directed land use and
zone amendments related to use and height in the Port Haney Area.
Following that direction, a public engagement process was undertaken in May through June 2022 to
invite community feedback on the proposed changes to the Port Haney land use policies, as discussed
in the Council direction above. The purpose of this report is to present the outcomes from the
engagement process and note the next steps in the process. Overall, through the engagement process,
the community indicated support for eliminating "residential only" zones from the land use
designation; increasing building heights for the area; and requiring ground floor commercial uses. The
engagement process also reaffirmed the Town Centre Area Plan's vision to retain and enhance the
historic character of Port Haney. The complete comments are available in Appendix B.
The completion ofthe public engagement process draws to a close the initial phases of the Port Haney
Land Use Policy Review project. The City is currently completing complementary initiatives that will
inform development in the Port Haney Area. Once preliminary recommendations are available, any
necessary proposed bylaw amendments will be brought forward to a future Committee of the Whole
meeting.
RECOMMENDATION:
For Information only.
1.0 CONTEXT:
1.1 Policy Landscape
The Town Centre Area Plan (TCAP) contains a vision for increased density, a range of mixed -uses,
ample green space, and a pedestrian -oriented environment. A large portion of residential and
commercial growth within Maple Ridge is anticipated for the Town Centre Area, which includes the
historic Port Haney and Waterfront area. During the extensive community consultation for the
development of the TCAP (from 2003 through 2004), the community expressed a desire to retain
Port Haney's historical character and views of the Fraser River, while encouraging revitalization.
Doc#3179192 Page 1 of 6
4.1
There was also interest and support within the community to create a tourist area along the Fraser
River waterfront that includes enhancing the wharf and constructing a boardwalk, with additional
parkland, at the foot of the Port Haney commercial hub.
The Port Haney and Waterfront Area (Figure 1, full size in Appendix A) represents approximately 11
hectares (27 acres) of land. The area boundary is set out by the land use designation and related
policies (see Section 1.2 below for further details) of the TCAP. Supporting the TCAP policies is the
Town Centre Development Permit Area Guidelines (the Guidelines), which contains guiding
principals and objectives that support the development of a compact and complete community
within the Town Centre, where residents have the option to live, work, shop and play in this vibrant
and multi -faceted area of Maple Ridge. Both the TCAP and the Guidelines are included within the
Maple Ridge Official Community Plan, as Sections 10.4 and 8.11, respectively.
1.2 Recent Work
At the September 10, 2019 Council Workshop, the key features of the Town Centre Area Plan (TCAP)
were presented to Council, along with examples of recent development that has proceeded under the
Plan. Through the discussion, there was acknowledgment that the Plan remains relevant in supporting
Council's aims for this area. However, Council indicated that a visioning process would be timely as a
2020 project, to ensure the TCAP land use policies are on track to encourage greater vibrancy as the
area redevelops overtime. As part of the 2020 Business Plan, the Planning Department was tasked
with undertaking a public process for Town Centre Visioning.
At the March 31, 2020 Council Workshop Meeting, Council endorsed the scope of work for the Town
Centre Visioning process and the engagement process ran duringthe summer of 2020. The outcomes
of the engagement process were presented at the February 23, 2021 Council Workshop Meeting,
which reaffirmed that the direction of the Town Centre Area Plan continues to resonate with Maple
Ridge residents today. At that meeting, Council directed staff to assess the recommendations in the
outcomes report to advance ideas aimed at fostering an inclusive, vibrant, and welcoming Town
Centre.
Since then, work to facilitate a successful and economically viable Town Centre has continued through
a number of initiatives, including development of the Community Social Safety Initiative, Economic
Development Strategy, the Strategic Transportation Plan, and the land use review on Cliff Avenue and
Selkirk Ave. each located directly east of the Lougheed Transit Corridor Plan boundary. The subject
`Port Haney Land Use Policy Review' was endorsed through the 2022 Business Plan at the December
14, 2021 Regular Council Meeting.
At the February 8, 2022 Council Workshop, staff presented a public engagement process for Council
to consider. At that meeting, Council endorsed an alternative recommendation and directed:
That staff prepare Official Community Plan and Zone Amending Bylaws to eliminate
"residential only" buildings on vacant or underutilized properties within lands designated as
Port Haney Multi -Family, Commercial, & Mixed -Use and to permit buildings up to 6 storeys in
height, and furthermore, that staff review and update the Town Centre Development Permit
Area Guidelines pertaining to the "Port Haney and Waterfront" precinct to ensure that the
guidelines clearly articulate that future development is to reflect Port Haney's roots and
heritage character.
Doc#3179192 Page 2 of 6
2.0 DISCUSSION
2.1 Public Engagement Process and Outcomes
Following Council's direction to initiate the Port Haney Land Use Policy Review, staff conducted a public
engagement process from May to June 2022. To support the public engagement process, a Port Haney
Land Use Policy webpage was created for sharing information with the public, with a kick-off video that
was posted online. The following engagement opportunities were promoted through a newspapers ad,
letter to residents in Port Haney, and usual City of Maple Ridge Networks:
1. Online Community Survey: The online survey was intended to reach as many members of the
community as possible for input and was available online from Tuesday, May 31, 2022 until
Monday, June 27, 2022. 118 responses were received.
2. Self -Guided Walking Tour: The City provided a self -guided tour route with 6 stops that were
paired with reflective questions to encourage exploration of the Port Haney area. One
Response was received.
3. Email and Phone: Residents who did not prefer to provide feedback through the online survey
were encouraged to reach out to staff by phone or email. Staff received three phone calls and
four emails providing feedback.
The input received from the public engagement process has been summarized in the outcomes section
of this report (see Section 2.1.2 below). A copy of the survey and the verbatim responses are available
in Appendix B as well as a summary of the feedback provided through the self -guided walking tour,
phone, and email.
2.1.1 Public Engagement Outcomes
An online survey that had eleven questions was available for approximately one month. The survey
received 118 responses and 96% of respondents indicated that they live in Maple Ridge and specified
if they lived in (23%) or near the Port Haney Area (43%). Below is a summary of what staff heard
through the engagement process. Copies of the online responses verbatim are in Appendix B.
Overall, the community indicated support to increase the building height, require ground floor
commercial uses, and also reaffirmed the Plan's vision to retain and enhance the historic character of
Port Haney. The community was almost 50/50 regarding eliminating "residential only" zones (i.e.
townhomes) from the land use designation, with 48% indicating support, while the remaining did not
support this change (29%), were unsure (19%), or had no opinion (4%).
Online Survey Outcomes
Three of the survey questions reflected Council's direction to eliminate "residential only" zones from
the land use designation, increase the building height, and require ground floor commercial uses.
Below is a summary of the results for these three questions:
• 48% of respondents support removing rowhouse and townhouse land use designations in the
Port Haney Area;
• 58% of respondents support increasing the maximum permitted building height from four
storeys to six storeys; and
• 75% of respondents support requiring ground floor commercial uses throughout the Port
Haney area.
Doc#3179192 Page 3 of 6
Two questions were related to the types of uses residents would like to see and not see in the Port
Haney area. Some common types of business that residents would like to see in Port Haney are the
following: Craft Breweries / pub and Restaurant/ Cafes; Grocery Store; Cultural centres (such as art
galleries, museums, etc.) - uses that would activate the area and street. In terms of uses identified
that they would not like to see, options included too much public parking, Heavy industry as well as
cannabis or payday stores. Some additional uses made both lists, including additional residential
buildings (affordable and market), and institutional uses (such as medical services and treatment
centres)
Four questions were related to conserving the heritage in Port Haney and areas that could be elevated
to enhance the heritage character and streetscape. The majority of survey respondents identified that
conserving the heritage character in Port Haney was "Very Important" (65 out of 118; 55%); and only
11% of respondents (13 out of 118; 11%) identified that conserving the heritage character was "Not
at All Important". The importance of conserving the heritage character increased for those who
identified as living in the Port Haney Area. Almost 70% of respondents who identified as living in the
Port Haney area identified conserving the heritage character of the area as "Very Important".
For elements that could enhance the built streetscape, the top three identified as being "Very
Important" by respondents are:
• Lighting (71%);
• Visual appearance of entrances (64%); and
• Historic Architectural Detail (42%).
For place -making elements that could enhance the character of Port Haney (besides heritage
character) the top three identified as being "Very Important" by respondents are:
• Landscaping (75%);
• Pocket Parks/Public Spaces (67%); and
• Protection of Viewscapes (67%).
When asked about what other elements are important to the Port Haney Area or could enhance the
character of the area, the most common responses are:
• Pedestrian and bike focused neighbourhood;
• Revitalization of the Wharf; and
• Activating the neighbourhood (events, parks, public art).
Overall, the main concerns for the area and possible changes are:
• Parking and traffic flow
• Blocking views of the river
• Community safety
Other Correspondence Outcomes
Staff also received direct feedback through phone, email, and through the self -guided walking tour.
Most of the direct feedback focused on community and traffic/parking concerns as well as housing
affordability. Other comments received are:
• 6 storeys may be too high for the entire area;
• 224th to Haney House should be more pedestrian friendly;
• Air conditioning should be included in new builds; and
• There is little landscaping currently found in the area.
Doc#3179192 Page 4 of 6
2.2 Next Steps
The completion of the public engagement process outlined in Section 2.1 above draws to a close the
initial phases of the Port Haney Land Use Policy Review project.
In addition to the Port Haney consultation, the City is currently completing a number of initiatives that
will inform development in the Port Haney Area. Such initiatives include:
• the review and update of the Off -Street Parking and Loading Bylaw which includes off-street
parking requirements for the Port Haney Area;
• adoption of OCP Amendment No. 7796-2021 to permit up to six storeys in Port Haney on a
case by case basis;
• a market analysis of industrial, commercial and residential development policy for the City's
growth areas; and
• a Landslide Risk Assessment to quantify the impacts of densifying development in the Port
Haney Area.
Once preliminary recommendations are available, any necessary proposed bylaw amendments will be
brought forward at a future Committee of the Whole meeting:
Figure 1 - Port Haney Land Use Policy Review
Background & Conduct Report back to Complete Report back to Council
Land Use Public Council Additional Council Consideration
Policy Review Engagement Studies of Bylaws
We are here!
3.0 STRATEGIC ALIGNMENT
Implementing strategic plans related to local infrastructure and the economy is a Council priority, as
established under the Growth pillar of the 2019-2022 City of Maple Ridge Strategic Plan. Additional
outcomes of work in the Town Centre, and specifically in the Port Haney neighbourhood, are intended
to align with the Growth, Community Safety, Community Pride & Spirit, and Natural Environment (Green
Infrastructure) pillars of Council's Strategic Plan.
4.0 POLICY IMPLICATIONS
The Official Community Plan (including the Town Centre Area Plan) establishes goals, objectives and
policies in support of the development of a complete community that is vibrant, healthy and safe.
5.0 INTERDEPARTMENT IMPLICATIONS
The review of Port Haney land use policies involves several City departments: Economic Development,
Engineering, Planning, Parks, Recreation & Culture, and Community Safety. Additionally, the process
is anticipated to provide opportunities for combining and supporting synergies with the work that is
underway on the Community Social Safety Initiative, Strategic Transportation Plan, Off -Street Parking
and Loading Bylaw, Green Infrastructure Strategy, and the Economic Development Strategy, in which
many City departments are already engaged, including on -going efforts from Communications,
Information Technology and Corporate Planning staff.
Doc#3179192 Page 5 of 6
6.0 FINANCIAL IMPLICATIONS
The Port Haney Land Use Policy process is included in the City's 2022 Financial Plan and the bylaw to
enact this plan was adopted at the December 14, 2021 Council meeting.
CONCLUSION:
Council approved the 'Port Haney Land Use Policy Review' through the endorsement of the 2022
Business Plan at the December 14, 2021 Regular Council Meeting. Subsequently, at the February 8,
2022 Council Workshop, Council endorsed an alternative recommendation and directed land use and
zone amendments related to use and height in the Port Haney Area.
Following that direction, a public engagement process was undertaken in May through June 2022 to
invite community feedback on the proposed changes to the Port Haney land use policies, as discussed
in the Council direction above. The purpose of this report is to present the outcomes from the
engagement process and note the next steps. Overall, through the engagement process, the
community indicated weak support for eliminating "residential only" zones from the land use
designation; increasing building heights for the area; and requiring ground floor commercial uses. The
engagement process also reaffirmed the Town Centre Area Plan's vision to retain and enhance the
historic character of Port Haney. The complete comments are available in Appendix B.
The completion of the public engagement process drawsto a close the initial phases of the Port Haney
Land Use Policy Review project. The City is currently completing complementary initiatives that will
inform development in the Port Haney Area. Once preliminary recommendations are available, any
necessary proposed bylaw amendments will be brought forward to a future Committee of the Whole
meeting:
"Original signed by Amanda Grochowich"
Prepared by: Amanda Grochowich, MCIP, RPP
Planner 2
"Original signed by Charles Goddard"
Approved by. Chuck Goddard, BA, MA
Director of Planning
"Original signed by Christine Carter"
Approved by. Christine Carter, M.PL, MCIP, RPP
GM Planning and Development Services
"Original signed by Scott Hartman"
Concurrence: Scott Hartman
Chief Administrative Officer
The following appendices are attached hereto:
Appendix A: Map of Port Haney Land Use Designations
Appendix B: Public Engagement Process & Outcomes
Doc#3179192 Page 6 of 6
APPFNnIX A
LOUGHEED HWY.
FTIMI I I �d
I]:: I � � �
NORTH ANT.
T� _J
U\�� HI � I __ A
Legend
Port Haney and Fraser River Waterfront Area
- Port Haney Heritage Adaptive Use
Port Haney Multi -Family, Commercial and Mixed -Use
- Conservation
- Park
.�Port Haneyand -
rLand Use Desginations
PLANNING DEPARTMENT
—
ir�1^�� �a, � MAPLE RIDGE
_---
Scale: 1:3,500
FILE: PortHaneyLandUse.mxd
DATE: Jan 21, 2022
BY: DT
ADDC'AIr11Y D
Port Haney Land Use Policy Review
What We Heard
The Port Haney public engagement process took place from May to June of 2022 and included an
online survey and self -guided walking tour to solicit input from a range of residents. The online
survey received 118 responses and the self guided walking tour received 1 response.
To support the public engagement process, a Port Haney Land Use Policy webpage was created for
sharing information with the public, with a kick-off video that was posted online. The engagement
opportunities were promoted through regular City communication channels, newspapers ad, letter to
residents in Port Haney, City of Maple Ridge Networks, including Community Advisory Committees.
The input received from the public engagement process has been compiled verbatim below.
Online Survey Results
#1 PLEASE SELECT ALL THE FOLLOWING STATEMENTS THAT APPLY TO YOU:
Who Responded to the Survey
90 78
v
80
70
a 60 49 48
s0
o 40 33
30 27
� 20
z 10 5
0
I live in the Port I live near the I travel through I regularly visit I am a resident Other
Haney Area Port Haney Area the Port Haney the Port Haney of Maple Ridge
Area Area
■ I live in the Port Haney Area ■ 1 live near the Port Haney Area
■ 1 travel through the Port Haney Area a I regularly visit the Port Haney Area
■ I am a resident of Maple Ridge ■ Other
The "Other" responses include:
1
Response
1
Work in Maple Ridge
2
Out of province Landlord
3
I work in Port Haney
4
Live on River Rd next to Billy Miner Pub
5
I am a resident of Maple Ridge and an Advisory Committee Member
#2 DO YOU SUPPORT REMOVING THE ROW HOUSE AND TOWNHOUSE FORMS FROM THE PORT HANEY
AREA?
Support for removing row house and townhouse forms
from the Port Haney Area?
60 -LL--
v 50
c
a 40
D-
in
a)
30
0
20
E
z 10
0
34
22
5
Yes No Unsure No Opinion
■ Yes ■ No ■ Unsure ■ No Opinion
#3. DO YOU SUPPORT INCREASING THE MAXIMUM PERMITTED BUILDING HEIGHT
FROM FOUR TO SIX STOREYS?
Support to increase the maximum permitted building
j height from four to six storeys
1 80 -
69
V)
70 - —
I o 60CL
—
50 45
0 40
30 - - - — --
! 20 - -
i z
10 -�--- - 1
i
0
Yes No Unsure No Opinion
�� ■ Yes ■ No ■ Unsure ■ No Opinion
EmMAPLE RIDGE
amen c.wmei.,
#4. DO YOU SUPPORT REQUIRING GROUND FLOOR COMMERCIAL USES THROUGHOUT THE
PORT HANEY AREA?
Support for Requiring Ground Floor Commercial Uses
100
89
90
80
Ln
Ln 70
c
0
Q- 60
aU
50
0
v 40
z 30 21
20
10 E____
6
0 _
Yes No Unsure
■ Yes m No ■ Unsure ■ No Opinion
2
No Opinion
#5. A RANGE OF USES ARE CURRENTLY PERMITTED IN THE PORT HANEY AREA, INCLUDING:
• Child Care Centres
• Educational Institutions (i.e. Colleges/universities)
• Community Centres
• Convenience Stores
• Cultural Centres
• Theatre / Gallery
• Financial Services (such as banks, credit unions)
• Tourist Accommodations )I(I.e. hotels)
• Indoor Recreation facilities (such as gyms, fitness studios);
• Office Space or co -working space
• Repair Services (such as repair of household goods, electronics and appliances)
• Personal Services (such as salons, dry-cleaning, dog grooming)
• Place of Worship;
• Professional Services (such as health care services, architects, lawyers, );
• Restaurants and cafes
• Retail Shops
® MAPLE RIDGE
#5 (CONINUTED) ARE THERE ANY OTHER USES THAT YOU WOULD LIKE TO SEE IN THE PORT
HANEY AREA? PLEASE LIST AND EXPLAIN WHY.
Feedback
1
The list is good and comprehensive. We have a pharmacy in the professional building on
224th. Illicit drugs are freely available of course in Port Haney and Haney as a whole :(
2
The list covers almost everything that I can think of.
3
1 would like the Port Haney area to be left alone. I would like the remaining original Port
Haney homes to be restored and given heritage status. I would like to see Beckett park
expanded to take over the 3 old houses on 117th as well as the lot where the Ceed Centre is
and have the Ceed Centre moved to Nokai Park. I would like the focus of Port Haney to
remain SMALL. NO more condos, NO townhouse, NO huge monster houses!
4
Craft breweries (e.g. a "brewer's row), art gallery, boutique shops, Indigenous coffee shop,
funky second hand shops, hostel/day use camping, boat launches, picnic areas (e.g. Derby
Reach), interpretive signage, dog park, trail connection to Kanaka, overhead walkway to
access south haney/town centre area.
5
A local pub!
6
Pharmacy and Lifelabs
7
Boat launch and park
8
Breweries and brewpubs
9
No
10
The development of the Port Haney wharf with walk ways (similar White rock). The Fraser
River is so unique and should be utilized to it's full potential sooner than later.
11
N/A
12
Breweries!
13
No
14
Market style grocery store.
15
No
16
satellite police station -this is an area which is frequented by the homeless/drug addicted
population.
17
No.
18
Brewery- we have a walking biking trial community with paths but when we want to relax after
doing our recreational activities we end up doing so in Langley at (smugglers cove) or Port
Moody brewery's with water access and kayaking. We are hugely surround by lakes and rivers
but we heavily lack access to them. The ways we can access them are always clogged and
ruin the vibe for a beautiful city. PORT HAM MMOND needs this too
19
Restaurants and retail
20
More frequent public transport to and from Mission and Coquitlam
21
Outdoor recreation - would be nice to see a an outdoor promenade, with perhaps a
playground area, picnic /bbq area, and some shops/market along the river, similar to the
New West Quay
22
Looks great!
23
please consider outdoor recreational areas in the port haney area plan as well. we could
have a riverfront greenbelt or multi -use path that could enhance the area for residents and
visitors alike.
24
1 said yes include ground floor commercial for the previous question, but it needs to be
focused; we need to have no nail salon type businesses in this area and more community
services, art galleries along with keeping the historical focus of the area. More space for
accommodating tourism related to the historical and natural features of Maple Ridge and
especially this area. A state of the art museum needs to be built in the area, as well as a
hotel that fits well in the context of the area. Nothing should be more than 4 stories high
® MAPLE RIDGE
though. And parking options are extremely important to always be addressed along with
alternate modes of transportation. Bike lanes/paths, wide sidewalks and state of the art
street lighting are important along with addressing the environmental problems caused by
heavier rains running down the hill from Lougheed in the winters and hotter dryer summers
affecting homes and offices on this south facing slope. Especially if we are to make this a
starting point for tourists and companies to explore the opportunities open to them in Maple
Ridge.
25
Social services
26
Take example of New West quay, fort Langley
27
Breweries, resturants, cafes, pubs with pool tables, patios,
28
Brewery - community feel, very popular and usually brings in friendly crowds with money to
spend
29
no
30
medical serives
31
To preserve the character of the area I think it's important to conserve the
forested/woodland area between River Gardens and Haney's Landing, in addition to the
conservation area noted on the map.
32
Develop the Wharf enhance the area Clean up the shoreline so there won't be another tent
city.
33
Just make sure that street parking for already existing buildings are not compromised. The
residents who bought here last year like myself have bought with the comfort of having easy,
always available street parking for guests and visitors.
34
no
35
NO
36
No
37
All of the above! I'd like to see a small grocery option. I love just to the west of the area and
with the large hill it is difficult to get to a grocery store on foot or by bike. It would also be
helpful for people who use the West Coast express. Creating a transit orient development
would be great for the waterfront neighbourhood
38
Micro brewery,will attract lots of people.
39
breweries, distilleries
40
grocery stores
41
Senior care
42
Restaurants, child care, parks, marina
43
A new museum
44
Hotel!! Maple Ridge doesnt have one, How are going to ever have tournaments in this town if
they have no where to stay
45
Proper parking area/designation for current west coast express users and to promote more
ridership for future. Currently it is almost impossible to find parking throughout the
neighbours and long walks to the train. There is an empty lot by Callaghan ave that could be
used for paid parking with a safe walk under the Haney bypass to use the train. It is better
for environment, the local residents and promotes more use of the west coast express.
46
Design with restaurants and cafes with an outdoor patio area from inception of the
commercial portion of the buildings... not as an afterthought like on 224st with the ugly
wood structures currently in place on the street
47
A park space for picnicking. A dock for boats. Community space to display art etc from the
community - kids display work, perform etc. Maybe a small museum space or info boards
along walkways...
48
Public spaces such as walking trails and playground(s) and spray park
49
Breweries
50
Restaurants and cafes, theatre/cultural, community centre, small retail local shops I think
it's a area we all should be able to be part
MAPLE RIDGE
em„n c�wmm,
51
1 would like to see Beckett Park expanded to the City land adjacent to the Park. It would be
great for expanded play equipment, washrooms and city run concession stand
52
Access to the water such as a sea wall with breweries and shops. The city is lacking a sense
of community and a place to go to view the river.
53
Strictly family oriented townhouses or Condos not exceeding 4 floors. No one wants to lose
their view of the Fraser River and Mount Baker.
54
affordable housing
55
In addition to all of the above, there must also be sufficient green space intermingled with
the above, not just block upon block of concrete.
56
Parks, gardens, and gathering spaces.
57
Brew Pubs. Give the area a look and feel like Port Moody has done with their District area
58
Liquor and cannabis sales, pub
59
Historical and Environmental Interpretative Centres
#6. ARE THERE ANY OTHER USES THAT YOU WOULD LIKE TO NOT SEE 1N THE PORT HANEY
AREA? IF SO, PLEASE LIST AND EXPLAIN WHY.
J.
Feedback
I have two sharps boxes that full to the brim. Your list does not include Salvation Army, Maple
Ridge Treatment Centre and similar, local services. These are necessary of course, but a
question hangs over how they are administered. After 27 years, the street people can wear
you down. Still, its our Haney, and we love it.
2
No.
3
1 do not want any industry or commercial in Port Haney. We are already T00 crowded and
there is WAY TOO MUCH noise!
4
public parking lot - discourages a walkable area; carbon polluters - destroys ecosystem; fast
cash businesses, loonie stores, hemp stores, big box stores - ruins opportunities for a funky
setting.,
5
No heavy industry or commercial use. Keep it for recreational and the beauty of the area, i.e.
Haney Wharf etc!
6
Marijuana and vape related stores
7
Paydayloans
8
Places of worship
9
No
10
N/A
11
No car dealership, car repair etc.
12
Cabaret/ strip club
13
No
14
No liquor stores, too many around already.
15
low income housing, addiction services
16
Liquor/cannabis stores- already this area sees a lot of traffic from caring place/anita place
former tenants, etc.
17
Tall buildings that drastically increase density. They block the views of people north of them
and I question the land stability, particularly along the western side of the map which is the
boundary area for the Haney slide.
18
Brewery's, recreational activities for the people that live here and want to enjoy the view -
also connect to port Hammond and make it the same. Let's invest in our city and enjoy it it's
so beautiful !
19
Anything tha
® MAPLE RIDGE
20
Liquor, or cannabis store
21
Don't want to see more residential being built up in this area
22
Pay day loans, Pharmacies, and Cannabis retailers. They are overrepresented in the town
centre already.
23
No commercial spaces that increase traffic in the Port Haney area.
24
allowing lots to sit vacant for years on end. theres the concrete slab just east of the port
haney wharf that has been vacant since I was a kid, it is a waste of space that could be
utilized for riverfront residential or commercial.
25
As I said above, no commercial stores like pot shops, tattoo parlors, nail and pedicure shops.
Make it more a destination centre for people to come and spend money learning about
Maple Ridge's history and our many local artists and performers. Plus we already have
limited parking opportunities in this area and certain kinds of commercial stores will cause a
lot of parking problems as well. So must include plans with the West Coast Express for
people coming to Maple Ridge for the weekend. Or find a parkade site out of the area where
community buses can shuttle people to this area. We have too many opportunities for a
world class destination site that can be lost because of poor choices made now. And once
lost we will never get them back. We already have a good percentage of buildings saved and
moved to this area, complete the plan and finally make it a destination choice for tourists
and especially people in Metro Vancouver. looking for a respite from their own poorly planned
communities barren of vegetation and natural beauty and clean air.
26
No
27
More addiction / treatment and homeless services. There is one up the street on Lougheed
where people regularly buy and use drugs outside of then they come and live in the bush
areas making it unsafe for residents. A neighbour was almost beat to death by one two
weeks ago while out in his nightly walk
28
We are one of several families that live across the street from the West Coast station in
southwest Port Haney. On north side a small green space that separates us from a row of
four -stories apartment buildings. This small patch of green means a lot the residents who live
just west of Haney Bypass. We would greatly appreciate the preservation of this small area.
29
No more treatment centres in the area. We are already saturated with a marginalized
population.
30
Financial services, Personal services, Professional services: there are so many in maple ridge
already and it would be nice to have commercial spaces with a more everyday use for people
like cafes, coworking spaces, convenience stores, and so on.
31
canibus stores or any stores that don,t provide a service to people in the area
32
1 would be very much opposed to removing any of the forested/woodland area between and
around River Gardens and Haney's Landing.
33
Way to many services considered. River Rd traffic has tripled since we bought. Speeding,
buses etc. There is no infrastructure or parking as it is. We were told it would like like
Lonsdown based on the suggestions it shows no forethought just a mishmash. Also all the
above ground poles and wires is unsightly. Where we live the tunnel and waterfront area is a
haven for homeless.
34
No 6 storey buildings - please. Two developments are already going up just east of us - Sierra
Ridge and something else. Higher storey buildings not only punish owners of lower storey
buildings from a good view of some privacy, but they also don't fit the Maple Ridge vibe. Let's
work to improve the city and keep its character and charm while not turning it into Central
City in Surrey.
35
Tourist Accommodations )I(I.e. hotels)
36
NO
37
No
38
Parking lots. Let's keep it green and walkable.
MAPLE RIDGE
39
Adult type stores (XXXX), NO DOLLAR stores,every development that has these two types of
stores are NOT high end nor do they attract "good" retail outlets.
40
NO car repair!! Any present car repair should be eliminated from the Town Centre and Port
Haney.
41
no hotels, no banks, No repair services
42
Industrial, offices or building spaces that do not allow us to enjoy the outside/waterfront
space
43
Not every single lot should be housing. Some spots should be reserved for culture spaces
alone
44
It would be nice to have things that promote tourism, people spending a day shopping,
picnicking etc
45
Safe injection sites
46
Generic stores like subway
47
Office space (that would be unfair for the the rest of Maple Ridge), repair or salons,
professional services, place of worship, financial services, child care, education or
convenience stores
48
No medical marijuana, no pharmacies or medical supply stores
49
No major stores (ie. Tim hortons, Walmart). No more parking lots. We need a more walkable
area for the community. No more cash advance stores or social assistance offices. Make
maple ridge a place that people want to hang out!!!!
50
Further social housing that leads to increases in homelessness and criminal activity
51
Definitely no drug transition units at all.
52
n/a
53
NO halfway or recovery houses!
54
Industrial.
55
Secondhand / Thrift stores, Dollar stores, Money/Cheque cashing stores. Maple Ridge does
not need anymore and especially in a "historical" area
56
The ceed centre must go if they continue to encourage the homeless/crackheads to
congregate in this area. They bring crime, garbage and ugly optics. Ask the local businesses.
If you can arrange this, port haney will grow and prosper and families will move back
57
Modular housing. Our lovely, quaint area is over run with homeless people and drug addicts.
Overdoses are almost a daily occurrence. I'm afraid to walk alone at night.
58
1 think there should be a limit to banks, nail salons and hairdressers, often small
towns/villages are over serviced by these businesses, ie edgemont village north van,
Ambleside village west van.
59
liquor or cannabis stores
60
1 would not want any large scale commercial operation. Prefer, small business, entrpreneur
opportunities
61
Industrial
MAPLE RIDGE
e.msn cm.me;i
#7. HOW IMPORTANT IS CONSERVING THE HERITAGE CHARACTER OF PORT HANEY TO YOU?
Level of Importance of Conserving the Heritage Character
of Port Haney
70 65
M-2
aU
N
0 50
0_
N
40
4-
30
22
E 20 16_. 13
z 10 . ■ 2
0
Very Important Moderately Slightly Important Not at All Important No Opinion
Important
■ VeryImportant ■ Moderately Important ■ Slightly Important ■ Not at All Important ■ No Opinion
#8. BELOW ARE SOME ELEMENTS THAT COULD ENHANCE THE BUILT STREETSCAPE (THE
APPEARANCE OR VIEW OFASTREET) OF THE PORT HANEYAREA. PLEASE RANK HOW IMPORTANT
THE FOLLOWING ELEMENTS ARE TO YOU?
Enhancing Built Streetscape
120
100
Qj
80
0
0_
V)
a�
60
0
a�
40
12
20 I 17
17
0
Roof style Building Window Colour of
Materials fenestration exterior
materials
■ No opinion ■ Not at all important ■ Slightly important
48
35 6i
1 42
35
36
21
16
19
Y
Entrances
Historic
Lighting
architectural
details
Moderately important ■ Very important
E
=�MAPLE
#9. BELOW ARE SOME PLACE -MAKING ELEMENTS THAT COULD ENHANCE THE CHARACTER OF PORT
HANEY. PLEASE RANK HOW IMPORTANT THE FOLLOWING ELEMENTS ARE TO YOU?
Enhancing Character of Port Haney
120 - ---- -
100
c 80 34
0
0_
N
40
0 60 = !a 36 47 35
23 29
� 40 1 17—
z � 23 j �24 21
20 22
] 18
0—
Street Pocket Community Landscaping Sharing Public Art Wayfinding Viewscapes Reuse of
Names Parks/ Public Gardens intangible salvaged or
spaces elements recycled
materials
■ No Opinion ■ Not at all important ■ Slightly important ■ Moderately important ■ Very important
#10. ARE THERE ANY OTHER ELEMENTS THAT ARE IMPORTANT TO THE PORT HANEY AREA OR
COULD ENHANCE THE CHARACTER OF THE AREA?
1
The Port Haney quay/dock needs to be torn down and rebuilt further into the river and
extended east to Kanaka. The old log sorting station could be converted into a marine park,
not unlike Rocky Point (it is important not be side tracked (no pun meant) by the presence of
the rail lines.
2
There are many homeless people in the neighborhood, sleep over on private sites are often
seen. I find the area not the most ideal for young family to hangout.
3
restore the remaining small homes/houses, build more small homes, no more condos, no
more commercial, definitely no townhouses
4
Cultural preservation (e.g. Indigenous, colonial history, Japanese and Kanaka heritage).
Multicultural elements to create an inclusive, accessible and welcoming environment for
people from all walks of life.
5
Keep it for pedestrians and bikes, and try and reduce vehicle traffic if possible!
6
The main purpose should be to make it easily accessible to both pedestrians and
automobiles.
7
Regular community events
8
This is the area of maple ridge that should be permitted high rises. There is opportunity to
develop the waterfront on the Fraser while not hindering views of the Golden Ears and
mountain scapes for residents. Seriously forget the 6 stories and go high rise. Contact the
city of New West for further discussion on development of waterfront while preserving
historical integrity.
10
MAPLE RIDGE
Brim
9
No
10
Public Art. Spaces for pop up shops. Wharf having a long walkway out and to the sides.
Pedestrian friendly.
11
N/A
12
More river access -for fishing
13
Clear out the druggie and homeless
14
1. Maintain period architectural style.
15
A boardwalk along the waterfront.
16
It would be nice if the area was like steveston, osprey village. River did Walking paths could
clean up the area and prevent the tents that are down there currently
17
updating the look and feel of the area, revitalizing the area to make it very walkable, safe and
with lots of amenities
18
More green space please, wish you could build this now, this area needs this
19
a waterfront walking plaza with places to fish, launch rowboats, eat ice cream or picnic would
be nice. Why not make an area similar to rocky point in port moody? The riverfront is wasted
in maple ridge -all industrial. It would be so nice to have accessible waterfront.
20
Keep in mind that the area is a mix of river and sloping glacial deposits, thus not suitable for
tall buildings in an active earthquake zone. The large area opposite Haney House is certainly
available for development but how will people be able to access new facilities there? It is
certainly not an easy walk from Lougheed Highway down 224th St. if we are planning
significant commercial development.
21.
Make it enjoyable for everyone that loves here. We need things for people to do here rather
than blocking off all the great views with housing that is not accessible for everyone. We all
love a good river view and want to appreciate why we love here and the heritage which it
heavily based on the river!!
22
Utilize the riverfront! Make more development down there, make our parks and waterfront
accessible not a homeless haven
23
Ensuring Traffic flows more efficiently
24
Better street lighting and mandatory sidewalks that allow people of all abilities to enjoy the
area.
25
maintaining good access to the area. there is currently a steep hill from the town centre and
that could potentially limit access for people with mobility issues. Also, trying to mitigate
noise from the Haney bypass could enhance a quaint village -like feel for the area.
26
sidewalks and street lighting need to always be built in order to give universal accessibility.
And with lessons learned from COVID - the wider, the better. Along with trees and gardens
everywhere. Anything that encourages people out of their apartments and building a
community for those who live in this special area.
27
Historic relevance should be prevalent
28
Safe pedestrian access to the river.
29
Board walk
30
Yes. Ensure more foot patrols of Police and security especially in the tunnel leading down
224 Street to the Wharf and River Road. I walk through there regularly and have to pass
addicts sitting or lying down doing drugs and surrounding themselves with garbage. As a
senior woman it's extremely unnerving to walk past them and ignore their comments in order
to get to the wharf on my daily walk. I have in fact stopped walking through and now walk
Brickwood Park instead.
31
Sidewalks and pedestrian activated crosswalks at busy locations (ex. Across river road by the
west coast station)
32
leaving as many mature trees as possible. they have history too and add to the historic feel of
the area.
33
signage
11
MAPLE RIDGE
34
If streets are to be renamed, the Katzie and Kwantlen First Nations should be consulted. In
fact, features that will draw attention to Katzie & Kwantlen culture and history are desirable
for enhancing the character of the area.
35
Get rid of phone and electrical make it underground. A fenced in dog park, with benches and
a decent size.
36
no
37
The Port Haney Warf is an important historical landmark and needs to be overhauled as it is
currently falling apart.
38
No
39
Better access and walkability on the waterfront. It could be beautiful and walkable but it's
quite neglected.
40
Dog park (s)- dog owners will let their dogs run loose in regular public parks -we see this every
day.
41
Reduce maximum speeds to 30 km/h.
42
Enhance/encourage bicycle and pedestrian mobility
43
Historic facades are vital to keep that historic feel and attract tourists. None of that is
happening in port Haney right now. Plan now or it will be too late and it will look like the
unplanned mess it does now
44
Create a stevston/Whiterock wharf like area along the Fraser River. Promote tourism, family,
exercise... such a beautiful view we could be benefit the whole community of maple Ridge.
45
Pedestrian safe rather than vehicle dominant
46
The sidewalk material - could have wood/dock style or brick rather than cement everywhere.
If there are walk/bike paths markings to either separate foot traffic from bikes or to keep
directions separate like a roadway.
47
Create a riverfront walkway with a pedestrian overpass going over the bypass
48
Such a great location. Make it so residents can enjoy it
49
Separated bike paths.
50
Clean up homelessness
51
More park area, less run down buildings amd vacant buildings
52
Get rid of the criminals!! Bring in a better community where I want to hang out and walk near
the water.
53
Beckett Park could use a building for bathrooms.
54
Indigenous engagement
55
DO NOT name any streets or avenues after unpronounceable Indian names.
56
considerations for green infrastructure (trees, swales, communal green spaces) are
important in every development. The reason I ticked "unsure" on building height and zoning
type is that the exact location of taller buildings is important to preserving viewscapes to the
Fraser River.
57
Parking and safe walking areas
58
I'd love to see an area like Ft Langley in Port Haney. Relocate the heritage buildings back to
Pt Haney. Improve the wharf for all residents to enjoy. Add food trucks, icecream trucks,
picnic tables. The wharf is such an asset to our community, yet so under used. I live two
minutes away but I'm afraid to go there alone
59
Rooftop amenities are a must - it allows for increased landscaping and takes advantage of
the view.
60
DON'T block the view of the river for streets above this area.
61
Greater density at the north (uphill end) to support more open areas nearer the river. Building
heights in excess of 6 along 117 could allow for green infrstructure, allow views of the Fraser
without blocking views from central Haney
62
Wate rfro nt Tra i I Connectivity
63
Protect the valuable trees that are already there.
12
#11. DID WE FORGET SOMETHING? LET US KNOW IF YOU HAVE ANY OTHER THOUGHTS OR
GENERAL COMMENTS!
Number...
Responses
As the Haney area densifies, one might double the size of the tennis courts at
Brickwood and remake the play ground to the standards of the Fireman's Park or the
one on the Bypass. Since 2017 1 have visited just about every kids park in MR. The
parks in Haney are very well attended and popular. As we densify we will need more
and more and parks for the moms and kids to step out their condos and be in a park
within a minute's.
2
No.
3
we need a HUGE concrete noise barrier fence (that could have a mural painted on it)
erected from Callaghan up to North Ave all along the Haney bypass. The amount of
pollution from the CONSTANT traffic on the bypass both sound and chemical is
DISGUSTING and not at all relaxing. All of our trees on the property were destroyed
by tent city and the building of Beckett park and the reconfiguration of the bypass.
4
Murals that tell a story about our unique and diverse culture. Businesses that
support a carbon neutral mandate. Bike racks.
5
Love the area, but it should be develpoded with tourist attractions in mind, Maple
Ridge has great potential for this area which is just down from the downtown core!
6
Like I said previously, port Haney should be high density and and high rise
apartments. Major transit hubs and logistical pathways run through the area. And
because it is as far south as you can get in Maple Ridge while also being lower set,
this makes it ideal for high rise development while not blocking the views and vistas
of our amazing mountain scapes.
7
No
8
N/A
9
Improve pedestrian and cyclist connectivity across and under the Haney Bypass.
Make the pedestrian/cyclist tunnel more welcoming. The steps and ramp are
terrible. The bollards need to go!!! The neighbourhoods need to be more sheltered
from the noisy and busy traffic on the Bypass.
10
Allow or encourage patio pubs and restaurants.
11
1 think we have a large attraction (the river) that is grossly untapped and unused. If
we can make a nice, attractive, safe, walkable area, with lots of amenities and
services with nice residential buildings it would be great for the area
12
Concerns are traffic for residents in the area, I have already been in contact with be
highways in regards to the new intersection at Callahan where people are running
the red and the noise from especially the trucks, rigs and Harley's has become
unbearable. Nothing is coming out of that maybe you could help. Thank you
13
Safe public parking!
14
The MR Historical Society has been offering four unique summer Music on the Wharf
events for a number of years and it is expected to start those up again this year.
Hopefully development will not impact on that unique experience.
15
River access for everyone to enjoy! Including restaraunra - get rid of kingfisher it's
terrible and in prime real estate give it to establishments that people want to go
back to
16
Ensure Public transport companies are involved in making transport efficient
17
Mandatory maintenance of empty lots in the area. As the area is becoming more of a
family area, curb appeal is important.
18
Try and draw inspiration from other riverfront areas in the lower mainland, IE:
Lonsdale or New Westminster Quay. It is never a bad idea to get creative with the
area and don't be shy about expropriating land for big picture uses. Build up the area
13
MAPLE RIDGE
and make it nice, people will come and spend money here. The region at large is
facing a housing/commercial space shortage. A cute, riverfont area with green
space, cafes, and transit would go gangbusters with some people.
19
Build on the visions planners and community leaders had when the Masonic and
other historical buildings were moved here and salvaged from demolition. But build
with an eye to the harsh lessons already learned from the past two years of climate
change and COVID.. And also address the disparity between the haves and have
nots in our community. It is very important to make anything built here to be
inclusive for all members of our community.
20
Riverfront commercial would be welcome as an attraction.
21
The pier has a lot of potential, more policing for paths / trails along bushed areas to
increase safety of residents or moving the treatment places further out of the
downtown core
22
Improve the infrastructure in order to support the higher volume of traffic that
accompanies a growing population.
23
there is an empty lot on 223 & river rd that would be a perfect pocket park with
views of the river. it is already really nice as it is and would require not too much
development to be a great asset to the community.
24
posible but I can't think of something at the moment.
25
Thank you for providing this space for feedback. The Port Haney area is charming
and I am proud to live here. I hope that the historical, natural, and heritage character
will be maintained.
26
Honestly hear what the public have to•say. Especially from those who live in the area.
Someone from 240th have no idea what the area is 24/7.Offer open sessions that
people have a chance to discuss concerns and ideas. Have architect's renditions to
illustrate concepts so the public have concrete idea. Six stories impacts views of the
River and up and the area. Offer grants to help create the heritage look. We came
from Nelson. They revitalized Baker Street. The same could happen on 224th Offer
Grants to spruce up buildings there as well. Walmart and old Thrifity store would be
a great hotel, University. It would clean up the area and by having the hotel there
would bring people into the downtown core. Juried art sculptures placed in the areas
throughout. No one culture should be represented some could just be interesting
pieces of art see Castlegar and their pieces. Offer walking tours highlighting historic
places. Have an art work where different stores establishments showcase art work
from the area. Summers months only.
27
Has the Katzie First Nation and Kwantlen First Nation been engaged on this planning
exercise? Redeveloping these lands in any way will have an impact on the adjacent
bypass and water systems - each requiring some consultation with Federal (DFO)
and/or Provincial (MOT[) agencies, both of which are required to consult with First
Nations. By consulting with both nations now, it may mitigate changes coming late
in the planning process that refutes the work you are doing now.
28
If additional density is proposed, do we have enough parking, road capacity for
commuters, and schools to accomodate it?
29
Marina / water access and a nice walking area similar to Osprey Village in Pitt
Meadows
30
Like the new affordable housing on 223rd, keep the old historic house as a meeting
space and leave it as part of the character in front of the new building. It looks really
neat and is an interesting concept to keep the old building, not stop needed housing
and development and actually make use out of a heritage building for everyone.
31
If there's going to be more housing, what does the school situation look like?
32
Sign boards with historical photos, info etc. Would be nice to take inspiration from
Steveston in Richmond with creating a tourist destination, a pedestrian area to enjoy
14
shopping, ice cream, cafes, restaurants all river front. WAlkways & paths. A few years
ago the newspaper had published a future artists plan of having a bit of a port with
boat access and float plane access. That would be really lovely.
33
Charging stations for e-bikes!
34
If you are going to be attracting tourism to the area, one suggestion is public
facilities such as toilets available since there are none in the close vicinity. Also it
would be great to see increased parking for people who catch the West Coast
Express and do not live close to transit so are essentially unable to use the station
as there is nowhere to park for park -and -ride.
35
Be quick
36
We need better infrastructure before we increase the density. We gave so much
traffic congestion already.
37
Please see "Not Just Bikes" youtube channel for guidance regarding traffic.
38
Crime abd homeless in the area
39
I love that you are reaching out to us locals. Preserving as much of MR is really to me
especially near the Fraser river
40
Need more green space for the families moving into the area, increase the size of
Beckett Park, it is busy from dawn to dusk, the City owner property adjacent to the
Park would be perfect to expand Beckett Park
41
Please replicate the lower Lonsdale area of North Vancouver. We all want a nicer
area to hang out near the fraser river. No more strip malls. More coffee shops,
breweries, restaurants, all while incorporating the heritage of maple ridge.
42
Better use of the riverfront area, residents want places to eat and drink by the water
and have local shops to visit. Currently there is nothing in the area except vacant lots
and vagrants
43
As above
44
I believe the riverfront area should be public space connecting ultimately as far east
to Kanaka Creek Regional Park via trails and West to the Pitt River Regional
Greenway if possible.
45
Relocate the homeless/crackheads and allow our history to be embraced. Build a
larger dock so that the paddlewheeler from "the new west quay to mission" can stop
at our city. Can you say tourist dollars!!! P.S. Now you have a gateway to uptown
(Westminster quay should be your starting point.)
46
Some 6-storey buildings close to Lougheed would be fine but not the entire area.
47
Change the zone so property dedication is possible through redevelopment. Put a
moratorium on development until guidelines are established. Develop a stormwater
management plan for the area including use of green infrastructure before
development proceeds. Halt in -stream development to comply with previous
mentioned items.
48
This form did not allow for any real discussion. It was just answering generic
questions without opportunity to provide alternative thoughts
49
Pedestrian crossing of the rail line. Increased pedestrian traffic may require an
elevated crossing of the rail line. North -south connectivity of walking trails between
hillside and waterfront; grade issues will require an integrated design whereby
stroller, wheel chair, etc traffic is accommodated.
MAPLE RIDGE
am.:n cowmen.,
Self -Guided Walking Tour Results
Stop 1- Corner of 224th & 117tn
• Response #1: streets further north do not have views of the river so having higher buildings
at the north end of Port Haney would allow for less density in the southern areas adjacent to
the river- with more opportunity for recreation, relaxation and local commercial.
Stop 2 - Regency Place
• Response #1: RE building heights, see above. Heights should start high and diminish as you
go towards the river. People are just living there. There is no draw, no recreation, no
commercial.
Stop 3 - Beckett Park
• Response #1: Great little place for families with kids but please put in some trees along the
highway. It would be a 'nice little corner' if you were not sitting beside a . See above re how
people are using the space,
Stop 4 - Corner of St. Anne and 223ra
• Response #1: Heights on people use- see above. Connection to the past requires direct
access to the river and visual landscaping. Block views of the highway. Heritage buildings
should be maintained in their original style including signage.
Stop 5 - Callaghan Street
• Response #1: River is critical. Re heights and people use, this is a generic question and
pertains to the entire area. See above
Stop 6 - Haney House
• Response #1: Better walking access like the trail that comes up from the east. That's a
beautiful little stretch that should be duplicated throughout the area. Possibly better transit -
mini bus that just loops around?
Thinking of the entire Port Haney Area:
• Response #1: Much better landscaping with natural plantings. The current parks, with the
exception of Haney House do not offer much in terms of recreation, relaxation, non vehicle
access. Upkeep on the heritage buildings and stronger direction to ensure it becomes
'greener', building styles respect the heritage. More access to the river.
16
MAPLE RIDGE
RPrPivad Finaik
[Fi�domation .Protection of Privacy Act
June 11, 2022SecEonof Inform42(1)
(Severed portions are shaded)
EMMUM
Maple Ridge, BC
Telephone:
E-mail:
Amanda Grochowich, Planner
City of Maple Ridge
11995 Haney Place
Maple Ridge, BC,V2X 6A9
Telephone: 604-467-7402
E-mail : agrochowich(c)-mapleridge. ca
Dear Amanda Grochowich, Planner
Re: Air conditioning for apartments, fourplexes, triplexes, and duplexes because of
climate change should be included in review of land use policies for Port Haney Area.
I realize that, for some people, built-in air conditioners, for new apartments, four plexes,
triplexes and duplexes are per se not related to review of land use policies for Port
Haney, but I disagree. Without built-in air conditioners, during a heat dome, people will
die, which is what happened last year. Moreover, a portable air conditioner and a
window air conditioner are not the same as a built-in air conditioner and/or a central air
conditioner. A portable or a window air conditioner will cool one room, whereas a built-in
air conditioner or a central air conditioner will cool the entire apartment, fourplex, triplex
or duplex. Consequently, built-in air conditioners or central air conditioners
increase the value of Port Haney of properties.
In my original review of land use polices for Port Haney I forgot to mention that all new
apartment buildings, fourplexes, triplexes, duplexes, and other dwelling units must have,
built-in, air-conditioning units because of climate change. If developers and/or builders
complain about the cost associated with purchasing and installing built-in air
conditioning, or central air conditioning then offer them a generous tax credit. Finally, do
whatever it takes, legally, to ensure that all new apartment buildings, fourplexes,
triplexes, duplexes, and other dwelling units have, built-in, air-conditioning units.
17
Soon MAPLE RIDGE
Freedom of IMomwtion Protection of Privacy Act
Section 22(1)
(Severed portions are shaded)
So, I made a phone call. I phoned the Salvation Army. The Salvation
Army told me they don't just help homeless people. If anyone experiences heat
exhaustion the Salvation Army will provide them with a place to sleep or will provide
them with a fan. In my opinion a fan doesn't cut it. The people that live in the low-
income apartment buildings in Port aey need Haney need either window air conditioners
I don't want anyone else to
die unnecessarily. I am telling all of you this because if the new apartments, fourplexes,
triplexes, and duplexes do not have built-in air conditioners then, for some people, their
home will be like a furnace and a death trap.
I lived in the .hottest apartment
-Decause i livea
According to my thermometer, during the last year's heat dome, my apartment reached
over 100 degrees Fahrenheit and I had a ortal air conditioner, which was runnin full
blast. I phoned up and I said two words: I
told I was a refugee from the heat, and took me in. I stayed with for a few
days, until the heat dome passed.
Besides, most of the time,
nearly impossible
and I was finding it
Moving to uced the impact of climate change on me because
my apartment now also redSome people, in
my building, are buying portable air conditioners, but not ever one can afford to buy a
portable air conditioner. However, if the people in the had built-
in air conditioners the that died of heat exhaustion would still be alive. But,
as far as I know, it is next to impossible to build built-in air conditioning units in an
existing apartment building, but that is not the case with the proposed new apartments,
fourplexes, triplexes, and duplexes because built-in air conditioning units can be
included in the building plans. Climate change is real. Climate change is in Port Haney.
Finally, Mdeaths, in Port Haney, from heat exhaustion, are ■ too many....
Sincerely,
P.S. Please respond in writing.
18
ONCE MAPLE RIDGE
Freedom of Information _Protecion of Privacy Act
Section 22(1)
June 8, 2022 (Severed Portions are shaded)
Ma le BC
Telephone:
E-mail:
Amanda Grochowich, Planner
City of Maple Ridge
11995 Haney Place
Maple Ridge, BC
V2X 6A9
Telephone: 604-467-7402
E-mail: agrochowich(a)-mapleridge.ca
Dear Amanda Grochowich, Planner
Re : Review of land use policies for Port Haney Area
I wrote a critique of the document entitled Review of Land use Policies for
Port Haney, which I obtained from the internet. I also received a letter from the City of
Maple Ridge entitled: Review of land use policies for Port Haney Area. In the letter the
Citv of Maple Rid a requested feedback from, mostly, Port Haney residents. I am_
In the letter I received from the City of Maple Ridge
it said the following: 'Your feedback will be included in an outcomes and
recommendations report to Council discussing any policy or zone amendments."
I spent a considerable amount of time researching, reading, and writing my response to
Maple Ridge's Review of Land use Policies for Port Haney. I sincerely hope the City of
Maple Ridge implements my recommendations. For once Maple Ridge has the
opportunity to make it right regarding revitalizing Port Haney, but please don't displace
any low-income people, However, if Port Haney people must be
displaced than please find Nalternate, low-income housing located near Port Haney.
Finally, `affordable' housing is not low-income housing.
19
" APCE-RID�GE—
My critique and feedback of the document entitled Review of land use policies for Port
Haney, is located in an e-mail attachment. Please respond in writing to this letter and to
the e-mail attachment.
Sincerely,
Freedom of Information Protection of Privacy Act
Section 22(1)
(Severed portions are shaded)
20
MAPLE RIDGE
mapleridge.ca City of Maple Ridge
TO: His Worship Mayor Michael Morden MEETING DATE: September 27, 2022
and Members of Council FILE NO: 13-6440-20
FROM: Chief Administrative Officer MEETING: Workshop
SUBJECT: Scoping Report for Permitting Secondary Suites in all Single Detached and Ground -
Orientated Duplex Zones
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY:
At the April 26, 2022 Council Workshop meeting, staff presented accessory dwelling unit (e.g.
secondary suites) regulatory options that would provide more opportunities for creating these forms of
housing, which benefit homeowners and those seeking to rent in urban locations where infrastructure,
amenities, and public transit already exist. During this meeting, Council directed staff to bring back
options to consider allowing secondary suites in the R-2 (single -detached medium density urban
residential) and R-3 (special amenity residential - single -detached) zones and the RT-1 zone (two unit
urban residential - duplex). Currently, the Maple Ridge Zoning Bylaw No. 7600-2019 prohibits
secondary suites in these three zones. At the April 26, Workshop meeting, Council also noted that
community consultation was desired for this topic.
This report presents a community engagement plan to seek feedback on permitting secondary suites
in the R-2, R-3, and the RT-1 zones. The intent behind the public engagement process is to invite broad
community input and focus on seeking feedback from property owners who own a R-2, R-3, or RT-1
zoned lot. Staff will also be engagingwith the development community through the Urban Development
Institute (UDI) and Homebuilders Association Vancouver (HAVAN). The input received from the public
engagement process will be compiled into an outcomes report and recommendations will be presented
to Council for input and to provide direction on next steps that may include bylaw amendments. The
public engagement process is anticipated to commence in late January and run through March 2023.
RECOMMENDATION:
That the public engagement process be endorsed, as outlined in the staff report titled 'Scoping
Report for Permitting Secondary Suites in all Single Detached and Ground -Orientated Duplex
Zones' dated September 27, 2022.
1.0 BACKGROUND:
a) Work Completed Through Housing Action Plan
Public Engagement Process in 2017
With Council's endorsement of the Housing Action Plan in 2014 and subsequent endorsement of the
implementation framework in 2015, Council directed in 2016that the regulations for secondarysuites
and detached garden suites be reviewed for expansion. In the Fall of 2017, a public consultation
process took place to gather feedback from the community on expanding the detached garden suites
and secondary suites program. The consultation outcomes on the secondary suite and detached
garden suite programs were presented at the February 6, 2018 Council Workshop meeting. Out of 193
Doc # 3178641 Page 1 of 10
4.2
survey responses, the majority of respondents indicated support for permitting secondary suites in all
single -detached (66% of respondents) and duplex zones (53% of respondents) and the main opposition
raised was from residents who are concerned about the supply of on -street parking.
Recent Work
At the April 26, 2022 Council Workshop, staff presented eleven regulatory options that were explored
during the public consultation and review of accessory dwelling unit regulations in 2017. During the
Workshop, Council directed staff to bring forward a report with detailed information and a description
of the amendments for ten of the eleven recommendations. Table 1 below outlines the ten
recommendations Council directed staff to move forward with, as well as the progress on each item.
Table
1: Council Directed Work and Progress to Date
item
Frogress
1.
Removal of the maximum and minimum gross floor area
Zone Amending Bylaw 7857-
requirement for secondary suites
2022 heard at Public Hearing
September 20, 2022*
2.
Development of 'Alternate Compliance Methods for
More information to come
Alterations to Existing Buildings to Add a Secondary Suite'
in the BC Building Code
3.
Options to potentially allow secondary suites in all single-
Discussed in this report
detached residential zones
4.
Permitting secondary suites in ground -orientated
Discussed in this report (Duplex
duplexes and townhouses
only)
5.
Permitting secondary suites and detached garden suites
More information to come
on the same lot in the Agricultural Land Reserve
6.
Allowing flexible siting of a detached garden suite on a lot
More information to come
7.
Removal of the minimum gross floor area requirement for
Zone Amending Bylaw 7857-
detached garden suites
2022 heard at Public Hearing
September 20, 2022*
8.
Permitting larger detached garden suites in specific
More information to come
residential zones
9.
Permitting secondary suites and detached garden suites
More information to come
on the same lot in all residential zones
10.
Development of program, for council consideration, that
More information to come
would create "pre -approved" building plan templates for
detached garden suites
*Zone Amending Bylaw 7857-2022 to remove the minimum and a maximum size requirement for secondary suites, as well
as removing the minimum size requirement for detached garden suites was given first and second reading on July 26, 2022.
On April 26, 2022, Council also directed that the current bylaw enforcement, related to the issue of
unregistered secondary suites, be held in abeyance while the work to expand the secondary suites and
detached garden suites program is underway. At this workshop meeting, Council passed the following
motion:
That the current bylaw enforcement related to the issue of unregistered secondary suites be
held in abeyance during the review of the bylaw unless there is an obvious nuisance situation
that staff are to enforce.
Doc # 3178641 Page 2 of 10
b) Official Community Plan Policy Alignment
Maple Ridge's Official Community Plan (OCP) reflects the community's long-term vision to become
more vibrant and prosperous, offering residents stable and special neighbourhoods, thoughtful
development, and respectforthe built and natural environment. Through the OCP housing policies, the
need to provide a mix of housing types, densities, and affordable options is recognized. In order to
meet the diverse residential needs of local residents, the OCP housing policies are intended to help:
• Accommodate growth through infill by promoting housing types and tenures to support diverse
needs, lifestyles, and preferences (Policy 3-1), by considering disparities in age, income, and
mobility;
• Support the provision of rental accommodation and encourage the construction of rental units
that vary in size and number of bedrooms (Policy 3-31); and
• Encourage housing that incorporates "age -in -place" concepts and facilitate seniors housing
designed to accommodate special needs (Policy 3-33).
Additionally, Policy 3-29 specifically identifies secondarysuites as dwelling unitsthat can provide rental
housingfor the community and thatthe municipality periodically review and update the secondarysuite
program to ensure that the regulations are meeting the community's needs.
Policy 3-29 Maple Ridge recognizes that secondary suites and other detached dwelling
units in residential neighbourhoods can provide affordable and/or rental
housing in the community. Maple Ridge is committed to ensuring that bylaws
and regulations are current, and responsive to community issues and needs
c) Housing Action Plan and Housing Needs Report Alignment
Council endorsed the Housing Action Plan on September 30, 2014 and the Implementation Framework
on September 14, 2015. The development and endorsement of the Housing Action Plan provides the
opportunity to implement the strategies and actions to enhance the Official Community Plan policy
direction for affordable, rental, and special needs housing. The Implementation Framework contains
actions that are based on the Housing Action Plan's strategies. The endorsed strategies of the Housing
Action Plan are summarized below:
Create new rental housing opportunities;
Continue to monitor secondary suites policies & bylaws; and
Minimize the loss of existing rental housing.
On February 9, 2021, Council received a Housing Needs Report that found there is a limited supply of
rental housing in Maple Ridge, especially in the form of secondary suites that families rely on for
mortgage help. The limited supply of rental units is also creating a substantial housing cost increase
within the rental market. A key theme from the Housing Needs Report is that there is a growing
disconnect between what is available and what is affordable to Maple Ridge residents and that the
community and that property owners need secondary suites to assist with the high housing costs.
d) Municipal Scan
In the April 26, 2022 Workshop report, several municipalities in the Lower Mainland were highlighted
for permitting secondary suites in all single detached zones. Table 2 below compares Maple Ridge's R-
2 and R-3 zones with other BC municipalities that have similar zones, in terms of siting regulations,
that allow secondary suites.
Doc # 3178641 Page 3 of 10
Table 2: Comparison of R-2 and R-3 Zone
Maple Ridge
Maple Ridge Chilliwack
Kelowna Port
•Coquitlam
315m2
255m2 300m2
255m2 300m2
• _
9m - Lane access
8.5m - Lane access
11m - No Lane
11m - No Lane
10m
8.5m
9.5m
• access
access
13m - Corner Lot
13.5m - Corner Lot
30m - Lane access
30m -Lane access
27m - No Lane
27m- No Lane 30m
27m
28m
access
access
Based on
Based on
• - 50%
50%
40%
_
density
density
1Off-
1Off-
1Off-
' - • - • 1 Off -Street Parking
10ff-Street Parking
Street
Street
Street
' Space
Space
Parking
Parking
Parking
Space
Space
I Space
Table 2 shows that accommodating the additional off-street parking space for a secondary suite on a
small urban lot is deemed feasible and permitted within other municipalities. However, additional
research is required to better understand what approaches these municipalities took to mitigate any
neighbourhood concerns and if they have identified any differences in neighbourhood complaints
based on single detached lot size.
2.0 DISCUSSION:
Currently, the Maple Ridge Zoning Bylaw No. 7600-2019 only prohibits secondary suites in three zones
that also permit single -detached residential use: R-2 (Single -detached (Medium Density) Urban
Residential), R-3 (Special Amenity Residential) and RT-1(Two-Unit Urban Residential). In the RT-1 zone,
a single detached or a duplex form are permitted in this zone, however, the predominant form within
this zone is duplex.
Section 2.0 outlines the current zoning bylaw regulations for secondary suites, temporary residential
units and the R-2 and R-3 zones. This section also discusses what will be explored with the community
through the engagement process. Subsection 2.3 discusses permitting secondary suites in ground -
oriented duplexes and how this work relates to the work being undertaken to establish a density bonus
rate in the RS-1 Single Detached Residential zone to permit duplex and small lot subdivision (potentially
to permit the R-1 zone, which has a minimum lot size of 371m2).
2.1. Current Zoning Bylaw Regulations - Secondary Suites and Temporary Residential Units
Secondary suites are a key form of rental housing, as it allows eligible renters the ability to move into
home ownership with the assistance of a mortgage helper. Additionally, this mortgage helper
contributes to the rental supply, allowing rental housing to increase in availability. Temporary
Residential Units are similar to a secondary suite in form, but it must be used as housing for a relative
of the property owner.
Doc # 3178641 Page 4 of 10
The Maple Ridge Zoning Bylaw No. 7600-2019 regulates where secondary suites and temporary
residential units can be located in the city, the size of the suite, and the number of required parking
spaces. Temporary residential units are permitted in the R-2 and RT-1 zone, whereas secondary suites
are not permitted in either the R-2, R-3 or RT-1 zone. Under current Zoning Bylaw requirements, a
secondary suite and temporary residential unit are not permitted on the same lot. Table 3 below
summarizes the City's current requirements for secondary suites.
Table 3: Current Regulations for Secondary Suites
Regulatory
Secondary Suites Temporary Residential
Requirement
(occupant must be a relative_)_
Permitted
All Single Detached zones, except R-3 All Single Detached zones, except R-3
Location
& R-2
Minimum Floor
37m2 (Zone Amending Bylaw 7857-
N/A
Area
2022 proposes removal of the 37m2)*
Maximum Floor
90m2 (Zone Amending Bylaw 7857-
not to exceed 40% of the total floor
Area
2022 proposes removal of the
area of the building
90m2)*, not to exceed 40% of the total
floor area of the building
# Permitted Per
One
One
Lot
Primary Dwelling
Must locate in primary dwelling
Must locate in primary dwelling
Relationship
Parking
One per unit
One per unit
Requirement
Strata Title
Not permitted
Not permitted
Floodplain
Suite must be above Flood
Suite must be above Flood
Requirement
Construction Level
Construction Level
Septic Site
Must notify Fraser Health Authority if
Must notify Fraser Health Authority if
Requirement
Lot is not serviced by Community
Lot is not serviced by Community
Sanitary Sewer System
Sanitary Sewer System
*Zone Amending Bylaw 7857-2022 to remove the minimum and a maximum size requirement for secondary suites was
given first and second reading on July 26, 2022.
2.2 R-2 and R-3 Single Detached Zone Regulations
Currently in Maple Ridge there are approximately 1,500 properties zoned R-3 and 500 properties
zoned R-2. These two single detached zones also have the smallest minimum lot area requirements in
the Zoning Bylaw, with the R-2 zone having a minimum lot area of 315m2 and the R-3 zone having a
minimum lot area of 255m2. However, one area in Albion, which is bounded by 102 Avenue to the
south, Albion Park to the east, 104 Avenue to the north and 240 Street to the west, has minimum lot
area of 217m2. This very small single detached lot size regulation was previously permitted in the R-3
zone, but was changed with the adoption of the new Zoning Bylaw in late 2020.
Table 4 outlines the siting regulations for both the R-2 and R-3 zones, as well as the permeable surface
requirements. In the Zoning Bylaw, permeable surfaces include ncn-grouted bricks and pavers or
crushed rock, and other ornamental features used for landscaping, but it does not include non -
permeable Off -Street Parking areas, uncleared natural vegetation, undergrowth or uncontrolled weeds.
Doc # 3178641 Page 5 of 10
Table 4: Siting and Permeable Surface Regulations for R-2 and R-3 Zones
R-2 Zone
R-3 Zone
Minimum Lot Size
315m2
255m2
9m - Lane access
8.5m - Lane access
Minimum Lot Width
11m - No Lane access
11m - No Lane access
13m - Corner Lot
13.5m - Corner Lot
Minimum Lot Depth
30m - Lane access
30m - Lane access
27m - No Lane access
27m- No Lane access
Lot Coverage Maximum
50%
50%
Required Parking
2 Off -Street Parking Space
2 Off -Street Parking Space
• Front Yard must be 30%
• Front Yard must be 30%
permeable
permeable
Permeable Surface
. 40% of the Lot Area shall
• 40% of the Lot Area shall be
be maintained as a
maintained as permeable
permeable surface
surface
Permits Secondary Suite
No
No
Permits Temporary
Yes
No
Residential Units
Backyard Requirement
None
None
Community Consultation for R-2 and R-3 Zoned Properties
There are two scenarios to explore when considering permitting, secondary suites in the R-2 and R-3
zones: 1) the roughly 2000 R-2 and R-3 zoned properties in existence today (see Appendix Afor map);
and 2) future development utilizing these zones. For new housing construction under a zone where a
secondary suite is permitted, the developer/builder typically applies the secondary suite requirements
from the beginning of the design process and addresses challenges through site and building design.
Being able to consider secondary suite requirements, such as parking, at the beginning of the process
is a key benefit to permitting secondary suites in R-2 and R-3 zones.
For existing properties zoned R-2 and R-3, staff are aware of many unregistered secondary suites in
these zones through various complaints or inspections. In the past, when enforcement action was
taking place, the homeowner was required to remove elements of the suite (stove, cabinets, etc.),
resulting with the displacement of the tenant. Staff have little discretion in these situations and have
concerns due to the limited supply of rental housing in Maple Ridge, and homeowner's reliance on
suites as a mortgage helper. However, such enforcement has been in abeyance, since April 26, 2022,
under Council direction.
Through this process, staff will be seeking community feedback on these two scenarios and identifying
concerns the community may have with permiting secondary suites in the R-2 and R-3 zones.
2.3 Duplexes and Secondary Suites
The British Columbia Building Code (BCBC) now permits secondary suites within ground -oriented
duplexes that are divided by a vertical wall. The City of Maple Ridge permits duplexes in the RT-1 zone
(Two -Unit Urban Residential), which permits either a single -detached or duplex use, but the zone does
not permit a secondary suite for either use. Temporary residential units are permitted in the RT-1 zone.
Doc # 3178641 Page 6 of 10
The minimum lot size for the RT-1 zone is 750m2, or if located in the Town Centre Area, the minimum
lot size is 557m2 if located on a corner lot or has lane access. Currently in Maple Ridge, there are 123
lots that are zoned RT-1(see Appendix B), with the majority of the duplex forms being ground -oriented.
Additionally, the majority of the duplex zoned lots are over 800m2 in size, which is more than double
the lot size of the R-1 (Single -detached Low Density Urban Residential) zone that permits secondary
suites.
Relation to the RS-1 and Duplex Infill Compatibility Framework
At the June 14, 2022 Council Workshop, Council endorsed the engagement process for the RS-1 Single
Detached Zone review. The process will involve seeking community feedback on establishing a density
bonus rate in the RS-1 Single Detached Residential zone to permit duplex and small lot subdivision
(potentially to the R-1 zone which has a minimum lot size of 371m2) without the need to rezone. The
June 14, 2022 Council Workshop report also noted that development permit guidelines for duplexes
will be developed to help guide form and character and encourage compatible design with the existing
neighbourhood.
While the RS-1 zone review work is separate, it is not unrelated. Should Council move forward with
establishing a density bonus rate to permit duplexes in the RS-1 zone (minimum lot area 668m2), it
could mean that through this work, new duplex developments may be eligible to have a secondary
suite. However, because the BCBC changes only apply to ground -oriented duplexes, secondary suites
would not be permitted in stacked duplexes.
Community Consultation for Duplexes
Seeking community feedback on permitting secondary suites in the RT-1 zone is proposed for this
consultation pocess, as it is timely with RS-1 and Duplex Infill Compatability work currently being
undertaken. The engagement processes for the subject Secondary Suites Program Expansion and the
RS-1 Zone Review will be designed to avoid consultation fatigue.
3.0 PUBLIC ENGAGEMENT PROCESS AND TIMELINES
The public engagement process will aim to solicit feedback from the broader community and
specifically from those who own property zoned R-2, R-3, or RT-1. The engagement components will
include a webpage informing on the project and current secondary suites regulations, an introductory
online video, and information how to provide feedback. Members of the public will be invited to
participate in two open houses (same content offered at each event) and complete an online survey.
Notification of the project and invitations to participate will be delivered through social media, the local
newspaper, and project webpage. An invitation letter will be mailed to property owners of the respective
topic zones requesting their participation in the engagement process.
The following engagement activities are proposed for consultation process:
Community Survey:. The aim for the online survey is to reach as many members of the
community as possible for input. The survey will be available on the project webpage and paper
versions of the survey will also be available at the open house events and at the City Hall
reception and front counter.
Doc # 3178641 Page 7 of 10
Community Open House: Two in -person open houses are anticipated for this engagement
process. The open houses will provide information on the project, general information on
secondary suites, an opportunity to complete the survey and discuss their concerns with staff.
Additionally, representatives from the building department will be available at these open
houses to answer questions about building code for secondary suites. Building department
guides and handouts regarding secondary suites will be updated and available at the open
houses. Staff are also proposing a third -party contractor to answer questions about feasibility
and costing.
• Industry Consultation: Staff will also be engaging with the Urban Development Institute (UDI)
and the Homebuilders Association Vancouver (HAVAN) and seeking feedback on potential
benefits and challenges for permitting secondary suites in the R-2, R-3, and the RT-1 (duplex)
zone for future development.
3.1 Branding and Public Engagement Notifications
Planning will work with the Communications Department on creating a Secondary Suite Program
Expansion brand and webpage for sharing information with the public. This will also likely include a
kick-off video that can be posted on YouTube. Broad community advertising of the process will include:
• Letters be sent to each household with either R-2, R-3 and RT-1 (duplex) zoning inviting them
to two different open houses;
• Posters in high community traffic areas, such as the Leisure Centre, the ACT, City Hall, library,
Seniors' Centre, Greg Moore Youth Centre, and distributed to Committees of Council;
• Spotlight space on the City's main landing page;
• Social media posts, such as Facebook, Instagram, and Twitter; and
• Newspaper advertisement.
3.2 Feedback Shape Recommendations
The input received from the public engagement process will be compiled into an outcomes report and
presented to Council. This report will also contain information on how other municipalities are
accommodating parkingfor secondary suites on smaller infill lots. Once the outcomes report is received
by Council, recommendations for next steps in the process will also be presented for Council's
consideration. This would potentially involve drafting Zoning amendment bylaw and may also involve
other bylaw amendments, such as the Off -Street Parking Bylaw.
Once the engagement process and review are complete, Bylaw staff will commence enforcement based
on Council's direction. Should Council support allowing suites in either the R-2 or R-3 zones, owners
will be advised on how to register their suite. Should Council not authorize suites in either the R-2 and
R-3 zones, Bylaw staff would commence enforcement and decommissioning of the suites.
3.3 Timelines
The public engagement process is anticipated to commence in late January and run through March
2023. Figure 1 below outlines the recommended planning process for the exploration of permitting
secondary suites in the R-2, R-3, and the RT-1 (duplex) zone.
Doc # 3178641 Page 8 of 10
Figure 1: Public Engagement Timelines
Direction tram Council Public Gather Oulcomes Bylaw and OCP
at the April 26, 2022 Engagement Cornnwnity Report and Amendment Process
Workshop Meeting Scoping Repoil Feedback Recommendations
We Are Here
4.0 STRATEGIC ALIGNMENT
Expanding the secondary suites program through thoughtful planning and policy work is a Council
priority, as established under the Growth pillar of the 2019-2022 City of Maple Ridge Strategic Plan.
5.0 INTERDEPARTMENTAL IMPLICATIONS:
Expanding the secondary suites program will continue to involve several City departments. An initial
interdepartmental meeting for the expanding the secondary suite program has already occurred with
the following departments and further meetings to obtain input and expertise are also anticipated:
• Building
• Economic Development;
• Engineering;
• Development and Environmental Planning;
• Fire;
• Bylaws; and
• Communications.
It is anticipated that staff from the Building Department will be the only non -planning staff to attend
the open house; however, the other departments will be involved in providing input into the preparation
of event information and the community survey.
6.0 FINANCIAL IMPLICATIONS
The process to potentially expand the secondary suite program will be included in the City's 2023
business plan.
CONCLUSION:
Secondary suites are a key form of rental housing, as it provides a mortgage helper to families
purchasing a single detached home and it contributes to the rental supply, allowing rental housing to
increase in availability. With the limited supply to rental housing in Maple Ridge, especially in the form
of secondary suites that families rely on for mortgage help, expanding where secondary suites are
permitted warrants consideration.
At the April 26, 2022 Council Workshop meeting, Council directed staff to bring back options to
potentially allow secondary suites in the R-2 and R-3 single detached zones and permit secondary
suites in ground orientated duplexes (RT-1 Zone). At this Workshop meeting, Council also directed that
community consultation be included in this regulatory review.
Doc # 3178641 Page 9 of 10
The community engagement process proposed in Section 3.0 will be designed to seek the community's
feedback on permitting secondary suites in the R-2, R-3, and the RT-1(duplex) zones and on potential
options to mitigate community concerns, such as parking. The public engagement process is
anticipated to commence in late January and run through March 2023. The input received from the
public engagement process will be compiled into an outcomes report and recommendations will be
presented to Council. The recommendations could potentially involve drafting a bylaw to amend the
Zoning Bylaw, an amendment to the Parking Bylaw, and/or an OCP amendment to the Development
Permit Guidelines for Intensive Residential Development (applicable to the R-3 zone). Once the
engagement process and review are complete, the moratorium on bylaw enforcement will cease.
"Original signed by Krista Gowan"
Prepared by: Krista Gowan, MA
Planner 1
"Original signed by Lisa Zosiak" for
Reviewed by: Charles R. Goddard, BA, MA
Director of Planning
"Original signed by Christine Carter"
Approved by: Christine Carter, M.PL, MCIP, RPP
GM Planning & Development Services
"Original signed by Scott Hartman"
Concurrence: Scott Hartman
Chief Administrative Officer
The following appendices are attached hereto:
Appendix A - Map of Properties Zoned R-2 and R-3
Appendix B - Map of Properties Zoned RT-1
Doc # 3178641 Page 10 of 10
ADDCkIPIIV D
2
�z e
MAPLE RIDGE
mapleridge.ca City of Maple Ridge
TO: His Worship Mayor Michael Morden MEETING DATE: September 27, 2022
and Members of Council FILE NO: 13-6440-20
FROM: Chief Administrative Officer MEETING: Workshop
SUBJECT: Scoping Report for Short -Term Accommodation Regulatory & Enforcement Framework
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY.
The term "short-term accommodations" is an umbrella term used to describe temporary overnight
accommodations for paying guests, who are staying fewer than 31 consecutive days. There is a growing
trend of "short-term accommodations" that have become an income generator for private property
owners through online platforms, such as Airbnb and VRBO. However, zoning regulations do not typically
align with this use and many municipalities are currently working on how to allow this use, while ensuring
safe conditions for guests and that the use is not disruptive for the surrounding residents. In Maple Ridge,
the growing number of unregulated short-term accommodations within the community has become a
concern with some residents and Council.
At the November 3, 2020 Workshop meeting, staff presented the regulations for existing short-term
accommodations, such as Hotels, Bed and Breakfasts, and Boarding, and included options to either bring
forward a regulatory approach to broaden where short-term accommodations are permitted, or clearly
prohibit unregulated short-term accommodations in the Zoning Bylaw. At this meeting, Council directed:
That staff be directed to proceed with option 1, implementing specific options for short-term
rentals, outlined in the November 3, 2020 report titled "Short -Term Rental Options", and prepare
a regulatory and enforcement framework for short-term rentals in Maple Ridge.
The purpose of this report is to outline a draft regulatory and enforcement framework for permitting short-
term accommodations beyond what is already permitted for Council consideration. The aim of the
proposed draft framework is to provide a springboard for community consultation and to modernize the
existing Bed and Breakfast regulations, while balancing the neighbourhood character and guest's safety.
This report presents a public engagement process to seek the community's feedback on the proposed
draft regulatory and enforcement framework.
RECOMMENDATION:
That the public engagement process be endorsed, as outlined in the report titled "Scoping Report
for ShortTerm Accommodation Regulatory and Enforcement Framework" and dated September 27,
2022.
1.0 BACKGROUND:
There has been worldwide growth in the use of private residences for tourist and visitor accommodations
in recent years through online platforms, such as Airbnb and VRBO. For a fee, these platforms enable
listing, searching and booking an accommodation, often within a private residence, for short-term stays.
Property owners can offer an entire unit, individual rooms in a unit, or a bed in a shared room for a set
price. The online platforms often allow prospective visitors to filter their search results according to their
preferences.
DOC# 3183196 Page 1 of 9 4.3
The most common benefit of short-term accommodations is the extra income generated that helps
homeowners offset housing costs in an expensive housing market, while providing the homeowners the
flexibility in utilization of the space. Additionally, while short-term accommodations help support the
tourism market, there is a concern that this use negatively impacts the long-term rental market by
reducing supply and thus driving up rents.
On September 17, 2019, staff brought a report to Council Workshop titled "Secondary Suite Regulatory
Review Accountability Mechanisms", which took an in-depth look the advantages and disadvantages of
various options, such as a Good Neighbour Agreement, and also included a discussion on Private Home
Tourist Lodging. At this meeting, staff noted the timing of a review on short-term accommodations should
consider the 2020 BC Summer Games (which were subsequently postponed due to the Covid-19
pandemic and to now occur in 2024).
At the November 3, 2020 Workshop meeting, staff presented the regulations for existing short-term
accommodations, such as Hotels, Bed and Breakfasts, and Boarding. From this meeting, Council directed
staff to bring forward a regulatory and enforcement approach to broaden where short-term
accommodations are permitted.
In the November 3, 2020 Workshop report, an overview of common practices for regulating short-term
accommodations as a separate category from Hotels, Bed and Breakfasts, and Boarding was provided.
Table 1, below, is a list and description of common practises that jurisdictions in British Columbia, and
across Canada have implemented.
Table 1 -Summary of
Common Short -Term Accommodation Regulations
PracticeCommon
Description
Principal
Permitting short-term accommodations only within dwelling units occupied as
residence*
someone's principal residence helps mitigate the impact of this use on long-
term rental supply and disruptions to neighbourhoods.
Business Licence
Required
The operator requires a valid business licence issued by the municipality.
Number of Guests
Cap
A cap on the number of guests at any one time.
Parking
The number of onsite and/or offsite parking stalls required per sleeping unit.
Safety Provisions
Additional specific provisions that ensure guest safety (i.e. short-term
accommodation unit inspected prior to issuance of business licence).
Nuisance
Additional specific provisions that reduce community impact (i.e. Provide
Provisions
guests with 24/7 contact).
Higher fines
Fines for non-compliance should be high enough to be a deterrent.
Obtain third party
Third party monitoring system that staff can use to verify compliance of a
data
short-term accommodation listing.
E)densive
Proactive, multi -faceted and widespread communication of regulations
communications
achieves higher rates of voluntary compliance.
* A principal residence is the primary location that a person inhabits, also referred to as primary residence or main residence
for most of the year.
b) Official Community Plan Housing Policies
Maple Ridge's Official Community Plan (OCP) housing policies encourage a mix of housing types,
densities, and affordable options to meet the diverse residential needs of local residents. The OCP
encourages the creation of rental units and discourages the loss or conversion of long-term rental units.
While short-term accommodations provide tourism benefits to the community and a flexible income -
generator for the property owner, OCP Policy 3-29 highlights the benefits that secondary suites and
DOC# 3183196 Page 2 of 9
TE
detached garden suites provide to the long-term rental market by contributing to a range of housing
options, sizes, and ample supply that helps keep rents more affordable.
c) Maple Ridge Housing Action Plan
Council has remained committed to creating new rental housing opportunities since the endorsement of
the Housing Action Plan (on September 14, 2015). Since 2016, Business Plans have included work on
rental creation, such as the Detached Garden Suite Pilot Project and removal of the Owner Occupancy
Requirement for secondary suites and detached garden suites. Council reiterated this commitment on
April 26, 2022 with a direction to staff to review regulations for secondary suites and detached garden
suites.
While work has been ongoing through various initiatives to increase rental housing in Maple Ridge, one
downside of allowing short-term accommodations within private homes is the potential impact to the long-
term rental housing supply.
d) Existing Short -Term Accommodation Regulations in Maple Ridge
The distinction between accommodations for residential use and short-term tourist accommodation has
become somewhat blurred with the emergence of various online platforms. The services provided within
residential buildings and tourist accommodations are becoming somewhat similar as well, with Bed and
Breakfasts operating out of residences and hotels offering self-catering suites as accommodations. As
short-term accommodations within private residences becomes more popular, many municipalities have
adopted or are considering regulatory frameworks that clarify the differentiation, address any gaps in
regulations, and mitigate negative impacts on the long-term rental stock. Table 1, below, provides a
snapshot of the three main short-term accommodation regulations in the Maple Ridge Zoning Bylaw No.
7600-2019.
- _ • Maximum thirty (30)
Maximum thirty (30) Unrestricted period of
consecutive days per
consecutive days per time
year
year
• Accommodation ratio
Maximum six (6) guests
Maximum two (2)
specified in zoning
Maximum of three (3)
Maximum two (2)
requirements
Sleeping Units**
Dining facilities, meeting
Breakfast provided on
Access to common
- rooms, Recreational
the premises**
Cooking Facility or
Facilities
provided with regular
meals
-• N/A
No
No
• - •-. -.
N/A
Yes
No
'-•
Yes
Yes
No
* Maximum six (6) guests at any one time includes the number of Boarders in calculating the maximum number of guests.
**SLEEPING UNIT means a use providing one or more rooms for the lodging of one or more Persons when the Sleeping Unit
contains no Cooking Facilities.
DOC# 3183196 Page 3 of 9
e) Short -Term Accommodation Market in Maple Ridge
Collecting accurate and detailed data on short-term rental operations is difficult for municipalities to
obtain without the assistance of third -party technologies that scrape listing and booking information from
the internet. However, in 2021, the Hotel Feasibility Study Update was completed by the Economic
Development Department and it provides a snapshot of short-term accommodations available in Maple
Ridge. At the time, the Study indicated that tourist accommodations in Maple Ridge included:
• 56 hotel rooms (from one accommodation);
• 3 Bed and Breakfasts offering rooms throughout the community; and
• 134 short-term accommodation units active on Airbnb.
As of November 2020, there were only 63 short-term accommodations available in Maple Ridge. Since
the November 2020 report, the number of short-term accommodation units available on Airbnb has
nearly doubled.
2.0 DISCUSSION:
This section outlines, for Council consideration, a draft regulatory and enforcement framework for
permitting short-term accommodations beyond what is already permitted. The aim of the proposed draft
framework is to provide a springboard for community consultation and to modernize the existing Bed and
Breakfast regulations, while maintaining neighbourhood character and guest safety. To modernize the
Bed and Breakfast requirements, the draft framework proposes changing the name from "Bed and
Breakfast" to "Short -Term Accommodations", eliminating the requirement for breakfast to be provided,
expanding where a homeowner can provide a Short -Term Accommodation, and updating business
licencing requirements.
2.1 Draft Regulatory and Enforcement Framework
The following preliminary regulations are identified for consultation purposes:
Principal Residence Requirement
Currently, the Zoning Bylaw's Bed and Breakfast regulations require that the property owner, who is also
the operator of the Bed and Breakfast, to live on the property year-round (known as a Principal Residence)
and reside on site during guests stay. The draft framework proposes keeping the requirement that the
property owner, who will also be the operator of the short-term accommodation, operate the short-term
accommodating in their Principal Residence, but clarifying that the property owner will not be required to
stay on site during guests stay. By using the language of "Principal Residence" it allows the property
owner the option to not be on -site while there are short-term accommodation guests, but it helps protect
the availability of long-term housing, with the idea being a principal residence is already someone's home
and therefore no long-term housing is being lost.
Business Licence Required
Currently, a business licence is required for property owners who wish to operate a Bed and Breakfast.
The same approach is proposed for short-term accommodation operators, but additional business licence
conditions are proposed in this draft framework.
Similar to the Bed and Breakfast regulations, it is proposed that only a registered owner of the property,
who occupies the dwelling as their principal residence, would be eligible to apply for a short-term
accommodation business licence. Tenants, family members who are not registered on title, or other
occupiers of the property would not be eligible to obtain a short-term accommodation business licence.
Corporations also would not be eligible for a short-term accommodation business licence within a private
dwelling unit. To prevent multiple registered owners from obtaining individual licences for a single
DOC# 3183196 Page 4 of 9
property, the proposed bylaw regulations would only permit one short-term accommodation business
licence to be issued for a single dwelling unit.
By requiring a business licence for short-term accommodations, it provides the opportunity for additional
information and documentation to be required to help ensure property owners are educated on City
nuisance bylaws and that their operation and guests will be respectful of neighbouring residents.
Additional documents proposed as part of the business licence requirements are a Good Neighbour
Agreement, strata council authorization, a parking plan, and some life safety documents.
By requiring the additional documents, the City is expanding the ways in which a business licence for a
short-term accommodation can be suspended or cancelled. Should a business licence be rescinded, the
property owner of where the short-term accommodation is operating must, within ten (10) business days,
deliver to the Corporate Officer a written request to have the business licencing reinstated. Then the
Corporate Officer would refer the request to Council and notify the applicant or Licence holder of the time
and place at which Council will reconsider the Licence Inspector's decision.
Location
Currently, Bed and Breakfasts in Maple Ridge are only permitted in Single Detached dwellings that do not
have a secondary suite or detached garden suite on the property. However, unlike traditional Bed and
Breakfasts, short-term accommodations are often offered in a portion of a dwelling unit (one or more
bedrooms with access to the rest of the dwelling unit), or an entire dwelling unit subject to a number of
conditions.
The proposed regulatory framework defines where a property owner is able to operate a short-term
accommodation. Generally, short-term accommodations will be permitted in most residential dwelling
forms, but will be subject to conditions. Table 2 below outlines the draft framework, identifying where
short-term accommodations are proposed to be permitted and where this use would not be permitted.
Table 2: Draft locations of where short-term accommodations may be permitted.
Short -Private Dwelling Forms Where
- Dwelling FormsWhere
Term Accommodations Will Be
Accommodations Won't Be Permitted:
permitted to conditions):
_(subject
✓Single detached
x Unregistered secondary suites or detached garden suites
✓ Registered secondary suites
x Temporary Residential (TRU)
✓ Registered detached garden
x Purpose built rental buildings
suites
✓ Duplexes
x Accessory Structures (such as sheds)
✓ Triplexes, Fourplexes, Courtyards
x Manufactured Home Parks
✓ Townhouses
x Campers, RV's, Tents, or other recreational vehicles or
equipment
✓ Apartments
x Residential uses in non-residential zones, such as care-
taker residence in industrial or institutional zoned
properties
x A dwelling unit that contains, a boarding use, a child care
facility, a private hospital, or an assisted living facility
(including supportive recovery and special needs housing)
Capping- Number of Guests and Sleeping Units
The number of guests that are permitted within a short-term accommodation is based on the number of
bedrooms (e.g. 2 adults per bedroom). The proposed draft framework includes keeping the same guest
and sleeping unit maximums as the Bed and Breakfast regulations, which are a maximum of six guests
and a maximum of three sleeping units in a single detached house. However, the draft framework
DOC# 3183196 Page 5 of 9
proposes to expand this cap to duplexes and reduce the maximums for other housing forms as outlined
in Table 3.
Table 3: Proposed Maximum Number of Guests and Sleeping Units Per Residential Housing Forms
Single Detached and Triplex, Fourplex,
Duplex Forms m t
Townhouses and Apartmen
Maximum Number of Guests 6 4
Maximum Number of Sleeping Units 1 3 1 2 1
Parkin
Currently, the Bed and Breakfast regulations require that one off-street parking space per sleeping unit
is required. The same parking regulation is proposed for the draft short-term accommodation framework.
For example, if a short-term accommodation operator is offering three sleeping units, as part of their
business licence application, they must demonstrate three vehicles can be accommodated onsite
through a site plan showing the location of the parking spaces.
Safety Provisions
Some life -safety regulations are proposed in obtaining a business licence to operate a short-term
accommodation. The intent is to help ensure the safety of guests, while not being overly expensive for
the property owner. Some proposed life -safety provisions are:
• Provide emergency contact name and number to guests and City;
• Post a fire safety plan by all entrances and exits to the Short -Term Rental Accommodation;
• Have smoke alarms* on each floor and in each bedroom of the Short -Term Accommodation;
• Have an accessible fire extinguisher* on each floor of the Short -Term Accommodation;
• Have carbon monoxide detectors* on each floor of the Short -Term Accommodation;
• Sleeping Unit windows meet BC Building Code for egress; and
• Not permitting more than ten people in a dwelling unit at any time.
* Regulations will require these units be changed regulatory prior to expiration dates.
Nuisance Provisions
As part of the Business Licence application to operate a short-term accommodation, the property owner
will have to enter into a Good Neighbour Agreement. The intent of this Agreement, which is currently used
as an accountability mechanism for non -owner occupied single detached rental units, is to set out
reasonable responsibilities for the property owner operating the short-term accommodation. This
Agreement can also outline how the City will deal with complaints, including legal action.
Should a property owner operating a short-term accommodation wish to rent out a dwelling unit that is
part of a strata, a strata authorization form will be required, as some strata corporations limit or ban
short-term rentals through their own bylaws.
In addition to a signed Good Neighbour Agreement and Strata Council Authorization, the proposed
regulations will require a short-term accommodation operator to designate a responsible person to be
available at all times to respond to any complaints received related to the short-term accommodation
and the property owner is not responding.
Also, in addition to fines captured under the Nuisance Prohibition - Bylaw 7596-2019, staff are
considering implementing other fines for non -compliant short-term accommodations. Some commonly
utilized fines are:
• Operating without a valid business licence;
DOC# 3183196 Page 6 of 9
• Operating contrary to zoning restrictions;
• Listing or advertising a short-term accommodation exceeding approved bedroom count on
business licence;
• Operating a short-term accommodation in a home that is not someone's principal residence;
• Operating an unsafe or nuisance property; and
• Refusing entry for inspection by a Licence Inspector or City representative
3.0 PUBLIC ENGAGEMENT PROCESS AND TIMELINES
An engagement process is proposed to gather feedback from the community on the draft regulatory
framework for short-term accommodations. Planning will work with the Communications Department on
creating a short-term accommodation brand and webpage for sharing information with the public.
Engagement will also include a kick-off video that can be posted on YouTube. Members of the public will
be invited to share their feedback through an online survey or by phone or email. A survey will be available
on the project webpage and paper versions will also be available at the workshop events and at City Hall
reception and front counter.
The input received from the public engagement process will be compiled into an outcomes report and
presented to Council. Once the outcomes report is received by Council, recommendations for next steps
in the process will also be presented for Council's consideration. This would potentially involve drafting a
bylaw to amend the Zoning Bylaw and Business Licencing Bylaw.
Figure 1 below outlines the project timelines, including the public engagement process. The engagement
process is anticipated to commence in mid -January and run through February 2023.
Figure 1: Project Timelines
Fall 2020 Fall 2022 Early 2023 Spring/ Summer 2023
Options Draft Gather Engagement Bylaw
Report Frameworki Community Outcomes Adaiption
Feedback Report Process
We Are*Here 0
4.0 STRATEGIC ALIGNMENT
Achieving long term sustainability through thoughtful planning and policy work is a Council priority, as
established under the Growth pillar of the 2019-2022 City of Maple Ridge Strategic Plan.
5.0 FINANCIAL IMPLICATIONS:
Should Council wish to proceed with the draft short-term accommodation regulatory and enforcement
framework, this work will be included in the City's 2023 Business Plan.
Additionally, staff predict there will be budgetary impacts related to the implementation of short-term
accommodation regulations, including processing of business licence applications, property inspections,
DOC# 3183196 Page 7 of 9
and additional bylaw enforcement resources and monitoring services required. Draft budget
requirements will be presented with associated draft bylaws.
6.0 INTERDEPARTMENTAL IMPLICATIONS:
The draft regulatory framework and engagement plan will be a multi -department undertaking between
the Planning, Economic Development, Bylaw & Licensing Services, Fire Department, and Building
Department.
CONCLUSION:
At the November 3, 2020 Workshop meeting, staff presented the regulations for existing short-term
accommodations, such as Hotels, Bed and Breakfasts, and Boarding. From this meeting, Council directed
staff to bring forward a regulatory and enforcement approach to broaden where short-term
accommodations are permitted.
The purpose of this report is to outline a draft regulatory and enforcement framework for permitting short-
term accommodations beyond what is already permitted. The aim of the proposed draft framework is to
provide a springboard for consultation, and to modernize the existing Bed and Breakfast regulations,
while maintaining neighbourhood character and guest safety. This report presents an engagement
process to seek the community's feedback on the proposed regulatory and enforcement framework.
"Ori inal signed by Krista Gowan"
Prepared by: Krista Gowan, MA
Planner 1
"Original signed by Charles Goddard"
Reviewed by: Charles R. Goddard, BA, MA
Director of Planning
"Original signed by Christine Carter"
Approved by: Christine Carter, M.PL, MCIP, RPP
GM Planning & Development Services
"Original signed by Scott Hartman"
Concurrence: Scott Hartman
Chief Administrative Officer
The following appendices are attached hereto:
Appendix A - Draft Short -Term Accommodation Regulations
DOC# 3183196 Page 8 of 9
APPENDIX A
Draft Short -Term Accommodation Regulatory and Enforcement Framework
Category-
gulation
Location
Must be within a Dwelling Unit, subject to conditions
6 (single detached and duplex forms)
Maximum Number of Guests
4 (triplex, fourplex, courtyard, townhouses and apartments forms)
Maximum Number of Sleeping
3 (single detached and duplex forms)
Units
2 (triplex, fourplex, courtyard, townhouses and apartments forms)
Property Owner Requirement
Must be their Principal Residence
Breakfast Requirement
None
Parking Space
1 space per Sleeping Unit
• Business Licence is required
• Only registered owner of the property can apply (tenants and
Business Licence
corporations would be prohibited)
• One STA Business Licence per registered owner
• One STA Business License per property
• Signed Good Neighbour Agreement
• Proof of general liability insurance
Supplementary Information
• Property information, such as number of bedrooms being
(required at time of Business
provided, emergency contact name and number, and number of
Licence Application)
on -site parking spaces available
• If applicable, obtain strata council authorization
• Obtain produce any such authorization to the Licence Inspector
if requested to do so.
• Provide emergency contact name and number to guests and
City;
• Post a fire safety plan by all entrances and exits to the Short -
Term Rental Accommodation;
Life Safety
• Have smoke alarms on each floor and in each bedroom of the
Short -Term Accommodation;
• Have an accessible fire extinguisher on each floor of the Short -
Term Accommodation;
• Have carbon monoxide detectors on each floor of the Short -Term
Accommodation
Application Fee
$500.00
*Note: STA = Short -Term Accommodation
DOC# 3183196 Page 9 of 9